Search

Intravenously administered nanoparticles (NPs) often bind with plasma proteins, forming the protein corona that promotes rapid systemic clearance, a primary challenge in nanomedicine. In this study, we developed a pH- and GSH-sensitive "stealth" nanodelivery system, PTX@NPs-aPD1-IL, for sequential drug release. By using a biocompatible choline-based ionic liquid (IL) as the coating for NPs, the interaction and adsorption of NPs with serum proteins were reduced, achieving targeted delivery to the lung organ and increasing drug accumulation. In the weakly acidic extracellular tumor microenvironment (pH 6.5), the anti-PD-1 antibody (aPD-1) was first released to block the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and restore the immunocidal function of T cells. In the highly reductive intracellular environment of tumor cells, the disulfide bonds were cleaved, causing NPs to rupture and release paclitaxel (PTX). It induced tumor cell apoptosis and triggered immunogenic cell death (ICD), promoted dendritic cells (DCs) maturation and activated T cells for chemo-immunotherapy. In the mouse orthotopic lung cancer model, PTX@NPs-aPD1-IL exhibited superior efficacy to other treatment groups at the same dose. This was due to the significantly increase in the release of immune factors, including TNF-α and IFN-γ, and the promotion of CD8 + T cells recruitment, which induced a stronger immune response, and thus enhanced the anti-lung cancer effect. In summary, PTX@NPs-aPD1-IL provided a promising strategy for effective chemo-immunotherapy for lung cancer through sequential release profile., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive disease, often diagnosed at an advanced stage and with limited treatment options. In recent years, immunotherapy has been approved in combination with chemotherapy in the first line setting of extensive stage disease (ES-SCLC). However, only 10-15 % of patients with ES-SCLC treated with chemoimmunotherapy (CT-IO) experience a long-term benefit. In addition, patients are often clinically frail due to advanced age, comorbidities, and disease-related symptoms, making SCLC a challenging condition. Real-world evidence (RWE) becomes particularly valuable in this scenario, not only to confirm the results of pivotal trials, but also to evaluate the outcomes of CT-IO in populations that are generally excluded from clinical trials. RWE could also define the role of integrative treatments such as thoracic consolidation radiotherapy and prophylactic cranial irradiation, which are used in selected patients in the clinical practice but were scarcely applied in pivotal trials. In this review, we focused on RWE in ES-SCLC, with the aim of improving clinical decision making. Notably, real-world data have largely confirmed the efficacy and safety of CT-IO observed in pivotal clinical trials, with a possible benefit even in more fragile patients. However, these studies also highlight that a significant proportion of the ES-SCLC population remains untreated due to poor clinical conditions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest LB received speakers’ fees from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche, outside Title Page WITH Author Information the submitted manuscript; travel fees from Takeda. SP received honoraria or speakers’ fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Takeda, Amgen, Novartis, and Roche, outside the submitted manuscript. E.B. has received grants or contracts from Astra-Zeneca, Roche and honoraria for lectures from Merck-Sharp & Dome, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer, Eli-Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Takeda and Roche; E.B. has been member of Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board of Merck-Sharp & Dome, Pfizer, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Astra-Zeneca, and Roche. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The median overall survival (OS) is approximately 10 months when chemotherapy alone is the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The approval of the two PD-L1 inhibitors, atezolizumab and durvalumab, marked the beginning of the immunotherapy era for ES-SCLC. Serplulimab, as the first PD-1 inhibitor to achieve success in the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC, has not only demonstrated significant improvements in patient survival outcomes but also ushered in a new era for PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of ES-SCLC. Recently, antiangiogenic agents with chemo-immunotherapy have achieved breakthroughs in first-line ES-SCLC treatment. Improving the clinical benefits of individualized treatment for patients with ES-SCLC remains challenging. Challenges include identifying biomarkers for targeted therapy, exploring new treatments, developing new medicines, and classifying SCLC molecular subtypes. This review provides an in-depth analysis of research on first-line ES-SCLC treatment. Additionally, it discusses advances in ES-SCLC treatment., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: The lack of definitive biomarkers presents a significant challenge for chemo-immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We aimed to identify key genes associated with chemo-immunotherapy efficacy in ES-SCLC through comprehensive gene expression analysis using machine learning (ML)., Methods: A prospective multicenter cohort of patients with ES-SCLC who received first-line chemo-immunotherapy was analyzed. RNA sequencing was performed on tumor samples to assess gene expression levels. ML techniques were applied to identify key gene features associated with treatment efficacy. A panel of genes was then developed and validated using the nCounter system, and the model's performance in predicting 180-day progression-free survival (PFS) was evaluated., Results: A total of 93 patients were included in the analysis. ML-based gene selection identified a gene set comprising 83 genes from the comprehensive gene expression data. An nCounter panel was developed using these genes, and an ML model was developed based on their expression levels. In the validation set, the model achieved an accuracy of 0.93, precision of 1.00, a true positive rate of 0.83, and a true negative rate of 1.00. PFS was significantly longer in the high-efficacy group than in the low-efficacy group in the validation set (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: These findings provide a foundation for biomarker development in ES-SCLC and highlight the potential of this method as a cost-effective, simple, and rapid tool for assessing treatment efficacy in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered potential competing interests:Daichi Fujimoto has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca KK and Boehringer Ingelheim Japan Inc., as well as personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., MSD KK, Eli Lilly Japan KK, Novartis Pharma KK, Kyowa Kirin Co. Ltd., and Janssen Pharmaceutical KK, outside of the submitted work. He also participates on an advisory board for AstraZeneca KK and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.Ryota Shibaki has received personal fees from AstraZeneca KK, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., MSD KK, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd., and Boehringer Ingelheim Japan Inc., outside of the submitted work.Keiichi Kimura has received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., outside of the submitted work.Koji Haratani has received grants from AstraZeneca K.K., Mochida Memorial Foundation, Nakatomi Foundation, Takeda Science Foundation, The Osaka Medical Research Foundation for Intractable Disease, YOKOYAMA Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology, SGH Foundation, KANAE Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science, and Osaka Cancer Society, as well as personal fees from AstraZeneca K.K., outside of the submitted work.Motohiro Tamiya has received personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, MSD, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Daiichi Sankyo, outside of the submitted work.Takashi Kijima has received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., outside of the submitted work.Yuki Sato has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Kyowa Kirin, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, outside of the submitted work.Akito Hata has received grants from MSD, Eli Lilly, Chugai, Taiho, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, and AbbVie, as well as personal fees from Eli Lilly, MSD, Chugai, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Taiho, outside of the submitted work.Toshihide Yokoyama has received grants from AbbVie GK, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Delta-Fly Pharma, Janssen, MSD, Parexel International, and Takeda, as well as personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Nippon Kayaku, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, and Takeda, outside of the submitted work.Yoshihiko Taniguchi has received personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., MSD, and Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., outside of the submitted work.Junji Uchida has nothing to disclose.Hisashi Tanaka has received personal fees from Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan Inc., Pfizer Japan Inc., Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD K.K., and Amgen, outside of the submitted work.Naoki Furuya has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, and MSD, outside of the submitted work.Satoru Miura has received personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan, and Takeda Pharmaceutical, outside of the submitted work.Mihoko Imaji Onishi has nothing to disclose.Shinya Sakata has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical, outside of the submitted work.Eisaku Miyauchi has received grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Eli Lily Japan KK, as well as personal fees from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo KK, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Ltd., Novartis Pharma KK, MSD KK, Kyowa Kirin Co. Ltd., Merck Biopharma Co. Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eisai Co. Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Amgen Inc., Thermo Fisher Scientific K.K., Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan KK, Sysmex Co. Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., and KYORIN Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., outside of the submitted work. He also participates on an advisory board for Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim Japan Inc., Eli Lilly Japan KK, Merck Biopharma Co. Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo KK, and Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.Nobuyuki Yamamoto has received grants from A2 Healthcare Corporation, Amgen K.K., AstraZeneca K.K., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Mebix Inc., AbbVie GK, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Bristol-Myers Squibb, RPM Co. Ltd., Pfizer R&D Japan G.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., MSD K.K., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd., PRiME-R Inc., IQVIA Solutions Japan G.K., Novartis Japan, EPS Corporation, Medpace Japan K.K., and Syneos Health Clinical K.K., as well as personal fees from Amgen K.K., AstraZeneca K.K., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., AbbVie GK, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Accuray Japan K.K., Guardant Health Japan Corp., TAIHO ONCOLOGY INC., Tsumura & Co., Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Merck Biopharma Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Miyarisan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Kyowa Kirin Co. Ltd., ShiftZero K.K., MSD K.K., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Novartis Japan, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Terumo Co. Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., USACO Corporation, KYORIN Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Medical Review Co. Ltd., and KOWA COMPANY LTD., outside of the submitted work. He also participates on advisory boards for Amgen K.K., Daiichi Sankyo Inc., USACO Corporation, AstraZeneca K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and Novartis Japan.Yasuhiro Koh has received grants from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and personal fees from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., outside of the submitted work.Hiroaki Akamatsu has received grants from Amgen Inc. and Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., as well as personal fees from Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca K.K., Boehringer Ingelheim Japan Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., MSD K.K., Nippon Kayaku Co. Ltd., Novartis Pharma K.K., Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., and Daiichi Sankyo, outside of the submitted work. He also participates on advisory boards for Amgen Inc., MSD, Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K., and Sandoz., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Osimertinib is approved as a standard treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation by FDA. However, the mechanisms of resistance for nearly half of patients after osimertinib progression are still unknown, and the optimal therapies for these patients are still controversial. In this retrospective study, we compared efficacy and safety between immunotherapy + chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and osimertinib + bevacizumab in NSCLC patients after osimertinib progression with unknown resistance mechanisms., Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients with unknown resistance mechanisms after osimertinib progression were retrospectively reviewed and divided into immunotherapy + chemotherapy, chemotherapy alone, and osimertinib + bevacizumab treatment groups according to the treatment they received after osimertinib progression. Clinicopathological features, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups., Results: A total of 121 patients were enrolled in this study, 22 in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group, 72 in the chemotherapy group, and 27 in the osimertinib + bevacizumab group. The ORR was much higher in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group compared with chemotherapy or osimertinib + bevacizumab group (55.56% vs. 14.81% vs. 0% in patients after progression on 1st line osimertinib treatment; 30.77% vs. 6.67% vs. 13.33% in patients after progression on 2nd/3rd line osimertinib treatment). Median PFS was also significantly longer in the immunotherapy + chemotherapy group compared with other groups (8.2 months vs. 4.0 months vs. 6.0 months in all patients, p = 0.0066). The median OS did not reach remarkable difference among groups, although osimertinib + bevacizumab group had a numerically longer median OS (37.0 months vs. 37.0 months vs. 47.6 months in all patients, p = 0.6357). Compared with immunotherapy + chemotherapy and chemotherapy, treatment-related adverse events (AEs) of osimertinib + bevacizumab were milder, especially in AEs related to gastrointestinal and bone marrow suppression., Conclusion: Our study provides clinical evidence that NSCLC patients after osimertinib progression with unknown resistance mechanisms may benefit from immunotherapy + chemotherapy, with higher ORR and longer PFS compared with osimertinib + bevacizumab or chemotherapy groups. Osimertinib + bevacizumab treatment was also an optional option for patients because OS was numerically longer and safer in this group., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Clinical Respiratory Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has the potential to attenuate the anti-tumor immune responses of T-cells by increasing immune suppressive neutrophils and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. However, the clinical impact of G-CSF on the efficacy of immunotherapy remains unknown. This multi-center retrospective analysis evaluated the impact of G-CSF in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) treated with chemo-immunotherapy., Methods: We analyzed 65 patients with ES-SCLC who completed four cycles of induction chemo-immunotherapy and evaluated the effects of G-CSF on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and a durable response to immunotherapy (defined as PFS ≥ 12 months)., Results: Fifty patients (76.9%) received ≥ 1 dose of G-CSF. The PFS of the patients with G-CSF was poorer than that of the patients without G-CSF (median PFS 8.3 vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.009). The OS of the patients with G-CSF tended to be shorter, but not statistically significant, than that of the patients without G-CSF (median OS 24.3 vs. 16.4 months, p = 0.137). In the multivariate analysis, G-CSF administration was associated with poorer PFS (hazard ratio 2.78, 95% CI 1.36-5.69, p = 0.005) and was identified as a determinant of a durable response (odds ratio 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.80, p = 0.024). These results were consistent with other definitions of G-CSF administration (administration of ≥ 1 dose of pegfilgrastim, or either ≥ 5 doses of filgrastim or ≥ 1 dose of pegfilgrastim)., Conclusions: G-CSF has the potential to attenuate the efficacy of immunotherapy; therefore, the indication for G-CSF during chemo-immunotherapy should be carefully considered for ES-SCLC., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

This study aimed to explore potential radiomics biomarkers in predicting the efficiency of chemo-immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eligible patients were prospectively assigned to receive chemo-immunotherapy, and were divided into a primary cohort (n = 138) and an internal validation cohort (n = 58). Additionally, a separative dataset was used as an external validation cohort (n = 60). Radiomics signatures were extracted and selected from the primary tumor sites from chest CT images. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify the independent clinical predictors. Subsequently, a radiomics nomogram model for predicting the efficiency of chemo-immunotherapy was conducted by integrating the selected radiomics signatures and the independent clinical predictors. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves demonstrated that the radiomics model, the clinical model, and the radiomics nomogram model achieved areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.92), 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.84), and 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94), respectively, in the primary cohort. In the internal validation cohort, the corresponding AUCs were 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-1.00), 0.79 (95% CI 0.68-0.91), and 0.96 (95% CI 0.90-1.00) respectively. Moreover, in the external validation cohort, the AUCs were 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.96), 0.75 (95% CI 0.62-0.87), and 0.86 (95% CI 0.75-0.96), respectively. In conclusion, the radiomics nomogram provides a convenient model for predicting the effect of chemo-immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: In an open-label multicenter non-randomized non-comparative phase II study in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oncogenic addiction (EGFR mutation or ALK/ROS1 fusion), with disease progression after tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and no prior chemotherapy (NCT04042558), atezolizumab, carboplatin, pemetrexed with or without bevacizumab showed some promising result. Beyond the clinical evaluation, we assessed safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to provide additional information on the relative impact of adding atezolizumab to chemotherapy with and without bevacizumab in this population., Materials: Patients received platinum-pemetrexed-atezolizumab-bevacizumab (PPAB cohort) or, if not eligible, platinum-pemetrexed-atezolizumab (PPA cohort). The incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events (AEs) were assessed. PROs were evaluated using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-Core 30 and EORTC QLQ-Lung Cancer 13)., Result: Overall, 68 (PPAB) and 72 (PPA) patients were evaluable for safety. Grade 3-4 AEs occurred in 83.8% (PPAB) and 63.9% (PPA). Grade 3-4 atezolizumab-related AEs occurred in 29.4% and 19.4%, respectively. Grade 3-4 bevacizumab-related AEs occurred in 36.8% (PPAB). Most frequent grade 3-4 AEs were neutropenia (19.1% in PPAB; 23.6% in PPA) and asthenia (16.2% in PPAB; 9.7% in PPA). In PPAB, we observed a global stability in global health security (GHS) score, fatigue and dyspnea with a constant tendency of improvement, and a significant improvement in cough. In PPA, we observed a significant improvement in GHS score with a significant improvement in fatigue, dyspnea and cough. At week 54, we observed an improvement from baseline in GHS score for 49.2% of patients. In both cohorts, patients reported on average no clinically significant worsening in their overall health or physical functioning scores., Conclusion: PPAB and PPA combinations seem tolerable and manageable in patients with stage IIIB/IV non-squamous NSCLC with oncogenic addiction (EGFR mutation or ALK/ROS1 fusion) after targeted therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: P.T report adviser and consultant for TAKEDA, BMS, ROCHE, JANSSENS, AMGEN and ASTRA ZENECA; support for attending meeting for TAKEDA, BMS, ASTRA ZENECA and JANSSENS. G.R-B report adviser and consultant for TAKEDA, ASTRA ZENECA,SANOFI, BMS ; support for attending meeting for LILLY, ASTRA ZENECA, PFIZER, SANOGI, TAKEDA, BOEHRINGER. L.B-G report adviser and consultant for BMS, MSD, ROCHE, JANSSEN, TAKEDA, VIATRIS, ASTRA-ZENECA, SANOFI and LEOPHARMA; support for attending meeting for JANSSEN, TAKEDA, ASTRA-ZENECA,MSD. D.A report support for attending meeting for MSD, TAKEDA, SANOFI. H.M report support for attending meeting for ARAIR, MSD, PFIZER, TAKEDA and BOEHRINGER. R.V report adviser and consultant for MSD, JANSSEN, ROCHE, BMS, PFIZER, SANOFI and TAKEDA; support for attending meeting for JANSSEN, TAKEDA and SANOFI. G.J report support for attending meeting for Sanofi. P.F report adviser and consultant for SANOFI, MSD and ASTRA ZENECA; support for attending meeting for TAKEDA. A.V report adviser and consultant for PIERRE FABRE, AMGEN and MSD; support for attending meeting for PIERRE FABRE, AMGEN; Participation on “Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board ” for MSD, ASTRAZENECA, SANOFI, AMGEN, PIERRE FABRE. A.B report support for attending meeting for Takeda, Sanofi and BMS. F.S report adviser and consultant for; support for attending meeting for report adviser and consultant for; support for attending meeting for C.D report adviser and consultant for BMS, MSD, TAKEDA, AMGEN, ROCHE, PFIZER, SANOFI, JANSSEN; support for attending meeting for ROCHE, AMGEN , MSD, TAKEDA. C.C reports research support from AstraZeneca, Boerhinger, GSK, Sanofi, BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer and Amgen; adviser and consultant for AstraZeneca, Boerhinger, GSK, Roche, Sanofi , BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer and Amgen ; support for attending meeting for AstraZeneca, Boerhinger, GSK, Roche, Sanofi , BMS, MSD, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, Bayer and Amgen; L.G. reports research support from BMS, MSD, Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda, adviser and consultant for Amgen, Janssens, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi and Takeda; support for attending meeting for AstraZeneca, Amgen, MSD, Pfizer and Takeda. Participation on “Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board ” for Inhatarget Therapeutics; O.B reports adviser and consultant for BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Takeda, Janssens, support for attending meeting for AstraZeneca and MSD. All other authors (L.A,E.D, C.R, E.H, F.S, B.C) have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The combination of platinum-based chemotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is a standard of care option in the front-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Positive efficacy and safety results have been demonstrated with different chemo-ICI combinations in the corresponding clinical trials, however no randomized prospective comparison is available and there is no evidence on how to choose among the available regimens., Methods: A virtual International Expert Panel took place in July 2023 to review data on chemo-ICI regimens available in the first-line setting in patients with NSCLC, and reach common considerations both in clinical practice and in research setting., Results: Overall, all panelists agreed that safety of the chemo-immunotherapy combination regimens is supported by reviewed data, showing no additional toxicity concerns over those of the individual components of each regimen and highlighting differences in toxicity profile based on ICI component (single anti-PD-1 versus double anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4). Among disease characteristics, PD-L1 value (<1%) but not histology was considered a potential selection factor in favor of the combination with dual ICI. With regards to clinical features, the panelists agreed that chemotherapy, whichever the ICI combination regimen, remains the backbone to counteract disease-related symptoms included those conditioning worse performance status. The panelists defined high, medium, and low priorities in clinical research. High priority was attributed to prospectively evaluating the impact of the addition of anti-CTLA-4 on brain metastasis, biomarker subgroups, and the optimal duration and schedule of combination regimens., Conclusions: Based on the available evidence, the panelists reached common considerations on strengths and differences between chemotherapy plus single agent ICI and chemotherapy plus double agent ICIs in patients with advanced NSCLC. In the absence of direct comparison, different toxicity profile and subgroup analysis by PD-L1 are considered as the main potential features to select among the two regimens, however to be confirmed by recommended prospective randomized clinical research., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest C. Gridelli received honoraria as speaker bureau or advisory board member or as consultant from MSD, BMS, Roche, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Pfizer, Menarini, Boehringer, Karyopharm, Eli Lilly, Amgen, Sanofi, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim. S. Peters received education grants, provided consultation, attended advisory boards and/or provided lectures for the following organizations: AbbVie, AiCME, Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Biocartis, BioInvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, F-Star, Fishawack, Foundation Medicine, Genzyme, Gilead, GSK, Illumina, Imedex, IQVIA, Incyte, iTeos, Janssen, Medscape, Medtoday, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Mirati, Novartis, Novocure, OncologyEducation, Pharma Mar, Phosplatin Therapeutics, PER, Peerview, Pfizer, PRIME, Regeneron, RMEI, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda, Vaccibody. T. Mok received education grants, honoraria, provided consultation, attended advisory boards and/or provided lectures for the following organizations: AstraZeneca, Aurora Tele-Oncology Platform, Lunit, ACT Genomics-Sanomics Group, HUTCHMED, Alpha Biopharma, ACEA Pharmaceutical Research, Amgen, Amoy Diagnostics, BeiGene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo/UCB Japan, Fishawack Facilitate, InMed, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Origimed, Pfizer, Prime Oncology, Roche, Sanofi Aventis GmbH, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda, Lucence, Medscape, Permanyer Publications, PeerVoice, Physicans' Education Resource, Research to Practice, Shanghai BeBirds Translation & Consulting, Liangyihui Network Technology Co, Ltd, AbbVie, Berry Oncology, Blueprint Medicines, C4 Therapeutics, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Curio Science, D3, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, Gritstone Bio, Guardant Health, touchIME, Hengrui Therapeutics, Ignyta, Incyte, Inivata, IQvia, Lilly, Loxo, Lunit, Merck Serono, Mirati Therapeutics, Puma Biotechnology, SFJ Pharmaceuticals Group, Vertex, Yuhan, Qiming Development (HK) Ltd, G1 Therapeutics, Janssen, geneDecode. Stock and Other Ownership Interests: Aurora Tele-Oncology Platform, HUTCHMED, ACT Genomics-Sanomics Group. MC Garassino received education grants, honoraria, provided consultation, attended advisory boards and/or provided lectures for the following organizations: MSD Oncology, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Tiziana Life Sciences, Sanofi, Celgene, Daiiki Sankyo, Inivata, Incyte, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Janssen, Regeneron, Otsuka, AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Exelixis, Amgen. Luis Paz-Ares reports institutional research support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Laboratorios Pfizer Ltda.; personal fees (self/family) from Altum Secuency, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, Genomica, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals Inc., Janssen Biotech, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Mirati, Novartis, Laboratorios Pfizer Ltda., PharmaMar, Roche, Servier Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda Oncology; and serves as a board member at Genómica and Altum all outside the submitted work. F. de Marinis received honoraria or consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer, Novartis, Takeda, Xcovery, and Roche. Dr. Attili reports no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Chemo-immunotherapy has become the best first-line treatment for advanced lung cancer patients without oncogenic drivers. However, it may also lead to an increased incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events. In this retrospective study, lung cancer patients administrated with either anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment plus chemotherapy were included. Data on demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, treatment strategies, laboratory results, and clinical outcomes were collected from the Electronic Medical Records System and evaluation scales. Chi-square, univariate, and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the risk factors for immune-related adverse events (irAEs). A total of 116 patients were included in the study, and the majority experienced treatment-related adverse events. Adverse events of any grade were reported in 114 (98.3%) patients, with 73 (62.9%) experiencing Grade 3 or higher events. The most frequent adverse events were anemia (67.2%), decreased appetite (62.9%), and alopecia (53.4%). Fifty-four (46.6%) patients were diagnosed with irAEs, with hypothyroidism (28.4%) being the most commonly reported. Multivariable analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between the number of treatment cycles, elevated baseline levels of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) with irAEs (OR = 1.222, P = 0.009, OR = 1.945, P = 0.016, OR = 1.176, P = 0.004), and IL-6 was identified as a strong predictor of severe irAEs (OR = 1.084, P = 0.014). Our study demonstrated the safety of chemo-immunotherapy in lung cancer patients without additional toxicity. The number of treatment cycles, higher baseline levels of TSH and IL-6 were identified as potential clinical biomarkers for irAEs., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Immunology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: Pembrolizumab alone (IO-mono) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (CT-IO) is first-line standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50%. This retrospective multicentre study assessed real-world use and efficacy of both strategies., Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50% from eight hospitals who had received at least one cycle of IO-mono or CT-IO were included. Overall survival (OS) and real-word progression-free-survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs, and a Cox model with inverse propensity treatment weighting was carried out., Results: Among the 243 patients included, 141 (58%) received IO-mono and 102 (42%) CT-IO. Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. With a median follow-up of 11.5 months (95% CI 10.4-13.3), median OS was not reached, but no difference was observed between groups (p = 0.51). Early deaths at 12 weeks were 11% (95% CI 4.6-16.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 9.0-20.9) in CT-IO and IO groups (p = 0.32). After adjustment for age, gender, performance status, histology, brain metastases, liver metastases and tobacco status, no statistically significant difference was found for OS between groups, neither in the multivariate adjusted model [HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.61-1.86), p = 0.8] nor in propensity adjusted analysis [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.60-1.65), p = 0.99]. Male gender (HR 2.01, p = 0.01) and PS ≥ 2 (HR 3.28, p < 0.001) were found to be negative independent predictive factors for OS., Conclusion: Younger patients, those with symptomatic disease and brain metastases were more likely to be proposed CT-IO. However, sparing the chemotherapy in first-line does not appear to impact survival outcomes, even regarding early deaths., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RD) is a promising treatment for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its clinical significance after platinum-based chemotherapy plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade remains unclear., Research Question: What is the clinical significance of RD as a second-line treatment after the failure of chemo-immunotherapy in NSCLC?, Study Design and Methods: In this multicentre retrospective study, 288 patients with advanced NSCLC who received RDas second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy plus PD-1 blockade, at 62 Japanese institutions from January 2017 to August 2020, were included. Prognostic analyses were performed using the log-rank test. Prognostic factor analyses were performed using a Cox regression analysis., Results: A total of 288 patients were enrolled: 222 were men (77.1%), 262 were aged <75 years (91.0%), 237 (82.3%) had smoking history and 269 (93.4%) had a performance status (PS) of 0-1. One hundred ninety-nine patients (69.1%) were classified as adenocarcinoma (AC) and 89 (30.9%) as non-AC. The types of PD-1 blockade used in the first-line treatment were anti-PD-1 antibody and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody in 236 (81.9%) and 52 (18.1%) patients, respectively. The objective response rate for RD was 28.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.7-34.4). The disease control rate was 69.8% (95% CI, 64.1-75.0).The median progression free survival and overall survival were 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-4.6) and 11.6 months (95% CI, 9.9-13.9), respectively. In a multivariate analysis, non-AC and PS 2-3 were independent prognostic factors for worse progression free survival , while bone metastasis on diagnosis, PS 2-3 and non-AC were identified as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival., Interpretation: RD is a feasible second-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC who had received combined chemo-immunotherapy with PD-1 blockade., Clinical Trial Registration Number: UMIN000042333., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Platinum doublet chemotherapy is the standard of care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation who had disease progression after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We aimed to assess immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of sensitive EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who progressed after EGFR-TKIs and received platinum doublet chemotherapy plus immunotherapy between 2015 and 2021. Efficacy outcomes, including overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, were assessed and compared with those of patients who had received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy., Results: Of the total 869 patients, 82 treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy and 82 with only chemotherapy were selected. The median progression-free survival in patients administered pembrolizumab was significantly longer than those not administered pembrolizumab (6.7 months; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-8.5 vs. 4.2 months; 95% CI 3.3-5.0, hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.89, P = .0076). Improved median overall survival was also observed in patients receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (26.7 [95% CI 22.6-30.8] vs. 13.4 months [95% CI 10.4-16.4], HR, 0.49 [95% CI 0.31-0.75], P = .0052). In addition, the overall response rate was higher in patients treated with than patients treated without pembrolizumab (34.1% and 20.7%, respectively)., Conclusion: The combination of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy is associated with improved efficacy and survival in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC after TKI resistance, but these findings need to be confirmed in further prospective studies., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Chemotherapy plus immunotherapy is the standard of care for patients with metastatic NSCLC. No study has evaluated the outcomes of second-line chemotherapy treatments after progression following first-line chemo-immunotherapy., Method: This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of second line (2L) chemotherapies after progression under first-line (1L) chemo-immunotherapy, measured by overall survival (2L-OS) and progression free survival (2L-PFS)., Results: A total of 124 patients were included. The mean age was 63.1 years, 30.6 % of the patients were female, 72.6 % had an adenocarcinoma and 43.5 % had a poor ECOG-performance status prior to 2L initiation. Sixty-four (52.0 %) patients were considered resistant to first line chemo-immunotherapy. (1L-PFS < 6 months). In 2L treatments, 57 (46.0 %) patients received taxane monotherapy, 25 (20.1 %) taxane plus anti-angiogenic, 12 (9.7 %) platinum-based chemotherapy and 30 (24.2 %) other chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 8.3 months (95 %CI: 7.2-10.2), post initiation of 2L treatment, the median 2L-OS was 8.1 months (95 % CI: 6.4-12.7) and the median 2L-PFS was 2.9 months (95 %CI: 2.4-3.3). Overall, the 2L-objective response and 2L-disease control rates were 16.0 %, and 42.5 %, respectively. Taxane plus anti-angiogenic and platinum rechallenge achieved longest median 2L-OS: not reached (95 %CI: 5.8-NR) and 17.6 months (95 %CI 11.6-NR), respectively (p = 0.05). Patients resistant to the 1L treatment had inferior outcomes (2L-OS 5.1 months, 2L-PFS 2.3 months) compared with 1L responders (2L-OS 12.7 months, 2L-PFS 3.2 months)., Conclusion: In this real-life cohort, 2L chemotherapy achieved modest activity following progression under chemo-immunotherapy. 1L-resistant patients remained a refractory population, highlighting a need for new 2L strategies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

There is no denying that many revolutions took place in the fight against cancer during the last decades. However, cancers have always managed to find new ways to challenge humankinds. Variable genomic epidemiology, socio-economic differences and limitations of widespread screening are the major concerns in cancer diagnosis and early treatment. A multidisciplinary approach is essentially to manage a cancer patient efficiently. Thoracic malignancies including lung cancers and pleural mesothelioma are accountable for little more than 11.6% of the global cancer burden [4]. Mesothelioma is one of the rare cancers, but concern is the incidences are increasing globally. However, the good news is first-line chemotherapy with the combination of immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and mesothelioma has showed promising respond and improved overall survival (OS) in pivotal clinical trials [10]. ICIs are commonly referred as immunotherapy are antigens on the cancer cells, and inhibitors are the antibodies produce by the T cell defence system. By inhibiting immune checkpoints, the cancer cells become visible to be identified as abnormal cells and attack by the body's defence system [17]. The programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) and programmed death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are commonly used immune checkpoint blockers for anti-cancer treatment. PD-1/PD-L1 are proteins produced by immune cells and mimic by cancer cells that are implicated in inhibiting T cell response to regulate our immune system, which results tumour cells escaping the defence mechanism to achieve immune surveillance. Therefore, inhibiting immune checkpoints as well as monoclonal antibodies can lead to effective apoptosis of tumour cells [17]. Mesothelioma is an industrial disease caused by significant asbestos exposure. It is the cancer of the mesothelial tissue which presents in the lining of the mediastinum of pleura, pericardium and peritoneum, most commonly affected sites are pleura of the lung or chest wall lining [9] as route of asbestos exposure is inhalation. Calretinin is a calcium binding protein, typically over exposed in malignant mesotheliomas and the most useful marker even while initial changes take place [5]. On the other hand, Wilm's tumour 1 (WT-1) gene expression on the tumour cells can be related to prognosis as it can elicit immune response, thereby inhibit cell apoptosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis study conducted by Qi et al. has suggested that expression of WT-1 in a solid tumour is fatal however, it gives the tumour cell a feature of immune sensitivity which then acts positively towards the treatment with immunotherapy. Clinical significance of WT-1 oncogene in treatment is still hugely debatable and needs further attention [21]. Recently, Japan has reinstated Nivolumab in patients with chemo-refractory mesothelioma. According to NCCN guidelines, the salvage therapies include Pembrolizumab in PD-L1 positive patients and Nivolumab alone or with Ipilimumab in cancers irrespective of PD-L1 expression [9]. The checkpoint blockers have taken over the biomarker-based research and demonstrated impressive treatment options in immune sensitive and asbestos-related cancers. It can be expected that in near future the immune checkpoint inhibitors will be considered as approved first-line cancer treatment universally., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Despite the positive results obtained by first-line chemoimmunotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only a few second-line options are available after disease progression. Combi-TED is a phase II international study that will assess the efficacy of Tedopi ® , a cancer vaccine, combined with either docetaxel or nivolumab and compared with docetaxel monotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC after chemoimmunotherapy. The study, currently in the recruitment phase, will assess 1-year overall survival (primary end point), patient's progression-free survival and overall response rate, as well as the correlation of efficacy with several tumor or blood biomarkers. The results will hopefully provide more information on Tedopi combinational treatment compared with current standard of care in NSCLC patients who fail first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04884282 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma with early metastatic potential. The standard-of-care treatment has not changed in years. Recent studies report improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with combined ICI and chemotherapy in ES-SCLC. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the magnitude of survival benefits. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane between 1 January 2010 and 15 July 2022 and conference proceedings from 2018 to 2022, for randomised controlled trials, evaluating chemo-ICI compared with platinum-doublet chemotherapy in untreated ES-SCLC. Outcomes assessed were PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), toxicity, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The search identified 8061 studies, with 8 (56 publications) included in the final analysis. PFS and OS were significantly improved for patients randomised to chemo-ICI (PFS hazard ratio (HR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-0.80) and (OS HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.85). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a differential effect between PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors. There was no difference in ORR and DoR. All-grade adverse events (RR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.12) were similar. The addition of ICI to chemotherapy in untreated ES-SCLC results in a 22% risk reduction in death, and a 25% risk reduction in disease progression with a minimal increase in toxicity. These improvements are modest but represent progress beyond the standard of care.

The impact of baseline versus intercurrent steroids on the efficacy of upfront chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (CT-ICI) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is unclear. We conducted a retrospective study on metastatic NSCLC patients treated with upfront CT-ICI at our institution between March 2020 and December 2021. The use of steroids was considered as the administration of at least 10 mg of prednisone equivalent. Of 101 patients, 36 (35.6%) received steroid therapy at baseline, and 18 (17.8%) started steroids on treatment. Overall, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.5 months (95% CI, 5.9−8.9) and median overall survival (mOS) was 18.2 months (95% CI, 8.9-NR). Patients taking baseline steroids had significantly shorter survival than those not taking them and those assuming intercurrent steroids (mPFS 5.0 vs. 9.2 vs. 7.3 months, p < 0.001; mOS 7.0 months vs. not reached, p < 0.001). Baseline steroids were significantly associated with poorer survival outcomes in the multivariate model (OS HR 2.94, p = 0.02; PFS HR 3.84, p > 0.001). Conversely, intercurrent prescription did not reach a significant value regardless of other pivotal variables included in the model. Baseline steroid administration was associated with a detrimental effect on survival outcomes in NSCLC patients treated with CT-ICI. The role of intercurrent steroid administration should be further explored in larger studies.

Background: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1 have demonstrated potency towards treating patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), the potential association between Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) oncogene substitutions and the efficacy of ICIs remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to find point mutations in the KRAS gene resistant to ICIs and elucidate resistance mechanism., Methods: The association between KRAS variant status and the efficacy of ICIs was explored with a clinical cohort (n = 74), and confirmed with a mouse model. In addition, the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of KRAS-mutant NSCLC, such as CD8 + tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD-L1 level, was investigated. Cell lines expressing classic KRAS substitutions were used to explore signaling pathway activation involved in the formation of TIME. Furthermore, interventions that improved TIME were developed to increase responsiveness to ICIs., Results: We observed the inferior efficacy of ICIs in KRAS-G12D-mutant NSCLC. Based upon transcriptome data and immunostaining results from KRAS-mutant NSCLC, KRAS-G12D point mutation negatively correlated with PD-L1 level and secretion of chemokines CXCL10/CXCL11 that led to a decrease in CD8 + TILs, which in turn yielded an immunosuppressive TIME. The analysis of cell lines overexpressing classic KRAS substitutions further revealed that KRAS-G12D mutation suppressed PD-L1 level via the P70S6K/PI3K/AKT axis and reduced CXCL10/CXCL11 levels by down-regulating high mobility group protein A2 (HMGA2) level. Notably, paclitaxel, a chemotherapeutic agent, upregulated HMGA2 level, and in turn, stimulated the secretion of CXCL10/CXCL11. Moreover, PD-L1 blockade combined with paclitaxel significantly suppressed tumor growth compared with PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy in a mouse model with KRAS-G12D-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. Further analyses revealed that the combined treatment significantly enhanced the recruitment of CD8 + TILs via the up-regulation of CXCL10/CXCL11 levels. Results of clinical study also revealed the superior efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy in patients with KRAS-G12D-mutant NSCLC compared with ICI monotherapy., Conclusions: Our study elucidated the molecular mechanism by which KRAS-G12D mutation drives immunosuppression and enhances resistance of ICIs in NSCLC. Importantly, our findings demonstrate that ICIs in combination with chemotherapy may be more effective in patients with KRAS-G12D-mutant NSCLC., (© 2022 The Authors. Cancer Communications published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. on behalf of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.)

Lung metastasis is challenging in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Surgery is always not available due to the dissemination of metastatic foci and most drugs are powerless because of poor retention at metastatic sites. TNBC cells generate an inflamed microenvironment and overexpress adhesive molecules to promote invasion and colonization. Herein, "walking dead" TNBC cells are developed through conjugating anti-PD-1 (programmed death protein 1 inhibitor) and doxorubicin (DOX)-loaded liposomes onto cell corpses for temporal chemo-immunotherapy against lung metastasis. The walking dead TNBC cells maintain plenary tumor antigens to conduct vaccination effects. Anti-PD-1 antibodies are conjugated to cell corpses via reduction-activated linker, and DOX-loaded liposomes are attached by maleimide-thiol coupling. This anchor strategy enables rapid release of anti-PD-1 upon reduction conditions while long-lasting release of DOX at inflamed metastatic sites. The walking dead TNBC cells improve pulmonary accumulation and local retention of drugs, reprogram the lung microenvironment through damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and PD-1 blockade, and prolong overall survival of lung metastatic 4T1 and EMT6-bearing mice. Taking advantage of the walking dead TNBC cells for pulmonary preferred delivery of chemotherapeutics and checkpoint inhibitors, this study suggests an alternative treatment option of chemo-immunotherapy to augment the efficacy against lung metastasis., (© 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Background: Clinical and laboratory biomarkers in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) receiving chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) are still poorly explored. Materials & methods: All consecutive aNSCLC patients who received at least one cycle of first-line CIT were enrolled. The impact of several clinical and laboratory biomarkers on outcomes was evaluated through Cox proportional hazard models. Results: Higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was shown to be an independent prognostic biomarker of both worse progression-free survival and worse overall survival. The EPSILoN score was able to divide patients into three different prognostic groups, with a median overall survival of 73.2, 45.6 and 8.6 months for the favorable, intermediate and poor groups, respectively. Conclusion: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and EPSILoN score were shown to have a prognostic value in aNSCLC patients treated with CIT.

Introduction: Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer who have had disease progression on osimertinib commonly receive platinum doublet chemotherapy, but whether adding immunotherapy or bevacizumab provides additional benefit is unknown., Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis at 2 university-affiliated institutions. Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer who had progression on osimertinib and received next-line therapy with platinum doublet chemotherapy (chemo), platinum doublet chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (chemo-IO), or platinum doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (chemo-bev), were identified; patients who continued osimertinib with these regimens were included. Efficacy outcomes including duration on treatment (DOT) and overall survival (OS) from the start of chemotherapy were assessed. Associations of treatment regimen with outcomes were evaluated using adjusted Cox regression models, using pairwise comparisons between groups., Results: 104 patients were included: 57 received chemo, 12 received chemo-IO, and 35 received chemo-bev. In adjusted models, patients who received chemo-IO had worse OS than did those who received chemo (hazard ratio (HR) 2.66, 95% CI 1.25-5.65; P= .011) or those who received chemo-bev (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.09-5.65; P= .030). A statistically significant difference in OS could not be detected in patients who received chemo-bev versus those who received chemo (HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.84-2.69; P= .17)., Conclusion: In this retrospective study, giving immunotherapy with platinum doublet chemotherapy after progression on osimertinib was associated with a worse OS compared with platinum doublet chemotherapy alone. Platinum doublet chemotherapy without immunotherapy (with consideration of continuation of osimertinib, in selected cases) is a reasonable choice in this setting, while we await results of clinical trials examining optimal next-line chemotherapy-based regimens in EGFR-mutant lung cancer., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Improvement in radiotherapy techniques and expected outcomes, as well as in understanding the underlying biological mechanisms contributing to its action (immunomodulation in primis), led to the integration of this therapeutical approach in the current management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), not only in oncogene-driven tumors, but also in non-oncogene addicted NSCLC where the combination of platinum-based chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab represents nowadays the pivotal strategy. In this light, we have designed a randomized phase II (ESPERa) trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) to pembrolizumab-pemetrexed maintenance in advanced NSCLC patients experiencing disease response or stability after chemo-immunotherapy induction., Patients and Methods: Advanced non-oncogene addicted NSCLC patients with ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, who obtained disease response or stability after 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab will be randomized 2:1 to receive pembrolizumab-pemetrexed maintenance plus SBRT vs pembrolizumab-pemetrexed alone. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). Concomitant translational researches will be performed to identify potential prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers, as well as to analyze and monitor tumour microenvironment and tumor-host interactions., Conclusions: Although available data suggest the safety and efficacy of combining immunotherapy and radiotherapy, their systematic integration in the current first-line landscape still remains to be explored. If the pre-planned endpoints of the ESPERa trial will be achieved, the addition of SBRT to pembrolizumab-pemetrexed maintenance as a strategy to consolidate and ideally improve the awaited benefit could be considered as a promising strategy in NSCLC undergoing first-line therapy, as well as an interesting approach to be evaluated in other disease setting, as well as in other oncological malignancies where immunotherapy represents nowadays the standard-of-care., Competing Interests: Disclosure M.M. reports personal fees from Pfizer, EUSA Pharma and Astra Zeneca, outside the submitted manuscript. S.P. received honoraria or speakers’ fee from Astra-Zeneca, Eli-Lilly, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD and Roche, outside the submitted manuscript. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapy has emerged as an important treatment modality throughout oncology with a particularly important role in the treatment of lung cancer. Early signals showed responses could be achieved in nonsmall cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer and these monoclonal antibodies have become standards of care for advanced stage disease. They have also shown promise in earlier-stage disease as complements to radiation or surgery, offering the potential for durable, meaningful survival gains., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatments of lung cancers, and multiple predictive biomarkers alone or in combination help clinicians with the appropriate therapeutic selections. Recently, chemo-immunotherapy has been recommended for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancers in patients without driver mutations. However, the clinical relevance of predictive biomarkers and the treatment efficacy of chemo-immunotherapy in large cell lung carcinoma (LCLC) remain unclear. Here, we reported a rare case of LCLC with none driver gene mutations and low values of multiple predictive biomarkers. These biomarkers included a low PD-L1 expression of 5-10%, a low tumor mutational burden (TMB) of 2.5 muts/mb, a low CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density of 147.91 psc/mm². After one-cycle chemotherapy, the patient progressed rapidly and then was switched to pembrolizumab combining paclitaxel plus cisplatin. Interestingly, he achieved a partial response after two cycles of chemo-immunotherapy, showing multiple lymph nodes obviously shrunk on CT scan, and other clinical symptoms were relieved when compared with the baseline findings. After five cycles of chemo-immunotherapy, this advanced patient still benefited and was changed to maintenance immunotherapy monotherapy. This case suggests that chemo-immunotherapy may provide an effective therapeutic option for those LCLC patients with low values of multiple predictive biomarkers, particularly for those who progressed from first-line classical treatments., Competing Interests: YX, MT, HL and XS were employed by the company YuceBio Technology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wang, Chai, Xiao, Peng, Teng, Wang, Lin, Su and Wu.)

Aim: To investigate the effect of liposomes containing the classical cytotoxic drugs paclitaxel and doxorubicin (Lipo-Pacli/Dox), against a metastatic breast cancer model. We also investigated if Lipo-Pacli/Dox was capable of reverting the tolerogenic environment of metastatic lesions. Materials & methods: Immunogenic cell death induction by the Pacli/Dox combination was assessed in vitro . Antitumor activity and in vivo safety of Lipo-Pacli/Dox were evaluated using a 4T1 breast cancer mouse model Results : Lipo-Pacli/Dox, with a size of 189 nm and zeta potential of -5.01 mV, promoted immune system activation and partially controlled the progression of pulmonary metastasis. Conclusion: Lipo-Pacli/Dox was useful to control both primary tumor and lung metastasis in breast cancer (4T1) mice model. Additionally, Lipo-Pacli/Dox acts as an immunological modulator for this metastatic breast cancer model.

There are plenty of evidences to show that combining of chemotherapy and immunotherapy should be a very potent anti-cancer therapeutic method. In this research, we evaluated the anti-tumor activity of doxorubicin prodrug combined with erythrocyte membrane-enveloped polymer nano-vaccine against tumor in vitro and in vivo. We also analyzed the immune cell populations to investigate the effect in the tumor microenvironment and explored the inhibitory of lung metastasis. Our study showed that chemo-immunotherapy could inhibit the growth of melanoma tumor in mice. This combination approach promoted a stronger immune response by up-regulating the expression of dendritic cells and cytotoxic T cells in lymph nodes and increased the secretion of cytokines. It also restricted the immunosuppressive environment through inhibiting expression of regulatory T cells. It suggested that combination of prodrug and nano-vaccine achieved better anti-tumor effect than monotherapy, which should be widely valued and further studied to establish in a more economical and efficient way, expected to apply in the future clinical practice of cancer treatment., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Over the past year, the combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and immunotherapy has become the standard of care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer with any programmed death ligand 1 tumor proportion score. There is preclinical evidence demonstrating potential synergistic immunomodulation with combination therapy by enhancing immune-mediated tumor death and by disrupting the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that prevents immune detection. This potential synergy or complementary activity has been demonstrated in clinical trials showing improved and durable responses with chemo-immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Disclosure J. Judd has nothing to disclose. H. Borghaei has research support from Millennium, Merck/Celgene, and BMS/Lilly; Advisory Board role/Consultant for BMS, Lilly, Genentech, Celgene, Pfizer, Merck, EMD-Serono, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Genmab, Regeneron, BioNTech, Cantargia AB, Amgen, AbbVie, Axiom, PharmaMar, Takeda, Huya Bio; and Data and Safety Monitoring Board role with University of Pennsylvania CAR T Program and Takeda., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) plays important roles in tumor immune suppression and thus correlates with the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) antibodies. We aimed to determine the association between change in plasma VEGF-A levels and the efficacy of chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (chemo-PD1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Methods: We included NSCLC patients treated with chemo-PD1. Plasma VEGF-A levels were measured at baseline (Pre) and days 7 (D7) and 14 (D14) after the initiation of chemo-PD1. Continuous VEGF-A decrease was determined by comparing Pre with the median value of maximum change rate of posttreatment VEGF-A as cutoff. Patients whose change rates of VEGF-A at both D7 and D14 were consistently lower than the cutoff value were classified into the VEGF-A decrease group, whereas those whose VEGF-A at D7 or D14 were higher than the cutoff level were classified into the VEGF-A no-decrease group. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS)., Results: A total of 32 patients were evaluated. The median Pre VEGF-A levels was 49 (range, 13-257). The median change rate of VEGF-A at D7 and D14 was -25.6% (range, -77.5-376.9) and -42.3% (range, -100-138.5) respectively. The cutoff value of posttreatment VEGF-A change rate was -9.3%. The PFS was significantly longer in the VEGF-A decrease group than that in the VEGF-A no-decrease group (median, not reached vs 2.4 months; p = 0.017)., Conclusions: Continuous decrease of plasma VEGF-A levels during treatment may be associated with the efficacy of chemo-PD1., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

As a purified active component from traditional Chinese medicine, lentinan administration can be applied as beneficial chemo-immunotherapy for anti-tumor. In this study, the immunomodulatory effects of lentinan on aberrant T subsets and cytokines profile were evaluated for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Of all NSCLC patients treated with NP chemotherapeutic protocol (combination of vinorelbin and cisplatin), 73 cases were recruited in this retrospective cohort trial study, of which 38 cases received additional lentinan. The changes of aberrant T subsets and cytokines profile were compared between two groups (chemotherapy in combination with lentinan vs. conserved single chemotherapy) by flow cytometry and molecular biology. Higher subset ratio of CD3 + CD8 + cytotoxic T cells was confirmed in the peripheral blood of NSCLC patients. Chemo-immunotherapy of lentinan resulted in a significant increase of CD3 + CD56+ NKT cells (15.7 ± 3.1%), compared with 8.6 ± 1.4% of NKT cells in single chemotherapy group, and up-regulated CD3 + CD8 + and CD3 + CD4 + subsets as well, but caused the decrease of CD4 + CD25 + Tregs induction, accompanied by significant alleviation of IL-10 and TGF-β1, and elevation of IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-12 (P < 0.05). It could be confirmed that lentinan could not only enhance the cellular immunity and promote the beneficial of anti-tumor by associated immunotherapy, but also had the ability to inhibit the expansion of immune suppressive Tregs in the NSCLC patients, in whom there was a raised Tregs induction compared to health control. Lentinan-based chemo-immunotherapy is a promising strategy for anti-tumor via enhancing the proliferation of cytotoxic T cells, followed by the elevation of inflammatory chemokines/cytokines. Meanwhile, the percentage of CD4+ CD25+ Tregs is down-regulated, leading to a shift in the inflammatory status from Th2 to Th1 in NSCLC patients treated with lentinan.

Introduction : Even with the currently recommended chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic treatment, the five year survival rate for advanced nonsquamous and squamous NSCLC without oncogenic drivers remains poor. However, several different chemo-immunotherapy combinations are presently being investigated - with favorable results- in order to increase the PFS and OS rates of these patients. Areas covered : Therefore, this paper aims to discuss the most promising trials investigating chemo-immunotherapy combinations and their present and future impact on advanced NSCLC treatment paradigms. Expert opinion : First line chemo-immunotherapy combinations are starting to and will certainly revolutionize the current paradigm of metastatic non small cell lung cancer treatment due to their superior performances - both in terms of PFS and OS - when compared to the actual standard of care platinum based chemotherapy. However, these associations are not devoid of problems, in fact, combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy obviously leads to enhanced treatment-related toxicities and to higher discontinuation rates; therefore these treatments should be administered carefully.

Chemoimmunotherapy with chemotherapeutics and immunoadjuvant inhibits tumor growth by activating cytotoxic T cells. However, this process also upregulates the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 and consequently leads to immune suppression. To maximize the anti-tumor immune responses and alleviate immunosuppression, PD-L1 antibody was combined with paclitaxel (PTX) and the immunoadjuvant α-galactosylceramide (αGC), which were coencapsulated into pH-sensitive TH peptide-modified liposomes (PTX/αGC/TH-Lip) to treat melanoma and lung metastasis. Compared to treatment with PD-L1 antibody or PTX/αGC/TH-Lip alone, the combination of PD-L1 antibody and PTX/αGC/TH-Lip further elevated the tumor-specific cytotoxic T cell responses and promoted apoptosis in tumor cells, leading to enhanced anti-tumor and anti-metastatic effects. In adoptive therapy, PD-L1 antibody further alleviated immunosuppression and enhanced the anti-tumor effect of CD8 + T cells. The combination of PD-L1 antibody and chemoimmunotherapy PTX/αGC/TH-Lip provides a promising strategy for enhancing treatment for melanoma and lung metastasis.

Cholesterol facilitated the formation of T cell receptor on cytotoxic CD8 + T lymphocytes (CTLs). However, the activation of CD8 + T cells always resulted in the upregulation of acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase-1 (ACAT-1) and enhanced the esterification of cholesterol. To relieve the suppression on CD8 + T cells, an ACAT-1 inhibitor avasimibe was combined with chemo-immunotherapy. Paclitaxel and immunoadjuvant αGC were co-encapsulated in liposomes modified with pH sensitive TH peptide (PTX/αGC-TH-Lip). After intravenous injections, the combination of avasimibe significantly elevated the free cholesterol level and relieved the inhibition of CD8 + T cells caused by PTX/αGC-TH-Lip, leading to enhanced CTL responses and anti-tumor effects of PTX/αGC-TH-Lip in B16F10 melanoma xenograft and lung metastasis models. The adoptive immunotherapy further confirmed the enhanced anti-tumor immune responses of the combined strategy. The combination of avasimibe and PTX/αGC-TH-Lip was proven as a feasible approach to enhance the antitumor effects of chemo-immunotherapy by relieving the inhibition of CD8 + T cells., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Despite advances in chemotherapy and immunotherapy, advanced lung cancer remains an incurable disease. Novel trends in anticancer therapeutics focus on harnessing the therapeutically-targeted tumor-related immune suppression. In this respect, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) have captured considerable attention in the last few years, as they are vividly implicated in tumor immune escape mechanisms. In this review, we specifically discuss the multifaceted roles of MDSCs in lung tumor microenvironment, encompassing lung tumor growth and progression via suppression of anti-tumor immunity, association with worse prognosis, and hampering the efficacy of lung cancer chemotherapy and immunotherapy. In addition, we also discuss that therapeutic manipulation of MDSCs-targeting, either alone or in combination with chemo- and/or immune-therapeutic regimens, may not only have tumor growth inhibition, anti-angiogenesis and anti-metastasis effects, but may also have the potential to enhance the efficacy of lung cancer chemotherapy and immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Regulatory T cells (Treg) are critical for cancer immune evasion; whereas natural killer (NK) cells are central for effective anti-tumor immunity including antibody-induced cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). The predictive role of Treg levels for clinical response to chemo-immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as well as therapy-induced Treg changes remain to be defined., Patients and Methods: The impact of Treg on NK-mediated cetuximab-dependent cellular cytoxicity was tested in vitro. Frequency and functional activity of Treg was analyzed in 31 NSCLC stage IB-IIIA patients treated by neoadjuvant Cetuximab/Docetaxel/Cisplatin prior to surgery. Data were correlated with clinical outcome variables and Treg tumor infiltration., Results: Treg potently inhibit NK-mediated and cetuximab-induced ADCC in vitro. In addition, a significant correlation between Treg reduction and clinical response was seen. However, the grade of tumor infiltrating Treg in resected tumors did not correlate with peripheral Treg levels. Moreover, Treg levels at diagnosis did not predict clinical response to chemo-immunotherapy., Conclusions: The drop of Treg levels during neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in NSCLC patients significantly correlates with clinical response. However, Treg at diagnosis are not linked to inferior clinical response to chemo-immunotherapy in NSCLC in vivo even though Treg efficiently inhibit ADCC in vitro., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)