Search

Direct inversion (DI) derives tissue shear modulus by inverting the Helmholtz equation. However, conventional DI is sensitive to data quality due to the ill-posed nature of Helmholtz inversion and thus providing reliable stiffness estimation can be challenging. This becomes more problematic in the case of estimating shear stiffness of the lung in which the low tissue density and short T2* result in considerably low signal-to-noise ratio during lung MRE. In the present study, we propose to perform MRE inversion by compressive recovery (MICRo). Such a technique aims to improve the numerical stability and the robustness to data noise of Helmholtz inversion by using prior knowledge on data noise and transform sparsity of the stiffness map. The developed inversion strategy was first validated in simulated phantoms with known stiffness. Next, MICRo was compared to the standard clinical multi-modal DI (MMDI) method for in vivo liver MRE in healthy subjects and patients with different stages of liver fibrosis. After establishing the accuracy of MICRo, we demonstrated the robustness of the proposed technique against data noise in lung MRE with healthy subjects. In simulated phantoms with single-directional or multi-directional waves, MICRo outperformed DI with Romano filter or Savitsky and Golay filter, especially when the stiffness and/or noise level was high. In hepatic MRE application, agreement was observed between MICRo and MMDI. Measuring in vivo lung stiffness, MICRo demonstrated its advantages over filtered DI by yielding stable stiffness estimation at both residual volume and total lung capacity. These preliminary results demonstrate the potential value of the proposed technique and also warrant further investigation in a larger clinical population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung diseases are one of the leading causes of death worldwide, from which four million people die annually. Lung diseases are associated with changes in the mechanical properties of the lungs. Several studies have shown the feasibility of using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to quantify the lungs' shear stiffness. The aim of this study is to investigate the reproducibility and repeatability of lung MRE, and its shear stiffness measurements, obtained using a modified spin echo‐echo planar imaging (SE‐EPI) MRE sequence. In this study, 21 healthy volunteers were scanned twice by repositioning the volunteers to image right lung both at residual volume (RV) and total lung capacity (TLC) to assess the reproducibility of lung shear stiffness measurements. Additionally, 19 out of the 21 volunteers were scanned immediately without moving the volunteers to test the repeatability of the modified SE‐EPI MRE sequence. A paired t‐test was performed to determine the significant difference between stiffness measurements obtained at RV and TLC. Concordance correlation and Bland–Altman's analysis were performed to determine the reproducibility and repeatability of the SE‐EPI MRE‐derived shear stiffness measurements. The SE‐EPI MRE sequence is highly repeatable with a concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) of 0.95 at RV and 0.96 at TLC. Similarly, the stiffness measurements obtained across all volunteers were highly reproducible with a CCC of 0.95 at RV and 0.92 at TLC. The mean shear stiffness of the lung at RV was 0.93 ± 0.22 kPa and at TLC was 1.41 ± 0.41 kPa. TLC showed a significantly higher mean shear stiffness (P = 0.0004) compared with RV. Lung MRE stiffness measurements obtained using the SE‐EPI sequence were reproducible and repeatable, both at RV and TLC. Lung shear stiffness changes across respiratory cycle with significantly higher stiffness at TLC than RV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]