Search

Objective: To link changes in the B-cell transcriptome from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with those in their macroenvironment, including cellular and fluidic components., Methods: Analysis was performed on 363 patients and 508 controls, encompassing transcriptomics, metabolomics, and clinical data. B-cell and whole-blood transcriptomes were analysed using DESeq and GSEA. Plasma and urine metabolomics peak changes were quantified and annotated using Ceu Mass Mediator database. Common sources of variation were identified using MOFA integration analysis., Results: Cellular macroenvironment was enriched in cytokines, stress responses, lipidic synthesis/mobility pathways and nucleotide degradation. B cells shared these pathways, except nucleotide degradation diverted to nucleotide salvage pathway, and distinct glycosylation, LPA receptors and Schlafen proteins., Conclusions: B cells showed metabolic changes shared with their macroenvironment and unique changes directly or indirectly induced by IFN-α signalling. This study underscores the importance of understanding the interplay between B cells and their macroenvironment in SLE pathology., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To unveil biological milieus underlying low disease activity (LDA) and remission versus active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)., Methods: We determined differentially expressed pathways (DEPs) in SLE patients from the PRECISESADS project (NTC02890121) stratified into patients fulfilling and not fulfilling the criteria of (1) Lupus LDA State (LLDAS), (2) Definitions of Remission in SLE remission, and (3) LLDAS exclusive of remission., Results: We analysed data from 321 patients; 40.8% were in LLDAS, and 17.4% in DORIS remission. After exclusion of patients in remission, 28.3% were in LLDAS. Overall, 604 pathways differed significantly in LLDAS versus non-LLDAS patients with an false-discovery rate-corrected p (q)<0.05 and a robust effect size (dr)≥0.36. Accordingly, 288 pathways differed significantly between DORIS remitters and non-remitters (q<0.05 and dr≥0.36). DEPs yielded distinct molecular clusters characterised by differential serological, musculoskeletal, and renal activity. Analysis of partially overlapping samples showed no DEPs between LLDAS and DORIS remission. Drug repurposing potentiality for treating SLE was unveiled, as were important pathways underlying active SLE whose modulation could aid attainment of LLDAS/remission, including toll-like receptor (TLR) cascades, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) activity, the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4)-related inhibitory signalling, and the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain leucine-rich repeat-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome pathway., Conclusions: We demonstrated for the first time molecular signalling pathways distinguishing LLDAS/remission from active SLE. LLDAS/remission was associated with reversal of biological processes related to SLE pathogenesis and specific clinical manifestations. DEP clustering by remission better grouped patients compared with LLDAS, substantiating remission as the ultimate treatment goal in SLE; however, the lack of substantial pathway differentiation between the two states justifies LLDAS as an acceptable goal from a biological perspective., Competing Interests: Competing interests: IP has received research funding and/or honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia, Elli Lilly, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Otsuka, and Roche., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: We aimed at investigating the whole-blood transcriptome, expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), and levels of selected serological markers in patients with SLE versus healthy controls (HC) to gain insight into pathogenesis and identify drug targets., Methods: We analyzed differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and dysregulated gene modules in a cohort of 350 SLE patients and 497 HC from the European PRECISESADS project (NTC02890121), split into a discovery (60%) and a replication (40%) set. Replicated DEGs qualified for eQTL, pathway enrichment, regulatory network, and druggability analysis. For validation purposes, a separate gene module analysis was performed in an independent cohort (GSE88887)., Results: Analysis of 521 replicated DEGs identified multiple enriched interferon signaling pathways through Reactome. Gene module analysis yielded 18 replicated gene modules in SLE patients, including 11 gene modules that were validated in GSE88887. Three distinct gene module clusters were defined i.e., "interferon/plasma cells", "inflammation", and "lymphocyte signaling". Predominant downregulation of the lymphocyte signaling cluster denoted renal activity. By contrast, upregulation of interferon-related genes indicated hematological activity and vasculitis. Druggability analysis revealed several potential drugs interfering with dysregulated genes within the "interferon" and "PLK1 signaling events" modules. STAT1 was identified as the chief regulator in the most enriched signaling molecule network. Drugs annotated to 15 DEGs associated with cis-eQTLs included bortezomib for its ability to modulate CTSL activity. Belimumab was annotated to TNFSF13B (BAFF) and daratumumab was annotated to CD38 among the remaining replicated DEGs., Conclusions: Modulation of interferon, STAT1, PLK1, B and plasma cell signatures showed promise as viable approaches to treat SLE, pointing to their importance in SLE pathogenesis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Ioannis Parodis reports a relationship with Amgen, AstraZeneca, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Elli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG that includes: consulting or advisory and funding grants., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a complex autoimmune disease that leads to significant worsening of quality of life and mortality. Flares appear unpredictably during the disease course and therapies used are often only partially effective. These challenges are mainly due to the molecular heterogeneity of the disease, and in this context, personalized medicine-based approaches offer major promise. With this work we intended to advance in that direction by developing MyPROSLE, an omic-based analytical workflow for measuring the molecular portrait of individual patients to support clinicians in their therapeutic decisions., Methods: Immunological gene-modules were used to represent the transcriptome of the patients. A dysregulation score for each gene-module was calculated at the patient level based on averaged z-scores. Almost 6100 Lupus and 750 healthy samples were used to analyze the association among dysregulation scores, clinical manifestations, prognosis, flare and remission events and response to Tabalumab. Machine learning-based classification models were built to predict around 100 different clinical parameters based on personalized dysregulation scores., Results: MyPROSLE allows to molecularly summarize patients in 206 gene-modules, clustered into nine main lupus signatures. The combination of these modules revealed highly differentiated pathological mechanisms. We found that the dysregulation of certain gene-modules is strongly associated with specific clinical manifestations, the occurrence of relapses or the presence of long-term remission and drug response. Therefore, MyPROSLE may be used to accurately predict these clinical outcomes., Conclusions: MyPROSLE (https://myprosle.genyo.es) allows molecular characterization of individual Lupus patients and it extracts key molecular information to support more precise therapeutic decisions., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

The implementation of precision medicine requires the recruiting of patients in statistically enough numbers, the possibility of obtaining enough materials, and the integration of data from various platforms, which are all real limitations. These types of studies have been performed extensively in cancer but barely on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or other rheumatic diseases. To consider the practical use of the information obtained from such studies, we have to take into account the best biological fluid to use, the ease to perform the analysis in clinical practice, and its relevance to clinical practice. Here we review the most relevant studies that have performed analyses that attempt to classify or stratify SLE. We focus on two types of studies: those that stratify individuals diagnosed with SLE and those that compare SLE with other autoimmune diseases, defining differences and similarities that may be clinically relevant in the future., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)