Search

Objectives: To update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) based on emerging new evidence., Methods: An international Task Force formed the questions for the systematic literature reviews (January 2018-December 2022), followed by formulation and finalisation of the statements after a series of meetings. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned, and participants finally provided their level of agreement with each item., Results: The Task Force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 13 recommendations, concerning the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), glucocorticoids (GC), immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) (including methotrexate, mycophenolate, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide (CYC)), calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, voclosporin) and biologics (belimumab, anifrolumab, rituximab). Advice is also provided on treatment strategies and targets of therapy, assessment of response, combination and sequential therapies, and tapering of therapy. HCQ is recommended for all patients with lupus at a target dose 5 mg/kg real body weight/day, considering the individual's risk for flares and retinal toxicity. GC are used as 'bridging therapy' during periods of disease activity; for maintenance treatment, they should be minimised to equal or less than 5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Prompt initiation of ISDs (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) and/or biological agents (anifrolumab, belimumab) should be considered to control the disease and facilitate GC tapering/discontinuation. CYC and rituximab should be considered in organ-threatening and refractory disease, respectively. For active lupus nephritis, GC, mycophenolate or low-dose intravenous CYC are recommended as anchor drugs, and add-on therapy with belimumab or CNIs (voclosporin or tacrolimus) should be considered. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric and haematological disease, SLE-associated antiphospholipid syndrome, kidney protection, as well as preventative measures for infections, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease., Conclusion: The updated recommendations provide consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence and expert opinion., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AF reports honoraria and/or consulting fees from Lilly, Boehringer, Novartis, Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, UCB, Amgen, Aenorasis, support for attending meetings from UCB. MK reports honoraria and/or consulting fees from GSK, participation in advisory boards from GSK, Astra Zeneca, Amgen. JA reports honoraria and/or consulting fees from Novartis, Astra Zeneca, support for attending meetings from Novartis, Astra-Zeneca, participation in advisory boards from Roche, Astra-Zeneca (all paid to Lupus Europe). MA reports honoraria and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Otsuka, Roche, support for attending meetings from Pfizer. LA reports grants from GSK, honoraria and/or consulting fees from Alexion, Alpine, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, GSK, Grifols, Idorsia, Janssen, Kezar, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Ono pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, support for attending meetings from Novartis, Astra-Zeneca. INB reports grants from GSK, Janssen, honoraria and/or consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, GSK, Eli Lilly, UCB, MSD, participation in advisory boards from Aurinia, Astra Zeneca, ILTOO. RC reports honoraria, consulting fees and/or participation in advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB, Rubió, Werfen. AD reports honoraria and consulting fees from Otsuka, Astra Zeneca, GSK, Lilly. TD reports consulting fees from Roche, Novartis, GSK, Astra Zeneca, participation in advisory boards from GNE, Roche, Novartis. DDG reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, consulting fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. FAH reports grants from GSK, Roche. DJ reports grants from GSK, Roche, CSL Vifor, honoraria and consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, Chemocentryx, GSK, Novartis, Takeda, CSL Vifor, participation in advisory boards from Chinook, GSK, stocks in Aurinia. LK reports honoraria fees from Janssen, Takeda, support for attending meetings from Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, CSL Behring, participation in advisory boards from Swixx Pharma, Roche, Astra Zeneca. CCM reports honoraria fees from GSK, support for attending meetings from Novartis. EFM reports grants from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Serono, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and UCB, honoraria and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly and Company, EMD Serono, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, IGM, Janssen, Novartis, Servier, Wolf, Zenas, support for attending meetings from Astra Zeneca, Roche. GM reports honoraria fees from GSK, Roche, Otsuka, participation in advisory boards from GSK, Otsuka. MM reports honoraria and/or consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, GSK, UCB, Janssen, participation in advisory boards from Idorsia. JM reports grants from GSK, honoraria and/or consulting fees from GSK, Astra Zeneca, Otsuka, BMS, participation in advisory boards from GSK, Astra Zeneca, BMS. GN reports honoraria and/or consulting fees from Sobi, GSK, Miltenyi Biotech, Swixx Biopharma, AbbVie, Lilly, Richter, Amgen, Roche, Kedrion, support for attending meetings from Roche, AbbVie, Sobi, Biotest. SVN reports honoraria and/or consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Idorsia, Astellas, Novartis, GSK, Roche, support for attending meetings from Pfizer, participation in advisory boards from Biogen. IP reports grants from Aurinia, BMS, GSK, Otsuka, Roche, honoraria and/or consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Otsuka, Roche, participation in advisory boards from Astra Zeneca, GSK, Novartis, Otsuka, medical writing from Astra Zeneca, GSK. JMPR reports grants from GSK, Pfizer, honoraria fees from GSK, Astra Zeneca, Lilly, support for attending meetings from GSK, Astra Zeneca, participation in advisory boards from GSK, Otsuka, Gebro, Astra Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, MSD. BAPE reports grants from Janssen, support for attending meetings from Astra Zeneca, participation in advisory boards from Astra Zeneca, GSK. MS reports grants from GSK, Astra Zeneca, honoraria and/or consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, GSK, Otsuka, UCB, participation in advisory boards from GSK. JSS reports grants from AbbVie, Astra Zeneca, Lilly, Galapagos, royalties or licenses from Elsevier, honoraria and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, Galapagos/Gilead, Novartis, BMS, Samsung, Sanofi, Chugai, R-Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Janssen, participation in advisory boards from Astra Zeneca. ES reports stocks in Astra Zeneca. YKOT reports grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Eisai, Chugai, Taisho, consulting fees from Lilly, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Gilead, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GSK, Eisai, Taisho, BMS, Pfizer, Taiho. MGT reports grants from Genesis, GSK, MSD, UCB, consulting fees from GSK, Lilly and UCB. CW reports grants from Versus Arthritis, British Society for Rheumatology, Lupus UK, honoraria fees from UCB, support for attending meetings from AbbVie. AT reports honoraria fees from UCB, GSK, participation in advisory boards from UCB, Galapagos. GB reports grants from GSK, Astra Zeneca, Pfizer, honoraria and/or consulting fees from Lilly, Aenorasis, Novartis, AstraZeneca, GSK, SOBI, Pfizer, participation in advisory boards from Novartis. DTB reports unrestricted investigational grants from GSK, honoraria and/or consulting fees from GSK, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Complement levels have been proposed as candidate biomarkers of disease activity and obstetric risk in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pregnancies, but their reliability has been questioned due to the physiologic fluctuations of complement during gestation. Thus, this network meta-analysis aimed at assessing the clinical significance of complement fluctuations in lupus pregnant women., Methods: Corresponding authors of 19 studies meeting inclusion criteria were invited to contribute with additional data including C3 and C4 levels [before pregnancy, at conception, in every trimester (T) and 3 months after delivery]; data were pooled together in a network meta-analysis., Results: A total of 532 lupus women from four studies were included in the analysis. In SLE women, C3 and C4 increased progressively during gestation: levels remained stable during T1 and peaked in T2 to decrease in T3. Patients with previous lupus nephritis (LN) and those who experienced flares during pregnancy had significantly lower mean levels of C3 and C4 at all timepoints. The lowest levels of complement were observed, particularly during T1, in patients with LN and gestational flare. Both reduction and the lack of increase of C3 and C4 levels at T1 versus conception were associated with gestational flares, particularly in LN patients. Pregnancies with flare had a statistically significant higher rate of maternal and fetal complications(60% versus 50.3%; p = 0.03)., Conclusions: Low complement levels, particularly in T1, were associated with a higher frequency of gestational flare. Either reduction or smaller increase of C3 and/or C4 levels, even within normal range, might predict flares especially in early gestation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Cytokines contribute to the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis (LN), yet their value as prognostic biomarkers is still debated. We aimed to describe the serum cytokines' profiles and prospectively assess correlations with disease features and renal response in a multicentric cohort of consecutive adult patients with biopsy-proven active LN. Cytokine associations with clinical and serological data were performed at LN diagnosis (T0), and at 3 (T3) and 6 months (T6) of follow up. Renal response according to EULAR definition was assessed at T3, T6 and T12. BAFF and interleukin (IL)-37 were measured by ELISA; IL-2, IL-10, IL-17A and IL-18 by a bead-based multiplex cytokine assay (Luminex). Thirty-nine patients with active LN (age 40.5 ± 15.6 years; F 71.8%; 84.6% proliferative LN) were enrolled, of whom twenty-nine displayed complete longitudinal records. At T0, we observed higher levels of IL-37 and IL-17 in proliferative vs. non-proliferative LN (IL-37: 0.0510 (0.0110-0.2300) vs. 0.0000 (0.0000-0.0397) ng/mL, p = 0.0441; IL-17: 2.0920 (0.5125-17.9400) vs. 0.0000 (0.0000-0.6025) pg/mL, p = 0.0026, respectively), and positive correlations between IL-10 and 24 h proteinuria (r = 0.416, p = 0.0249) and anti-dsDNA levels (r = 0.639, p = 0.0003). BAFF was higher in patients with low complement ( p < 0.0001). We observed a sustained correlation between BAFF and IL-10 throughout T6 (r = 0.654, p = 0.0210). Higher baseline IL-37 and BAFF levels were associated with renal response at T3 and T6, respectively, while baseline IL-18 levels were higher in patients achieving response at T12. Our study highlights the complexity of the cytokine network and its potential value as a marker of active LN and renal response.

Mechanisms for the generation of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies are still not completely elucidated. One theory states that dsDNA interacts for mimicry with antibodies raised versus other antigens but molecular features for mimicry are unknown. Here we show that, at physiological acid-base balance, anti-Annexin A1 binds IgG2 dsDNA in a competitive and dose-dependent way with Annexin A1 and that the competition between the two molecules is null at pH 9. On the other hand, these findings also show that dsDNA and Annexin A1 interact with their respective antibodies on a strictly pH-dependent basis: in both cases, the binding was minimal at pH 4 and maximal at pH9-10. The anionic charge of dsDNA is mainly conferred by the numerous phosphatidic residues. The epitope binding site of Annexin A1 for anti-Annexin A1 IgG2 was here characterized as a string of 34 amino acids at the NH2 terminus, 10 of which are anionic. Circulating levels of anti-dsDNA and anti-Annexin A1 IgG2 antibodies were strongly correlated in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (n 496) and lupus nephritis (n 425) stratified for age, sex, etc. These results show that dsDNA competes with Annexin A1 for the binding with anti-Annexin A1 IgG2 on a dose and charged mediated base, being able to display an inhibition up to 75%. This study provides the first demonstration that dsDNA may interact with antibodies raised versus other anionic molecules (anti-Annexin A1 IgG2) because of charge mimicry and this interaction may contribute to anti-dsDNA antibodies generation., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Authors declair Non competing interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Based on available data, the histological predictors of long-term outcome of lupus nephritis (LN) are not clearly defined. Aims of this retrospective study were: (i) to evaluate the change of chronicity index from the first to second kidney biopsy and to find the predictors of chronicity index increase and (ii) to detect the clinical/histological features at first and at second kidney biopsy associated with long-term kidney function impairment., Methods: Among 203 biopsy proven LN subjects, 61 repeated kidney biopsy 49 months after the first biopsy. The reasons for repeated biopsy were: nephritic flares in 25 (41%), proteinuric flares in 21 (36%) of patients and protocol biopsy in 14 (23%) of cases., Results: During 23-year follow-up, 25 patients presented a decrease in glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30%. At repeat biopsy, chronicity index increased in 44 participants (72%) and did not increase in 17 (28%). Nephritic syndrome and serum creatinine >1.6 mg/dL at presentation correlated with chronicity index increase (p=0.031, 0.027, respectively), cyclophosphamide therapy tended to protect against chronicity index increase (p=0.059). Kidney flares occurred in 53.6% of patients with vs 23.5% of those without chronicity index increase (p=0.035). Chronicity index increases of 3.5 points in patients with kidney flares vs 2 in those without flares (p=0.001). At second, but not at first kidney biopsy, two different models predicted eGFR decrease at multivariate analysis. The first included activity index >3 (OR: 3.230; p=0.013) and chronicity index >4 (OR: 2.905; p=0.010), and the second model included moderate/severe cellular/fibrocellular crescents (OR: 4.207; p=0.010) and interstitial fibrosis (OR: 2.525; p=0.025)., Conclusion: At second biopsy, chronicity index increased in 3/4 of participants. Its increase was predicted by kidney dysfunction at presentation and occurrence of LN flares. Kidney function impairment was predicted by both activity and chronicity index and by some of their components at repeated biopsy, but not at first biopsy., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in patients with SLE remains unclear and data on clinical manifestations after infection are lacking. The aim of this multicentre study is to describe the effect of SARS-CoV-2 in SLE patients., Methods: SLE patients referring to four Italian centres were monitored between February 2020 and March 2021. All patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Disease characteristics, treatment, disease activity and SARS-CoV-2-related symptoms were recorded before and after the infection., Results: Fifty-one (6.14%) SLE patients were included among 830 who were regularly followed up. Nine (17.6%) had an asymptomatic infection and 5 (9.8%) out of 42 (82.6%) symptomatic patients developed interstitial pneumonia (no identified risk factor). The presence of SLE major organ involvement (particularly renal involvement) was associated with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (P = 0.02). Chronic corticosteroid therapy was found to be associated with asymptomatic infection (P = 0.018). Three SLE flares (5.9%) were developed after SARS-CoV-2 infection: one of them was characterized by MPO-ANCA-positive pauci-immune crescentic necrotizing glomerulonephritis and granulomatous pneumonia., Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection determined autoimmune flares in a small number of patients. Our data seem to confirm that there was not an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 in SLE. Patients with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections were those having major SLE organ involvement. This may be explained by the high doses of corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents used for SLE treatment., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: We aimed to identify the rates and predictors of chronic damage accrual and mortality in lupus nephritis (LN)., Methods: We retrospectively measured SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI) in biopsy proven active LN with at least 5 years follow-up. We searched for the predictors of first SDI increase and death at univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Then, we considered clinical/biochemical/histological features at diagnosis, corticosteroids dose and proportion of follow-up in complete renal remission., Results: 187 patients (91.4% females, age 28.1 years, 95.7% Caucasians) were included. After a median follow-up of 18.6 years, 26 patients (13.9%) died, 116 (62%) accrued damage. SDI annual rate has significantly reduced over the last decades (from a mean of 0.14±0.17 in 1970-1985, to 0.09±0.21 in 1986-2001, to 0.07±0.1 in 2002-2019; p=0.0032). SDI increases occurred more frequently in renal (22.5%), ocular (18.2%), cardiovascular, neuropsychiatric (13.4% both) and malignancy (12.8%) domains. First SDI increase free survival was 73.3%, 59.8%, 49.9% and 38% at 5,10,15 and 20 years. At multivariate analysis, hypertension (HR:1.699, CI:1.126-2.457, p=0.011), presentation with acute renal dysfunction (HR:1.587,CI:1.082-2.327, p=0.018) and average prednisone dose >5mg/day (HR:3.378, CI:1.984-5.751, p<0.0001) independently predicted damage. Achievement of complete renal remission (HR:0.993, CI:0.987-0.999, p<0.039) reduced the risk of damage. Age (HR:1.063, CI:1.027-1.099, p=0.0004), hypertension (HR:3.096, CI:1.211-7.912, p=0.019), and no immunosuppressors as maintenance therapy (HR:4.168, CI:1.212-14.336, p=0.024) predicted mortality at multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Besides arterial hypertension, presentation with acute renal dysfunction and corticosteroids dose predict SDI increase in LN, while achieving renal remission prevents damage. Aggressive therapy to induce remission in the acute phases of LN and low corticosteroids dose in maintenance therapy may prevent the increase of chronic damage.

Objective: To investigate second kidney biopsy as predictor of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in active lupus nephritis (LN)., Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven LN (International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society 2003) who had undergone a second kidney biopsy between January 1990 and December 2018 were included. Clinical and histological findings at first and at second biopsy were analysed with Cox proportional hazard models to predict ESKD, defined as start of kidney replacement therapy. Survival curves were calculated with Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Ninety-two patients with LN were included, 87% females, mean follow-up 17.9±10.1 years. Reasons for second kidney biopsy encompassed nephritic flares (n=28, 30.4%), proteinuric flares (n=46, 50%) or lack of renal response (n=18, 19.5%). Class switch from first biopsy occurred in 50.5% of cases, mainly from non-proliferative towards proliferative classes. Class IV remained stable in over 50% of cases. Twenty-five patients (27.2%) developed ESKD, mostly belonging to the nephritic flare group (17/28, 60.7%). Independent predictors of ESKD at second biopsy were activity index (AI; (HR 95% CI) 1.20 (1.03 to 1.41), p=0.022), chronicity index (CI; 1.41 (1.09 to 1.82), p=0.008) and 24h-proteinuria (1.22 (1.04 to 1.42), p=0.013). AI≥2 (log-rank p=0.031), CI >4 (log-rank p=0.001) or proteinuria ≥3.5 g/day (log-rank=0.009) identified thresholds for higher ESKD risk. In a subgroup analysis, glomerular activity and tubular chronicity mostly accounted for AI and CI association with ESKD. No histological or laboratory predictors emerged at first biopsy (95% CI): AI: 0.88 to 1.19; CI: 0.66 to 1.20; proteinuria 0.85 to 1.08., Conclusions: Findings at second but not at first kidney biopsy in patients with persistently active or relapsing LN inform about ESKD development in a long-term follow-up., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressants still represent the cornerstone drugs for the management of SLE and lupus nephritis. The refined use of these drugs over the years has allowed us to obtain stable disease remission and improvement of long-term kidney and patient survival. Nevertheless, a prolonged use of immunosuppressive agents may be accompanied by severe and even life-threatening side effects. Theoretically, a transient or even definitive withdrawal of immunosuppression could be useful to prevent iatrogenic morbidities. For many years, however, the risk of SLE reactivation has held clinicians back from trying to interrupt therapy. In this review, we report the results of the attempts to interrupt glucocorticoids and other immunosuppressive agents in lupus nephritis and in SLE. The available data suggest that therapy withdrawal is feasible at least in patients enjoying a complete clinical remission after a prolonged therapy. A slow and gradual reduction of treatment under medical surveillance is needed to prevent flares of activity. After therapy withdrawal, around one-quarter of patients may have kidney or systemic flares. However, most flares may respond to therapy if rapidly diagnosed. The other patients can enter stable remission for even 20 years or more. The use of antimalarials can help in maintaining the remission after the withdrawal of the immunosuppressive therapy. A repeated kidney biopsy could be of help in deciding to stop therapy, but given the few available data, it cannot be considered essential., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

The kidney is frequently involved by autoimmune rheumatic diseases. The renal manifestations may be variable, ranging from asymptomatic proteinuria and microscopic haematuria to nephrotic syndrome and rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis or vasculitis. In a number of cases the kidney involvement is related to the treatment of the original disease and may represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Thus, it is important for nephrologists and rheumatologists to remember that dysfunction of the kidney may be part of the primary systemic disorder or consequence of its pharmacotherapy. In the first part of this review we will analyse the kidney involvement in four autoimmune connective tissue diseases: systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren syndrome, polymyositis/dermatomyositis, and systemic sclerosis. Renal disease is common in lupus and is a main cause of morbidity and mortality. About 10% of patients with Sjögren syndrome may present interstitial nephritis or, more rarely, glomerulonephritis. Myoglobinuria and acute kidney injury is a frequent complication of polymyositis. Renal disease is one of the most serious complications of systemic sclerosis and may present with a dramatic renal crisis, characterized by malignant hypertension, oligo-anuria, and microangiopathic thrombocytopenic anaemia., (© 2020. Italian Society of Nephrology.)

Objectives: Circulating anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A IgG2 have been identified as specific signatures of LN in a cross-over approach. We sought to show whether the same antibodies identify selected population of patients with LN with potentially different clinical outcomes., Methods: Here we report the prospective analysis over 36 months of circulating IgG2 levels in patients with newly diagnosed LN (n=91) and SLE (n=31) and in other patients with SLE recruited within 2 years from diagnosis (n=99). Anti-podocyte (ENO1), anti-nucleosome (DNA, histone 2 A, histone 3) and anti-circulating proteins (C1q, AnnexinA1-ANXA1) IgG2 antibodies were determined by home-made techniques., Results: LN patients were the main focus of the study. Anti-ENO1, anti-H2A and anti-ANXA1 IgG2 decreased in parallel to proteinuria and normalized within 12 months in the majority of patients while anti-dsDNA IgG2 remained high over the 36 months. Anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A had the highest association with proteinuria (Heat Map) and identified the highest number of patients with high proteinuria (68% and 71% respectively) and/or with reduced estimated glomerula filtration rate (eGFR) (58% for both antibodies) compared with 23% and 17% of anti-dsDNA (agreement analysis). Anti-ENO1 positive LN patients had higher proteinuria than negative patients at T0 and presented the maximal decrement within 12 months., Conclusions: Anti-ENO1, anti-H2A and anti-ANXA1 antibodies were associated with high proteinuria in LN patients and Anti-ENO1 also presented the maximal reduction within 12 months that paralleled the decrease of proteinuria. Anti-dsDNA were not associated with renal outcome parameters. New IgG2 antibody signatures should be utilized as tracers of personalized therapies in LN., Trial Registration: The Zeus study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (study number: NCT02403115)., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objectives: Serum anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome IgGs have been proposed as signatures for SLE and LN in limited numbers of patients. We sought to show higher sensitivity and specificity of the same antibodies with the IgG2 isotype and included IgG2 antibodies vs specific intracellular antigens in the analysis., Methods: A total of 1052 SLE patients with (n = 479) and without (n = 573) LN, recruited at different times from the beginning of symptoms, were included in the study. Patients with primary APS (PAPS, n = 24), RA (RA, n = 24) and UCTD (UCTD, n = 96) were analysed for comparison. Anti-nucleosome (dsDNA, Histone2A, Histone3), anti-intracellular antigens (ENO1), anti-annexin A1 and anti-C1q IgG2 were determined by non-commercial techniques., Results: The presence in the serum of the IgG2 panel was highly discriminatory for SLE/LN vs healthy subjects. Serum levels of anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q IgG2 were more sensitive than those of IgGs (Farr radioimmunoassay/commercial assays) in identifying SLE patients at low-medium increments. Of more importance, serum positivity for anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A IgG2 discriminated between LN and SLE (ROC T0-12 months), and high levels at T0-1 month were detected in 63% and 67%, respectively, of LN, vs 3% and 3%, respectively, of SLE patients; serum positivity for each of these was correlated with high SLEDAI values. Minor differences existed between LN/SLE and the other rheumatologic conditions., Conclusion: Nephritogenic IgG2 antibodies represent a specific signature of SLE/LN, with a few overlaps with other rheumatologic conditions. High levels of anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A IgG2 correlated with SLE activity indexes and were discriminatory between SLE patients limited to the renal complication and other SLE patients., Trial Registration: The Zeus study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02403115., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Belimumab (Benlysta) is currently approved for the treatment of active Lupus despite standard therapy. Few data are available on the efficacy of this drug in lupus nephritis (LN)., Methods: 17 LN female followed in two Nephrology Italian Unit received belimumab for a median period of 36 months (range 6-42 months). The indications were: arthralgia in 3 patients, cutaneous manifestations in 2, residual proteinuria in 8, and the need to reduce steroids for severe side effects in 4. Of interest, 1 patient started therapy during Peritoneal Dialysis and continued after kidney transplantation due to non-responsive arthralgias., Results: Arthralgia and skin manifestations resolved in all patients. Proteinuria normalized in three patients and stabilized in all but one of the others. Steroids were indefinitely stopped in six patients (35%) and reduced to around 40% of the basal dosage in the other patients. During belimumab therapy, three extrarenal and one renal SLE flares were diagnosed accounting for a rate of renal flares of 0.02/patient/year. No major adverse events leading to therapy withdrawal occurred., Clinical Case: Arthralgia resolved, immunological parameters improved and prednisone could be reduced within few months in the patient who started belimumab during peritoneal dialysis. After kidney transplantation belimumab was stopped but due to arthralgias unresponsive to standard immunosuppressive therapy it was restarted with success., Conclusions: Belimumab allows the achievement of complete response together with the withdrawal or the reduction of corticosteroids in almost all our patients. Of interest its satisfactory use in a patient in peritoneal dialysis and after kidney transplantation.

Objectives: Remission in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is defined through a combination of 'clinical SLE Disease Activity Index (cSLEDAI)=0', 'physician's global assessment (PGA) <0.5' and 'prednisone (PDN) ≤5 mg/day'. We investigated the performance of these items, alone or in combination, in defining remission and in predicting SLICC/ACR Damage Index., Methods: We tested seven potential definitions of remission in SLE patients followed-up for ≥5 years: PDN ≤5 mg/day; PGA <0.5; cSLEDAI=0; PGA <0.5 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day; cSLEDAI=0 plus PGA <0.5; cSLEDAI=0 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day; cSLEDAI=0 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day plus PGA <0.5. The effect of these definitions on damage was evaluated by Poisson regression analysis; the best performance was identified as the lowest Akaike and Bayesian information criterion (AIC and BIC). Positive and negative predictive values in identifying no damage increase were calculated., Results: We included 646 patients (mean±SD disease duration 9.2±6.9 years). At multivariate analysis, ≥2 consecutive year remission according to all definitions protected against damage (OR, 95% CI: PGA <0.5 0.631, 0.444 to 0.896; cSLEDAI=0 0.531, 0.371 to 0.759; PGA <0.5 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day 0.554, 0.381 to 0.805; cSLEDAI=0 plus PGA <0.5 0.574, 0.400 to 0.826; cSLEDAI=0 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day 0.543, 0.376 to 0.785; cSLEDAI=0 plus PDN ≤5 mg/day plus PGA <0.5 0.532, 0.363 to 0.781, p<0.01 for all), except PDN ≤5 mg/day, which required four consecutive years (OR 0.534, 95% CI 0.325 to 0.877, p=0.013). Positive and negative predictive values were similar; however, cSLEDAI=0 showed the best performance (AIC 1082.90, BIC 1109.72, p<0.0001). Adding PGA <0.5 and/or PDN ≤5 mg/day to cSLEDAI=0 decreased remission duration (-1.8 and -1.5 year/patient, respectively) without increasing cSLEDAI=0 performance in predicting damage accrual., Conclusions: cSLEDAI=0 is the most attainable definition of remission, while displaying the best performance in predicting damage progression in the short-to-mid-term follow-up., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: Neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) expose modified antigens for autoantibodies in vasculitis. Little is known about levels and removal pathways of NET in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), especially in lupus nephritis (LN). We determined circulating levels and defined NET removal in large subsets of patients with incident SLE (iSLE), some of whom had new-onset nephritis., Methods: Serum levels of NET (ELISA), DNase1/DNase1L3 (ELISA), and DNase activity (functional assay) were determined in 216 patients with iSLE [103 had incident LN (iLN)], in 50 patients with other primary glomerulonephritis, and in healthy controls. Ex vivo NET production by neutrophils purified from a random selection of patients was quantified as elastase/DNA release and by immunofluorescence techniques., Results: Serum NET levels were very high in iSLE/iLN compared to all groups of controls and correlated with anti-dsDNA, C3-C4, and proteinuria; iLN had the highest levels. DNase activity was decreased in iLN compared to SLE (20% had one-half DNase activity) despite similar serum levels of DNase1/DNase1L3. In these cases, pretreatment of serum with protein A restored DNase efficiency; 1 patient was homozygous for a c.289&#95;290delAC variant of DNASE1L3 . Ex vivo NET production by neutrophils purified from LN, SLE, and normal controls was similar in all cases., Conclusion: Patients with iLN have increased circulating NET and reduced DNase activity, the latter being explained by the presence of inhibitory substances in circulation and/or by rare DNase1L3 mutations. Accumulation of NET derives from a multifactorial mechanism, and is associated and may contribute to disease severity in SLE, in particular to renal lesions. (Clinical trial registration: The Zeus study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, study number NCT02403115).

Objective: The efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a subject of debate. This study was undertaken to investigate the outcomes of RTX treatment in a European SLE cohort, with an emphasis on the role of RTX as a maintenance agent., Methods: All patients with SLE who were receiving RTX as induction therapy in 4 centers were included. Patients who received a single course of RTX and those who received RTX maintenance treatment (RMT) were followed up after treatment. Disease flares during the follow-up period were defined as an increase in disease activity and the number or dose of immunosuppressive drugs., Results: Of 147 patients, 27% experienced treatment failure at 6 months. In a multivariate analysis, a low number of previous immunosuppressive therapies (P = 0.034) and low C4 levels (P = 0.008) reduced the risk of treatment failure. Eighty patients received RMT over a median of 24.5 months during which 85 relapses, mainly musculoskeletal, were recorded (1.06 per patient). At the time of the last RTX course, 84% of the patients were in remission. Twenty-eight (35%) of 80 patients never experienced a flare during RMT and had low damage accrual. Active articular disease at the time of the first RTX administration was associated with a risk of flare during RMT (P = 0.011). After RMT, relapse-free survival was similar to that in patients receiving a single RTX course (P = 0.72)., Conclusion: RMT is a potential treatment option for patients with difficult-to-treat disease. Relapses occur during RMT and are more likely in those with active articular disease at the time of the first RTX administration. Relapse risk after RMT remains high and apparently comparable to that seen after a single RTX course., (© 2019, American College of Rheumatology.)

Our objective was to update the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), based on emerging new evidence. We performed a systematic literature review (01/2007-12/2017), followed by modified Delphi method, to form questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. Treatment in SLE aims at remission or low disease activity and prevention of flares. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended in all patients with lupus, at a dose not exceeding 5 mg/kg real body weight. During chronic maintenance treatment, glucocorticoids (GC) should be minimised to less than 7.5 mg/day (prednisone equivalent) and, when possible, withdrawn. Appropriate initiation of immunomodulatory agents (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate) can expedite the tapering/discontinuation of GC. In persistently active or flaring extrarenal disease, add-on belimumab should be considered; rituximab (RTX) may be considered in organ-threatening, refractory disease. Updated specific recommendations are also provided for cutaneous, neuropsychiatric, haematological and renal disease. Patients with SLE should be assessed for their antiphospholipid antibody status, infectious and cardiovascular diseases risk profile and preventative strategies be tailored accordingly. The updated recommendations provide physicians and patients with updated consensus guidance on the management of SLE, combining evidence-base and expert-opinion., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AF reports personal fees from GSK, Abbvie, Amgen, Enorasis and Genesis Pharma, outside the submitted work. MA reports fees from advisory boards from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche. IB reports personal fees from consultant for GSK, outside the submitted work. JNB reports grants from GSK, personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Abbvie, personal fees from UCB, personal fees from Enorasis, grants from Pfizer, outside the submitted work. RC reports personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Astra Zeneca, personal fees from Rubió, outside the submitted work. DJ reports personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, Aurinia, Boehringer-Ingeleheim, Celgene, BMS, Chemocentryx, grants and personal fees from GSK, from null, outside the submitted work. AK reports grants from Biogen, grants from Galderma, grants from GlaxoSmithKline, grants from Leo Pharma, personal fees from La Roche Posay, outside the submitted work. MM reports personal fees from GSK, Lilly and UCB. MS reports grants from GSK, UCB, Abbvie, outside the submitted work. JSS reports grants from AbbVie, Astra-Zeneca, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche, and personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Astro, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung, Sanofi and UCB, during the conduct of the study. AT reports personal fees from UCB, Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, Sanofi, Roche, GSK, Alpha Sigma, Lilly, Jannsen, Cellgene and Novartis, outside the submitted work. RvV reports grants from BMS, GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Celgene, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier, UCB, outside the submitted work. JW reports grants from GSK, grants from Incyte, personal fees from Biogen, personal fees from Leo, other from Novartis, during the conduct of the study. GB reports grants from GSK, Pfizer and personal fees from GSK, Abbvie, UCB and Enorasis, outside the submitted work. DTB reports unrestricted grant support/advisory board fees from Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, Enorasis, GSK, Pfizer, Novartis, UCB, Lilly, all deposited to the research account of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Drug-induced lupus (DIL) includes a spectrum of drug-induced reactions often characterised by a clinical phenotype similar to that of idiopathic systemic lupus eruthematosus (SLE) but usually lacking major SLE complications. Different drugs may be associated with distinct clinical and serological profiles, and early recognition is crucial. Drugs traditionally associated with DIL include procainamide, hydralazine, quinidine and others, but strong associations with newer agents, such as TNF α (TNFα) inhibitors, are increasingly recognised. The pathogenic mechanisms explaining how drugs that have heterogeneous chemical structure and function lead to autoimmunity are only partially understood. However, it is likely that traditional DIL-associated agents can boost innate immune responses, particularly neutrophil responses, with neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation and exposure of autoantigens. Research in the field of DIL is evolving and may provide interesting models for the study of autoimmunity., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

No data are available about the impact of pregnancy on the long-term outcome of lupus nephritis. Thirty-two women with lupus nephritis with a 10-year follow-up after their first pregnancy ("women who gave birth") and 64 matched controls with the same follow-up and who never had pregnancies ("controls") were compared for the occurrence of SLE flares, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI) in the post pregnancy period. The same evaluations were done before and after pregnancy in women who gave birth. The predictors of CKD and damage accrual in the whole population were studied. All patients were Caucasians and had biopsy proven LN. At conception and after 10 years, in both groups, less than 10% of patients had active renal disease (p = ns). Controls had more frequent arterial hypertension (p = 0.025). Between the two groups there was no difference in SLE flares and in CKD free survival curves (p = 0.6 and p = 0.37) during the 10-year follow-up. In both groups, the temporal trend, based on annual evaluation, of glomerular filtration rate and serum creatinine shows a significant decrease and increase respectively. However, the women who gave birth persistently maintained better values of renal function than controls during the whole follow-up (P = 0.00001). There was no difference in the CKD-free survival curves. SDI did not increase significantly in women who gave birth in comparison to controls. All the above mentioned clinical parameters were comparable before and after pregnancy in the women who gave birth. Among the basal clinical characteristics, high serum creatinine and occurrence of SLE flares predicted CKD, whereas low levels of C3, pre-existing damage score, and occurrence of SLE flares predicted SDI increase. Pregnancy was not a predictor of CKD or SDI increase. Carrying a pregnancy during inactive lupus nephritis does not seem to increase the rate of SLE flares, worsen renal prognosis or increase SDI significantly in the very long-term., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To determine the prevalence of drusen-like deposits (DLDs) and choroidal changes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), with or without glomerulonephritis; and to correlate ocular findings with systemic features., Design: Case-control study., Methods: Sixty patients with SLE (age, 18-55 years; 30 with and 30 without SLE-related glomerulonephritis) and 60 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled. All patients underwent noninvasive multimodal imaging that included fundus photography, near-infrared reflectance, blue autofluorescence, blue reflectance, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT). Images were analyzed for the prevalence of DLDs. Distribution, size, and number of DLDs were measured. Correlations between ocular findings and systemic features were analyzed. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) was measured using the SDOCT., Results: Drusen-like deposits were detected in 40% of SLE subjects and 3.33% of controls (P < .0001). Compared with other techniques, SDOCT detected the largest number of affected subjects. In eyes with DLDs, small, medium, and large lesions were found in 75%, 50%, and 42% of cases, respectively. Drusen-like deposits were located in the nasal, temporal, inferior, superior, and central regions of the posterior pole in 83%, 75%, 67%, 54%, and 25% of eyes, respectively. The prevalence of DLDs in patients with SLE was similar regardless of renal involvement, but patients with glomerulonephritis had more DLDs per eye, larger deposits, and DLDs in >3 quadrants (P < .001, P = .03, P = .009, respectively). Subfoveal choroidal thickness was greater in patients with SLE (P = .002)., Conclusions: Drusen-like deposits in patients with SLE were independent of renal disease and were best detected with SDOCT. Lupus-related glomerulonephritis was associated with more fundus abnormalities and a screening SDOCT should be considered in all patients with SLE. Drusen-like deposits in the absence of glomerulonephritis may support the recent proposal that complement alteration is the primary cause of these lesions., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an alkalinizing lysosomatropic drug that accumulates in lysosomes where it inhibits some important functions by increasing the pH. HCQ has proved to be effective in a number of autoimmune diseases including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Areas covered: In this review the mechanisms of action, the efficacy, and the safety of HCQ in the management of patients with SLE have been reviewed. HCQ may reduce the risk of flares, allow the reduction of the dosage of steroids, reduce organ damage, and prevent the thrombotic effects of anti-phospholipid antibodies. The drug is generally safe and may be prescribed to pregnant women. However, some cautions are needed to prevent retinopathy, a rare but serious complication of the prolonged use of HCQ. Expert opinion: HCQ may offer several advantages not only in patients with mild SLE but can also exert important beneficial effects in lupus patients with organ involvement and in pregnant women. The drug has a low cost and few side effects. These characteristics should encourage a larger use of HCQ, also in lupus patients with organ involvement.

Introduction: Lupus nephritis is a frequent complication and a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Area covered: The main characteristics and mechanisms of action of the synthetic drugs more frequently used in lupus nephritis are described. Possible strategies aimed to reduce the potential adverse events without affecting efficacy are reported. Expert opinion: Many synthetic immunosuppressive drugs used in lupus nephritis have a low therapeutic index. Good knowledge of their pharmacologic characteristics, mechanisms of action, and drug-to-drug interactions, coupled with a strategy aimed to increase immunosuppression in the active phases of SLE while reducing the dosage in quiescent periods can reduce the iatrogenic morbidity while maintaining efficacy. Biologic agent may allow to reduce the use or the dosage of synthetic immunosuppressive drugs.

For many years pregnancy has been contraindicated in patients with SLE, particularly when kidney involvement was present. Today, pregnancy is no longer considered impossible in women with lupus. Yet, lupus pregnancies are still considered high-risk. The prognosis has considerably improved for pregnant women but the fetal risk, although progressively reduced, is still higher in pregnancies of patients with SLE than in pregnancies of healthy women. Miscarriage, premature delivery, and preeclampsia, as well as heart problems in the baby are the major complications that can occur. In this paper we will review the outcome of pregnant women with SLE, the influence of lupus on fetal outcome, the effects of pregnancy on lupus, and the management of pregnant lupus patients based on our personal experience and the revision of the most recent and significant papers on the subject., (Copyright © 2016 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) refractory to standard therapy in the clinical practice setting., Methods: 145 SLE patients (ACR criteria) were treated with RTX in 11 Italian Centres: 118 with two infusions (1 g), two weeks apart; 27 with 4 infusions (375 mg/m2), one week apart, followed in 10 cases by two further doses, after 1 and 2 months. Systemic complete response (CR) was defined as European Consensus Lupus Activity Measurement (ECLAM) score ≤1 and partial response (PR) as 1< ECLAM ≤3. Renal CR (RCR) and renal PR (RPR) were defined according to EULAR recommendations for management of lupus nephritis., Results: Data from 134 (92.4%) patients were available. The mean±SD follow-up was 27.3±18.5 months. After the first course of RTX, CR or PR were observed in 85.8% and CR in 45.5% of cases; RCR or RPR in 94.1% and RCR in 30.9% of patients after 12-month follow-up. Disease flares occurred in 35.1% and renal flares in 31.2% of patients during observational period. Among patients retreated, CR or PR were observed in 84.4% and CR in 57.8% of cases. Adverse events, infections, and infusion reactions occurred after first RTX course in 23.8%, 16.4%, and 3.8% of patients and after retreatment in 33.3%, 22.2% and 11.1%, respectively. No severe infusion reactions or deaths occurred., Conclusions: Data from Italian multicentre RTX Registry confirmed the efficacy and safety of RTX in SLE patients refractory to standard treatment in clinical practice setting.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical features, course, outcome, and prognostic indicators in lupus membranous nephritis (LMN) and to compare data of "pure" LMN vs "mixed" forms., Methods: We retrospectively examined medical records and kidney biopsies of 103 patients with a diagnosis of LMN., Results: Sixty-seven patients had "pure" LMN and 36 had "mixed" forms. Patients with mixed LMN had more frequent nephrotic syndrome (66.6 vs 44.7%, P = 0.05), low C3 (83.3 vs 62.6%, P = 0.05) and C4 (80.5 vs 52.2%, P = 0.005), anti-DNA positivity (86.0 vs 62.6%, P = 0.03), and a tendency toward a lower creatinine clearance (93 ± 29 vs 112 ± 50 mL/min, P = 0.07). Moreover, mixed membranous nephritis had a higher activity and chronicity index (6.5 ± 2.1 vs 1.4 ± 2.03, P = 0.005 and 2.4 ± 1.7 vs 1.4 ± 1.8, P = 0.0001, respectively). Methylprednisolone pulses and immunosuppressive therapy were more often used in patients with mixed forms (86.1 vs 60.6%, P = 0.016 and 83.3 vs 57.5%, P = 0.008, respectively). After a mean follow-up of 156.5 ± 104.5 months, there was no difference in the 2 subgroups concerning the number of patients achieving remission and patient/renal survival (94.5 vs 94.0% and 85.8 vs 86% at 10 years). At multivariate analysis, serum creatinine at presentation (P = 0.0013), chronicity index (P = 0.007), failure of achieving remission (P = 0.000001), and occurrence of nephritic flares (P = 0.00167) were independent predictors of chronic renal insufficiency., Conclusions: Despite the differences in clinical and histological presentation, a therapy tailored on the grounds of clinical and histological features may reduce the differences in the outcome of white patients with mixed and pure membranous nephritis., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease affecting multiple organ systems, skin and joints the most involved. Lupus Nephritis occurs in Approximately 50% of patients, sometimes it may be the first manifestation of SLE. Clinical features range from asymptomatic urinary abnormalities to full-blown nephrotic syndrome or rapidly progressive renal failure. Because of the heterogeneity of clinical renal manifestations, renal biopsy plays an important role in the management of patients with SLE: it provides information about the class, severity, activity and chronicity of the renal disease that cannot be accurately predicted on the basis of clinical parameters. The complexity of protean renal manifestation of SLE can be approached using the original WHO classification (1982), recently revised (2004).

The clinical impact of anti-DNA antibodies lies on their diagnostic power for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), being a formal classification criterion. In spite of such a disease association, low-avidity anti-DNA antibodies might also be part of the natural autoantibody repertoire. Their switch to pathogenic high-avidity autoantibodies is the result of the autoimmune process leading to SLE.Anti-DNA antibodies were shown to play a role in SLE pathogenesis and particularly in kidney damage. Accordingly, antibody titres might fluctuate in relation to disease activity, but their prognostic value for flares is still debated.Several methods for anti-DNA detection were described and there is evidence that the assays identify different antibodies with different prognostic value. The results of a multicenter study on four different routine tests for anti-dsDNA antibody detection showed that: (i) Farr assay displays the best diagnostic specificity/sensitivity for SLE, followed by Crithidia luciliae method (CLIFT), (ii) the new generation of solid phase assay (EliA) shows an increased sensibility versus the classical enzyme linked immune assay (ELISA) but a decreased specificity. Antibody titre detected by EliA and Farr assay correlated with disease activity. These findings would suggest that more than one assay should be useful for SLE diagnosis and monitoring.

Background: Previous studies have documented the high frequency of thrombosis and fetal loss in patients with lupus nephritis and antiphospholipid (aPL) antibodies, but there is little information on the impact of aPL antibodies on the outcome of lupus nephritis. The aims of this study are to evaluate the prevalence of aPL antibodies in patients with lupus nephritis and assess their prognostic value for thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity and impact on long-term renal outcome., Methods: One hundred eleven patients with lupus nephritis followed up for a mean of 173 +/- 100 months were tested regularly for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies and lupus anticoagulant., Results: The overall prevalence of aPL antibodies was 26%. In follow-up, 79% of aPL antibody-positive patients experienced thrombotic events and/or fetal losses, and aPL antibodies were associated significantly with arterial or venous thrombosis (P = 0.00001), pregnancy morbidity (P = 0.045), thrombocytopenia (P = 0.0015), and persistent arterial hypertension (P = 0.028). aPL antibodies were significantly more frequent in patients with biopsy-proven membranous lupus nephritis (P = 0.01). A strong association between aPL antibodies and the development of chronic renal insufficiency in the long-term outcome also was found (P = 0.01). With multivariate analysis, aPL antibody positivity (P = 0.02), high plasma creatinine level at presentation (P = 0.01), and chronicity index (P = 0.00004) were independent predictors of chronic renal function deterioration., Conclusion: Detection of aPL antibodies in patients with lupus nephritis is useful not only to identify patients at risk for vascular and obstetric manifestations, but also for their potential deleterious impact on renal outcome.

Affinity purified immunoglobulin G (IgG) fractions from systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) bind human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) monolayers. In vitro incubation of serial protein concentrations of SLE AECA IgG induces a dose-dependent endothelial activation: i) increase of functional adhesion of the monocytic cell line U937; ii) upregulation of E-Selectin, ICAM-1, VCAM-1 expression evaluated by a cell solid-phase enzyme linked immunoassay; and iii) increased secretion of interleukin (IL)-6 in the culture supernatants. Control experiments carried out with HUVEC monolayers incubated with IgG fractions from normal healthy controls or from AECA negative SLE sera do not affect at all endothelial adhesion molecule expression or pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion. The AECA IgG effects are not related to both anti-phospholipid or anti-DNA activities. Taken together the findings suggest that these autoantibodies might be important in recruiting and in activating mononuclear leukocytes responsible for vessel wall infiltration and raise the possibility that AECA might display a pathogenic role in SLE vessel damage.