Search

Purpose: The extent of lymph node dissection appropriate for gastric cancer is still under debate. We have conducted a randomized trial to compare the results of a limited (D1) and extended (D2) lymph node dissection in terms of morbidity, mortality, long-term survival and cumulative risk of relapse. We have reviewed the results of our trial after follow-up of more than 10 years., Patients and Methods: Between August 1989 and June 1993, 1,078 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to undergo a D1 or D2 lymph node dissection. Data were collected prospectively, and patients were followed for more than 10 years., Results: A total of 711 patients (380 in the D1 group and 331 in the D2 group) were treated with curative intent. Morbidity (25% v 43%; P <.001) and mortality (4% v 10%; P =.004) were significantly higher in the D2 dissection group. After 11 years there is no overall difference in survival (30% v 35%; P =.53). Of all subgroups analyzed, only patients with N2 disease may benefit of a D2 dissection. The relative risk ratio for morbidity and mortality is significantly higher than one for D2 dissections, splenectomy, pancreatectomy, and age older than 70 years., Conclusion: Overall, extended lymph node dissection as defined in this study generated no long-term survival benefit. The associated higher postoperative mortality offsets its long-term effect in survival. For patients with N2 disease an extended lymph node dissection may offer cure, but it remains difficult to identify patients who have N2 disease. Morbidity and mortality are greatly influenced by the extent of lymph node dissection, pancreatectomy, splenectomy and age. Extended lymph node dissections may be of benefit if morbidity and mortality can be avoided.

Background: Curative resection is the treatment of choice for gastric cancer, but it is unclear whether this operation should include an extended (D2) lymph-node dissection, as recommended by the Japanese medical community, or a limited (D1) dissection. We conducted a randomized trial in 80 Dutch hospitals in which we compared D1 with D2 lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer in terms of morbidity, postoperative mortality, long-term survival, and cumulative risk of relapse after surgery., Methods: Between August 1989 and July 1993, a total of 996 patients entered the study. Of these patients, 711 (380 in the D1 group and 331 in the D2 group) underwent the randomly assigned treatment with curative intent, and 285 received palliative treatment. The procedures for quality control included instruction and supervision in the operating room and monitoring of the pathological results., Results: Patients in the D2 group had a significantly higher rate of complications than did those in the D1 group (43 percent vs. 25 percent, P<0.001), more postoperative deaths (10 percent vs. 4 percent, P= 0.004), and longer hospital stays (median, 16 vs. 14 days; P<0.001). Five-year survival rates were similar in the two groups: 45 percent for the D1 group and 47 percent for the D2 group (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -9.6 percent to +5.6 percent). The patients who had R0 resections (i.e., who had no microscopical evidence of remaining disease), excluding those who died postoperatively, had cumulative risks of relapse at five years of 43 percent with D1 dissection and 37 percent with D2 dissection (95 percent confidence interval for the difference, -2.4 percent to +14.4 percent)., Conclusions: Our results in Dutch patients do not support the routine use of D2 lymph-node dissection in patients with gastric cancer.

For patients with gastric cancer deemed curable the only treatment option is surgery, but there is disagreement about whether accompanying lymph-node dissection should be limited to the perigastric nodes (D1) or should extend to regional lymph nodes outside the perigastric area (D2). We carried out a multicentre randomised comparison of D1 and D2 dissection. 1078 patients were randomised (539 to each group). 26 allocated D1 and 56 allocated D2 were found not to satisfy eligibility criteria (histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach without clinical evidence of distant metastasis). Each of the remainder was attended by one of eleven supervising surgeons who decided whether curative resection was possible and, if so, assisted with the allocated procedure. Among the 711 patients (380 D1, 331 D2) judged to have curable lesions, D2 patients had a higher operative mortality rate than D1 patients (10 vs 4%, p = 0.004) and experienced more complications (43 vs 25%, p < 0.001). They also needed longer postoperative hospital stays (median 25 [range 7-277] vs 18 [7-143] days, p < 0.001). Morbidity and mortality differences persisted in almost all subgroup analyses. While we await survival results, D2 dissection should not be used as standard treatment for western patients.

Posterolateral neck dissection, alone or combined with a modified radical neck dissection, may be an appropriate method of treating occult and clinically manifest nodal metastases of malignant epithelial tumours of the skin of the posterior scalp. The technique and results are described in 21 patients treated between February 1981 and November 1989. Transformation of nodal status from cN0 to pN+ was seen in five of 13 patients treated electively, who may benefit from such a procedure. During a mean follow-up of 47 months the disease was controlled locally in all patients. Three patients suffered regional recurrence of whom only one had a nodal recurrence within the region previously operated on. The results of this limited retrospective study confirm the value of posterolateral neck dissection in posterior scalp lesions.

Most Japanese studies have better survival results for gastric cancer after surgery compared to the results reported by Western authors. Japanese surgeons trace their success to early detection and extended lymph-node dissection. Analysis of data from several Japanese and Western surgical departments could not substantiate factors other than the surgical procedure as an explanation for the better survival rates in advanced gastric cancer in Japan. Whether extended lymph-node dissection actually improves survival results or merely rectifies classification which influences stratified survival results, remains to be justified. A prospective randomized study, comparing the Japanese R2 with R1 resection, is initiated in The Netherlands to answer this question. For this purpose we describe the surgical strategy and operative technique of the extended lymph-node procedure.