Search

Summary: Therapy‐related acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (tr‐ALL) is a disease entity attributed to previous exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiation for antecedent malignancy. There is observed female predominance for tr‐ALL, likely due to high prevalence and excellent curable rate for non‐metastatic breast cancer as well as the frequent use of carcinogenic agents as part of adjuvant therapy. Here, we reviewed 37 women with diagnosis of ALL following breast cancer treatment with focus on cytogenetic categorization. Philadelphia chromosome positivity (Ph+), KMT2A alterations and other cytogenetic change groups were observed in 32%, 22% and 46% of patients respectively. Median overall survival (OS) and relapse‐free survival (RFS) were 19.4 and 12.9 months, overall while both OS and RFS were superior in tr‐ALL with Ph+ disease compared to KMT2Ar and other cytogenetics respectively. Seventeen (45.9%) patients underwent consolidative allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in CR1 out of which 4 (24%) relapsed following transplant. Both OS and RFS were superior in the KMT2Ar cytogenetics group following alloHCT. Ph chromosome represents the largest genetic entity of tr‐ALL following breast cancer therapy, and it may be associated with superior survival outcomes while KMT2Ar may be associated with poorer outcomes that can perhaps be mitigated by alloHSCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Blinatumomab has demonstrated encouraging activity in relapsed/refractory (r/r) and minimal residual disease–positive (MRD+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Extramedullary disease (EMD) relapse or relapse with CD19– disease has been observed after blinatumomab therapy in patients with r/r or MRD+ ALL. However, the pathophysiology and risk factors of treatment failure are not fully understood. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of adult patients with B‐cell ALL treated with blinatumomab (n = 132) for either r/r (n = 103) or MRD+ disease (n = 29) at the authors' center (2013‐2021) and analyzed factors associated with treatment response and EMD failure. Results: The overall response rate was 64%. A lower marrow blast burden before blinatumomab (P =.049) and no history of previous EMD (P =.019) were significantly associated with a higher response. Among the patients who responded to blinatumomab, 56% underwent consolidation with allogeneic transplantation. Blinatumomab failure was observed in 89 patients; 43% of these patients (n = 38) either progressed or relapsed at extramedullary sites. A history of extramedullary involvement (53% vs 24%; P =.005) and retention of CD19 expression at the time of relapse/progression (97% vs 74%; P =.012) were associated with a higher risk for extramedullary failure. Central nervous system (CNS) failure after blinatumomab was encountered in 39% of the patients with EMD. Conclusions: A history of EMD predicted an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy with a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites (particularly CNS). Consolidation with allogenic transplantation in patients who primarily responded to blinatumomab did not abrogate the risk of extramedullary relapse. The incorporation of extramedullary assessment and the intensification of CNS prophylaxis may help in addressing extramedullary failure. Lay Summary: Extramedullary failure is common during blinatumomab therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.A history of extramedullary disease predicts an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy and a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites.Most extramedullary failure cases retain CD19 expression. Extramedullary failure is common during blinatumomab therapy for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. A history of extramedullary disease predicts an inferior response to blinatumomab therapy and a higher risk for relapse/progression at extramedullary sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• HCT outcomes in ALL patients after Flu/Mel conditioning & Tac/Siro GVHD prophylaxis. • OS and PFS at 4 years were 58% and 44%, respectively. • Cumulative incidences of relapse and NRM at 4 years were 34% and 22%, respectively. • Patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) status had lower relapse. • This regimen had favorable outcomes in adult ALL patients with Ph+ status. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with poor survival in older adults, and allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has been an increasingly used strategy in this population. At City of Hope we conducted a retrospective analysis of 72 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT with fludarabine and melphalan (FluMel) as the conditioning regimen between 2005 and 2018, from either a matched sibling or fully matched unrelated donor while in complete remission. Tacrolimus and sirolimus (T/S) were used as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Overall survival and progression-free survival at 4 years post-HCT were 58% and 44%, respectively. The cumulative incidences of relapse/progression and nonrelapse mortality at 4 years were 34% and 22%, respectively. Patients with Philadelphia chromosome–positive (Ph+) ALL had a significantly lower cumulative incidence of relapse/progression (20% versus 48% for patients with Ph-negative status, P =.007). In conclusion, RIC HCT with FluMel conditioning and T/S GVHD prophylaxis was associated with favorable outcomes in patients with Ph+ ALL and should be considered as a viable consolidative therapy for adult patients with ALL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• HCT outcomes were analyzed in r/r ALL patients, after salvage with blinatumomab. • Pre-HCT blinatumomab was given for morphologic (n = 24) or MRD-positive disease (n = 11). • No unusual toxicities or delayed engraftment was observed post-HCT. • Subgroup analysis (MRD/cytogenetics) showed no significant difference in survival. • Blinatumomab may be considered as a safe and effective salvage therapy pre-HCT. Historically, outcomes of adult patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who fail to enter remission with conventional chemotherapy are very poor. Blinatumomab, a bispecific CD3/CD19 antibody, has shown remarkable activity in relapsed/refractory (r/r) ALL. Although allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is the recommended consolidation therapy for patients with r/r ALL who respond to salvage therapy, HCT and toxicity outcomes for those who received blinatumomab salvage and HCT remain largely unknown. We treated 89 patients with r/r ALL with blinatumomab, of whom 43 patients (48%) achieved remission. Here we describe our single-center experience in the subset of patients who responded to blinatumomab salvage therapy for eradication of either gross (n = 24) or minimal residual disease (n = 11) before HCT. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years after allogeneic HCT was 77% and 52%, respectively. Leukemia-free survival at 1 and 2 years were 65% and 40%, respectively. Additionally, with blinatumomab administration pre-HCT, no unusual toxicities such as delayed neutrophil/platelet engraftment or graft failure were observed. Acute grades II to IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day +100 post-HCT was at 43% and 2-year chronic GVHD was 36%, both comparable with historic control subjects. Finally, results of our subset analysis based on pre-HCT minimal residual disease (MRD) status indicated no significant difference in survival outcomes among patients undergoing transplant in MRD-negative status and the entire cohort. In conclusion, based on results of this study, blinatumomab may be considered as a safe and effective agent for r/r ALL patients before HCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is recommended for patients with T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) in second or later complete remission (CR) and high-risk patients in first CR. Given its relative rarity, data on outcomes of HCT for T-ALL are limited. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study using data from 208 adult patients who underwent HCT between 2000 and 2014 to describe outcomes of allogeneic HCT for T-ALL in the contemporary era. The median age at HCT was 37 years, and the majority of patients underwent HCT in CR, using total body irradiation (TBI)-based myeloablative conditioning regimens. One-quarter of the patients underwent alternative donor HCT using a mismatched, umbilical cord blood, or haploidentical donor. With a median follow up of 38 months, overall survival at 5 years was 34%. The corresponding cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality and relapse was 26% and 41%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with overall survival were the use of TBI (HR, 0.57; P  = .021), age >35 years (HR, 1.55; P  = .025), and disease status at HCT (HR, 1.98; P  = .005 for relapsed/refractory disease compared with CR). Relapse was the most common cause of death (58% of patients). Allogeneic HCT remains a potentially curative option in selected patients with adult T-ALL, although relapse is a major cause of treatment failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on pretransplantation minimal residual disease (MRD) and outcomes of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) are limited. Out of the 143 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who underwent UCBT at the University of Minnesota between 2004 and 2010, we evaluated 86 patients with available MRD assessment data by 4- and 8-color flow cytometry analysis immediately before transplantation. Ten patients (11.6%) were MRD-positive, and 76 were MRD-negative (88.4%). Most of the patients (82%) received myeloablative conditioning. GVHD prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. In multivariate analysis, age, disease status (complete remission [CR] 1 versus CR2/CR3), disease group (precursor B cell ALL versus Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL versus T cell ALL), and time to transplantation had no impact on relapse. Patients with MRD before UCBT had a greater incidence of relapse at 2 years (relapse rate, 30%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-56%) and lower 3-year disease-free survival (30%; 95% CI, 7%-58%) compared with those without MRD (relapse rate, 16%; 95% CI, 8%-25%; P = .05; disease-free survival, 55%; 95% CI, 43%-66%; P = .02). Our data suggest that in patients with ALL, achieving an MRD-negative state before UCBT improves outcomes. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]