Search

The diagnosis of leukemic B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (B-LPDs) is made by integrating clinical, cytological, cytometric, cytogenetic, and molecular data. This leaves room for differences and inconsistencies between experts. In this study, we examine methodological and conceptual aspects of the flow cytometric classification of leukemic B-LPDs that could explain them. Among methodological aspects, we discuss (1) the different statistical tests used to select and evaluate markers, (2) how these markers are analyzed, (3) how scores are interpreted, (4) different degrees to which diagnostic information is used, and (5) and the impact of differences in study populations. Among conceptual aspects, we discuss (1) challenges to integrating different biological data points, (2) the under examination of the costs of misclassification (false positives and false negatives), and finally, (3) we delve into the impact of the lack of a true diagnostic gold standard and the indirect evidence suggesting poor reproducibility in the diagnosis of leukemic B-LPDs. We then outline current harmonization efforts and our personal approach. We conclude that numerous flow cytometry scores and diagnostic systems are now available; however, as long as the considerations discussed remain unaddressed, external reproducibility and interobserver agreement will not be achieved, and the field will not be able to move forward if a true gold standard is not found.

Introduction: Pre-analytical and analytical errors can threaten the reliability of flow cytometry (FC) results. A potential solution to some of these is the use of dry, pre-mixed antibodies, such as the ClearLLab 10C system. The purpose of the present study was to compare the diagnostic performance of the ClearLLab 10C B cell tube with that of our standard laboratory practice., Methods: We compared the diagnoses made with the ClearLLab 10C B cell tube (experimental strategy) with those made with standard laboratory practice (standard strategy). Samples were selected aiming for representation of the full spectrum of B cell disorders, with an emphasis on mature B cell malignancies, as well as healthy controls., Results: We included 116 samples (34 normal controls, 4 acute lymphoblastic leukemias, 54 mature lymphoproliferative disorders in peripheral blood and bone marrow, 3 myelomas, 6 bone marrow samples with involvement by lymphoma and 1 with elevated hematogone count, 14 lymph node samples, 1 cerebrospinal fluid, and 1 pleural effusion). There were two diagnostic errors (1.7%). The agreement between the two strategies in the percentage of CD19 cells and fluorescence intensity of CD5, CD19, CD20, CD200, and CD10 was very good., Conclusions: In this study, the ClearLLab 10C B cell tube performed similarly to our standard laboratory practice to diagnose and classify mature B cell malignancies., (© 2020 International Clinical Cytometry Society.)

Objectives : CD43 can be useful in routine flow cytometry. We conducted a systematic review aiming to describe when CD43 is used by flow cytometry in malignant hematology and to determine its value in these settings. Methods : Systematic review of MEDLINE (search 'CD43' AND 'flow cytometry,' starting in 2010). Results : Twenty-one of 103 entries retrieved were included in this systematic review. CD43 is used in three settings: 1) in the classification of mature B cell lymphoproliferative disorders, 2) as part of a strategy to quantify residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and 3) to help classify CD10-positive B cell populations. In this section, the published data is summarized, the clinical usefulness in each of these settings is evaluated and illustrative cases are shown. Conclusion : CD43 has a growing role in the diagnosis and management of B cell malignancies; it has become essential for the classification of B cell lymphoproliferative disorders and may be of help in the differential diagnosis of CD10-positive lymphomas by FC. It is also required for optimal quantification of CLL residual disease, which will soon be used to guide therapeutic decisions.

Background: The role of CD200 in the differential diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and classical mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is well established. Its role in the differential diagnosis of CLL and other lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD) is less clear, in particular its positive predictive value (PPV)., Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the use of CD200 in the differential diagnosis of CLL, MCL, and other predominantly leukemic, typically CD103-negative LPD. With the results, we then derived a curve to determine the PPV based on the prevalence of the disorders included in the differential diagnosis., Results: Of 43 publications screened, 27 were included in the systematic review (5,764 patients). The median CD200 positivity rate in all studies and the percentage of CD200-positive (pooled) patients was 100% and 95% (3,061/3,208) in CLL, 4 and 8% (86/1112) in MCL and 56 and 62% (425/689) in other LPD., Conclusion: CD200 is suboptimal for the differential diagnosis of CLL and disorders other than nodal MCL., (© 2019 International Clinical Cytometry Society.)

Background: Within the hematopoietic compartment, fibromodulin (FMOD) is almost exclusively expressed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) lymphocytes. We set out to determine whether FMOD could be of help in diagnosing borderline lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD)., Methods: We established 3 flow cytometry-defined groups (CLL [n = 65], borderline LPD [n = 28], broadly defined as those with CLLflow score between 35 and -20 or discordant CD43 and CLLflow, and non-CLL LPD [n = 40]). FMOD expression levels were determined by standard RT-PCR in whole-blood samples. Patients were included regardless of lymphocyte count but with tumor burden ≥40%., Results: FMOD expression levels distinguished between CLL (median 98.5, interquartile range [IQR] 37.8-195.1) and non-CLL LPD (median 0.012, IQR 0.003-0.033) with a sensitivity and specificity of 1. Most borderline LPDs were CD5/CD23/CD200-positive with no loss of B-cell antigens and negative or partial expression of CD43. 16/22 patients with available cytogenetic analysis showed trisomy 12. In 25/28 (89%) of these patients, FMOD expression levels fell between CLL and non-CLL (median 3.58, IQR 1.06-6.21)., Discussion: This study could suggest that borderline LPDs may constitute a distinct group laying in the biological spectrum of chronic leukemic LPDs. Future studies will have to confirm these results with other biological data. Quantification of FMOD can potentially be of help in the diagnosis of phenotypically complex LPDs., (© 2020 International Clinical Cytometry Society.)

Background: The concept of borderline lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) has not been clearly defined., Methods: This study aimed to classify patients with leukemic LPD (n = 597, excluding hairy cell leukemia, mantle cell lymphomas, and CD10-positive LPDs) into CLL or non-CLL applying three diagnostic strategies (the D'Arena and CLLflow scores and CD43 expression) and to better characterize unclassified patients., Results: Patients with concurring CLL-like (n = 441) or non-CLL like (n = 99) results with the three diagnostic strategies were determined to have CLL and non-CLL, respectively. Patients with discordant results (n = 57) were analyzed taking into consideration each individual cytometric marker and cytogenetic data: 41 were classified (11 CLL, 30 non-CLL) and 16 (2.7% of the entire series) could not and were considered borderline LPD. Excluding borderline LPD, the CLLflow score had the highest accuracy of the three strategies. With the addition of CD43 no patient was misclassified. With the aid of hierarchical clustering, 12 of the 16 borderline patients seemed to fall into two well-defined antigenic groups. None of the diagnostic strategies could reliably pick out borderline LPD., Conclusion: The combination of the CLLflow score and CD43 generally has a high diagnostic accuracy for leukemic LPD but it is not reliable to identify or diagnose borderline LPD. This latter group needs further study to determine its underlying biology. © 2018 International Clinical Cytometry Society., (© 2018 International Clinical Cytometry Society.)

Background: The CLLflow score was recently suggested as an improvement over the Moreau score (MS) for the diagnosis and classification of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (B-LPD)., Methods: We determined the CLLflow score in peripheral blood or bone marrow of a series of cases with an inconclusive immunophenotype, including samples with a MS of 3 (n = 52) and CD5-positive with a score of 2 (n = 38). As controls, B-LPD with a MS of 0-1 (n = 95), CD5-negative score 2 (n = 24), and score 4-5 (i.e., chronic lymphocytic leukemia [CLL], n = 166) were included., Results: The CLLflow score was positive (suggestive of CLL) in all CLL cases and negative in all MS <2, regardless of CD200-positivity, which occurred in 31% (29/95) of cases. The CLLflow score was positive in 71%, 29%, and 8% of samples with a MS 3, CD5-positive score 2, and CD5-negative score 2, respectively., Discussion: Our results suggest that the CLLflow is useful in the differential diagnosis of cases with inconclusive immunophenotype. © 2018 International Clinical Cytometry Society., (© 2018 International Clinical Cytometry Society.)

Background: The Moreau score is essential for the diagnosis of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (B-LPD)., Methods: We assessed the consistency of the Moreau score in a series of 138 patients with at least two samples involved by a B-LPD (316 samples) other than germinal center-derived malignancies, hairy cell leukemia, and mantle cell lymphomas. Patients with evidence of two distinct B-LPDs were also excluded., Results: We found 53 inconsistencies in 44 of 138 (32%) patients. FMC7 was the most inconsistent (18 cases) and CD5 the least (5 cases). CD200 was inconsistent in 6 of 67 (9%) cases. The most important predictive factor for the finding of antigenic inconsistencies was sampling of a different anatomic site. Other factors, including number of samples, time between samples, or cytogenetic group, were not predictive. For the most part, these inconsistencies did not appear to be clinically relevant., Conclusion: Inconsistencies in the Moreau score are common, supporting the importance of integrated laboratory diagnosis. However, the practical implications of these antigenic inconsistencies are probably limited., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: CD43 has been used on histological samples for the differential diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders but there is scarce data on its use by flow cytometry (FC). We set out to characterize the expression of CD43 by FC in B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders and to determine its possible role in the differential diagnosis of these malignancies., Methods: We analyzed the expression of CD43 in clonal B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders with exclusive peripheral blood and/or bone marrow involvement based on their Moreau chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) score with particular emphasis on Moreau CLL score 3 (MS3) cases, which often present a diagnostic challenge. The cohort included 433 CLL (score 4-5), 34 MS3 and 166 lymphoproliferative disorders with lower scores., Results: Generally, the higher the Moreau CLL score, the higher CD43-positivity (425/443 [96%] for CLL, 23/34 [67%] for MS3 and 18/166 [11%] for cases with lower scores). MS3 cases constituted 5.4% of all cases and were more frequently CD5, CD200, CD43-positive and had del(q13) than score 0-2 cases. Among MS3 cases, del(13q) cases were predominantly CD43-positive (12/13)., Conclusions: The frequency of CD43-positivity increases sharply with the Moreau score. MS3 cases seem to include both CLL and non-CLL lymphoproliferative disorders and CD43 could aid in the differential diagnosis between the two. However, studies analyzing the correlation between CD43 expression and the underlying biologic changes of these cases are warranted. © 2017 International Clinical Cytometry Society., (© 2017 International Clinical Cytometry Society.)

The article discusses a study focusing on the differences in the expression of CD5 and CD10 antigens, based on the anatomic site. Topics discussed include the diagnosis and characterization of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders (B-LPD), the analysis of the intensity of surface immunoglobulin (sIg), and the use of lymphocyte gate, T cells and granulocytes in the study.