Search

Background: Fluorescent detection methods are indispensable tools for chemical biology. However, the frequent appearance of potential fluorescent compound has greatly interfered with the recognition of compounds with genuine activity. Such fluorescence interference is especially difficult to identify as it is reproducible and possesses concentration-dependent characteristic. Therefore, the development of a credible screening tool to detect fluorescent compounds from chemical libraries is urgently needed in early stages of drug discovery., Results: In this study, we developed a webserver ChemFLuo for fluorescent compound detection, based on two large and high-quality training datasets containing 4906 blue and 8632 green fluorescent compounds. These molecules were used to construct a group of prediction models based on the combination of three machine learning algorithms and seven types of molecular representations. The best blue fluorescence prediction model achieved with balanced accuracy (BA) = 0.858 and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.931 for the validation set, and BA = 0.823 and AUC = 0.903 for the test set. The best green fluorescence prediction model achieved the prediction accuracy with BA = 0.810 and AUC = 0.887 for the validation set, and BA = 0.771 and AUC = 0.852 for the test set. Besides prediction model, 22 blue and 16 green representative fluorescent substructures were summarized for the screening of potential fluorescent compounds. The comparison with other fluorescence detection tools and theapplication to external validation sets and large molecule libraries have demonstrated the reliability of prediction model for fluorescent compound detection., Conclusion: ChemFLuo is a public webserver to filter out compounds with undesirable fluorescent properties, which will benefit the design of high-quality chemical libraries for drug discovery. It is freely available at http://admet.scbdd.com/chemfluo/index/., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

False-positive assay readouts caused by badly behaving compounds-frequent hitters, pan-assay interference compounds (PAINS), aggregators, and others-continue to pose a major challenge to experimental screening. There are only a few in silico methods that allow the prediction of such problematic compounds. We report the development of Hit Dexter, two extremely randomized trees classifiers for the prediction of compounds likely to trigger positive assay readouts either by true promiscuity or by assay interference. The models were trained on a well-prepared dataset extracted from the PubChem Bioassay database, consisting of approximately 311 000 compounds tested for activity on at least 50 proteins. Hit Dexter reached MCC and AUC values of up to 0.67 and 0.96 on an independent test set, respectively. The models are expected to be of high value, in particular to medicinal chemists and biochemists who can use Hit Dexter to identify compounds for which extra caution should be exercised with positive assay readouts. Hit Dexter is available as a free web service at http://hitdexter.zbh. uni-hamburg.de., (© 2018 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.)

AlphaScreen is one of the most widely used assay technologies in drug discovery due to its versatility, dynamic range and sensitivity. However, a presence of false positives and frequent hitters contributes to difficulties with an interpretation of measured HTS data. Although filters do exist to identify frequent hitters for AlphaScreen, they are frequently based on privileged scaffolds. The development of such filters is time consuming and requires deep domain knowledge. Recently, machine learning and artificial intelligence methods are emerging as important tools to advance drug discovery and chemoinformatics, including their application to identification of frequent hitters in screening assays. However, the relative performance and complementarity of the Machine Learning and scaffold‐based techniques has not yet been comprehensively compared. In this study, we analysed filters based on the privileged scaffolds with filters built using machine learning. Our results demonstrate that machine‐learning methods provide more accurate filters for identification of frequent hitters in AlphaScreen assays than scaffold‐based methods and can be easily redeveloped once new data are measured. We present highly accurate models to identify frequent hitters in AlphaScreen assays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Compounds interfering with high-throughput screening (HTS) assay technologies (also known as “badly behaving compounds”, “bad actors”, “nuisance compounds” or “PAINS”) pose a major challenge to early-stage drug discovery. Many of these problematic compounds are “frequent hitters”, and we have recently published a set of machine learning models (“Hit Dexter 2.0”) for flagging such compounds.Here we present a new generation of machine learning models which are derived from a large, manually curated and annotated data set. For the first time, these models cover, in addition to target-based assays, also cell-based assays. Our experiments show that cell-based assays behave indeed differently from target-based assays, with respect to hit rates and frequent hitters, and that dedicated models are required to produce meaningful predictions. In addition to these extensions and refinements, we explored a variety of additional setups for modeling, including the combination of four machine learning classifiers (i.e. k-nearest neighbors (KNN), extra trees, random forest and multilayer perceptron) with four sets of descriptors (Morgan2 fingerprints, Morgan3 fingerprints, MACCS keys and 2D physicochemical property descriptors).Testing on holdout data as well as data sets of “dark chemical matter” (i.e. compounds that have been extensively tested in biological assays but have never shown activity) and known bad actors show that the multilayer perceptron classifiers in combination with Morgan2 fingerprints outperform other setups in most cases. The best multilayer perceptron classifiers obtained Matthews correlation coefficients of up to 0.648 on holdout data. These models are available via a free web service.