Search

As an emerging desalination technology, forward osmosis (FO) can potentially become a reliable method to help remedy the current water crisis. Introducing uncomplicated and precise models could help FO systems' optimization. This paper presents the prediction and evaluation of FO systems' membrane flux using various artificial intelligence‐based models. Detailed data gathering and cleaning were emphasized because appropriate modeling requires precise inputs. Accumulating data from the original sources, followed by duplicate removal, outlier detection, and feature selection, paved the way to begin modeling. Six models were executed for the prediction task, among which two are tree‐based models, two are deep learning models, and two are miscellaneous models. The calculated coefficient of determination (R2) of our best model (XGBoost) was 0.992. In conclusion, tree‐based models (XGBoost and CatBoost) show more accurate performance than neural networks. Furthermore, in the sensitivity analysis, feed solution (FS) and draw solution (DS) concentrations showed a strong correlation with membrane flux. Practitioner Points: The FO membrane flux was predicted using a variety of machine‐learning models.Thorough data preprocessing was executed.The XGBoost model showed the best performance, with an R2 of 0.992.Tree‐based models outperformed neural networks and other models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ionic liquids (ILs) have drawn much attention due to their extensive applications and environment-friendly nature. Refractive index prediction is valuable for ILs quality control and property characterization. This paper aims to predict refractive indices of pure ILs and identify factors influencing refractive index changes. Six chemical structure-based machine learning models called eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Adaptive Boosting-Decision Tree (Ada-DT), and Adaptive Boosting-Support Vector Machine (Ada-SVM) were developed to achieve this goal. An enormous dataset containing 6098 data points of 483 different ILs was exploited to train the machine learning models. Each data point's chemical substructures, temperature, and wavelength were considered for the models' inputs. Including wavelength as input is unprecedented among predictions done by machine learning methods. The results show that the best model was CatBoost, followed by XGBoost, LightGBM, Ada-DT, CNN, and Ada-SVM. The R2 and average absolute percent relative error (AAPRE) of the best model were 0.9973 and 0.0545, respectively. Comparing this study's models with the literature shows two advantages regarding the dataset's abundance and prediction accuracy. This study also reveals that the presence of the –F substructure in an ionic liquid has the most influence on its refractive index among all inputs. It was also found that the refractive index of imidazolium-based ILs increases with increasing alkyl chain length. In conclusion, chemical structure-based machine learning methods provide promising insights into predicting the refractive index of ILs in terms of accuracy and comprehensiveness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]