Search

Background/aims: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and durability of intravitreal faricimab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with unsatisfactory response to traditional anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents., Methods: Single-centre, prospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with nAMD who were switched to intravitreal faricimab from intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept, due to unsatisfactory treatment response (maximal fluid-free interval ≤ 8 weeks). Intravitreal faricimab was administered with a loading dose of four 4-weekly injections, followed by an 8-week extension. A treat and extend (T&E) regime was adopted thereafter. Primary outcome was the difference between the maximal fluid-free interval achieved with faricimab, and the one achieved before the switch. Morpho-functional outcomes were also assessed. Secondary outcome was accordance with clinical management when applying faricimab pivotal trial criteria versus our real-world T&E protocol, measured as a proportion., Results: Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients with a median age of 82 years (range 77-85) were included. Patients were followed for 30.2 weeks (range 26.3-33.1). Maximal fluid-free interval after switch to faricimab (Mdn = 6.0 weeks; IQR = 4-8) was longer than the maximum interval before the switch (Mdn = 4.0 weeks; IQR = 4-4), p < 0.001. Comparing real-world T&E protocol with pivotal trial criteria, 8 (30.8%) eyes received the same clinical management while 18 (69.2%) eyes were kept at a shorter interval when following our T&E protocol. No serious adverse events were recorded., Conclusions: Faricimab appears to increase the fluid-free interval and allow extension of dosing interval in patients with nAMD poorly responsive to traditional anti-VEGF drugs., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To evaluate 1-year outcomes of loading phase treatment followed by maintenance therapy using a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen with intravitreal faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Study Design: Retrospective, interventional case series., Methods: We retrospectively studied 40 eyes of 38 consecutive patients with treatment-naïve nAMD, assessing best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal thickness, central choroidal thickness (CCT), total number of injections over 1 year, and intended injection interval at the last visit., Results: Thirty eyes (75.0%) had completed the 1-year intravitreal faricimab treatment. Their BCVA showed significant improvement, with significant reductions in foveal thickness and CCT. The total number of injections during the 1-year treatment period was 6.6 ± 0.7. The intended injection interval at the last visit was 12.7 ± 3.3 weeks. Of the 10 eyes (25.0%) failing to complete the 1-year faricimab treatment, 1 eye developed intraocular inflammation after the loading phase treatment but showed no recurrence of exudative changes, and no further treatment was required. Moreover, 5 eyes switched to intravitreal brolucizumab injection due to persistent exudative changes with an 8-week interval of faricimab injections. The remaining 4 eyes either dropped out or the patient died., Conclusions: A loading phase treatment followed by a TAE regimen with intravitreal faricimab appears to be generally safe and effective for improving visual acuity and ameliorating exudative changes in eyes with nAMD. However, there might be cases in which exudative changes cannot be adequately controlled with injections of faricimab every 8 weeks in the maintenance phase., (© 2024. Japanese Ophthalmological Society.)

Introduction: AZURE was a 76-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IIIb noninferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in a treat-and-extend (T&E) regimen with fixed dosing in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously receiving IVT-AFL for ≥ 1 year., Methods: Patients were aged ≥ 51 years and had completed ≥ 1 year of IVT-AFL treatment prior to enrollment (IVT-AFL once per month [- 1 or + 2 weeks] for 3 months followed by IVT-AFL every 2 months [6-12 weeks]). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive IVT-AFL 2 mg in either a T&E (minimum treatment interval of 8 weeks with no upper limit, adjusted according to functional and anatomic outcomes, as assessed by the investigator; n = 168), or a fixed dosing regimen (treatment every 8 weeks [± 3 days]; n = 168). The primary endpoint was best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) change from baseline to week (W) 52. The key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients maintaining vision (< 15-letter loss) at W52., Results: The full analysis set comprised 332 patients (T&E: n = 165; fixed dosing: n = 167). Mean BCVA change (baseline to W52) was - 0.3 ± 7.5 vs. - 0.5 ± 8.4 letters (T&E vs. fixed dosing; least-squares mean difference [95% CI]: 0.22 [- 1.51 to 1.96] letters; P < 0.0001 for noninferiority test [5-letter margin]). From baseline to W52, 95.2% (T&E) and 94.0% (fixed dosing) of patients maintained vision. Mean central subfield thickness change from baseline to W52 was - 24 ± 55 (T&E) and - 33 ± 47 (fixed dosing) µm. Last treatment interval to W76 was ≥ 12 weeks for 37.0% of T&E patients. No new safety signals were identified., Conclusion: IVT-AFL T&E can achieve similar functional and anatomic outcomes to fixed dosing every 8 weeks over 52 weeks in patients with nAMD who have completed ≥ 1 year of treatment, while reducing treatment burden., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02540954., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of initial treatment regimen individualization (pro re nata or treat-and-extend [TAE]), according to macular neovascularization (MNV) subtype, on the functional and anatomical response in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). The secondary objective was to compare the treatment burden between each MNV subtype., Methods: Consecutive treatment-naïve nAMD patients were retrospectively included. MNV subtype was graded by 2 independent blinded investigators on multimodal imaging. Functional and anatomical outcomes were analysed according to treatment regimen and MNV subtypes., Results: A total of 281 eyes from 243 patients were included in the study. According to the treatment regimen, there was no significant difference in best-corrected visual acuity gain within the first 2 years of treatment for type 1 (p = 0.106) and type 3 MNV (p = 0.704). Conversely, there was a significant difference in favour of TAE regimen for type 2 (p = 0.017) and type 4 MNV (p = 0.047). Type 1 MNV had a higher proportion of visits with subretinal fluid (p = 0.0007) but not with intraretinal fluid (p = 0.22). The mean interval between the last 2 injections was significantly shorter for type 1 MNV (p = 0.0045)., Conclusion: The individualization of the initial treatment protocol according to MNV subtype can improve the functional outcome and may decrease the treatment burden., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: To compare two aflibercept treatment regimens and the electrophysiological outcome concerning cone and rod function in age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) over 18 months., Methods: 41 patients with treatment-naïve nAMD were randomized 1:1 to either arm 1 or 2. Arm 1 received three consecutive monthly aflibercept injections, followed by bimonthly treatment until week 52. Thereafter, a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen was applied. Arm 2 was treated according to a TAE protocol throughout the 18-month follow-up. We assessed visual acuity (VA), central retinal thickness (CRT), injection rate and interval, and evaluated cone and rod function with full-field and multifocal electroretinography (ffERG, mERG)., Results: There were no statistically significant differences in mean baseline VA, lesion type, age, gender, or symptom duration between the two arms. During the 18-month follow-up, mean VA improved in arm 1 (n = 19) from 63.5 ± 10.5 to 69.1 ± 9.2 letters; p = 0.098; and in arm 2 (n = 20) from 66.8 ± 13.6 to 73.9 ± 9.0 letters; p = .002. In both arms, mean CRT was significantly reduced; p < 0.000. At month 18, we found no significant difference in the number of injections or injection intervals between groups. Arm 1 had received 11.3 ± 1.7 injections vs. 10.9 ± 2.0 in arm 2. The mean injection interval was 9.2 ± 3.4 weeks vs. 9.5 ± 3.1, with 52% (n = 10) on the maximum 12-week interval in arm 1, and 50% (n = 10) in arm 2. The combined rod-cone a-wave amplitude significantly decreased over time; p = 0.043. The isolated rod b-wave amplitude showed a statistically significant decline; p = 0.026. The overall mERG amplitude and implicit time remained unchanged over time; p = 0.878 vs. p = 0.922. The central ring 1 mERG amplitude improved; p = 0.041, with an unaffected implicit time., Conclusions: After 18 months, both treatments arms have received a similar number of injections at comparable intervals. Electrophysiological evaluation shows no signs of toxicity concerning cone function. But ffERGs for the combined and isolated rod response have declined, possibly reflecting either toxic effects of the drug to rods or the natural course of the disease itself., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

The management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) has taken a major stride forward with the advent of anti-VEGF agents. The treat-and-extend (T&E) approach is a refined management strategy, tailoring to the individual patient's disease course and treatment outcome. To provide guidance to implementing anti-VEGF T&E regimens for nAMD in resource-limited health care systems, an advisory board was held to discuss and generate expert consensus, based on local and international guidelines, current evidence, as well as local experience and reimbursement policies. In the experts' opinion, treatment of nAMD should aim to maximize and maintain visual acuity benefits while minimizing treatment burden. Based on current evidence, treatment could be initiated with 3 consecutive monthly injections. After the initial period, treatment interval may be extended by 2 or 4 weeks each time for the qualified patients (i.e. no BCVA loss ≥5 ETDRS letters and dry retina), and a maximum interval of 16 weeks is permitted. For patients meeting the shortening criteria (i.e. any increased fluid with BCVA loss ≥5 ETDRS letters, or presence of new macular hemorrhage or new neovascularization), the treatment interval should be reduced by 2 or 4 weeks each time, with a minimal interval of 4 weeks. Discontinuation of anti-VEGF may be considered for those who have received 2-3 consecutive injections spaced 16 weeks apart and present with stable disease. For these individuals, regular monitoring (e.g. 3-4 months) is recommended and monthly injections should be reinstated upon signs of disease recurrence., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To assess vision, injection quantity, initial lesion size, and final anatomic status in patients with nAMD completing the treat-extend-stop (TES) protocol., Methods: Patients with nAMD received ≥ 3 monthly anti-VEGF injections followed by 1-2 week injection interval extensions, with intra/subretinal fluid resolution on SD-OCT, to 12 weeks. With quiescent disease, and 2 quarterly injections, patients were monitored alone beginning at 4 weeks extending by 1-2 week intervals until quarterly monitoring., Results: Eighty-eight of 143 eyes with nAMD completed the TES protocol without disease recurrence. Sixteen (18.2%) developed sub-foveal geographic atrophy (GA), 25 (28.4%) developed fibrovascular scarring (FV) and 47 (53.4%) developed regressed choroidal neovascularization (rCNV) with 16.9 ± 13.3 average injections between the 3 groups which was not statistically significant. Average treatment time was 30.3 ± 26.1 months and subsequent follow-up was 23.2 ± 19.8 months. Average lesion size for FV was 18.77 ± 10.8mm 2 vs. GA at 12.00 ± 9.99mm 2 vs. regressed CNV at 7.12 ± 6.5mm 2 (p < 0.05). Pre, post, and final vision for GA was 39.6 letters (20/160) vs. 32.7 letters (20/200 + 2, p = 0.4725) vs. 25.0 letters (20/320, p = 0.0865); FV was 22.4 letters (20/400 + 2) vs. 11.6 letters (20/640, p = 0.0351) vs. 11.0 letters (20/640 + 1, p = 0.0226), and rCNV was 56.4 letters (20/80 + 1) vs. 69.5 letters (20/40, p < 0.001) vs. 67.3 letters (20/40-2, p = 0.0016). In the rCNV group, 17/46 eyes gained ≥ 3 lines and 30/46 eyes achieved ≥ 20/40 vision. Non-central GA expanded 0.226 ± 0.126 mm vs. 0.225 ± 0.098 mm during and after treatment completion over 24 months (p = 0.99)., Conclusions: Central GA or FV portends worse visual outcomes vs. rCNV after cessation of therapy. Anti-VEGF therapy may not affect the rate of GA expansion. Final anatomic character and location are key determinants of final vision., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To explore the relationship between retinal fluid status and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients treated with intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treat-and-extend (T&E) in the ALTAIR study., Methods: Outcomes were investigated according to overall fluid status at week 16 (predefined) and the relationship between any fluid, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), or pigment epithelial detachment with BCVA at baseline, and weeks 16, 52, and 96 (post-hoc). The analyses involved treatment-naïve patients (N = 246) with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), aged ≥ 50 years with BCVA of 73-25 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, who participated in the ALTAIR study., Results: The mean (standard deviation) change in BCVA from baseline to week 52 was + 10.6 (10.9) and + 6.5 (16.0) letters in patients without and with fluid at week 16, respectively; and to week 96 was + 9.1 (14.3) and + 4.3 (16.1) letters in patients without and with fluid at week 16, respectively. The last injection interval was 16 weeks in 33.6% and 2.0% (week 52), and 62.9% and 17.6% (week 96) of patients without or with fluid at week 16, respectively. At baseline, 35.7% of patients had IRF and 85.2% of patients had SRF, which decreased to 11.8% (IRF) and 31.7% (SRF) of patients, 8.5% (IRF) and 18.7% (SRF), and 6.5% (IRF) and 20.7% (SRF) at weeks 16, 52, and 96, respectively. Presence of IRF at all timepoints was associated with poorer BCVA than if IRF was absent, while the presence of SRF was not associated with poorer BCVA compared with the absence of SRF., Conclusion: IVT-AFL T&E dosing was effective at clearing fluid regardless of fluid type in ~ 80% of patients with exudative AMD. Patients without fluid at week 16 had numerically better BCVA than those with fluid at week 16. Over 60% of patients without fluid at week 16 achieved the maximum treatment interval of 16 weeks by study end, compared with < 20% of patients with fluid at week 16. IRF (weeks 16, 52, 96), although evident in a small number of patients, was associated with poorer BCVA, whereas SRF was not., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02305238., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To assess disease stability (absence of intra- and/or subretinal fluid) and the portion of eyes being capable to extend their treatment interval to ≥ 12 weeks in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD)., Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in NCBI, PubMed, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify clinical studies reporting treatment outcomes for ranibizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab in exudative AMD under a treat-and-extend protocol and a follow-up of ≥ 12 months. Weighted mean differences and subgroup comparisons were used to integrate the different studies., Results: This meta-analysis refers to 29 published series, including 27 independent samples and 5629 patients. In the pooled group, disease stability was reported in 62.9% and 56.0%, respectively, after 12 and 24 months of treatment, whereas treatment intervals were extended to ≥ 12 weeks in 37.7% and 42.6%, respectively. Ranibizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab differed regarding their potential to achieve disease stability (56.3%, 64.5%, and 71.5% after 12, and 50.0%, 52.7% and 75.7% after 24 months; p = < 0.001) and to allow an interval extension to ≥ 12 weeks (28.6%, 34.2%, and 53.3% after 12, and 34.2%, 47.7%, and 41.7% after 24 months; p = < 0.001)., Conclusion: The portion of eyes achieving disease stability regressed in the second year, whereas the portion of eyes under a ≥ 12-week interval increased. This discrepancy may reflect the challenges in balancing between under-treatment and a reduced treatment burden., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

The problem associated with the prevalence of retinal diseases, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in particular, is undoubtedly relevant. This aspect is based on steadily growing statistics on morbidity, a high number of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and published real world data (RWD). The analysis of RCT results being published by researchers on 15.05.19 showed 2915 studies were registered on the subject of retinal diseases; that exceeds the number of studies on glaucoma by approximately 1.38 times (2118 studies) and conjunctival lesions by 2.37 times (1230 studies). AMD is one of the leading causes of irreversible vision loss and blindness; its neovascular form leads to blindness in 80-90% of all cases. Even though the topic of nAMD therapy is widely highlighted in modern ophthalmology, today there are many aspects that require targeted solutions. The main controversial issues that determine the complexity of therapy and patient management include discrepancies in determination of reference points (disease activity criteria) for implementation of anti-VEGF dosing regimens, patients' compliance, prioritization issues in treatment, its continuity with potential for the increase of intervals between injections and monitoring visits.

Purpose: To investigate the 4-year outcome of aflibercept treatment using a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen for recurrent neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD)., Study Design: Retrospective observational study., Methods: Data of eyes with recurrent AMD previously treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents or photodynamic therapy and had started aflibercept treatment using a TAE regimen for the first time were collected. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intervals of treatments, the presence of exudation, central foveal thickness (CFT), and central choroidal thickness (CCT) were analyzed., Results: Of 47 consecutive eyes, 30 of the 47 eyes completed a 4-year follow-up. The mean BCVA (logMAR) was sustained over the 4 years (0.37 at baseline, 0.36 at 1 year, 0.36 at 2 years, 0.41 at 3 years, and 0.43 at 4 years, P = 0.21). Of the 30 eyes that completed the follow-up, BCVA of two eyes deteriorated by 0.3 logMAR or more at 4 years. At 4 years, 67% of eyes had extended treatment intervals to > 8 weeks, and 47% of eyes had extended intervals to > 12 weeks. Exudative changes in the macula, seen in all eyes at baseline, were only seen in 50% of the eyes at 4 years. The mean CFT and CCT decreased significantly at 4 years from 332 μm to 248 μm and from 218 μm to 183 μm, respectively., Conclusion: In clinical settings, aflibercept treatment using a TAE regimen may successfully maintain visual acuity for up to 4 years even in recurrent cases of AMD.

Optimizing treatment regimens for anti-angiogenic drugs is now a major issue in the management of patients with exudative AMD. The evolution of these approaches has led retinologists to favor so-called proactive administration regimens, such as Treat-and-Extend (T&E), which make it possible to anticipate recurrence and to plan intravitreal injections of anti-angiogenic drugs in advance. Nevertheless, a real need to standardize the application of this regimen has been identified. This article proposes a consensus based on the Delphi methodology, which might provide a guide for ophthalmologists to manage patients with exudative AMD using the T&E protocol. While some aspects remain debated to date, this article provides elements to guide the implementation of T&E. The experts recommend that a loading dose of 3 monthly injections should be administered before starting T&E. They also recommend adjusting the reinjection intervals by±2 weeks in a standardized fashion. The intervals are then decreased in the presence of anatomical and/or functional deterioration, maintained when the interval of recurrence is identified, and increased when anatomical and/or functional improvement is observed. A maximum interval between 3 and 4 months is recommended by the experts, with maintenance of the maximum interval for 1 year before considering a possible exit from the T&E protocol. In the event of a significant decrease in visual acuity related to the disease along with significant anatomical degradation, it is recommended to restart monthly injections. In the case of bilateral disease, when synchronized timing of injections for both eyes is desired, the experts recommend using the shorter of the two intervals., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: To evaluate the three-year outcome after intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD)., Methods: Forty-nine treatment-naïve nAMD patients (50 eyes) were enrolled in this prospective study. The eyes received IAI at two-month intervals in the first year. The treatment regimen was changed to IAI based on a treat-and-extend approach in the second and third years., Results: Twenty-nine eyes of 28 patients were successfully followed up over 36 months. The nAMD subtypes included 15 eyes with typical AMD and 14 eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. The number of IAIs performed over the 3 years was 17.2 ± 3.1 (mean ± standard deviation). The mean logMAR, which was 0.42 at baseline, improved to 0.19 (P = 0.001) at 12 months, and 0.26 (P = 0.049) at 36 months. The central retinal thickness (CRT) was 329 ± 120 μm at baseline, 151 ± 38 μm (P < 0.001) at 12 months, and 143 ± 61 μm (P < 0.001) at 36 months. The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was 288 ± 97 μm at baseline, 243 ± 82 μm (P < 0.001) at 12 months, and 208 ± 63 μm (P < 0.01) at 36 months. The changes in logMAR, CRT, and SFCT over the study period did not differ between typical AMD and PCV., Conclusion: Long-term aflibercept injection can achieve visual improvement and reduce the thickness of the retina and choroid in nAMD. Morphological improvement of these tissues may not be sufficient to sustain earlier visual improvement over the long-term.

Purpose: To evaluate efficacy and safety of intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treat-and-extend (T&E) dosing regimens in treatment-naïve patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD)., Methods: Adults aged at least 50 years old with exudative AMD and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 73-25 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters were included. Patients received three monthly doses of IVT-AFL 2 mg. At week 16, patients were randomized 1:1 to IVT-AFL T&E with either 2- or 4-week adjustments. The primary endpoint was mean change in BCVA from baseline to week 52. Outcomes were assessed at weeks 52 and 96., Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups (n = 123 each). Over 52 weeks, mean number of injections was 7.2 and 6.9 and mean last injection interval was 10.7 and 11.8 weeks, for the 2- and 4-week groups, respectively. From baseline, mean change in BCVA was + 9.0 and + 8.4 letters (week 52) and + 7.6 and + 6.1 letters (week 96); mean change in central retinal thickness was - 134.4 µm and - 126.1 µm (week 52) and - 130.5 µm and - 125.3 µm (week 96). Last injection interval before week 52 was at least 12 weeks in 42.3% and 49.6% of patients and 56.9% and 60.2% before week 96. Over 96 weeks, mean number of injections was 10.4 (both groups). The safety profile of IVT-AFL was consistent with previous reports., Conclusions: IVT-AFL administered using two different T&E regimens for treatment-naïve exudative AMD improved functional and anatomic outcomes at week 52 and outcomes were maintained to week 96. Outcomes were similar between the 2- and 4-week groups., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02305238.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept therapy using a treat-and-extend regimen on treatment-naïve pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) and Type 1 neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD)., Methods: We retrospectively studied 42 eyes with PNV and 60 eyes with Type 1 neovascular AMD. We assessed best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), central choroidal thickness (CCT), and total number of injections over 2 years., Results: The BCVA and CMT improvements during the 2-year treatment period did not differ significantly between PNV and AMD; however, CCT decreased significantly in PNV than in AMD (P<0.05). Management of PNV required significantly fewer injections than AMD during the 2-year period (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in BCVA, CMT and CCT changes between PNV with and without polypoidal lesions (28 vs. 14 eyes) during the 2 year period. Significantly fewer injections were needed for PNV with polypoidal lesions than for PNV without (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in BCVA, CMT and CCT changes, or in the number of injections during the 2-year treatment period, between AMD with and without polypoidal lesions (30 vs. 30 eyes)., Conclusion: Treat-and-extend regimen of intravitreal aflibercept injection may be equally effective in terms of improvement of BCVA and exudative changes both in eyes with PNV and those with Type 1 neovascular AMD requiring fewer injections for the former. Among eyes with PNV, those with polypoidal lesions needed fewer injections than those without polypoidal lesions.

Background: Intravitreal faricimab, a bispecific antibody targeting both angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) and vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), was recently introduced for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema and cystoid macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, safety and durability of intravitreal faricimab in a real-world cohort of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. Methods: Single-centre, prospective cohort study of 21 eyes from 19 treatment-naïve nAMD patients who were treated with intravitreal faricimab from October 2022 to April 2024. Patients underwent a loading dose (LD) of 4 monthly faricimab injections followed by a treat-and-extend regimen. Primary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and structural parameters from spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of eyes achieving a dry macula, maximal fluid-free interval and intended interval at last follow-up. Results: The study included 21 eyes of 19 patients (mean age 83.1 years). After LD, 93.3% of eyes achieved a dry macular SD-OCT scan within a median time of 8 weeks. At the first extension, 53% of eyes remained dry, while 47% showed fluid recurrence. Long-term analysis (n = 14) revealed significant reductions in macular volume (MV), central subfield thickness (CST), and pigment epithelial detachment (PED) height over a median follow-up of 64.9 weeks, with sustained visual and anatomical improvements. Median BCVA, CST, and MV at the final follow-up were significantly improved from baseline (p < 0.01). The intended interval between injections was ≥ 12 weeks in 42.86% of eyes. No cases of intraocular inflammation were observed, although 10% experienced retinal pigment epithelial tears. Conclusions: Intravitreal faricimab demonstrated favourable efficacy, safety, and durability outcomes in a real-world cohort of treatment-naïve nAMD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is generally given using pro re nata or "treat-and-extend" (T&E) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Randomized clinical trials have reported that T&E is superior to Pro re nata (PRN), but results from clinical trials may not always be replicated in clinical practice. Real-world data comparing T&E and PRN regimens for nAMD are limited. The objective of this work was to report 24-month outcomes of PRN versus T&E regimens for ranibizumab and aflibercept to treat nAMD in routine clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from a prospectively designed observational outcomes registry, the Fight Retinal Blindness! Project (FRB). Treatment-naïve eyes starting nAMD treatment with at least three injections using a T&E or PRN regimen were tracked by using the FRB. The primary outcome was the mean change in visual acuity (VA) measured by the number of letters read on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution chart at 2 years versus baseline. The secondary outcome was the number of injections at 2 years. Results: From January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2019, 3313 eyes from 2948 patients with nAMD were included: 1243 eyes from 1065 patients were classified as PRN and 2070 eyes from 1935 patients started a T&E regimen. At 24 months, patients on the T&E regimen experienced significantly greater mean (95% confidence interval) improvement in VA than those on PRN (+ 4.2 [3.1, 5.2] vs. + 1.3 [0.1, 2.6] letters; p < 0.001), with more injections (14.9 standard deviation(SD) 4.3) vs. 9.8(SD 4.3); p < 0.001). Conclusions: Eyes treated with a T&E regimen had better VA outcomes from VEGF inhibitors than eyes treated PRN. This large real-world data assessment supports previous data from randomized clinical trials that the T&E regimen delivers better outcomes than PRN. Plain Language Summary: This study focused on comparing two methods of treating neovascular age-related macular degeneration, a common eye condition. The treatments used were ranibizumab and aflibercept. We looked at the reactive "pro re nata" method, where treatment is given sporadically and only when the condition reactivates, and the proactive "treat-and-extend" method, which aims to keep the disease inactive with the fewest treatments at regular intervals. The main aim was to determine which method provides the best vision outcomes over a 24-month period and the frequency of treatment required. We found that the treat-and-extend method resulted in a greater improvement in vision than the pro re nata method, although it did require more injections. This study highlights the effectiveness of the treat-and-extend method for neovascular age-related macular degeneration, suggesting it gets better outcomes despite requiring more injections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/aims: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and durability of intravitreal faricimab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) with unsatisfactory response to traditional anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. Methods: Single-centre, prospective cohort study of all consecutive patients with nAMD who were switched to intravitreal faricimab from intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept, due to unsatisfactory treatment response (maximal fluid-free interval ≤ 8 weeks). Intravitreal faricimab was administered with a loading dose of four 4-weekly injections, followed by an 8-week extension. A treat and extend (T&E) regime was adopted thereafter. Primary outcome was the difference between the maximal fluid-free interval achieved with faricimab, and the one achieved before the switch. Morpho-functional outcomes were also assessed. Secondary outcome was accordance with clinical management when applying faricimab pivotal trial criteria versus our real-world T&E protocol, measured as a proportion. Results: Twenty-six eyes of 26 patients with a median age of 82 years (range 77–85) were included. Patients were followed for 30.2 weeks (range 26.3–33.1). Maximal fluid-free interval after switch to faricimab (Mdn = 6.0 weeks; IQR = 4–8) was longer than the maximum interval before the switch (Mdn = 4.0 weeks; IQR = 4–4), p < 0.001. Comparing real-world T&E protocol with pivotal trial criteria, 8 (30.8%) eyes received the same clinical management while 18 (69.2%) eyes were kept at a shorter interval when following our T&E protocol. No serious adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: Faricimab appears to increase the fluid-free interval and allow extension of dosing interval in patients with nAMD poorly responsive to traditional anti-VEGF drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There remains limited agreement regarding the efficacy and safety of different antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents for the management of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). Our meta-analysis compares different anti-VEGF agents for PCV treatment. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from January 2000 to July 2022. We included articles comparing the efficacy and safety of different anti-VEGF agents, specifically bevacizumab (BEV), ranibizumab (RAN), aflibercept AFL), and brolucizumab (BRO), for patients with PCV. 10,440 studies were identified, 122 underwent full-text review, and seven were included. One study was a randomized trial, and six were observational studies. Ranibizumab and aflibercept were associated with a similar best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the last visit in three observational studies (P = 0.10), similar retinal thickness at the last visit in two observational studies (P = 0.85). One observational study comparing BEV versus RAN found comparable outcomes for final BCVA, retinal thickness, and polyp regression. One randomized trial on BRO versus AFL found comparable outcomes for improvement in BCVA, while anatomical outcomes favored BRO. The available evidence suggests that final BCVA is comparable across different anti-VEGF agents, however, further investigation is warranted due to paucity of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to investigate whether a treat-and-extend regimen of intravitreal brolucizumab (6.0 mg/0.05 mL) is effective for eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) refractory to aflibercept for 12 months. Sixty eyes from 56 patients receiving brolucizumab for exudative AMD refractory to aflibercept were included. Patients received a mean of 30.1 aflibercept administrations for a mean 67.9-month follow-up. All patients exhibited exudation on optical coherence tomography (OCT) despite regular 4–8 weeks of aflibercept administration. Visit 1 was scheduled at the same interval from the last aflibercept injection to the baseline. The treatment interval was extended or shortened by 1–2 weeks depending on the presence or absence of exudation on OCT. After switching to brolucizumab, the follow-up interval significantly extended at 12 months (before switching: 7.6 ± 3.8 weeks vs. at 12 months: 12.1 ± 6.2 weeks, p = 1.3 × 10−7). Forty-three percent of the eyes achieved a dry macula at 12 months after switching. However, the best-corrected visual acuity did not improve at any visit. Morphologically, the central retinal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness significantly decreased from baseline at 12 months (p = 3.6 × 10−3 and 1.0 × 10−3, respectively). Switching to brolucizumab can be considered to extend the treatment interval in eyes with exudative AMD refractory to aflibercept. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The Canadian Treat-and-Extend Analysis Trial with Ranibizumab (CANTREAT) was a 2-year, multicentred, randomized clinical trial to evaluate treat-and-extend (T&E) relative to monthly administration of ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). This post hoc analysis of the CANTREAT trial explores the relationship between the maximal extension interval tolerated by patients receiving T&E ranibizumab and visual acuity outcomes. Methods: Treatment-naïve patients with nAMD were randomized to receive either a once-monthly dosing or T&E regimen of ranibizumab across 27 treatment centres in Canada and were followed for 24 months. For this post hoc analysis, patients in the T&E cohort were subdivided into the following groups based on maximum extension interval: 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in ETDRS best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to month 24 while secondary outcomes included change in central retinal thickness (CRT). All results were reported using descriptive statistics. Results: A total of 285 participants undergoing T&E were enrolled in this post hoc analysis. At month 24, the change in BCVA from baseline was +8.5 ± 9.3, +7.7 ± 13.8, +4.4 ± 9.6, +4.4 ± 18.5, and +7.8 ± 14.8 letters in the 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 12-week cohorts, respectively. The change in CRT at month 24 was −79.2 ± 95.0, −143.9 ± 128.9, −97.7 ± 101.1, −120.9 ± 105.3, and −133.2 ± 108.8 μm in the 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, and 12-week cohorts, respectively. Conclusion: The capacity to extend does not necessarily associate with improved visual acuity outcomes, with the poorest change in BCVA seen in those extended 8–10 weeks. The highest change in BCVA and lowest decrease in CRT was in the group maximally extended for 4 weeks. There was a correlation between change in BCVA and change in CRT for other extension groups. Future studies should establish the predictive factors for successful extension in patients undergoing T&E in nAMD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The aim of this post hoc analysis of the ARIES study is to explore the requirement for intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treatment intervals of < 8 weeks (w) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), and to assess vision and anatomic outcomes in such patients who require more intensive treatment. Methods: ARIES was a multicenter, randomized, phase 3b/4 study that investigated the efficacy of two IVT-AFL proactive, individualized, treat-and-extend regimens over 2 years in treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. Patients were determined as injection-intensive if the study investigator identified that a treatment interval of < 8 w was needed and if they had ≥ 1 interval of < 8 w after three initial monthly doses. Treatment intervals could be extended subsequently if extension criteria were met. This is a post hoc analysis of patients enrolled in ARIES and statistical analysis is descriptive. Results: Of 269 patients in the combined treatment arms, 23.0% (n = 62) were injection-intensive (Year 1: 13.8% [n = 37]; Year 2: 9.3% [n = 25]). Time from IVT-AFL initiation to injection-intensive determination varied (range, 16–100 w; median: 43.2 w). Mean treatment interval was 8.4 w before and 6.1 w after injection-intensive determination. Overall, 59.7% achieved treatment intervals of ≥ 8 w following injection-intensive determination. Vision improvements from baseline to Week 104 were smaller for injection-intensive patients than non–injection-intensive patients (mean [SD] best-corrected visual acuity change: + 2.3 [15.6] vs. + 5.9 [12.3] letters). Anatomic outcomes were similar between injection-intensive and non–injection-intensive patients (central retinal thickness change from baseline to Week 104: − 160 [154] vs. − 167 [136] µm). Conclusions: In ARIES, 23% of treatment-naïve patients with nAMD experienced at least one treatment interval of < 8 w. Injection-intensive patients showed improved vision and anatomic outcomes. For most, treatment intervals could be extended to ≥ 8 w following injection-intensive determination. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Recently, there has been growing interest in exploring the relationship between visual acuity and fluid localization in different retinal compartments. This post hoc analysis of the ARIES study explores the relationship between the presence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF), both at baseline and throughout treatment, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) treated with intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) in a treat-and-extend regimen. Methods: ARIES (NCT02581891) was a multicenter, randomized, phase 3b/4 study comparing the efficacy of two IVT-AFL treat-and-extend regimens over 2 years in patients with treatment-naïve nAMD. This post hoc analysis explores the relationship between the presence of SRF/IRF and absolute BCVA (letter score) at baseline and fixed visits. Results: In 210 patients (treat-and-extend treatment arms combined), SRF presence at baseline was associated at every time point with a numerically higher mean BCVA than if absent, with 10 more letters at week 104. IRF presence at baseline was associated at all but one time point with a numerically lower mean BCVA than if absent (week 104, 8-letter difference). Baseline SRF+IRF was associated with lower BCVA (week 104, 7-letter difference) than if only SRF was present, but higher BCVA (week 104, 8-letter difference) than if only IRF was present. Absence of SRF+IRF was not associated with better BCVA at any time point during the study. Conclusion: In ARIES, in patients with nAMD treated with IVT-AFL, the presence of SRF was associated with better visual acuity, whereas IRF was associated with poorer visual acuity. The findings of this post hoc analysis suggest that differentiating IRF from SRF may offer better prognostic value in guiding treatment-extension decisions than the use of combined or "any" IRF and SRF. Prospective trials are needed to validate these results and determine their clinical relevance. Trial registration number (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT02581891. 2jEy9rDhgXKJkUVo9DzmZL Association between Visual Acuity and Fluid Compartments with Treat-and-Extend Intravitreal Aflibercept in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An ARIES Post Hoc Analysis: A Video Abstract (MP4 308264 KB) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) have become the standard of care for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Although most pivotal trials have used monthly injections, alternative strategies that enable the injections to be administered on a more flexible schedule, including pro re nata (PRN) and treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens, are being applied more frequently. This review sought to provide further scientific evidence about the visual outcomes and treatment burden among the currently available anti-VEGF agents and regimens, including aflibercept, ranibizumab, abicipar and brolucizumab. To this end, a systematic review of published randomized studies was conducted from the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane library, and a meta-analysis was applied to the obtained data using single-means modeling to compare the efficacy and maintenance among the different available treatments and regimens at Years 1 and 2. Quality analysis identified the best-informed data for modeling purposes. Overall, 47 relevant publications were retrieved for the analysis. Superior efficacy, meaning that there were observed improvements in visual acuity (VA) and central retinal thickness (CRT), occurred with monthly versus PRN regimens, yet a higher IVI number was also observed. Conversely, the T&E regimens displayed similar efficacy to the monthly regimens, but with a reduced IVI number. Aflibercept T&E exhibited similar efficacy to ranibizumab T&E, but with significantly lower IVI numbers at both Year 1 (p < 0.0001) and Year 2 (p = 0.0011). Though all of the regimens resulted in maintained efficacy between Years 1 and 2, the required IVI number varied. The retrieved data did not enable other regimens or newer anti-VEGF agents such as brolucizumab to be compared. In conclusion, the T&E regimens were shown to be the most efficient, optimizing durable effectiveness whilst minimizing the IVI number in newly diagnosed exudative AMD, with aflibercept requiring the lowest IVI number. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Switching to an alternative anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent has been suggested for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who have a suboptimal response to initial therapy. However, post hoc analyses of some studies have shown that continuation of initial anti-VEGF therapy is, in many cases, associated with stable visual outcomes or gradual gains. Methods: This ARIES (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891) post hoc analysis describes outcomes in patients with treatment-naïve nAMD receiving treat-and-extend intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) for 104 weeks, who were identified as meeting criteria for an early hypothetical switch. Patients were categorized retrospectively according to six criteria (presence of central intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid at week 8 or 24, with/without a next planned treatment interval ≤ 8 weeks, and with/without gains in best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] ≤ 5 letters [with absolute BCVA < 70 letters]). Results: Hypothetical switch criteria were largely met due to the presence of central subretinal fluid rather than intraretinal fluid. Depending on the criterion, 8–46% of patients were considered to be hypothetical switchers. BCVA outcomes were not worse in the hypothetical switchers, irrespective of criteria. Using criteria of intraretinal/subretinal fluid at week 24 and a next planned treatment interval ≤ 8 weeks, mean changes in BCVA (letters) from baseline in hypothetical switchers and non-switchers were: + 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4, 8.8) and + 6.6 (95% CI 4.7, 8.6), respectively, at week 24; + 8.2 (95% CI 5.0, 11.3) and + 7.5 (95% CI 5.3, 9.7), respectively, at week 52; and + 5.7 (95% CI 1.3, 10.1) and + 3.4 (95% CI 0.1, 6.7), respectively, at week 104. Conclusions: In newly diagnosed nAMD, there appears little rationale for early switching from IVT-AFL since, with continuous proactive treatment, comparable visual gains can be achieved by patients meeting hypothetical switch criteria compared with those who initially respond well on a treat-and-extend regimen. However, further prospective studies are needed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891. Video Summary: 49swg7LFcAwynzUPgPUQw7 Video summary of the ARIES Post Hoc Analysis "Hypothetical Switch of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration" (MP4 54283 KB) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess the effect of fluid status at baseline (BL) and at the end of the loading phase (LP) of three different ranibizumab regimens: treat‐and‐extend (T&E), fixed bimonthly (FBM) injections and pro re nata (PRN), in patients with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration (nAMD). Design: Post hoc analysis of the In‐Eye study (phase IV clinical trial). Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to the three study arms and were treated accordingly. The presence and type of fluid, intraretinal fluid (IRF) or subretinal fluid (SRF) and the anatomical and visual outcomes were analysed. Main outcome measures: Best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the mean change from baseline BCVA (BL BCVA), and the proportion of eyes gaining more than 15 letters or losing more than five letters were analysed. Morphological characteristics including the subtype of choroidal neovascular membrane and the development of atrophy and fibrosis were also evaluated. Results: Patients with SRF at LP had better visual outcomes than patients with IRF. The persistence of SRF did not affect the mean change from BL BCVA among the three treatment regimens. However, in patients with IRF mean change from BL BCVA was significantly lower in the FBM group. The presence of IRF at BL and at the end of the loading phase was associated with the development of fibrosis at the end of the study; this result was contrary to that observed for patients with SRF. Conclusions: While SRF is compatible with good visual and anatomical outcomes, IRF leads to worse results in patients with nAMD; our results suggest that patients with IRF have better outcomes when individualized treatment regimens are used (PRN or T&E) in contrast with a FBM regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To explore the relationship between retinal fluid status and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients treated with intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) treat-and-extend (T&E) in the ALTAIR study. Methods: Outcomes were investigated according to overall fluid status at week 16 (predefined) and the relationship between any fluid, intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), or pigment epithelial detachment with BCVA at baseline, and weeks 16, 52, and 96 (post-hoc). The analyses involved treatment-naïve patients (N = 246) with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD), aged ≥ 50 years with BCVA of 73–25 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, who participated in the ALTAIR study. Results: The mean (standard deviation) change in BCVA from baseline to week 52 was + 10.6 (10.9) and + 6.5 (16.0) letters in patients without and with fluid at week 16, respectively; and to week 96 was + 9.1 (14.3) and + 4.3 (16.1) letters in patients without and with fluid at week 16, respectively. The last injection interval was 16 weeks in 33.6% and 2.0% (week 52), and 62.9% and 17.6% (week 96) of patients without or with fluid at week 16, respectively. At baseline, 35.7% of patients had IRF and 85.2% of patients had SRF, which decreased to 11.8% (IRF) and 31.7% (SRF) of patients, 8.5% (IRF) and 18.7% (SRF), and 6.5% (IRF) and 20.7% (SRF) at weeks 16, 52, and 96, respectively. Presence of IRF at all timepoints was associated with poorer BCVA than if IRF was absent, while the presence of SRF was not associated with poorer BCVA compared with the absence of SRF. Conclusion: IVT-AFL T&E dosing was effective at clearing fluid regardless of fluid type in ~ 80% of patients with exudative AMD. Patients without fluid at week 16 had numerically better BCVA than those with fluid at week 16. Over 60% of patients without fluid at week 16 achieved the maximum treatment interval of 16 weeks by study end, compared with < 20% of patients with fluid at week 16. IRF (weeks 16, 52, 96), although evident in a small number of patients, was associated with poorer BCVA, whereas SRF was not. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02305238 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess vision, injection quantity, initial lesion size, and final anatomic status in patients with nAMD completing the treat-extend-stop (TES) protocol. Methods: Patients with nAMD received ≥ 3 monthly anti-VEGF injections followed by 1–2 week injection interval extensions, with intra/subretinal fluid resolution on SD-OCT, to 12 weeks. With quiescent disease, and 2 quarterly injections, patients were monitored alone beginning at 4 weeks extending by 1–2 week intervals until quarterly monitoring. Results: Eighty-eight of 143 eyes with nAMD completed the TES protocol without disease recurrence. Sixteen (18.2%) developed sub-foveal geographic atrophy (GA), 25 (28.4%) developed fibrovascular scarring (FV) and 47 (53.4%) developed regressed choroidal neovascularization (rCNV) with 16.9 ± 13.3 average injections between the 3 groups which was not statistically significant. Average treatment time was 30.3 ± 26.1 months and subsequent follow-up was 23.2 ± 19.8 months. Average lesion size for FV was 18.77 ± 10.8mm2 vs. GA at 12.00 ± 9.99mm2 vs. regressed CNV at 7.12 ± 6.5mm2 (p < 0.05). Pre, post, and final vision for GA was 39.6 letters (20/160) vs. 32.7 letters (20/200 + 2, p = 0.4725) vs. 25.0 letters (20/320, p = 0.0865); FV was 22.4 letters (20/400 + 2) vs. 11.6 letters (20/640, p = 0.0351) vs. 11.0 letters (20/640 + 1, p = 0.0226), and rCNV was 56.4 letters (20/80 + 1) vs. 69.5 letters (20/40, p < 0.001) vs. 67.3 letters (20/40–2, p = 0.0016). In the rCNV group, 17/46 eyes gained ≥ 3 lines and 30/46 eyes achieved ≥ 20/40 vision. Non-central GA expanded 0.226 ± 0.126 mm vs. 0.225 ± 0.098 mm during and after treatment completion over 24 months (p = 0.99). Conclusions: Central GA or FV portends worse visual outcomes vs. rCNV after cessation of therapy. Anti-VEGF therapy may not affect the rate of GA expansion. Final anatomic character and location are key determinants of final vision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the visual and anatomical outcomes associated with treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen of intravitreal (IVT) aflibercept in eyes with treatment naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nvAMD). Methods: A retrospective chart review of eyes that underwent IVT aflibercept injections for nvAMD between May 2014 and March 2018 was performed. The primary outcome was the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included the change in central retinal thickness (CRT), subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF). Results: Data from 213 eyes of 213 patients (138 female, 65%) met the inclusion criteria. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 80.4 (± 9.2) years. The mean baseline BCVA (0.92 ± 0.50 logMAR, improved by 0.20 (± 0.40) logMAR units at 12 months (p < 0.001). Seventy-two (34%) eyes gained ≥ 0.3 logMAR and 47 (22%) eyes achieved BCVA ≤ 0.3 logMAR at 12 months. Baseline BCVA, patient age, and the number of aflibercept injections received were predictors of the change in BCVA at 12 months. Mean CRT improved from 347 (± 117) µm at baseline to 246 (± 55) µm at 12 months (p < 0.001). The percentage of eyes with SRF and IRF on SD-OCT declined from 63 to 21% and from 60 to 26% at 12 months, respectively. Conclusion: A TAE regimen of IVT aflibercept in treatment naïve nvAMD is associated with good visual and anatomical outcomes in routine clinical practice. Resolution of exudation occurred in about half of nvAMD cases at 12 months. Individualized administration of IVT aflibercept may reduce injection burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess disease stability (absence of intra- and/or subretinal fluid) and the portion of eyes being capable to extend their treatment interval to ≥ 12 weeks in exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in NCBI, PubMed, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify clinical studies reporting treatment outcomes for ranibizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab in exudative AMD under a treat-and-extend protocol and a follow-up of ≥ 12 months. Weighted mean differences and subgroup comparisons were used to integrate the different studies. Results: This meta-analysis refers to 29 published series, including 27 independent samples and 5629 patients. In the pooled group, disease stability was reported in 62.9% and 56.0%, respectively, after 12 and 24 months of treatment, whereas treatment intervals were extended to ≥ 12 weeks in 37.7% and 42.6%, respectively. Ranibizumab, aflibercept, and brolucizumab differed regarding their potential to achieve disease stability (56.3%, 64.5%, and 71.5% after 12, and 50.0%, 52.7% and 75.7% after 24 months; p = < 0.001) and to allow an interval extension to ≥ 12 weeks (28.6%, 34.2%, and 53.3% after 12, and 34.2%, 47.7%, and 41.7% after 24 months; p = < 0.001). Conclusion: The portion of eyes achieving disease stability regressed in the second year, whereas the portion of eyes under a ≥ 12-week interval increased. This discrepancy may reflect the challenges in balancing between under-treatment and a reduced treatment burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Purpose: To compare the 1‐year outcomes of treat‐and‐extend (TAE) and every‐other‐month (2M) regimens with intravitreal aflibercept in Japanese wet age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) patients. Methods: Prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eyes in which the best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was maintained at week 52 [with a loss of <0.3 logarithm of minimum angular of resolution (logMAR) units]. The secondary outcome measures were the mean change from baseline in the central retinal thickness (CRT) and the number of injections. Results: Forty‐one patients were enrolled. The mean changes in the BCVA from baseline in the TAE and 2M were −0.32 ± 0.27 and −0.26 ± 0.30 logMAR units (p = 0.46). The TAE group was noninferior to the 2M group in BCVA maintenance. The mean CRT changes from baseline in the TAE and 2M were −161 ± 133 and −157 ± 90 μm (p = 0.73). The mean number of injections in the TAE and 2M were 7.5 ± 1.2 (range, 7–12) and 8.0 ± 0.0 (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Treat‐and‐extend (TAE) regimen with aflibercept improved the BCVA and CRT to the same extent as 2M regimen, with a reduced number of injections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]