Search

Background: Intravitreal ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema (DMO) has been recently shown to modulate levels of aqueous cytokines. This study investigates the associations between changes in aqueous cytokine levels following intravitreal ranibizumab therapy and the corresponding anatomical and functional changes in the eye., Methods: Twenty-five patients comprising 30 eyes diagnosed with DMO were prospectively recruited. All eyes received three loading dose ranibizumab injections at baseline, week 4 and week 8, followed by pro re nata treatment based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) up to week 48. Prior to ranibizumab administration, aqueous samples were collected from all eyes, and subsequent sampling was performed at week 8. Levels of 32 cytokines were assessed at baseline and at week 8., Results: At baseline, higher aqueous TNF-α levels were associated with poorer BCVA (p = 0.033), greater macular volume (p = 0.017) and worse diabetic retinopathy (p = 0.047). Higher levels of IL-7 were associated with poorer BCVA and greater macular volume (MV). Following treatment with ranibizumab there was a significant correlation with reduction of aqueous TNF-α and improvements in BCVA and MV, both at 6 months (BCVA [r = -0.558, p = 0.001], MV [r = 0.410, p = 0.024]) and 12-months (BCVA [r = -0.413, p = 0.023], MV [r = 0.482, p = 0.008]). The change in VEGF concentration following ranibizumab treatment did not correlate with either BCVA or MV improvements (p > 0.05)., Conclusions: Higher levels of aqueous TNF-α and IL-7 correlated with worse DMO, both anatomically and functionally. Reductions in levels of aqueous TNF-α, but not VEGF, post ranibizumab treatment were associated with improvement in BCVA and MV., (© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.)

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of the dexamethasone implant on the electrophysiological profile of Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO) patients over six months., Methods: In this prospective, single-center study 30 eyes of 22 patients were examined using comprehensive baseline assessments including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), contrast sensitivity (CS) and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG), before and after 0.7mg dexamethasone implant injection, with follow-ups at months 1, 2, 4, and 6. The study employed mixed models to analyse within-subject and between-subject correlations, considering the complexities of multiple measurements per subject., Results: At baseline, BCVA was 0.66 ± 0.104 logMAR, improving to 0.568 ± 0.104 logMAR by month 6 (P > 0.05). CRT significantly reduced from 521 ± 28.7 μm to 336 ± 28.7 μm (P < 0.05). CS slightly increased from 26.8 ± 1.23 letters to 28.5 ± 1.05 letters (P > 0.05). P wave amplitude saw a notable rise from 33.4 ± 5.66 μV to 47.9 ± 5.43 μV (P < 0.05). P wave implicit time changed minimally from 47.4 ± 0.503 seconds to 48.0 ± 0.503 seconds (P > 0.05). No severe adverse events were recorded., Conclusion: These results underscore the 0.7mg dexamethasone implant's potential in improving certain electrophysiological markers in DMO, while also highlighting the need for further investigation into its comprehensive impact on retinal function., Competing Interests: The authors have no other conflict of interest to declare., (© 2024 Tranos et al.)

Purpose: The worldwide prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) continues to increase. As DM is linked to various ophthalmological comorbidities, it is crucial to understand the incidence and the treatment patterns of these complications to minimise the treatment burden for the patient and the healthcare system. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and prevalence of diabetic macular oedema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and to analyse intravitreal (IVT) treatment patterns and responses in the Finnish population with diabetes., Methods: A nationwide data register containing details of over 20-year-old individuals with diabetes was used in the analyses., Results: The incidence and prevalence of DME and PDR among the Finnish population with diabetes either declined or remained stable during 2007-2017 (Incidence rate: DME -40.8%, PDR -65.3%; prevalence rate: DME +4.7%, PDR -11.2%). During the same period, number of persons suffering from diabetes increased by +58.3%. The total number of IVT injections increased by 261.7%; the number of patients receiving IVT treatments increased by 133.6% from 2011 to 2017, reflecting changes in patient numbers in the ophthalmology departments. Furthermore, irrespective of the rising number of patients with diabetes, the numbers with visual impairment declined by 75.8% among DME and by 75.7% among PDR patients in 2007-2017., Conclusions: Regardless of the considerable increase in the workload of ophthalmology departments, the healthcare system has been able to reduce both the age and sex standardised incidence of DME and PDR among the diabetic population suffering from a visual impairment associated with this disease., (© 2024 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Background: Intravitreal injection anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (IVI anti-VEGF) therapy serves as the primary treatment for centre involving diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Conventional laser therapy (CLT) adjunct has proven beneficial; however, it is not widely used due to significant risks of retinal scarring. Subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) therapy has, however, emerged as a comparable alternative to combination therapy, offering a distinct advantage by mitigating the risk of retinal scarring., Methods: A search of six databases was conducted. A meta-analysis of mean differences was performed including subgroup analyses where appropriate. Primary outcome was the number of injections at 12-14 months; secondary outcomes were changes in central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 6-8 months and 12-14 months., Results: A total of ten papers including six randomised clinical trials and four retrospective clinical studies were included in our study, capturing 563 eyes of 478 patients. Overall, the risk of bias was moderate for these studies. Significantly fewer anti-VEGF therapy injections were administered in the combination therapy versus anti-VEGF monotherapy patients at 12-14 months who had poor visual acuity (6/18 Snellen or worse) at baseline, mean difference - 2.25 (95% CI; - 3.35, - 1.15; p < 0.05). Combination therapy was not associated with significantly fewer intravitreal injections in patients with a higher visual acuity (6/15 Snellen or better) at baseline. Our analysis also showed significant improvements to both BCVA and CMT were reached at 6 - 8 month post-baseline at the 95% confidence intervals: - 1.13 (- 2.09, - 0.16) and - 4.04 (- 7.59, - 0.50). These improvements remained statistically significant at 12-14 months: - 0.94 (- 1.67, - 0.20) and - 1.92 (- 3.52, - 0.32) respectively with combination therapy., Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that combination therapy (SML + IVI anti-VEGF) is associated with fewer intravitreal injections. We report a better BCVA and a reduction in CMT at 6 and 12 months from baseline with combination treatment compared to the IVI anti-VEGF monotherapy comparator. SML is a proven non-scarring cost-effective therapy for DMO that should be readily available in the medical retinal therapy as it may reduce the burden of care., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: A number of algorithms have been developed to calculate screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy on the basis of individual risk factors. However, these approaches have not considered proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macular oedema (DME) as separate end points and death as competing risk., Methods: A multi-state survival model with death as competing risk was used to predict the screening interval for diabetic retinopathy based on information about all 2446 patients from a well-defined population who had started treatment for either PDR or DME during 25 years. The performance of the model was tested on the existing database and at seven screening sites on patients who had not developed a treatment requiring condition., Results: Testing on the existing database showed that at a risk level of 2% the algorithm could predict a screening interval with a success rate higher than 90% and a 1.75 times average prolongation of the screening interval without failing to detect the development of verified PDR og DME. The model was limited to a diabetes duration shorter than 40 years and depended on knowledge of relevant risk factors. At the other participating screening sites the algorithm predicted shorter intervals than the screener., Conclusions: Algorithms for individualised screening for diabetic retinopathy can prolong screening intervals without losing patients who develop a vision threatening condition. The calculation of screening intervals requires access to relevant risk factors and should be developed on large data sets that reflect the population in which the algorithm should be used., (© 2024 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Purpose: To identify associations between systemic drugs and the incidence of diabetic macular oedema (DME). Of interest was to find beneficial and/or deleterious associations of used drugs., Methods: A historic cohort design based on administrative data. Study population consisted of 150 353 individuals with diabetes. Endpoint event was the development of DME (ICD-10 H36.01), censoring events were death or study end December 2017. The follow-up started between 1997 and 2010. The systemic medication consisted of 95 substances. We constructed a nested case-control study design comparing 2630 cases with DME to 13 144 age- and sex-matched controls without DME. Results are reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on conditional logistic regression models., Results: Incidence rate for DME was 1.80 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 1.73-1.87). In all, we observed a lower incidence rate of DME in females (IRR 0.57; 95% CI 0.52-0.62) compared to males. Exposure to hormone replacement therapy estradiol (OR 0.42; 0.25-0.68), temazepam (0.23; 0.08-0.62) and allopurinol (0.61; 0.43-0.86) were associated with lower risk of DME, while use of insulin or insulin analogue (3.30; 2.99-3.64), sulfonylureas (1.21; 1.05-1.40), diuretic furosemide (1.90; 1.61-2.24), calcium channel blocker amlodipine (1.53; 1.34-1.75), ACE inhibitors ramipril (1.66; 1.46-1.89) and enalapril (1.38; 1.16-1.64) were associated with an increased risk of DME., Conclusions: Large-scale studies examining the incidence of DME are lacking. Our findings suggest that associations of systemic medications with the incidence of DME may shed light on the pathogenesis of complex DME, encouraging further studies., (© 2023 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Objective: To describe the management of diabetic macular oedema (DME) patients from the entire French population between 2012 and 2018., Methods: In this retrospective longitudinal study, we identified adults treated for DME from the French population using the exhaustive French National Health Information database (SNDS), and an algorithm based on diagnosis and procedure codes, and reimbursed treatments., Results: Between 2012 and 2018, we identified 53 584 treated DME patients, who were followed for up to 7 years from DME treatment initiation. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) became the predominant imaging tool to diagnose DME. Only 14% of patients consulted a diabetologist or endocrinologist in the 3 months prior to initiating DME treatment, whereas 84% consulted a general practitioner. The percentage of patients consulting an ophthalmologist declined over time, from 97% of patients in Year 1 (median of 9 consultations), to 46% in Year 7 (median of 7 consultations). The median DME treatment duration with an anti-VEGF and/or dexamethasone implant treatment was 9 months; 54% of patients had a treatment duration less than 1 year. First-line treatment was more common with ranibizumab (55% of patients) than with aflibercept (30%), or dexamethasone implant (15%). About 25% of patients who initiated anti-VEGF treatment switched treatment at least once, while 30% of patients who initiated dexamethasone implant switched to anti-VEGF treatment at least once., Conclusions: French DME patients seem well-monitored by their ophthalmologist, but median DME treatment duration was just 9 months. These results emphasise the challenge to manage and treat patients with DME over the long term., (© 2023 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Clinical Relevance: The role of subclinical inflammation in the pathophysiology of diabetic macular oedema (DME), which is known to be quite complex, is of much interest. Serum ferritin level, which is an indicator of body iron stores, is both an inflammatory marker for various neurodegenerative diseases and an important indicator in the evaluation of iron-induced oxidative stress., Background: Iron metabolism indicators play a role in the formation and development of diabetic retinopathy, which is known to be associated with subclinical inflammation, and may also play a role in the pathogenesis of DME. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of serum iron metabolism markers in the pathogenesis of DME., Materials and Methods: The files of all nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) patients who were scheduled for the first intravitreal injection for DME in the eye clinic between January 2019 and January 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. By examining the files of all diabetes mellitus patients who attended the outpatient eye clinic on the same dates, those without retinopathy and those with NPDR but not DME were recorded. All results, including a comprehensive ophthalmological examination, laboratory data of fasting blood tests, and an internal medicine outpatient examination were collected for analysis., Results: Of the 157 participants, 44 were NPDR patients with oedema, 50 were NPDR patients without oedema, and 63 were patients without retinopathy. There was a significant difference between the groups in respect of creatinine, high-density lipoprotein, mean corpuscular volume, serum iron and ferritin, total iron binding capacity and transferrin saturation ( p  < 0.050). Ferritin values were found to be significantly higher in patients with macular oedema. Other iron status markers were found to be significantly lower ( p  < 0.050)., Conclusion: Evaluation of serum iron status indicators in the routine follow-up of diabetic patients may be of diagnostic and/or prognostic benefit in terms of DME.

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is the major cause of visual impairment in people with diabetes. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is now the most widely used modality to assess presence and severity of DMO. DMO is currently broadly classified based on the involvement to the central 1 mm of the macula into non-centre or centre involved DMO (CI-DMO) and DMO can occur with or without visual acuity (VA) loss. This classification forms the basis of management strategies of DMO. Despite years of research on quantitative and qualitative DMO related features assessed by OCT, these do not fully inform physicians of the prognosis and severity of DMO relative to visual function. Having said that, recent research on novel OCT biomarkers development and re-defined classification of DMO show better correlation with visual function and treatment response. This review summarises the current evidence of the association of OCT biomarkers in DMO management and its potential clinical importance in predicting VA and anatomical treatment response. The review also discusses some future directions in this field, such as the use of artificial intelligence to quantify and monitor OCT biomarkers and retinal fluid and identify phenotypes of DMO, and the need for standardisation and classification of OCT biomarkers to use in future clinical trials and clinical practice settings as prognostic markers and secondary treatment outcome measures in the management of DMO., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Introduction: Intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant is indicated for the treatment of macular oedema due to diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion and uveitis. The most common complications are cataract and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). Accidental injection of DEX implant into the lens is a rare complication and only few papers presented it., Case Presentation: A 40-year-old man was treated with DEX implant for diabetic macular oedema in both eyes. At 1 week follow-up visit, slit lamp examination showed the DEX implant was located in the crystalline lens of the right eye (RE) without any sign of inflammation, cataract or elevated IOP, so we decided to plan a normal follow-up schedule. Macular oedema relapsed 5 months after the injection in the left eye (LE), whereas the RE did not show any sing of intraretinal or subretinal fluid. Six months after DEX implantation an uneventful phacoemulsification and intraocular lens placement were performed in the RE because of IOP elevation., Conclusions: The therapeutic effect of DEX implant can be maintained for a longer period of time than intravitreal implant, determining complete reabsorption of macular oedema. Intralenticular implant can be maintained inside the lens until either IOP increases, cataract progresses, or other complications occur., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Purpose: To evaluate the short-term effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) injection on visual outcomes of patients with diabetic macular oedema., Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate 39 eyes of thirty-nine patients (mean age ± SD: 61.4 ± 15.0 years) that received intravitreal bevacizumab injection (1.25 mg in 0.05 ml) as treatment for diabetic macular oedema between January 2014 and July 2019 in Ghana. Data on visual acuity and central macular thickness before treatment and 6 weeks post-treatment were collected and analysed using paired t-test. Ordinary least squares linear regression analysis was also conducted to determine the relationship between improvement in visual acuity and central macular thickness after treatment and other predictor variables., Results: The mean ± SD visual acuity (LogMAR-equivalent of Snellen) of patients with diabetic macular oedema significantly improved from 0.84 ± 0.58 LogMAR before treatment to 0.69 ± 0.58 LogMAR at 6 weeks post-treatment (mean difference: 0.15 ± 0.32 LogMAR; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.25; p = 0.01). Mean macular thickness ± SD on the other hand, reduced significantly (p < 0.001) from 316.54 ± 75.35 μm before treatment to 275.54 ± 57.43 μm after treatment. While age and worse pre-treatment visual acuity predicted improvement in visual acuity after treatment, a higher central macular thickness before treatment predicted an improvement in central macular thickness after intravitreal bevacizumab injection., Conclusion: Treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab injection produces short-term improvement in vision and reduction in central macular thickness in African patients with diabetic macular oedema., (© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Introduction: A systematic literature review (SLR) and network meta-analysis (NMA) were conducted to evaluate the comparative efficacy, durability and safety of faricimab, used in a Treat & Extend (T&E) regime with intervals up to every 16 weeks (Q16W), relative to other therapies currently in use for treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). Of particular interest were anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies applied in flexible dosing regimens such as Pro re nata (PRN) and T&E, which are the mainstay in clinical practice., Methods: An SLR identifying randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published before August 2021 was conducted, followed by a Bayesian NMA comparing faricimab T&E treatment to aflibercept, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, dexamethasone and laser therapy. Outcomes included in the analysis were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), change in central subfield thickness (CST), injection frequency, ocular adverse events (AE) and all-cause discontinuation, all of which were evaluated at 12 months. Subgroup analyses including patients' naïve to anti-VEGF were conducted where feasible., Results: Twenty-six studies identified in the SLR were included in the NMA. Most importantly for decision making in clinical practise, faricimab T&E was associated with a statistically greater (95% credible intervals exclude zero) and clinically meaningful decrease in retinal thickness compared to all other flexible dosing regimens (greater retinal drying by 55-125 microns). Anatomical outcomes determine treatment efficacy and retreatment of patients. The NMA also showed a statistically greater increase in mean change in BCVA for faricimab T&E vs. flexible regimens using ranibizumab and bevacizumab (increase of 4.4-4.8 letters) as well as a numerical improvement vs. aflibercept PRN (two letters, 95% credible intervals including zero). Accordingly, the injection frequency was numerically lower versus other treatments using flexible dosing regimens (decrease by 0.92-1.43 injections). The analyses also indicated that the safety profile of faricimab T&E was comparable to those of ranibizumab and aflibercept, which have well-established safety profiles, with similar results for the number of all-cause discontinuations., Conclusion: Faricimab provides a new treatment option in DME with dual-pathway inhibition of VEGF and angiopoeitin-2 (Ang-2). To the authors' knowledge, this is the first indirect comparison of faricimab T&E in DME. The analyses indicate that faricimab T&E is associated with superior retinal drying along with numerically fewer injections compared to all other treatments given in flexible dosing regimens. It also showed superior visual acuity outcomes compared to ranibizumab and bevacizumab., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Healthcare Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) are generally considered the gold-standard for providing scientific evidence for treatments' effectiveness and safety but their findings may not always be generalisable to the broader population treated in routine clinical practice. RCTs include highly selected patient populations that fit specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Although they may have a lower level of certainty than RCTs on the evidence hierarchy, real-world data (RWD), such as observational studies, registries and databases, provide real-world evidence (RWE) that can complement RCTs. For example, RWE may help satisfy requirements for a new indication of an already approved drug and help us better understand long-term treatment effectiveness, safety and patterns of use in clinical practice. Many countries have set up registries, observational studies and databases containing information on patients with retinal diseases, such as diabetic macular oedema (DMO). These DMO RWD have produced significant clinical evidence in the past decade that has changed the management of DMO. RWD and medico-administrative databases are a useful resource to identify low frequency safety signals. They often have long-term follow-up with a large number of patients and minimal exclusion criteria. We will discuss improvements in healthcare information exchange technologies, such as blockchain technology and FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources), which will connect and extend databases already available. These registries can be linked with existing or emerging retinal imaging modalities using artificial intelligence to aid diagnosis, treatment decisions and provide prognostic information. The results of RCTs and RWE are combined to provide evidence-based guidelines., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest PHG: consultant for Novartis, Bayer, Roche, Horus Pharma and Zeiss; HM: consultant for Allergan/Abbvie, Bayer, Novartis and Roche; DB: received research grants and travel expenses for Bayer and Novartis and consultant for Alcon; VD: consultant for Horus Pharma and Théa Pharma; VN: None; MG: received grants from NHMRC, grants from RANZCO Eye Foundation, grants and others from Novartis, and grants and others from Bayer; CCG: consultant for Allergan/AbbVie, Bayer, Horus Pharma, Novartis, Roche, Alcon and Théa Pharma., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Different network meta-analyses (NMAs) on the same topic result in differences in findings. In this review, we investigated NMAs comparing aflibercept with ranibizumab for diabetic macular oedema (DME) in the hope of illuminating why the differences in findings occurred., Methods: Studies were searched for in English and Chinese electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP; see detailed search strategy in the main body). Two independent reviewers systematically screened to identify target NMAs that included a comparison of aflibercept and ranibizumab in patients with DME. The key outcome of interest in this review is the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), including various ways of reporting (such as the proportion of participants who gain ≥ 10 ETDRS letters at 12 months; average change in BCVA at 12 months)., Results: For the binary outcome of BCVA, different NMAs all agreed that there is no clear difference between the two treatments, while continuous outcomes all favour aflibercept over ranibizumab. We discussed four points of particular concern that are illustrated by five similar NMAs, including network differences, PICO (participants, interventions, comparators, outcomes) differences, different data from the same measures of effect, and differences in what is truly significant., Conclusions: A closer inspection of each of these trials shows how the methods, including the searches and analyses, all differ, but the findings, although presented differently and sometimes interpreted differently, were similar., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Degenerative eye conditions such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), diabetic retinopathy, and retinal vein occlusion are major contributors to significant vision loss in developed nations. The primary therapeutic approach for managing complications linked to these diseases involves the intravitreal delivery of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatments. Faricimab is a novel, humanised, bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds all VEGF-A isoforms and Angiopoietin-2, which has been approved by regulatory agencies, such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), for the treatment of neovascular AMD and diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Intravitreal faricimab holds the promise of reducing the treatment burden for patients with these conditions by achieving comparable or superior therapeutic outcomes with fewer clinic visits. The scope of faricimab's application includes addressing complex macular conditions such as DMO. This review intends to elucidate the distinctive pharmacological characteristics of faricimab and provide an overview of the key clinical trials and real-world studies that assess its effectiveness and safety in treating degenerative macular diseases., Competing Interests: Winfried M Amoaku has provided consultancy services to Alcon, Alimera, Allergan (AbbVie), Bayer, Novartis and Roche. The other authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Panos et al.)

Objective: Intravitreal ranibizumab is one of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factors used for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema, not always successfully. We aimed to identify the factors affecting the changes of central macular thickness after induction treatment with intravitreal ranibizumab, to predict the treatment effect and facilitate early treatment decisions., Methods: Cross-sectional study involving a retrospective record review of diabetic macular oedema patients who received an induction treatment of three monthly 0.5 mg intravitreal ranibizumab injections between 2016 and 2019. Central macular thickness was measured at baseline and 3 months post-treatment. Linear regression was applied to identify the factors associated with the changes of central macular thickness., Results: A total of 153 diabetic macular oedema patients were involved in this study. Their mean age was 57.5 ± 7.7 years, 54.9% were female. The mean change of central macular thickness from baseline to 3 months after completed induction treatment of intravitreal ranibizumab was 155.5 ± 137.8 μm. Factors significantly associated with changes of central macular thickness were baseline central macular thickness [b = 0.73; 95% (CI): 0.63, 0.84; p = <0.001] and presence of subretinal fluid [b = 35.43; 95% CI: 3.70, 67.16; p = 0.029]., Conclusion: Thicker baseline central macular thickness and presence of subretinal fluid were the factors significantly associated with greater changes of central macular thickness in diabetic macular oedema patients after receiving three injections of intravitreal ranibizumab., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) intravitreal implant (Iluvien ® ) is a corticosteroid implant indicated for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) in patients who have previously received conventional treatment without good response, non-infectious posterior uveitis, and as an off-label treatment of the macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion. FAc is a non-biodegradable 0.19 mg intravitreal implant which is designed to release FAc over 3 years at a rate of approximately 0.2 mcg per day. The aim of this review is to describe the special pharmacological properties of Iluvien and display the outcomes of the most important clinical trials and real-world studies regarding its efficacy and safety for the management of the above retinal disorders., Competing Interests: Yusuf Mushtaq and Maryam M Mushtaq are co-first authors for this study. Lorenzo Motta and Georgios D Panos are co-correspondence authors for this study. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (© 2023 Mushtaq et al.)

Objective: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision impairment and blindness among diabetics. We aimed to explore whether long-term exposure to residential greenness was beneficial to DR., Research Design and Methods: We used data from a large-scale, cross-sectional screening survey conducted in 129 cities of 27 provincial regions of China from 2018 to 2021 among patients with diabetes. We measured residential greenness exposure as the 3-year average of annual maximum Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) at a spatial resolution of 250 m. DR was assessed by ophthalmologists based on fundus photographs. The primary outcome was DR, and secondary outcome included DR severity status (i.e., nonproliferative and proliferative), hallmarks of retinal lesions and macular oedema., Results: A total of 484,380 adult participants with diabetes were included in the current analysis, and 15.7% of them were diagnosed with DR. NDVI was inversely and linearly associated with DR prevalence, and an increment of 0.1 NDVI was associated with a 10% (9%-10%) decrease in DR prevalence. Significant and inverse associations were further found for nonproliferative and proliferative DR, hallmarks of lesions and macular oedema. The association between greenness and DR was stronger among participants who were older, obese, lived in the south, had longer duration of diabetes or did not take antidiabetic medications., Conclusions: This large-scale nationwide study provides the first-hand epidemiological evidence on the associations of residential greenness with DR. Our findings highlight the importance of residential greenness in alleviating DR risk especially in an era of aging and urbanization., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Purpose: Various treatment regimens are currently practiced in the treatment of CI-DMO (centre-involving diabetic macular oedema). In recent years, there has been a growing body of evidence supporting a treat and extend (T&E) regimen for DMO which offers the promise of comparable visual and anatomical outcomes while reducing injection burden. This meta-analysis was hence performed to evaluate the aforementioned outcomes in the treatment of DMO. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria., Methods: A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases was performed. We employed the terms 'treat AND extend AND (diabetic AND macular AND edema OR oedema)' to ensure a comprehensive search. The search workflow adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses., Results: The pooled analysis of the mean number of injections in 1 year for T&E-aflibercept (AFL), T&E-ranibizumab (RBZ) and collectively was 9.1 (95% CI: 7.63-10.63), 10.0 (95% CI: 9.55-10.47) and 9.6 (95% CI: 8.62-10.49), respectively. Improvements in vision at 1 year for T&E-AFL, T&E-RBZ and collectively were 6.26 (95% CI: 3.24-9.29), 7.14 (95% CI: 4.76-9.52) and 7.08 (95% CI: 5.32-8.84) letters, respectively. The improvements in central subfield thickness at 1 year for T&E-AFL, T&E-RBZ and collectively were 131.94 (95% CI: 100.29-163.60), 108.64 (95% CI: 82.82-134.46) and 121.32 (95% CI: 102.89-139.75) microns, respectively., Conclusion: The meta-analysis of T&E for DMO did not show a clear advantage in reducing the number of injections compared to landmark clinical trials with pro-re-nata (PRN) treatment regimens in the first year of treatment with limited gains in visual and anatomical outcomes. However, the T&E approach offers the potential for fewer patient visits, thereby reducing treatment burden. Longer term studies on T&E with a standardised protocol would be required to assess the longevity of the vision gain in the first year despite a likely reduced treatment burden compared to the PRN trials., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Retinal imaging has been a key tool in the diagnosis, evaluation, management and documentation of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular oedema (DMO) for many decades. Imaging technologies have rapidly evolved over the last few decades, yielding images with higher resolution and contrast with less time, effort and invasiveness. While many retinal imaging technologies provide detailed insight into retinal structure such as colour reflectance photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT), others such as fluorescein or OCT angiography and oximetry provide dynamic and functional information. Many other novel imaging technologies are in development and are poised to further enhance our evaluation of patients with DR., (© 2022 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.)

Background: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends macular laser to treat diabetic macular oedema with a central retinal subfield thickness of < 400 µm on optical coherence tomography. The DIAMONDS (DIAbetic Macular Oedema aNd Diode Subthreshold micropulse laser) trial compared standard threshold macular laser with subthreshold micropulse laser to treat diabetic macular oedema suitable for macular laser., Objectives: Determining the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of subthreshold micropulse laser compared with standard threshold macular laser to treat diabetic macular oedema with a central retinal subfield thickness of < 400 µm., Design: A pragmatic, multicentre, allocation-concealed, double-masked, randomised, non-inferiority, clinical trial., Setting: Hospital eye services in the UK., Participants: Adults with diabetes and centre-involving diabetic macular oedema with a central retinal subfield thickness of < 400 µm, and a visual acuity of > 24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (Snellen equivalent > 20/320) in one/both eyes., Interventions: Participants were randomised 1 : 1 to receive 577 nm subthreshold micropulse laser or standard threshold macular laser (e.g. argon laser, frequency-doubled neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet 532 nm laser); laser treatments could be repeated as needed. Rescue therapy with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies or steroids was allowed if a loss of ≥ 10 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters between visits occurred and/or central retinal subfield thickness increased to > 400 µm., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity in the study eye at 24 months (non-inferiority margin 5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters). Secondary outcomes included the mean change from baseline to 24 months in the following: binocular best-corrected visual acuity; central retinal subfield thickness; the mean deviation of the Humphrey 10-2 visual field in the study eye; the percentage of people meeting driving standards; and the EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version, National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire - 25 and Vision and Quality of Life Index scores. Other secondary outcomes were the cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained, adverse effects, number of laser treatments and additional rescue treatments., Results: The DIAMONDS trial recruited fully ( n  = 266); 87% of participants in the subthreshold micropulse laser group and 86% of participants in the standard threshold macular laser group had primary outcome data. Groups were balanced regarding baseline characteristics. Mean best-corrected visual acuity change in the study eye from baseline to month 24 was -2.43 letters (standard deviation 8.20 letters) in the subthreshold micropulse laser group and -0.45 letters (standard deviation 6.72 letters) in the standard threshold macular laser group. Subthreshold micropulse laser was deemed to be not only non-inferior but also equivalent to standard threshold macular laser as the 95% confidence interval (-3.9 to -0.04 letters) lay wholly within both the upper and lower margins of the permitted maximum difference (5 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters). There was no statistically significant difference between groups in any of the secondary outcomes investigated with the exception of the number of laser treatments performed, which was slightly higher in the subthreshold micropulse laser group (mean difference 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.79; p  = 0.002). Base-case analysis indicated no significant difference in the cost per quality-adjusted life-years between groups., Future Work: A trial in people with ≥ 400 µm diabetic macular oedema comparing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy alone with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy and macular laser applied at the time when central retinal subfield thickness has decreased to < 400 µm following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections would be of value because it could reduce the number of injections and, subsequently, costs and risks and inconvenience to patients., Limitations: The majority of participants enrolled had poorly controlled diabetes., Conclusions: Subthreshold micropulse laser was equivalent to standard threshold macular laser but required a slightly higher number of laser treatments., Trial Registration: This trial is registered as EudraCT 2015-001940-12, ISRCTN17742985 and NCT03690050., Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research ( NIHR ) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment ; Vol. 26, No. 50. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Clinical Relevance: Diabetic macular oedema (DME) is a significant cause of visual impairment and inflammation plays an important role in its pathophysiology., Background: This study evaluates the diagnostic value of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in the occurrence of DME in patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy., Methods: In this prospective study, the SII was applied to 150 consecutive patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. The relationship between the SII and the occurrence of DME was examined. Patients with DME were also divided into two subgroups according to the presence of accompanying sub-retinal fluid. The SII value was calculated as follows: platelet count × (neutrophil/lymphocyte). The risk factors for DME were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of SII for predicting DME was performed., Results: Patients with DME had significantly higher levels of SII than those without DME (599.7 ± 279.2 and 464. 9 ± 172.2, respectively, p < 0.001). However, The SII values were similar between sub-retinal fluid subgroups. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that SII, together with duration of diabetes, was an independent factor for DME occurrence [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.005, 95% confidence interval = 1.001-1.009, p = 0.04, and OR = 1.146, 95% CI = 1.049-1.252, p = 0.003, respectively]. ROC curve analysis revealed that the best cut-off value of SII was 399 (area under the curve: 0.633; sensitivity: 70%; specificity: 60%)., Conclusion: An elevated SII value is strongly associated with the development of DME. The SII may be a diagnostic biomarker for identifying DME to improve the risk stratification and management of non-proliferative patients with diabetic retinopathy.

Purpose: To evaluate choroidal vascularity index (CVI) after a single dose of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in refractory diabetic macular oedema (DME)., Methods: Total choroidal area, luminal area, and CVI were measured at baseline, 1st month, and at 3rd month after dexamethasone implant using binarization of enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) images., Results: A total of 25 eyes of 25 patients (mean age: 61.4 ± 8.3 years; 12 males, 13 females), were enroled in the study. All eyes had been previously treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections (mean number of injections 4.6 ± 2.5). Mean CVI was 70.3 ± 8.1 prior to intravitreal dexamethasone treatment. It was decreased to 66.1 ± 9.3 at 1 month and 63.5 ± 10.1 at 3 months after treatment. The mean CVI was significantly decreased at 3 months compared with pre-treatment measures (p = 0.033)., Conclusion: CVI was found to be decreased in patients who responded to intravitreal dexamethasone implant., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DME), and macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) are leading causes of vision loss, currently managed with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (anti-VEGF). The aim of this study was to calculate QALYs in patients with nAMD, DME, and CRVO treated with anti-VEGF agents (QALYs + ) in a Greek tertiary hospital setting and compare them to theoretical QALYs that the patients would have without treatment (QALYs - )., Material and Methods: The study included 143 treatment-naive patients with macular oedema due to nAMD (n = 79), DME (n = 57), and CRVO (n = 7), who received anti-VEGF injections as monotherapy according to the Treat-and-Extend (T&E) protocol. The anti-VEGF agents were ranibizumab and aflibercept in equivalent fractions. QALYs where calculated by the formula QALY = Utility Value × Time, where "Time" refers to the follow-up period of the study. For QALYs - , we assumed that visual acuity remained unchanged during this period., Results: Mean follow-up time was 1.3 ± 1.2 years in the nAMD group, 1 ± 1.3 years in the DME group, and 0.5 ± 1 years in the CRVO group. There was no statistically significant difference between QALYs - and QALYs + in all three ocular pathologies for the study period (p > 0.05 for each of the three statistical tests performed)., Discussion/conclusion: Possible explanations for the lack of significant difference between QALYs - and QALYs + in nAMD, DME, and CRVO groups, may be the short time horizon used in this analysis, the inclusion of data from the better-seeing eye (BSE) and the specific socio-economic, geographical and health care characteristics of this rural Greek area., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Diabetic retinopathy is a frequent complication in diabetes and a leading cause of visual impairment. Regular eye screening is imperative to detect sight-threatening stages of diabetic retinopathy such as proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema in order to treat these before irreversible visual loss occurs. Screening is cost-effective and has been implemented in various countries in Europe and elsewhere. Along with optimised diabetes care, this has substantially reduced the risk of visual loss. Nevertheless, the growing number of patients with diabetes poses an increasing burden on healthcare systems and automated solutions are needed to alleviate the task of screening and improve diagnostic accuracy. Deep learning by convolutional neural networks is an optimised branch of artificial intelligence that is particularly well suited to automated image analysis. Pivotal studies have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for classifying advanced stages of diabetic retinopathy and identifying diabetic macular oedema in optical coherence tomography scans. Based on this, different algorithms have obtained regulatory approval for clinical use and have recently been implemented to some extent in a few countries. Handheld mobile devices are another promising option for self-monitoring, but so far they have not demonstrated comparable image quality to that of fundus photography using non-portable retinal cameras, which is the gold standard for diabetic retinopathy screening. Such technology has the potential to be integrated in telemedicine-based screening programmes, enabling self-captured retinal images to be transferred virtually to reading centres for analysis and planning of further steps. While emerging technologies have shown a lot of promise, clinical implementation has been sparse. Legal obstacles and difficulties in software integration may partly explain this, but it may also indicate that existing algorithms may not necessarily integrate well with national screening initiatives, which often differ substantially between countries., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: The intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-I) is an alternative to anti-VEGF for the first-line treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DME). However, several questions remain regarding its routine use and its place in certain situations not always specified in current recommendations. A national consensus approach was, therefore, initiated by French retinal experts., Methods: An iterative Delphi consensus approach was used. A steering committee (SC) of seven experts analysed data from the literature to formulate statements divided into five key areas of treatment. These statements were submitted to the independent and anonymous electronic vote of 87 French retina experts among whom 39 expressed their opinion and therefore constituted the voting panel., Results: After two rounds of voting, 22 and 7 of 38 statements received a strong consensus and a good consensus, respectively. The consensus level was higher for statements regarding first-line indications and safety of DEX-I compared to those regarding efficacy assessment, reprocessing time or pathophysiological biomarkers. The panellists recommended the preferential use of DEX-I for patients with limited availability for multiple injections, those who needed to undergo cataract surgery or who had a recent cardiovascular history, and as a therapeutic alternative to anti-VEGF in patients with a history of vitrectomy, retinal serous detachment, hyper-reflective points or dry exudates in optical coherence tomography (OCT). However, some statements proposed by SC experts were not validated., Conclusion: This study provides some key recommendations to clinicians treating diabetic macular oedema, which may be useful when using intravitreal dexamethasone implants in daily practice.

The pathophysiology of diabetic macular oedema (DME) remains poorly understood. Proteomic analysis of the vitreous using mass spectrometry (MS) can potentially identify proteins of pathophysiological importance. In this systematic review, we summarize the available evidence on protein changes in DME detected by MS. We systematically searched 13 literature databases on 19 September 2021. Eligible studies were defined as those using samples from human eyes with DME analysed with MS. Two authors assessed the studies for eligibility, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias independently. Six eligible studies were identified. All were designed in a cross-sectional fashion comparing results to either a non-diabetic control group or a control group without DME. A total of 62 eyes from 60 patients contributed as study group and 48 eyes from 48 patients served as control group. Proteomic analyses revealed significant differences in the vitreous protein levels in patients with DME when compared with controls. Three studies or more identified increased contents of apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein A-II, apolipoprotein A-IV, apolipoprotein C-III, gelsolin, pigment epithelium-derived factor, serum albumin, transthyretin, vitamin D-binding protein in DME. Two studies found increased levels of complement factors B and C3. Protein changes reproduced across the studies suggested that DME was associated with retinal lipid accumulation, angiogenesis, retinal protective mechanisms, inflammation and complement activation. Proteome studies support the multifactorial pathogenesis of DME as proteins with highly different biological functions are regulated in DME. An important number of proteins differ, provide pathophysiological insight and suggest the direction for future research., (© 2022 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Frequent intravitreal anti-VEGF injections are impractical for many Aboriginal patients with diabetic macular oedema (DMO). The longer acting intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-implant) is approved for DMO but has not been assessed in an Aboriginal population., Methods: This was a prospective, multicentre, randomised, single-masked, non-inferiority clinical trial. Aboriginal adults from Western Australia with DMO were randomised to receive 3-monthly DEX-implant, or monthly intravitreal bevacizumab. The primary outcome was the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months., Results: The final endpoint was analysed for 24 DEX-implant and 28 bevacizumab injection eyes. Mean BCVA improved by 4.0 letters (-0.08 LogMAR) in the DEX-implant group and worsened by 5.5 letters (0.11 LogMAR) in the bevacizumab group. Before adjusting for cataract surgery, the upper bound of the two-sided 90% CI for the DEX-implant was 3.5 letters (0.07 LogMAR), which met non-inferiority criteria. The BCVA of remote participants who received the DEX-implant improved by 5.5 letters (0.11 LogMAR), compared to an 18.5 letter (0.37 LogMAR) decline for bevacizumab (p = 0.04). The incidence of steroid-induced ocular hypertension for the DEX-implant was 33.3%., Conclusions: Before adjusting for the effect of cataract surgery, the DEX-implant was non-inferior to bevacizumab for treating DMO in Aboriginal participants. In remote participants, the DEX-implant surpassed non-inferiority to achieve superior outcomes to bevacizumab. The incidence of steroid-induced hypertension was comparable to that reported in non-Aboriginal populations. We provide guidelines for the judicious use of DEX-implant among Aboriginal people, and a framework for performing ophthalmic clinical trials in Aboriginal communities., (© 2022 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.)

Purpose: In eyes with diabetic macular oedema (DME), aqueous humour (AH) cytokine levels before and after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment were compared and correlated with optical coherence tomography structural parameters., Methods: This prospective study included 56 control patients with cataracts and 83 patients with DME manifesting as diffuse retinal thickening (DRT), cystoid macular oedema and serous retinal detachment (SRD). AH samples were obtained before intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF or cataract surgery. VEGF, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-10, interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) levels were measured by multiplex bead assay. AH cytokine levels, central macular thickness (CMT), number of hyper-reflective foci (HF), continuity of external limiting membrane and ellipsoid zone (EZ) and best-corrected visual acuity were evaluated., Results: In SRD, IL-6 and MCP-1 levels and HF were increased (all p < 0.05) compared to DRT. At baseline, the number of HF was correlated with VEGF, IL-6, IL-8, IP-10 and MCP-1 (all p < 0.05). Eyes sensitive to anti-VEGF treatment had high baseline levels of VEGF, MCP-1, HF and many EZ disruptions (all p < 0.05). DME patients with normal VEGF levels but with high levels of IL-8, IP-10 and MCP-1 (all p < 0.05) had little change in CMT after anti-VEGF treatment (p = 0.678)., Conclusions: AH concentrations of some inflammatory cytokines in DME were differentially expressed among the three DME morphologies. HF was associated with VEGF and other inflammatory cytokine levels. Multiple HF at baseline predicted a significant decrease in CMT, and eyes with normal VEGF but increased inflammatory cytokines may be insensitive to anti-VEGF treatment., (© 2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aim: To determine the association and the prognostic value of soluble ST2 (sST2) levels in the development of diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular oedema (DMO) or diabetic nephropathy (DN), in a cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D)., Methods: A total of 269 individuals with T1D (154 males and 115 females) were recruited. The overall mean age was 43.2±14.9 years, and the diabetes duration was 17.1±12.1 years. Levels of sST2 in serum were evaluated, and the presence as well as the degree of DR, DMO and DN was recorded. Additionally, other clinical and analytical parameters including demographic variables were recovered from patients' electronic health record. Ten years later, the presence and stage of DR, DMO and DN were again recorded under the same criteria. The association between previously mentioned parameters with DR and DN was analysed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The variables in the final multivariate models were adjusted from complete models via backward elimination and maintained only when significant., Results: An increase of 10ng/ml in the levels of sST2 was associated with a 1.50 (1.02-2.19) and 1.48 (1.05-2.08) prevalence odds ratio (OR) in DMO and DR, respectively. There was no association between sST2 levels and DN. Meanwhile, sST2 levels did not display a prognostic effect in any of the microangiopathic diabetic complications studied., Conclusions: Levels of sST2 are associated with the presence of DR and DMO, they do not seem to be predictive for the development or deterioration of DR, DMO or DN., (Copyright © 2021 SEEN and SED. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare visual acuity (VA) change at 24 months in eyes with clinically significant DME (CSDME) and good VA initially treated versus initially observed in routine clinical practice., Methods: Retrospective analysis of treatment-naïve eyes with CSDME and good VA (baseline VA ≥ 79 letters), with at least 24 months of follow-up and initially managed with treatment (intravitreal treatment and/or macular laser) or observation with possible treatment after 4 months that were tracked in a prospectively designed observational registry., Results: We identified 150 eligible eyes (98 initially observed, 52 initially treated) of 130 patients. The proportion of eyes with at least a 5-letter VA loss at 24 months was not significantly different between the groups: 65% with initial observation and 42% with initial treatment (p = 0.39). However, initially observed eyes were more likely to have a 10-letter VA loss at 24 months (OR = 4.6, p = 0.022). Most of eyes in the initial observation group received at least one treatment (an intravitreal injection in 66% and macular laser in 20%) during the 24-month period., Conclusions: The risk of 5 letters loss was similar between both management groups. However, initially observed eyes were more at risk of developing moderate visual loss and more than 80% of them required treatment over 24 months., (© 2020 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Purpose: To identify parameters that can predict the postoperative risk for progression of retinopathy to a vision-threatening stage after cataract surgery. This may optimize the timing of surgery and the postoperative follow-up strategy in diabetic patients., Methods: Multi-state survival analysis with death as competing risk was used to investigate how year of onset and age of onset of diabetes, gender, body mass index, HbA1c and blood pressure had affected the risk for developing diabetic macular oedema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) among 2540 right eyes from 2797 diabetic patients operated for cataract on one or both eyes during 25 years until July 1. 2019., Results: Cataract surgery had been performed in 98.8% of patients reaching 90 years of age. The risk for developing both DME and PDR was increased by cataract surgery. The risk was highest during the first postoperative years and increased by pre-operative variability in HbA1c. The risk after more than 20 years postoperatively increased by increased cumulative HbA1c pre-operatively. The other studied risk factors contributed differently to the development of the two complications., Conclusions: Decision models for the timing of cataract surgery in diabetic patients should consider that the risk for developing vision-threatening retinopathy depends on follow-up time. Differences in the risk profiles for developing DME and PDR after cataract surgery support that the two complications should be regarded as separate late complications., (© 2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: This study aimed to compare anatomical and functional outcomes between patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) with diabetic macular oedema (DME) who adhered to intravitreal aflibercept therapy and patients lost to follow-up (LTFU)., Methods: We enrolled 200 patients and recorded the interval between each procedure and the subsequent follow-up visit. Moreover, visual acuity (VA) and anatomical outcomes were measured at each follow-up examination., Results: Among the patients, 103 (51%) patients adhered to intravitreal aflibercept therapy and follow-up examination while 97 (49%) patients were LTFU. Forty-six (47%) patients LTFU who returned for further treatment showed a significant decrease in VA from 0.51 (±0.46) to 0.89 (±0.38) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) after 48 months (p = 0.004). Compared with the adherent group, the return group showed a worse VA at 48 months (p = 0.036). Further, 1 (1%) patient in the adherent group and 8 (17%) patients in the return group developed a proliferative DR. Patients who were LTFU had a 13.0 times greater chance to develop a proliferative DR (p = 0.022)., Conclusions: Patients who did not adhere to intravitreal aflibercept therapy for DME showed significantly worse visual outcomes compared to patients with good therapy adherence. Moreover, patients with LTFU had a 13 times higher risk of developing a proliferative DR. Considering the potential disease progress, better strategies should be applied to optimize the functional outcome of patients at risk of reduced adherence., (© 2021 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Diabetic macular oedema (DME) is considered a chronic inflammatory disease associated with aberrations in many intraocular cytokines. Studies assessing the role of these cytokines as biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of DME have demonstrated inconsistent findings. We quantitatively summarized data related to 116 candidate aqueous and vitreous inflammatory cytokines as biomarkers in DME. A systematic search without year limitation was performed up to 19 October 2020. Studies were included if they provided data on aqueous or vitreous cytokine concentrations in patients with DME. Effect sizes were generated as standardized mean differences (SMDs) of cytokine concentrations between patients with DME and controls. Data were extracted from 128 studies that included 4163 study eyes with DME and 1281 control eyes. Concentrations (standard mean difference, 95% confidence interval and p-value) of aqueous IL-6 (1.28, 0.57-2.00, p = 0.004), IL-8 (1.06, 0.74-1.39, p < 0.00001), MCP-1 (1.36, 0.57-2.16, p = 0.0008) and VEGF (1.31, 1.01-1.62, p < 0.00001) and vitreous VEGF (2.27, 1.55-2.99, p < 0.00001) were significantly higher in patients with DME (n = 4163) compared to healthy controls (n = 1281). No differences, failed sensitivity analyses or insufficient data were found between patients with DME and healthy controls for the concentrations of the remaining cytokines. This analysis implicates multiple cytokine biomarker candidates other than VEGF in DME and clarifies previously reported inconsistent associations. As the therapeutic options for DME expand to include multiple agents with multiple targets, it will be critical to manage the treatment burden with tailored therapy that optimizes outcomes and minimizes treatment burden. Intraocular cytokines have the promise of providing a robust individualized assessment of disease status and response to therapy. We have identified key candidate cytokines that may serve as biomarkers in individualized treatment algorithms., (© 2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: The MERCURY study aimed to evaluate the effects on visual acuity and psychological symptoms, and safety, of ranibizumab and subsequent treatment in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DME) and impaired visual acuity (VA). We report data from the prespecified 12-month interim analysis., Methods: This was a 24-month, phase 4, open-label, single-arm, prospective, observational study conducted at 20 specialised retinal centres in Japan. Participants were 209 patients with DME and impaired VA, not previously treated with either intravitreal or systemic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, who initiated ranibizumab 0.5 mg per investigator discretion. Following ranibizumab administration, patients were treated per routine clinical practice. Other treatments were allowed. The main outcome measure was the mean change in best-corrected VA (BCVA) in logarithmic minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) from baseline to month 12. An exploratory objective was to assess patients' psychological status using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)., Results: The mean ± standard deviation BCVA at baseline was 0.43 ± 0.39 logMAR. The mean number of injections of ranibizumab and anti-VEGF agents from baseline to month 11 was 3.2 ± 2.0 and 3.6 ± 2.4, respectively. The BCVA change from baseline to 12 months was - 0.08 ± 0.34 logMAR (p = 0.011), showing a significant improvement; the HADS-anxiety score also decreased significantly (p = 0.001) and the depression score decreased numerically (p = 0.080)., Conclusion: MERCURY study data confirm the effectiveness of real-world treatment initiated with ranibizumab in Japanese patients with DME. In addition, treatment was able to positively influence anxiety via VA improvement., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Clinical relevance : Optical coherence tomography biomarkers are dynamic and possibly change over time. The dynamic biomarkers may better predict improvement of final vision than those at baseline for diabetic macular oedema after treatment. Background : To investigate predictors for ellipsoid zone (EZ) dynamics and the association with visual acuity after treatment for diabetic macular oedema Methods : A total of 135 eyes from 135 patients with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular oedema were retrospectively enrolled in this study. EZ status was evaluated by optical coherence tomography at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-operatively. Macular perfusion status was analysed by fluorescein angiography. Duration of EZ disruption was quantified by giving scores from 0 to 5 based on the sum of visits with evidence of EZ disruption. Linear regression models were used to predict factors for scores of EZ disruption. Binary logistic regression was used to predict various EZ biomarkers for final visual acuity improvement. Results : Thirty of 87 eyes (34.4%) with intact EZ at baseline developed subsequent EZ disruption. For those with EZ disruption at baseline, 17 of 48 (35.4%) patients had restoration of disrupted EZ over time. Non-perfused macula was associated with both earlier development of EZ disruption and poor restoration (p < 0.001 and p = 0.011, respectively). Non-perfused macula, absence of epiretinal membrane, and EZ disruption at baseline predicted higher EZ scores (p < 0.001, p = 0.022 and p < 0.001, respectively). Higher EZ scores (p = 0.016), but not baseline EZ disruption (p = 0.56), were less likely to have improvement of final vision 5 letters or more. Conclusion : Macular perfusion status played an independent role in EZ dynamics. Duration of EZ disruption could be more predictive than baseline status for improvement of vision over 12 months.

Background and Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of a switch back to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in diabetic macular oedema (DME) eyes treated temporarily with a dexamethasone implant (DEXi), after an initial poor response to anti-VEGF., Methods: The study involved a case series., Results: Twenty-three eyes of 17 patients were included. All were poorly responsive to anti-VEGF and switched to a DEXi after a mean of 12 anti-VEGF injections. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) increased from 0.25 ± 0.19 (decimals) to 0.29 ± 0.20 after switching to the DEXi (p = 0.11). BCVA remained stable (0.31 ± 0.23; p = 0.11) after switching back to anti-VEGF, one month after the last injection. The mean central macular thickness (CMT) decreased significantly from 517.0 ± 128.5 μm to 343.4 ± 118.9 μm (p < 0.001) after switching to the DEXi. In eyes receiving ≥3 anti-VEGF injections during the switch back, the CMT 1 month after the last anti-VEGF injection was significantly decreased compared to the CMT before the switch to the DEXi (mean change of - 95.55 ± 89.82 μm, p = 0.005)., Conclusion: Switching back poorly responsive DME eyes to anti-VEGF after temporary DEXi therapy is associated with good anatomical and visual outcomes similar to those obtained with the DEXi, provided that at least 3 anti-VEGF injections are administered. The DEXi might restore retinal sensitivity to anti-VEGF., (© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: Diabetic macular oedema (DMO), a complication of diabetes, causes vision loss and blindness. Corticosteroids are usually used as a second-line treatment. The aim of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone implants compared to cheaper and more frequently applied triamcinolone injections., Methods: Markov-modelling, which incorporated both eyes, was used for economic evaluation. The model consisted of five health states based on visual acuity, illustrating the progression of DMO. A cycle length of five months was chosen for dexamethasone and four months for triamcinolone. Time horizons of two and five years were applied. Transition probabilities and health state utilities were sourced from previous studies. The perspective used in this analysis was the hospital perspective. The health care costs were acquired from Kuopio University Hospital in Finland., Results: In this cost-effectiveness analysis, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ICER with 3% discount rate was €56 591/QALY for a two-year follow-up and -€1 110 942/QALY for a five-year follow-up. In order to consider dexamethasone as cost-effective over a 2-year time horizon, the WTP needs to be around €55 000/QALY. Over the five-year follow-up, triamcinolone is clearly a dominant treatment. Sensitivity analyses support the cost-effectiveness of dexamethasone over a 2-year time horizon., Conclusions: Since the sensitivity analyses support the results, dexamethasone would be a cost-effective treatment during the first two years with WTP threshold around €55 000/QALY, and triamcinolone would be a convenient treatment after that. This recommendation is in line with the guidelines of EURETINA., (© 2021 The Authors. Acta Ophthalmologica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between microaneurysm (MA) density and residual oedema after intravitreal injection of an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agent for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO)., Methods: Patients with DMO were divided into those with residual oedema (RO) and those with no residual oedema (NRO) by the presence and absence of oedema at 1 month after intravitreal injection of either aflibercept or ranibizumab. We then compared MA density, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) and size of the severely thickened area, as indicated by a white area (WA) on optical coherence tomography., Results: We examined 48 eyes in the RO group and 25 eyes in the NRO group (n = 73). In both groups, the CRT and WA size significantly decreased and BCVA improved at 1 month and thereafter. CRT was significantly higher and BCVA was poor in the RO group at 1 and 3 months, while WA size was larger at 1, 3 and 6 months compared with the NRO group (p < 0.05). The number of injections in the RO group (3.62 ± 1.75) was larger than the NRO group (1.89 ± 0.97; p < 0.0001). At 1 and 6 months, the MA density in the area with persistent oedema was significantly higher than in the area with improved oedema (1 month: p = 0.0001, 6 months: p = 0.029)., Conclusion: High MA density and extensive swelling may be characteristic of RO following treatment for DMO with intravitreal injection of either aflibercept or ranibizumab., (© 2020 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: To evaluate the changes in the mean macular intercapillary area (ICA) from sequential enface optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images following intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in initially treatment-naïve eyes with diabetic macular oedema (DME)., Methods: In this multicentre retrospective study, 6 × 6 and 3 × 3 mm customised, total retinal projection enface OCTA images were collected and processed for quantitative assessment of ICA by a customised MATLAB software. Measurements were done in concentric regions centred on the fovea-with the exclusion of foveal avascular zone (FAZ)-in 0.5 mm diameter increments as well as within the intervening rings., Results: In this study, 6 × 6 mm OCTA images from 46 eyes of 29 patients, and 3 × 3 mm OCTA images from 23 eyes of 15 patients were included. There was no significant change in mean ICA after treatment in either scan size or in any measurement regions (all p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that baseline BCVA was significantly correlated with the visual outcome (p = 0.039). Additionally, after correction for age, baseline central retinal thickness (CRT), baseline BCVA, and retinopathy severity, mean ICA in the 1.5 mm circle was found to be a significant predictor of post treatment CRT, (p = 0.006)., Conclusions: Absence of significant change in mean ICA after a minimum of three intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, may indicate that, in the short term, anti-VEGF injections neither impair nor improve macular perfusion in DME. Baseline BCVA was found to be a robust predictor of functional outcome, while inner mean ICA was a significant predictor for macular thickness outcomes., (© 2021 Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Ophthalmologists.)

Purpose: To report evolution and predictive value of intracystic hyperreflective material (ICHRM) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in centre-involving diabetic macular oedema (CI-DME)., Methods: Demographic and OCT features of patients with treatment-naïve CI-DME were analysed retrospectively. OCT parameters noted were macular oedema type, ICHRM presence, presence of hyperreflective spots, disorganised inner retinal layers and outer retinal layers integrity. Eyes were grouped into group 1 CI-DME without ICHRM and group 2 CI-DME with ICHRM. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were done to study the correlation between various OCT features and final vision., Results: In this study, 62 eyes of 50 patients were included in group 1 and 61 eyes of 51 patients in group 2. Mean presenting logMAR vision in groups 1 and 2 was 0.374 ± 0.346 and 0.523 ± 0.369 respectively. Poor final visual acuity was noted in CI-DME with ICHRM group (p = 0.015). On linear regression analysis, 3 OCT features, namely, ICHRM presence (p = 0.034), inner segment-outer segment layer disruption (p = 0.001) and ellipsoid zone defects (p = 0.003), were associated with poor final vision. More intravitreal anti-VEGF (2.98 vs 0.629) and steroid (1.51 vs 0.242) injections were required for macular oedema resolution in ICHRM group., Conclusion: This study is the first to assess the ICHRM on OCT as predictor for treatment outcome in DME eyes. We described its evolution during the DME management and its plausible influence on intravitreal therapy. We believe that this finding has the potential to become a novel biomarker for predicting the visual outcome in DME., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: To examine whether real-world clinical patients with macular oedema (MO) receiving intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy have a higher mortality compared with a matched reference population., Methods: A population-based, retrospective cohort study of 26 386 patients from Finland, from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2017. Index patients were identified through the Caring Epidemiology Project database, receiving at least one intravitreal anti-VEGF injection for wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD, n = 2243, 48.61%), diabetic MO (n = 744, 16.12%), MO due to retinal vascular occlusion (n = 589, 12.77%), or other MO (n = 1038, 22.5%). For each individual treated with intravitreal injection (n = 4614), five age- , sex- , calendar year- and hospital district- matched control individuals (n = 21 772) were chosen. Baseline data of chronic conditions were available. All-cause and cause-specific mortality was analysed using Cox´s proportional hazards model., Results: In general, the anti-VEGF treated patients had a higher prevalence of systemic conditions, including diabetes (60.1% vs. 46.8%, p < 0.001), chronic hypertension (38.4% vs. 34.6%, p < 0.001), in hospital-treated ischaemic heart disease (23.1% vs. 21.5%, p = 0.014), and glaucoma (11.1% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.001) than controls. There was no difference in all-cause mortality between the anti-VEGF treated patients and matched controls (p = 0.62). In unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis of wet AMD subgroup, all-cause mortality was lower in anti-VEGF treated patients than matched controls (p = 0.015), but adjusted Cox´s proportional hazards model showed no difference in the risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.66-1.09)., Conclusions: Intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy was not associated with an increase in the risk of mortality in patients with MO compared with age- and sex-matched controls., (© 2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: To investigate the risk of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) associated with the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study by analysing a large multi-institutional electronic medical records database in Taiwan. We included adult patients with T2DM without DMO newly receiving either SGLT2 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) during the period 2016 to 2018. We used propensity scores with inverse probability of treatment weighting to generate comparable groups. The study outcome was incident DMO, determined by clinical diagnosis during outpatient visits or admissions. We followed patients from the index date to either DMO occurrence, last clinical visit, patient death, or December 31, 2020. We performed Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of DMO., Results: We included 9986 new users of SGLT2 inhibitors (mean [SD] age 59.6 (12.1) years, median [interquartile range {IQR}] glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 70 (61-81)mmol/mol, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] 89.1 [71.4-108.7] mL/min/1.73 m 2 and urine albumin-creatinine ratio [UACR] 26.1 [9.7-117.6] mg/g) and 1067 new users of GLP-1RAs (mean [SD] age 58.4 (41.5) years, median [IQR] HbA1c 73 [64-84] mmol/mol, eGFR 91.6 [68.6-114.0] mL/min/1.73 m 2 and UACR 37.6 [11.1-153.2] mg/g) with similar baseline characteristics. Lower DMO risks were observed among patients newly receiving SGLT2 inhibitors (7.9/1000 person-years), compared to those receiving GLP-1RAs (10.7/1000 person-years) with an HR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.88)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with lower risk of DMO in T2DM patients in clinical practice, compared to use of GLP-1RAs. Future studies are necessary to confirm this observation., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is one of the leading causes of vision loss associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR). New insights in managing this condition have changed the paradigm in its treatment, with intravitreal injections of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) having become the standard therapy for DMO worldwide. However, there is no single standard therapy for all patients DMO refractory to anti-VEGF treatment; thus, further investigation is still needed. The key obstacles in developing suitable therapeutics for refractory DMO lie in its complex pathophysiology; therefore, there is an opportunity for further improvements in the progress and applications of new drugs. Previous studies have indicated that Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase/ROCK) is an essential molecule in the pathogenesis of DMO. This is why the Rho/ROCK signalling pathway has been proposed as a possible target for new treatments. The present review focuses on the recent progress on the possible role of ROCK and its therapeutic potential in DMO. A systematic literature search was performed, covering the years 1991 to 2021, using the following keywords: "rho-Associated Kinas-es", "Diabetic Retinopathy", "Macular Edema", "Ripasudil", "Fasudil" and "Netarsudil". Better insight into the pathological role of Rho-kinase/ROCK may lead to the development of new strategies for refractory DMO treatment and prevention.

Purpose: To evaluate the characteristics of corneal parameters in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DME) treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections., Methods: Participants in this study were 36 patients with DME, treated with either intravitreal ranibizumab ( n  = 16) or aflibercept ( n  = 20). All participants underwent best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement, optical coherence tomography and non-contact specular microscopy to evaluate corneal endothelium parameters (endothelial cell density-ECD, hexagonality, coefficient of variation of the cell size and central corneal thickness-CCT), at baseline and at months 6 and 12 after the first intravitreal injection. Comparisons between baseline and months 6 and 12 were performed., Results: There was no statistically significant difference regarding ECD, hexagonality, coefficient of variation of the cell size and CCT at month 6 and 12 post initial injection compared to baseline in patients with DME. BCVA improved significantly at month 6 and 12 compared to baseline ( p  < 0.001 for both comparisons). Central retinal thickness was significantly reduced at month 6 and 12 compared to baseline ( p  < 0.001 for both comparisons)., Conclusion: Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections in patients with DME were found not to affect corneal parameters, namely ECD, hexagonality, coefficient of variation of the cell size and CCT at the long-term follow-up of 12 months.

Background/aims: To assess structural and functional outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (®Eylea) for diabetic macular oedema in treatment-naïve patients., Methods: Sixty-four eyes receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included in the data analysis of this retrospective, real-life study which follow-up was 3 years. Each patient had corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters and optical coherence tomography central foveal thickness and macular volume performed at baseline, 12, 24 and 36 months. Patients were initiated on a loading phase of five 1-monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections, followed by injections if needed as per clinicians' discretion., Results: The mean number of aflibercept injections received over 3 years was 12.59. At baseline, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation) (Snellen) was 61.45 (16.30) (20/63) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, the mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 422 (138) µm, while the mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 9.51 (2.01) mm 3 . At 36 months, the mean visual acuity (standard deviation) (Snellen) was 68.34 (13.66) (20/50) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (p = .0003). Mean central foveal thickness (standard deviation) was 303 (106) µm (p < .0001) and mean macular volume (standard deviation) was 8.35 (1.62) mm 3 (p = .0022) at 36 months. Sixteen (25%) eyes gained ≥15 ETDRS letters at month 36, and 33 (52%) eyes had a decrease in central foveal thickness of ≥ 100 µm at the same time., Conclusion: There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and in anatomical outcomes in aflibercept-treated eyes at 36 months after commencing treatment for diabetic macular oedema in real-life settings. The good vision and anatomical outcomes were maintained over second and third year of treatment with mean 2.93 and 2.57 intravitreal injections, respectively.

Purpose: To assess visual and optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical outcomes of treatment with intravitreal aflibercept (Eylea®) for diabetic macular oedema in patients switched from intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis®)., Design: Retrospective, cohort study., Participants: Ninety eyes (of 67 patients) receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy were included., Methods: This is a retrospective, real-life, cohort study. Each patient had visual acuity measurements and optical coherence tomography scans performed at baseline and 12 months after the first injection of aflibercept was given., Main Outcome Measures: We measured visual acuities in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, central foveal thickness and macular volume at baseline and at 12 months after the first aflibercept injection was given., Results: Ninety switched eyes were included in this study. The mean (standard deviation) visual acuity was 63 (15.78) Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters. At baseline, the mean (standard deviation) central foveal thickness was 417.7 (158.4) μm and the mean macular volume was 9.96 (2.44) mm 3 . Mean change in visual acuity was +4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (p = 0.0053). The mean change in macular volume was -1.53 mm 3 in SW group (p = 0.21), while the change in central foveal thickness was -136.8 μm (p = 0.69)., Conclusion: There was a significant improvement in visual acuity and in anatomical outcomes in the switched group at 12 months after commencing treatment with aflibercept for diabetic macular oedema.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to report the long-term efficacy and safety of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN ® ) in pseudophakic eyes with diabetic macular oedema in a multi-ethnic patient cohort., Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective analysis of patients with persistent diabetic macular oedema, despite previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and/or steroid treatment, treated with the ILUVIEN implant according to national guidelines. Patients with follow-up of less than 24 months were excluded. Best corrected visual acuity, central retinal thickness and intraocular pressure were evaluated at baseline and month 3, 12, 24 and 36 post-treatment. A sub-group analysis was performed on eyes with 36-month follow-up data., Results: In total, 24 eyes (24 patients) completed at least 24 months of follow-up, of which 9 completed 36 months of follow-up. Three-fourths of the patients were black or South Asian (blacks, Asians and minority ethnic). Improvement in mean best corrected visual acuity was seen at year 1 and year 3 improving from 0.62 LogMAR at baseline to 0.55 LogMAR at year 1 and 0.47 LogMAR at year 3 (all p > 0.05). Mean central retinal thickness also showed a progressive reduction from 471 μm at baseline to 397 μm at year 1 and 339 μm at year 3 (all p < 0.05). Four eyes required intraocular pressure-lowering drops post-implant. Supplementary treatment for persistent or recurrent diabetic macular oedema was necessary in 13 eyes over the total study period of 3 years. Blacks, Asians and minority ethnic patients had a worse response compared with white patients., Conclusion: The ILUVIEN implant was effective and safe in the treatment of multi-ethnic patients with diabetic macular oedema refractory to conventional therapies, improving the vision and macular anatomy, without significant adverse events up to 36 months post-treatment.

Purpose: To predict the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapeutic response of diabetic macular oedema (DME) patients from optical coherence tomography (OCT) at the initiation stage of treatment using a machine learning-based self-explainable system., Methods: A total of 712 DME patients were included and classified into poor and good responder groups according to central macular thickness decrease after three consecutive injections. Machine learning models were constructed to make predictions based on related features extracted automatically using deep learning algorithms from OCT scans at baseline. Five-fold cross-validation was applied to optimize and evaluate the models. The model with the best performance was then compared with two ophthalmologists. Feature importance was further investigated, and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to assess the difference of a single feature between two groups., Results: Of 712 patients, 294 were poor responders and 418 were good responders. The best performance for the prediction task was achieved by random forest (RF), with sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.900, 0.851 and 0.923. Ophthalmologist 1 and ophthalmologist 2 reached sensitivity of 0.775 and 0.750, and specificity of 0.716 and 0.821, respectively. The sum of hyperreflective dots was found to be the most relevant feature for prediction., Conclusion: An RF classifier was constructed to predict the treatment response of anti-VEGF from OCT images of DME patients with high accuracy. The algorithm contributes to predicting treatment requirements in advance and provides an optimal individualized therapeutic regimen., (© 2020 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: To report clinical outcomes of two different timings of intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant administration for prevention of diabetic macular oedema (DME) worsening following cataract surgery., Methods: This multicentre, retrospective study included patients with DME who received an intravitreal DEX implant 1 month before cataract surgery, 'precataract DEX' group, or at the time of cataract surgery, 'concomitant treatments' group. Inclusion criteria were a follow-up ≥3 months and ophthalmological examination with optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging at baseline (cataract surgery) and throughout follow-up. Anatomical improvement was considered to be a decrease in OCT central subfield (CSF) thickness ≥20% compared to baseline. The primary outcomes were anatomical and functional results at 3 months., Results: Two hundred twenty-one patients were included: 136 in the 'precataract DEX' group and 85 in the 'concomitant treatments' group. At 3 months, a reduction of CSF thickness ≥ 20% was found in 7.3% of eyes in the 'precataract DEX group' and in 83.7% of eyes in the 'concomitant treatments' group (p < 0.001), with mean CSF thickness lower in the latter group (371 ± 52 µm versus 325 ± 57 µm, p < 0.001). At 3 months, mean best-corrected visual acuity had improved from baseline in both groups (p < 0.001), with no difference between groups (p = 0. 20). No serious systemic adverse events were reported., Conclusion: Both approaches prevented a worsening of DME, showing a comparable visual outcome. Dexamethasone (DEX) implant given at the same time as cataract surgery provided a better anatomical outcome., (© 2020 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)