Search

Objective: Our study was a prospective in vivo study to evaluate whether MR angiography is suitable for assessing stent patency and grading in-stent stenoses and to examine whether the accuracy of MR angiography changes with time after stent implantation., Subjects and Methods: In a prospective study, 34 iliac stenoses in 27 patients were treated by implantation of 35 nitinol stents. MR angiography was performed immediately after stent placement for 32 stents, and both digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and MR angiography were repeated at the 6-month follow-up for 23 stents. Three blinded observers assessed stent patency and the degree of in-stent stenoses on MR angiography and DSA (the standard of reference) images. The difference between the observers' grading of stenoses on DSA and on MR angiography was determined. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student's t test for paired samples., Results: Stent patency was assessed correctly for all stents and both sets of MR angiography images. Evaluation of DSA 1 images (obtained at end of implantation procedure) revealed that 96.9% of in-stent stenoses were less than 50%. On DSA 2 images (obtained at follow-up), 95.7% of in-stent stenoses were graded as less than 50%. The difference between grading of stenoses on DSA and MR angiography images was 15.0% +/- 16.0% (minimum, 0.0%; maximum, 63.3%) for DSA 1 versus MR angiography 1 (statistically significant, p = 0.037) and 9.8% +/- 13.5% (minimum, 0.0%; maximum, 63.3%) for MR angiography 2 versus DSA 2 (not statistically significant, p = 0.355)., Conclusion: Patency was correctly assessed for all stents on MR angiography. The quality of MR angiography regarding characterization of in-stent stenoses improved with time after stent placement. However, discrepancies of more than 60% between grading of lumen narrowing on DSA and MR angiography images occurred even at the 6-month follow-up. Thus, MR angiography is not yet a reliable technique for characterization of in-stent stenoses.

Objective: The objectives of this study were to show the feasibility of intraarterial MR angiography of the infrainguinal arteries and to compare the accuracy of intraarterial MR angiography with selective intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for the detection of stenoses before and after percutaneous balloon angioplasty., Subjects and Methods: Fifteen patients underwent digital subtraction angiography and intraarterial MR angiography before and after balloon angioplasty. For intraarterial MR angiography, 30 mL of diluted contrast agent (5 mL of gadodiamide diluted in 55 mL of 0.9% saline solution) was injected through a sheath in the superficial femoral artery using a flow rate of 2.5 mL/sec. A 3D gradient-echo sequence was performed. Four independent blinded observers assessed differences in the quantitative measurement of stenoses and localization of lesions between digital subtraction angiography and intraarterial MR angiography. The overall impression of the intraarterial MR angiography images was documented on a 4-point scale (1 = excellent, 4 = poor). Interobserver variability was calculated., Results: Intraarterial MR angiography from the upper leg to the trifurcation was feasible in all 30 examinations with a mean overall impression of all segments of 1.3 (SD, 0.68). For the detection of significant stenoses (> or = 50% stenosis), the overall sensitivity and specificity for the femoropopliteal and crural vessels were 92.4% and 91.7% and 91.9% and 87.8%, respectively. For the complete leg, sensitivity and specificity were 92.2% and 88.6%, respectively. Interobserver variability for intraarterial MR angiography of the crural vessels exceeded that of the femoropopliteal arteries., Conclusion: Intraarterial MR angiography of the infrainguinal arteries is feasible in humans using injections of diluted contrast agent at concentrations as low as 8%. It has a high sensitivity for detecting stenoses and an acceptable interobserver variability.

Objective: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the possibility of performing magnetic resonance (MR)-guided interventional therapy for femoral and popliteal artery stenoses with commercially available materials supported by MR real-time imaging and intra-arterial MR angiography., Materials and Methods: A total of 15 patients suffering from symptomatic arterial occlusive disease of the lower limbs with 19 stenoses were included. Interventional intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography was performed before and after angioplasty on each patient as standard of reference. MR images were acquired on a 1.5-T MR scanner. A fast-low-angle shot (FLASH) 3D sequence was applied for a contrast enhanced MR-angiography (ceMRA). A total of 5 mL of diluted gadodiamide was injected via the arterial access. Maximum intensity projections (MIPs) were used as roadmaps and localizers for the interactive positioning of a continuously running 2D-FLASH sequence with a temporal solution of 2 images/second. The lesion was crossed by a balloon-catheter, which was mounted on a guidewire. The visibility was provided by the radiopaque markers on the balloon and was improved by injection of 1 mL of gadolinium into the balloon. Postinterventional control was performed by intra-arterial MR angiography and catheter angiography., Results: Stenoses were localized by intra-arterial MR angiography. The guidewire/balloon combination was visible, and the balloon was placed correctly to cover the entire stenoses. Balloon dilation reduced the degree of stenosis by approximately 57% on average. No complications were observed., Conclusion: MR-guided balloon dilation of femoral and popliteal artery stenoses supported by real-time MR imaging and intra-arterial MR angiography is feasible with commercially available materials.

Purpose: Contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is increasingly used in postinterventional imaging after implantation of endovascular stents. The main limitations are stent-related artifacts compromising the visibility of the stent lumen. The aim of this in vivo study is the evaluation of contrast-enhanced MR angiography imaging characteristics of the carotid Wallstent., Materials and Methods: The carotid arteries of 29 patients were examined with contrast-enhanced MR angiography 3-6 days and/or 7-23 months after implantation of a carotid Wallstent into the internal carotid artery. Images were evaluated with regard to the diameter and signal intensity (SI) of the visible stent lumen. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) was used as the standard of reference., Results: Stent-related artifacts on contrast-enhanced MR angiography caused an artificial lumen narrowing and a reduction of the SI within the stent. Artifacts were pronounced on imaging 3-6 days after stent implantation, but 68% of stents imaged 7-23 months after stent implantation presented with a significantly decreased artificial signal reduction and an improved visibility of the stent lumen., Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that a reliable evaluation of the stent lumen is limited as a result of an artificial decrease of the SI inside the stent. However, in follow-up examinations 7-23 months after stent implantation, visibility of the stent lumen was improved and diagnostic reliability of contrast-enhanced MR angiography was markedly increased. A probable explanation for this phenomenon might be the formation of a neointimal layer covering the stent struts and thereby reducing stent-related artifacts.

In a period of 4 months, 10 patients were examined prospectively with intraarterial magnetic resonance (MR) angiography after digital subtraction angiography. Intraarterial MR angiography was performed with use of a 1.5-T MR imaging system. Contrast agent (gadodiamide) was injected with a conventional angiography catheter placed in the proximal abdominal aorta. The increase in vascular signal intensity was determined and the diagnostic value of the MR angiograms was scored according to a five-point scale by four investigators. The MR angiograms were judged good to excellent, and all were scored as diagnostic. In conclusion, this study shows that intraarterial MR angiography is feasible. Intraarterial MR angiography is appropriate to support MR-guided vascular intervention.

Rationale and Objectives: To assess the influence of injection rates and volumes on the arrival time of contrast material (CM) in the common carotid artery, the jugular vein and the resulting arterial-venous transit time. Additionally the relationship between injection parameters and the extent of a CM plateau was evaluated., Materials and Methods: In 60 patients a CM injection was necessary to investigate suspected cranial disease. All patients were prospectively assigned to 6 protocol groups with varying volumes of gadolinium dimeglumine (2, 10, 20 mL) and injection rates (0.5, 1, 2, 4 mL/s). Simultaneously to the CM injection, 50 repetitive transverse measurements (1/s) were acquired at the level of the common carotid artery. Based on the resulting signal-time curves, the arrival time of the contrast material in the common carotid artery and the jugular vein, the resulting arterial-venous transit time, the peak enhancement and the extent of a CM-plateau were calculated as a function of the injection parameters., Results: Smaller flow rates (0.5 mL/s) resulted in a longer arrival time in the common carotid artery (mean value 22,6 seconds +/- 2.3) and the jugular vein (mean value 32.6 seconds +/- 2.6) and resulted in longer arterial-venous transit time (mean value 10.1 second +/- 1.9). The volume showed no effect on these parameters. The peak arterial and venous signal intensity and a consistent CM-plateau after 50 seconds were dependent on the volume, but not on the injection rate., Conclusion: The injection rate showed an influence to the arrival time in the common carotid artery and the jugular vein and also to the arterial-venous transit time. The injected volume only affected the extent of the contrast plateau. A flow rate of 1 to 2 mL/s and a minimum of 20 mL gadolinium dimeglumine are recommended to achieve optimal image quality without venous overlay.

Background and Purpose: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography and extracranial color-coded duplex sonography are noninvasive, preoperative imaging modalities for evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Innovative techniques and improvements in image quality require frequent reassessment of accuracy, reliability, and diagnostic value compared with those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We evaluated contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography compared with DSA for detection of high-grade carotid artery stenoses., Methods: Four readers, blinded to clinical symptoms and the outcome of other studies, independently evaluated stenoses on contrast-enhanced MR angiograms in 71 vessels of 39 symptomatic patients. Duplex sonography was also performed in all vessels. The severity of stenosis was defined according to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria (0-29%, 30-69%, 70-99%, 100%). Results of both modalities were compared with the corresponding DSA findings., Results: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.9% and 79.1%, respectively, for the identification of carotid artery stenoses of 70% or greater. Sensitivity and specificity of duplex sonography were 92.9% and 81.9%, respectively. Combining data from both tests revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 81.4%, respectively, for concordant results (80% of vessels)., Conclusion: Concordant results of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography increase the diagnostic sensitivity to 100%. The reliability of MR angiography is comparable to that of DSA. The combination of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography might be preferable over DSA for preoperative evaluation in most patients, thus reducing the risk of perioperative morbidity and improving the overall outcome.