Search

Background: Revascularization strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease include percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. In this study, we compared the completeness of revascularization as assessed by coronary angiography and by quantitative serial perfusion imaging using cardiovascular magnetic resonance., Methods and Results: Patients with multivessel coronary disease were recruited into a randomized trial of treatment with either coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention. Angiographic disease burden was determined by the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) myocardial jeopardy index. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion imaging was performed before and 5 to 6 months after revascularization. Using model-independent deconvolution, hyperemic myocardial blood flow was evaluated, and ischemic burden was quantified. Sixty-seven patients completed follow-up (33 coronary artery bypass grafting and 34 percutaneous coronary intervention). The myocardial jeopardy index was 80.7±15.2% at baseline and 6.9±11.3% after revascularization (P<0.0001), with revascularization deemed complete in 62.7% of patients. Relative to cardiovascular magnetic resonance, angiographic assessment overestimated disease burden at baseline (80.7±15.2% versus 49.9±29.2% [P<0.0001]), but underestimated it postprocedure (6.9±11.3% versus 28.1±33.4% [P<0.0001]). Fewer patients achieved complete revascularization based on functional criteria than on angiographic assessment (38.8% versus 62.7%; P=0.015). After revascularization, hyperemic myocardial blood flow was significantly higher in segments supplied by arterial bypass grafts than those supplied by venous grafts (2.04±0.82 mL/min per gram versus 1.89±0.81 mL/min per gram, respectively; P=0.04)., Conclusions: Angiographic assessment may overestimate disease burden before revascularization, and underestimate residual ischemia after revascularization. Functional data demonstrate that a significant burden of ischemia remains even after angiographically defined successful revascularization.

Background: Absolute quantification of perfusion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance has not previously been applied in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Owing to increased contrast bolus dispersion due to the greater distance of travel through a bypass graft, this approach may result in systematic underestimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF). As resting MBF remains normal in segments supplied by noncritical coronary stenosis (<85%), measurement of perfusion in such territories may be utilized to reveal systematic error in the quantification of MBF. The objective of this study was to test whether absolute quantification of perfusion with cardiovascular magnetic resonance systematically underestimates MBF in segments subtended by bypass grafts., Methods and Results: The study population comprised 28 patients undergoing elective CABG for treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. Eligible patients had angiographic evidence of at least 1 myocardial segment subtended by a noncritically stenosed coronary artery (<85%). Subjects were studied at 1.5 T, with evaluation of resting MBF using model-independent deconvolution. Analyses were confined to myocardial segments subtended by native coronary arteries with <85% stenosis at baseline, and MBF was compared in grafted and ungrafted segments before and after revascularization. A total of 249 segments were subtended by coronary arteries with <85% stenosis at baseline. After revascularization, there was no significant difference in MBF in ungrafted (0.82±0.19 mL/min/g) versus grafted segments (0.82±0.15 mL/min/g, P=0.57). In the latter, MBF after revascularization did not change significantly from baseline (0.86±0.20 mL/min/g, P=0.82)., Conclusions: Model-independent deconvolution analysis does not systematically underestimate blood flow in graft-subtended territories, justifying the use of this methodology to evaluate myocardial perfusion in patients with CABG.

The article presents a study which characterizes the relationship between regional oxygenation and perfusion in normal volunteers and patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It provides a comparison of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of CAD. It states that the application of BOLD CMR was done at 3 T. Results show that BOLD imaging at 3 T is feasible for CAD diagnosis.