1. Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion
- Author
-
Johannes Kaesmacher, Urs Fischer, Mohamad Abdalkader, Carlos Ynigo Lopez, Mohammad W. Kassem, Ameena Rana, Samer Abdul Kareem, Alicia C. Castonguay, Patrik Michel, Osama O. Zaidat, Syed F Zaidi, Jan Gralla, Ajit S. Puri, Sunil A Sheth, Diogo C Haussen, Marta Olivé-Gadea, Behzad Farzin, Mahmoud H. Mohammad, Anna Luisa Kühn, François Caparros, Stefania Nannoni, Simon Nagel, Muhammad M. Qureshi, Fatih Seker, Thanh N. Nguyen, Peter A. Ringleb, Anvitha Sathya, Markus A Möhlenbruch, Piers Klein, Tudor G Jovin, Sergio Salazar-Marioni, Hesham Masoud, Marc Ribó, James E. Siegler, Charlotte Cordonnier, Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez, Artem Kaliaev, Raul G Nogueira, William Boisseau, Hilde Hénon, Mudassir Farooqui, and Jean Raymond
- Subjects
Mechanical Thrombolysis ,Perfusion Imaging ,Arterial Occlusive Diseases ,Cohort Studies ,Modified Rankin Scale ,Occlusion ,Medical imaging ,Clinical endpoint ,Online First ,Medicine ,Humans ,610 Medicine & health ,Stroke ,Original Investigation ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Research ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Odds ratio ,medicine.disease ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Featured ,Treatment Outcome ,Neurology (clinical) ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,Perfusion ,Comments - Abstract
Key Points Question In patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion stroke presenting in the extended window, are rates of favorable outcomes at 90 days comparable in the patients selected for thrombectomy with noncontrast computed tomography vs patients selected with computed tomography perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging? Findings In a multicenter cohort of 1604 patients in the extended window with large-vessel occlusion, patients selected by noncontrast computed tomography had comparable clinical and safety outcomes with patients selected by computed tomography perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging. Meaning These findings suggest noncontrast computed tomography alone may be used as an alternative to advanced imaging in selecting patients with late-presenting large-vessel occlusion for mechanical thrombectomy., This cohort study compares the clinical outcomes of patients with stroke who presented 6 to 24 hours after symptom onset and were selected for mechanical thrombectomy by noncontrast computed tomography vs those selected by computed tomography perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging., Importance Advanced imaging for patient selection in mechanical thrombectomy is not widely available. Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of patients selected for mechanical thrombectomy by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) vs those selected by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the extended time window. Design, Setting, and Participants This multinational cohort study included consecutive patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion stroke presenting within 6 to 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2014 to December 2020. This study was conducted at 15 sites across 5 countries in Europe and North America. The duration of follow-up was 90 days from stroke onset. Exposures Computed tomography with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, CTP, or MRI. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days (ordinal shift). Secondary outcomes included the rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores of 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality. Results Of 2304 patients screened for eligibility, 1604 patients were included, with a median (IQR) age of 70 (59-80) years; 848 (52.9%) were women. A total of 534 patients were selected to undergo mechanical thrombectomy by CT, 752 by CTP, and 318 by MRI. After adjustment of confounders, there was no difference in 90-day ordinal mRS shift between patients selected by CT vs CTP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .64) or CT vs MRI (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.8-1.13]; P = .55). The rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores 0-2 vs 3-6) were similar between patients selected by CT vs CTP (aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.7-1.16]; P = .42) but lower in patients selected by MRI than CT (aOR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64-0.98]; P = .03). Successful reperfusion was more common in the CT and CTP groups compared with the MRI group (474 [88.9%] and 670 [89.5%] vs 250 [78.9%]; P
- Published
- 2021