Search

Objectives: Cystic fibrosis arthropathy (CFA) is a term commonly used for joint pain with and without swelling seen in some patients with CF. Early studies into CFA focused on the presence of rheumatoid factor and immunological changes on synovial biopsy, with parallels drawn between respiratory and joint activity. Identification of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP) as a marker of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), along with increased access to sensitive imaging techniques including ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), offer great potential to investigate and more accurately understand the type(s) of inflammatory arthritis that may underlie CFA. The aim of this study was to phenotype an active CFA cohort using serology and imaging, as a basis for further work in this understudied area., Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study of symptomatic CFA patients presenting with joint pain. Participants underwent serological testing, clinical and US joint and entheseal assessment, as well as MRI of the most symptomatic joint/joint area., Results: Ten symptomatic patients were studied with 9/10 having positive clinical findings. Inflammatory changes on US were seen in 8/10 cases. Five patients had positive findings on MRI (3 of whom had received IV gadolinium contrast). This included patients with significant erosive changes. One patient was anti-CCP positive suggestive of RA, and two were anti-nuclear antibody positive., Conclusion: Imaging, and to a lesser extent serology, identified inflammatory joint pathology in a proportion of cases, providing important data to explore in a large CFA cohort examining the clinical and imaging phenotype of this group., (Copyright © 2016 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of tenosynovitis affecting the interosseous tendons of the hand in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population and to assess for association with metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint synovitis, flexor tendon tenosynovitis or ulnar drift., Methods: Forty-four patients with RA underwent hand MRI along with 20 normal controls. Coronal 3D T1 VIBE sequences pre- and post-contrast were performed and reconstructed. The presence of interosseous tendon tenosynovitis was recorded alongside MCP joint synovitis, flexor tendon tenosynovitis and ulnar drift., Results: Twenty-one (47.7%) patients with RA showed interosseous tendon tenosynovitis. Fifty-two (14.8%) interosseous tendons showed tenosynovitis amongst the RA patients. Interosseous tendon tenosynovitis was more commonly seen in association with adjacent MCP joint synovitis (p < 0.001), but nine MCP joints (5.1%) showed adjacent interosseous tenosynovitis in the absence of joint synovitis. Interosseous tendon tenosynovitis was more frequently seen in fingers which also showed flexor tendon tenosynovitis (p < 0.001) and in patients with ulnar drift of the fingers (p = 0.01)., Conclusion: Tenosynovitis of the hand interosseous tendons was found in 47.7% of patients with RA. In the majority of cases this was adjacent to MCP joint synovitis; however, interosseous tendon tenosynovitis was also seen in isolation., Key Points: • Tenosynovitis of the interosseous tendons of the hand occurs in rheumatoid arthritis. • Interosseous tendon tenosynovitis has a prevalence of 47.7% in patients with RA. • Interosseous tendon tenosynovitis is related to MCP joint synovitis in the adjacent joints.

Objective: To assess the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected subclinical inflammation for subsequent radiographic progression in a longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical remission or low disease activity (LDA), and to determine cutoffs for an MRI inflammatory activity acceptable state in RA in which radiographic progression rarely occurs., Methods: Patients with RA in clinical remission [28-joint Disease Activity Score-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) < 2.6, n = 185] or LDA state (2.6 ≤ DAS28-CRP < 3.2, n = 69) with longitudinal MRI and radiographic data were included from 5 cohorts (4 international centers). MRI were assessed according to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) RA MRI scoring system (RAMRIS). Statistical analyses included an underlying conditional logistic regression model stratified per cohort, with radiographic progression as dependent variable., Results: A total of 254 patients were included in the multivariate analyses. At baseline, synovitis was observed in 95% and osteitis in 49% of patients. Radiographic progression was observed in 60 patients (24%). RAMRIS synovitis was the only independent predictive factor in multivariate analysis. ROC analysis identified a cutoff value for baseline RAMRIS synovitis score of 5 (maximum possible score 21). Rheumatoid factor (RF) status yielded a significant interaction with synovitis (p value = 0.044). RF-positive patients with a RAMRIS synovitis score of > 5 vs ≤ 5, had an OR of 4.4 (95% CI 1.72-11.4) for radiographic progression., Conclusion: High MRI synovitis score predicts radiographic progression in patients in clinical remission/LDA. A cutoff point for determining an MRI inflammatory activity acceptable state based on the RAMRIS synovitis score was established. Incorporating MRI in future remission criteria should be considered.

Imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) have been increasingly used in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) providing additional clues to the pathogenesis of this peripheral, axial and dermatologic disease. This has improved our understanding of the disease and can be used to aid diagnosis and then to follow outcomes of treatment. Both imaging modalities have highlighted the differing involvement of PsA when compared with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with a significant burden of entheseal disease, flexor tenosynovitis (occurring alone or as part of dactylitis) and other extra-capsular inflammatory changes. MRI scanning has also highlighted the link between the nail and the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint confirming previous clinical observations. Imaging studies in psoriasis patients have discovered a high level of subclinical inflammatory change but the clinical importance of such findings has not yet been defined. The potential use of MRI and US to monitor treatment outcomes has encouraged research in this field. In MRI, the PsA MRI Score (PsAMRIS) has been developed with promising initial validation. In US, work is ongoing with the OMERACT group to define key pathologies and to develop scoring systems. A few scoring systems are available for enthesitis scoring using US which are further being developed and refined. Further improvements in technologies in both of these fields offer exciting possibilities for future research. New MRI techniques offer the chance to image previously 'dark' structures such as tendons which is key in spondyloarthritides (SpA). Sonoelastography may also improve our understanding of tendon involvement in SpA. Whole-body multi-joint MRI allows a 'snapshot' of inflammation in PsA including joints, entheses and spinal involvement. Three-dimensional US should improve reliability and comparability of US scoring reducing inter-operator variability. The latest machines offer real-time fusion imaging employing US machines with an in-built virtual navigator system linked to previous MRI acquisitions. All of these new techniques should aid our understanding of PsA and our ability to objectively measure response to therapy., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The OMERACT magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in inflammatory arthritis group previously developed the rheumatoid arthritis MRI score (RAMRIS) for use in clinical studies, evaluated the use of extremity MRI, and initiated development of a psoriatic arthritis MRI score (PsAMRIS). At OMERACT 9 the group looked at clarifications of applying the RAMRIS, and presented data from a study examining how the contrast agent gadolinium affects RAMRIS outcomes. Much of the group's effort has been aimed at the iterative development of its PsA score, and reported exercises examining this score demonstrated encouraging results, allowing subsequent presentation of a preliminary PsAMRIS. The large amount of data presented were followed by discussions with the wider audience highlighting constructive suggestions for future research priorities, including further feasibility studies, understanding imaging remission, and further improvements to PsAMRIS.

Purpose of Review: This review describes the important role of MRI in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), exploring recent reliability and validity work, as well as the current use of MRI in clinical trials and practice., Recent Findings: Both bone oedema and erosions on MRI have been confirmed as representing osteitis and cortical bone defects, respectively, adding to what was already known about the validity of contrast enhanced synovium representing synovitis. An increasing number of studies have used MRI as an outcome measure with interest moving from disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to biological therapies and a more technical focus on dynamic imaging. In addition, low-field extremity MRI has been developed as a well tolerated, comfortable and convenient method for imaging assessment in clinical practice., Summary: This review has highlighted both recent research advances as well as the future potential for MRI in RA, with the aim that MRI will become part of standard measures for RA clinical trials. With respect to extremity imaging, further work is required to provide useful clinical algorithms.

Objective: To identify the optimal combination for detecting erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis using extremity magnetic resonance imaging (eMRI)., Methods: In 44 patients, eMRI of 1 hand identified 77% who were erosive, 2 hands 89%, and 2 hands and feet 91%., Results: eMRI identified 4 times as many erosions as radiography. At 6 months, eMRI of 1 hand identified an increase in erosions in 50% subjects, 2 hands in 55%, and 2 hands and feet in 55%. When only subjects with a change in erosion score above the smallest detectable difference were considered, these numbers were 30%, 25%, and 20%, respectively., Conclusion: eMRI provides superior erosion identification compared to radiography. Imaging 2 hands can be used as a screening tool and 1 hand to monitor erosions over time.

Objectives: To develop and test the reliability of a modified version of the OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis magnetic resonance imaging score (RAMRIS) for erosions using extremity MRI (eMRI) with reduced field of view (RAMRIS-RV)., Methods: Using a MagneVu 0.2 T machine, the preliminary RAMRIS-RV assessed erosions in metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints 2-3, bases of metacarpal (MC) 2-5, and all wrist bones excluding base MC 1, pisiform and trapezium. T1 weighted images of >/=500 MCP and wrist bony sites from a mixed severity RA and control cohort were evaluated. An inter-reader reliability study evaluating 300 wrist and 160 MCP bony sites was then performed., Results: Mean per cent exact (and close) agreement results were as follows: MCP proximal sites 83.5 (96.2), MCP distal 54.4 (77.2), bases MC 2-4 85.2 (96.7), carpal bones 79.0 (92.1), distal radius/ulna 66.4 (87.8). The base of MCP 5 was visualised in