Search

Background/aims: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) 2018 and Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center (KLCA-NCC) 2018 criteria on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in high-risk patients., Methods: This retrospective study included 273 treatment-naïve patients (71 patients with extracellular contrast agent [ECA]-MRI and 202 patients with hepatobiliary agent [HBA]-MRI; 352 lesions including 263 HCCs) with high risk of HCC who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI between 2016 and 2017. Two readers evaluated all lesions according to the criteria of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018. The per-lesion diagnostic performances were compared using the generalized estimating equation method., Results: On ECA-MRI, the sensitivity and specificity of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 were not significantly different (LR-5 vs. definite HCC: 75.8% vs. 69.4%, P=0.095 and 95.8% vs. 95.8%, P>0.999; LR-5/4 vs. definite/probable HCC: 87.1% vs.83.9%, P=0.313 and 87.5% vs. 91.7%, P=0.307). On HBA-MRI, definite HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 showed significantly higher sensitivity (79.1% vs. 68.2%, P<0.001) than LR-5 of LI-RADS 2018 without a significant difference in specificity (93.9% vs. 95.4%, P=0.314). Definite/probable HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 had higher specificity (92.3% vs. 80.0%, P=0.003) than LR-5/4 of LI-RADS 2018. The sensitivity was lower for definite/probable HCC than for LR-5/4 without statistical significance (85.6% vs. 88.1%, P=0.057)., Conclusion: On ECA-MRI, LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 showed comparable diagnostic performances. On HBA-MRI, definite HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 provided better sensitivity than LR-5 category of LI-RADS 2018 without compromising the specificity, while definite/probable HCC of KLCA-NCC 2018 revealed higher specificity than LR-5/4 of LI-RADS 2018 for diagnosing HCC.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between preoperative Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) categories and prognosis after curative resection of single hepatic malignancies in patients with chronic liver disease., Materials and Methods: Between January 2008 and December 2010, 225 patients with chronic liver disease underwent resection of single hepatic malignant tumors (218 hepatocellular carcinomas, three cholangiocarcinomas, four biphenotypic carcinomas) after undergoing gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists retrospectively categorized the tumors into LI-RADS categories. Differences in disease-free survival duration between categories were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test., Results: Reviewer 1 categorized two (0.9%) patients as having LR-3, 53 (23.6%) LR-4, 159 (70.7%) LR-5, and 11 (4.9%) LR-M lesions. The corresponding numbers for reviewer 2 were six (2.7%) LR-3, 30 (13.3%) LR-4, 178 (79.1%) LR-5, and 11 (4.9%) LR-M. The 2-year cumulative recurrence or death rates were 15.1% for lesions categorized LR-3 or LR-4 by reviewer 1, 31.7% for LR-5, and 60% for LR-M. For lesions categorized by reviewer 2 the corresponding rates were 20.6% for LR-3 or LR-4, 29% for LR-5, and 54.5% for LR-M. Disease-free survival was significantly worse among patients with lesions categorized as LR-M than for lesions categorized as LR-3 or LR-4 or as LR-5 (p < 0.01 for both reviewers). Disease-free survival did not significantly differ between patients with LR-3 or LR-4 and those with LR-5 lesions (reviewer 1, p = 0.301; reviewer 2, p = 0.291)., Conclusion: Patients with tumors preoperatively categorized as LR-M may have a worse prognosis than those with tumors categorized LR-3, LR-4, or LR-5 after curative resection of single hepatic malignancy.

Purpose: We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and transient elastography (TE) in assessing liver fibrosis and steatosis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Methods: Patients who underwent liver biopsy or liver surgery at two academic hospitals between 2017 and 2021 were retrospectively recruited. The stages of liver fibrosis and steatosis were evaluated using histologic examination. Liver stiffness (LS) was assessed using MR elastography (LSMRE) and TE (LSTE). Liver steatosis was assessed using proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). Results: The mean age of the study population (n = 280) was 53.6 years and male sex predominated (n = 199, 71.1%). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease was the most prevalent (n = 127, 45.5%), followed by hepatitis B virus (n = 112, 40.0%). Hepatocellular carcinoma was identified in 130 patients (46.4%). The proportions of F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4 fibrosis were 13.2%, 31.1%, 9.6%, 16.4%, and 29.7%, respectively. LSMRE had a significantly greater AUROC value than LSTE for detecting F2–F4 (0.846 vs. 0.781, P = 0.046), whereas LSMRE and LSTE similarly predicted F1–4, F3–4, and F4 (all P > 0.05). The proportions of S0, S1, S2, and S3 steatosis were 34.7%, 49.6%, 12.5%, and 3.2%, respectively. PDFF had significantly greater AUROC values than CAP in predicting S1-3 (0.922 vs. 0.806, P < 0.001) and S2-3 (0.924 vs. 0.795, P = 0.005); however, PDFF and CAP similarly predicted S3 (P = 0.086). Conclusion: MRI exhibited significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than TE for detecting significant fibrosis and mild or moderate steatosis in patients with CLD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: According to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), the LI-RADS category M (LR-M), which are probably or definitely malignant but are not specific for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), does not exclude HCCs. A gap in knowledge remains, including their characteristics and recurrence of HCCs categorized as LR-M.Purpose: To compare the characteristics of HCCs categorized as LR-M with HCCs categorized as LR-4 or LR-5 (LR-4/5) using the LI-RADS version 2018 and evaluate the relationship of these categories with the risk of early recurrence after curative resections of single HCCs.Study Type: Retrospective.Subjects: Two hundred and eighty-one patients (mean age, 57 years; 191 men and 90 women) who underwent curative resections for single HCCs and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI between 2015 and 2017.Field Strength/sequence: 3T Dual gradient-echo T1 WI with in- and opposed-phase, turbo spin-echo T2 WI, diffusion-weighted echo-planar images, and three-dimensional gradient-echo T1 WI before and after administration of contrast agent.Assessment: MRI features according to the LI-RADS version 2018 were evaluated and LI-RADS category were assigned for each observation. Clinical, imaging, and histopathological features were compared based on LI-RADS categorization. Early recurrence rates (<2 years) and associated factors were also evaluated.Statistical Tests: Fisher's exact test, two-sample t test after satisfying assumption of normality through Shapiro-Wilk test, Fleiss κ coefficient, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank test.Results: Forty-one HCCs (14.6%) were categorized as LR-M and 240 HCCs (85.4%) were categorized as LR-4/5. LR-M HCCs showed poorer differentiation than LR-4/5 HCCs. In the multivariate analysis, the LR-M category was an independent predictor for early recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.904; 95% confidence interval, 1.024-3.542; P < 0.05). Early recurrence rates were significantly higher in patients with LR-M HCCs than in patients with LR-4/5 HCCs (32.0% vs. 18.4%, respectively, P < 0 05).Data Conclusion: Compared to LR-4/5 HCCs, LR-M HCCs were associated with poorer tumor differentiation and higher early recurrence rates after curative resections of single HCCs.Level Of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endolymphatic sac tumor (ELST) is an extremely rare disease that does not have established clinical guidelines. Objective: To provide guidance for the diagnosis and management of ELSTs. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who were suspected to have a lesion in the location of endolymphatic sac. Seven patients were included. Histopathologic diagnosis confirmed five ELSTs and two other diseases. Results: All of the enrolled patients had hearing impairment. Facial palsy was found in four out of five patients with ELST, whereas none of the patients in other disease group showed facial palsy. CT and MRI findings were consistent with those in previous literatures; however, angiographic findings were not consistent with those previously reported. All patients underwent surgery. Recurrence occurred in two patients with ELST, although there was no visible remnant tumor after the operation. These patients were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Conclusion: Hearing impairment and facial palsy were representative symptoms of ELST. All ELSTs showed 'salt and pepper' signal in MRI T1-weighted images, and smaller tumors could have blood supply from AICA in the radiologic study. Complete surgical resection with optional stereotactic radiosurgery should be considered in ELST. Hearing impairment and facial weakness are remarkable symptoms of ELST compared to other diseases that invade the endolymphatic sac. All ELSTs showed 'salt and pepper' signal in MRI T1-weighted images. ELST less than 3 cm in diameter could have blood supply from AICA. A complete surgical excision with optional stereotactic radiosurgery is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: The liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI‐RADS) is a comprehensive system for standardizing liver imaging in patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We performed a meta‐analysis to determine the diagnostic performance of the LR‐5 category for HCC and the pooled proportions of HCCs in each LI‐RADS category using CT/MRI LI‐RADS v2017. Methods: We searched multiple databases for original studies reporting on the diagnostic accuracy of CT/MRI LI‐RADS v2017. Random‐effects models were used to determine the summary estimates of the diagnostic performance of the LR‐5 category and the pooled proportions of HCCs for each LI‐RADS category. Risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability were evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies‐2 tool. Results: Fourteen studies (3 prospective studies and 11 retrospective studies) were included in the final analysis, consisting of 2056 patients, 2589 observations, and 1693 HCCs. The pooled per‐observation sensitivity was 67% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62%‐72%) with specificity of 92% (95% CI, 88%‐95%) in the LR‐5 category of CT/MRI LI‐RADS v2017 for diagnosing HCC. The pooled proportions of HCCs were 0% (95% CI, 0%‐0%) for LR‐1, 4% (95% CI, 0%‐8%) for LR‐2, 34% (95% CI, 23%‐44%) for LR‐3, 67% (95% CI, 53%‐81%) for LR‐4, and 92% (95% CI, 87%‐96%) for LR‐5. The proportions of HCCs were significantly different among LI‐RADS categories 1‐5 (P =.034). Conclusions: The LR‐5 category of CT/MRI LI‐RADS v2017 shows moderate sensitivity and high specificity for diagnosing HCC. Higher LI‐RADS categories contained higher proportions of HCCs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]