1. Free-breathing magnetic resonance imaging with radial k-space sampling for neonates and infants to reduce anesthesia.
- Author
-
Browne LP, Malone LJ, Englund EK, Fujiwara T, Fluta C, Lu Q, Grover TR, Fuhr PG, and Barker AJ
- Subjects
- Artifacts, Child, Child, Preschool, Contrast Media, Humans, Image Enhancement methods, Imaging, Three-Dimensional methods, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Respiration, Retrospective Studies, Anesthesia, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods
- Abstract
Background: Conventional chest and abdominal MRI require breath-holds to reduce motion artifacts. Neonates and infants require general anesthesia with intubation to enable breath-held acquisitions., Objective: We aimed to validate a free-breathing approach to reduce general anesthesia using a motion-insensitive radial acquisition with respiratory gating., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled children <3 years old who were referred for MRI of the chest or abdomen. They were divided into two groups according to MRI protocol: (1) breath-held scans under general anesthesia with T2-weighted single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted modified Dixon, and (2) free-breathing scans using radial sequences (T2-W MultiVane XD and contrast-enhanced T1-W three-dimensional [3-D] Vane XD). Two readers graded image quality and motion artifacts., Results: We included 23 studies in the free-breathing cohort and 22 in the breath-hold cohort. The overall imaging scores for the free-breathing radial T2-W sequence were similar to the scores for the breath-held T2-W SSFSE sequence (chest, 3.6 vs. 3.2, P=0.07; abdomen, 3.9 vs. 3.7, P=0.66). The free-breathing 3-D radial T1-W sequence also had image quality scores that were similar to the breath-held T1-W sequence (chest, 4.0 vs. 3.0, P=0.06; abdomen, 3.7 vs. 3.9, P=0.15). Increased motion was seen in the abdomen on the radial T2-W sequence (P<0.001), but increased motion was not different in the chest (P=0.73) or in contrast-enhanced T1-W sequences (chest, P=0.39; abdomen, P=0.15). The mean total sequence time was longer in free-breathing compared to breath-held exams (P<0.01); however, this did not translate to longer overall exam times (P=0.94)., Conclusion: Motion-insensitive radial sequences used for infants and neonates were of similar image quality to breath-held sequences and had decreased sedation and intubation., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF