Search

The aim of this study was to determine the value of 2-D and 3-D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) in assessing the extent of mesorectal invasion (EMI) and mesorectal fascia involvement (MRF+) in patients with T3 rectal tumours. We retrospectively evaluated 80 patients with T3 stage rectal cancer who were pre-operatively evaluated by 2-D and 3-D TRUS before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a reference standard. The T3 stage was subdivided into T3 ab (EMI ≤5 mm) and T3 cd (EMI >5 mm). The consistency assessment of the T3 sub-staging and MRF+ was compared between 2-D and 3-D TRUS using Cohen's kappa statistic. The concordance of the T3 sub-staging based on EMI was excellent between the 3-D TRUS and MRI (κ = 0.84) and good between the 2-D TRUS and MRI (κ = 0.67). For the assessment of MRF+ (κ = 0.82), 3-D TRUS and MRI showed excellent concordance. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 3-D TRUS for MRF+ assessment was 95.3%, 86.5%, 89.1% and 94.1%, respectively. The agreement between 3-D TRUS and MRI for the assessment of T3 sub-staging and MRF status was better in low rectal cancer (both κ = 0.85) than in middle (κ = 0.79 and 0.77) rectal cancer. Compared with MRI, 3-D TRUS has more advantages in the sub-staging of T3 rectal cancer and the assessment of MRF+ than those of 2-D TRUS, especially in low rectal cancer. For patients with T3 rectal cancer, 3-D TRUS may well complement MRI for selecting the appropriate treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to MRI for evaluating local invasion of cervical cancer. METHODS: A total of 108 patients with cervical cancer were included in this study. All the enrolled patients were Stage IIA2−IVB according to the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy. Tumour size in different dimensions was compared between MRI and CEUS. The correlation coefficients (r) between MRI and CEUS for diagnosing local invasion, parametrial extension, and invasion to vagina, uterine corpus and adjacent organs were assessed. RESULTS: Measurements by MRI and CEUS were strongly correlated in the three dimensions: left-right r = 0.84, craniocaudal r = 0.86 and anteroposterior r = 0.88. Vaginal and parametrial invasion were detected by both MRI and CEUS with moderate concordance, and invasion of uterine corpus, bladder and rectum with good concordance. CONCLUSION: CEUS is comparable to MRI for measuring tumour size, with good concordance for evaluating invasion of cervical cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: CEUS is a less expensive non-invasive modality for assessment of tumour size and invasion of cervical cancer.

To investigate the imaging features, clinical manifestations and pathological characteristics of solitary fibrous tumors (SFT).The clinicopathological manifestations and medical imaging findings were analyzed retrospectively in 27 patients with surgically confirmed SFT.The SFTs originated from different parts of the body, including 18 in the chest, 4 in the abdomen, 1 in the lumboscral area, 3 in the pelvis, and 1 in the left shoulder. Twenty-three cases were found by CT scan, among which there were 16 benign diseases, presented with well-defined round or elliptic margins, with homogeneous attenuation and clearly surrounding; 6 malignant cases with unclear demarcations, invasive surrounding, heterogeneous attenuation due to calcification and/or irregular necrosis, and 1 junctional case with well-defined margins, which was enlarged during follow-up. There were 4 SFTs scanned by MRI with clear margin and homogeneous or heterogeneous signal intensity. All of the 4 cases were isointense or hyperintense to muscle on T1-weighted images, and were hyperintense on the T2-weighted images. All tumors showed heterogeneously intense enhancement with geographic pattern. Immunohistochemical staining showed that CD34-positive was 81.5%, vimentin (100.0%), CD99 (100.0%) and bcl-2 (96.3%), as well as negative CK (100.0%) and S-100 (96.3%).The location of SFT is varying. Though its clinical manifestations vary, the diagnosis is depended on pathology and immunohistochemistry. There are certain specific features related to SFTs on CT or MRI. These imaging techniques may serve to provide helpful information as to the location and vicinal anatomic structure of the tumor, which is of substantial importance for planning surgery.