Search

The mismatch field (MMF) to minor pitch changes in two experimental conditions was studied. Standard tones of 1000 Hz and deviant tones of 1050 Hz both of 50 ms duration were delivered in single tone condition. Paired tones of the same duration were used in the paired tone condition. The standard tone pair consisted of two 1000 Hz tones, whereas the deviant tone pair was composed of a 1000 Hz tone in the first position and a 1050 Hz tone in the second position with a silent interval of 15 ms between the two. Standards of 90% and deviants of 10% probability were presented in random order and with a randomized interstimulus interval between 600 and 900 ms. The source analysis showed a more lateral location for the MMF obtained in the paired tone condition (MMF.P) compared to the MMF elicited by the single deviants (MMF.S). The source location of both the MMF.P and MMF.S turned out to be significantly anterior relative to the sources of the M100. The increased stimulus repetition in the paired tone condition (two times more stimuli than in the single tone condition) lead to a strong suppression of the field amplitude and of the dipole moment of the M100, while this effect could not be seen for the MMF. The data demonstrate a fundamental difference between the processes reflected by the M100 and the MMF: while the M100 represents the processing of every individual tone, the MMF reflects the change detection of the paired stimuli as unitary events, forming a perceptual group. The different sources of the MMF.P and MMF.S also support an integrated processing of the paired stimuli.

The magnetic counterpart of the CNV, the contingent magnetic variation (CMV), was investigated in an Go/No Go design: subjects moved their index finger to the offset of a 4 sec tone of a certain frequency in the Go condition and were asked not to move during presentation of a 4 sec tone of different frequency in the No Go condition. During the preparatory interval, both the CMV and the electrical wave form followed a similar time course and both produced an equally pronounced statistical difference between conditions (Go and No Go). Compared to the variability in the auditory evoked fields, the CMV showed considerably more variance in the field distribution across subjects. The polarity reversal across the temporal surface of the head and the pronounced amplitudes over inferior temporal areas led us to conclude that a significant temporal activity contributes to both the late and the early CMV. However, neither for the early nor for the late CMV component did a single equivalent dipole prove to be a satisfying model. The data are consistent with the suggestion that the earlier as well as the later aspects of the CMV are fed through distributed sources in motoric, sensory and association areas, a distribution with considerable intersubject variability.

The neuromagnetic source localizations of the auditory M100 and the mismatch field (MMF) were studied using a large-array biomagnetometer. Standard tones of 1000 Hz and deviant tones of 1050 Hz were delivered with 90% and 10% probability, respectively. Wave forms of the derived MMF were computed by examining difference wave forms between the responses to the deviants and the responses to the standards preceding (D-P) and following (D-F) the deviants as well as to all remaining standards (D-A). The subset of standards preceding the deviants was used for a more realistic comparison with the set of deviants (having the same number of epochs and a similar signal-to-noise ratio), while the subset of standards following the deviants served to answer the question whether those standards also elicit an MMF. The MMF deflections were compared with each other, with the "native" MMF occurring in response to the deviants, and with wave M100. (The MMF as it appears in the unprocessed response to the deviants was termed "native" for an easy distinction from the "derived" MMF.) Our results demonstrate a distinct MMF deflection, corresponding in latency to the simultaneously recorded fronto-central electrical MMN. Source analysis, using a single moving dipole model, showed the same spatial localization for the native MMF and for the different derived MMFs. The MMF source location turned out to be significantly anterior, medial and inferior relative to the sources of the M100. The present data also demonstrate that a minor frequency deviation may not activate measurably different M100 generators, yet be sufficient to trigger the nearby but spatially distinct mismatch generator.

We have discovered a ca. 40-Hz transient magnetic oscillatory response, evoked in the human brain by the onset of auditory stimuli, consisting of four or more cycles locked in phase to stimulus onset in approximately the 20- to 130-ms poststimulus interval. The response originates in the supratemporal auditory cortex, some millimeters deeper and anterior to the source of the larger-amplitude slow-wave M100 component of the evoked magnetic field and moves in a posterior arcing trajectory 1 cm or more in length. The oscillatory cortical activation elicited by auditory stimuli may be similar to the gamma-band cortical oscillations elicited by olfactory and visual stimuli and may represent an essential component of auditory perceptual processing.

The input-output characteristics of amplitude and latency of simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked magnetic fields (AEMF) and auditory-evoked potentials (AEP) are significantly different, although they are closely related to the same excitation process of the auditory system. As the source of both AEMF and AEP an equivalent-current dipole lying in the auditory cortex can be assumed. Differences in the input-output characteristics of AEMF and AEP can be explained by changes of one or more parameters of this dipole (depth, location in the tangential x-y plane and direction). Maps of the field distribution obtained at 60 and 80 dB HL indeed reveal a change of the location of the dipole in the x-y plane and the direction of the dipole momentum, whereas the depth of the dipole was found to be more or less constant.

The high variability of both amplitude and latency measures of the components of the auditory evoked magnetic field (AEMF), which we have attributed primarily to changes in the state of vigilance, makes it often impossible to compute significant isofield contour maps. Using a randomized data acquisition paradigm we have been able to considerably reduce the time-dependent fluctuations of the state of vigilance resulting in more stable latencies and in more stable and higher amplitudes of the AEMF components.

Both auditory-evoked magnetic fields (AEMF) and auditory-evoked potentials (AEP) mainly consist of three peaks with latencies of about 50, 100 and 160 ms. Comparison of responses to ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural stimulation yields no significant amplitude or latency differences of the AEP peaks whereas the simultaneously recorded AEMF peaks exhibit a 10 ms shorter latency and an approximately 38% greater amplitude for contralateral versus ipsilateral stimulation. This fact can be due to differences in the strength, location (especially the depth) and the direction of the dipole source, and a decision cannot be made considering the data recorded from just one position. Another finding is that binaural stimulation reduces the peak amplitudes by approximately 25% compared with contralateral stimulation. This result indicates some kind of interference between the ipsilateral and contralateral pathways ('binaural interaction').