Stas Barabash, Esa Kallio, Hans Nilsson, Janet G. Luhmann, Gérard Chanteur, Sunil Simon, Eduard Dubinin, Michael W. Liemohn, Yingjuan Ma, Ronan Modolo, Xiaohua Fang, Markus Fraenz, David Brain, Kaijun Liu, Naoki Terada, Uwe Motschmann, A. Boesswetter, Stephen A. Ledvina, Helmut Lammer, Mats Holmström, Stephen H. Brecht, Andrew F. Nagy, Erika M. Harnett, Jasper Halekas, Stephen W. Bougher, Hiroyuki Shinagawa, Dana M. Hurley, Space Sciences Laboratory [Berkeley] (SSL), University of California [Berkeley], University of California-University of California, Swedish Institute of Space Physics [Uppsala] (IRF), Institut für Theoretische Physik [Braunschweig], Technische Universität Braunschweig = Technical University of Braunschweig [Braunschweig], Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences [Ann Arbor] (AOSS), University of Michigan [Ann Arbor], University of Michigan System-University of Michigan System, Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas (LPP), Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Observatoire de Paris, Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École polytechnique (X)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung (MPS), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Space Research Institute of Austrian Academy of Sciences (IWF), Austrian Academy of Sciences (OeAW), HELIOS - LATMOS, Laboratoire Atmosphères, Milieux, Observations Spatiales (LATMOS), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), National Institute of Information and Communications Technology [Tokyo, Japan] (NICT), Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology [Köln] (IGM), University of Cologne, University of California [Berkeley] (UC Berkeley), University of California (UC)-University of California (UC), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-École polytechnique (X)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), and Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung = Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (MPS)
International audience; We present initial results from the first community-wide effort to compare global plasma interaction model results for Mars. Seven modeling groups participated in this activity, using MHD, multi-fluid, and hybrid assumptions in their simulations. Moderate solar wind and solar EUV conditions were chosen, and the conditions were implemented in the models and run to steady state. Model output was compared in three ways to determine how pressure was partitioned and conserved in each model, the location and asymmetry of plasma boundaries and pathways for planetary ion escape, and the total escape flux of planetary oxygen ions. The two participating MHD models provided similar results, while the five sets of multi-fluid and hybrid results were different in many ways. All hybrid results, however, showed two main channels for oxygen ion escape (a pickup ion 'plume' in the hemisphere toward which the solar wind convection electric field is directed, and a channel in the opposite hemisphere of the central magnetotail), while the MHD models showed one (a roughly symmetric channel in the central magnetotail). Most models showed a transition from an upstream region dominated by plasma dynamic pressure to a magnetosheath region dominated by thermal pressure to a low altitude region dominated by magnetic pressure. However, calculated escape rates for a single ion species varied by roughly an order of magnitude for similar input conditions, suggesting that the uncertainties in both the current and integrated escape over martian history as determined by models are large. These uncertainties are in addition to those associated with the evolution of the Sun, the martian dynamo, and the early atmosphere, highlighting the challenges we face in constructing Mars' past using models.