Search

Frostbite causes tissue damage through five major mechanisms, out of which two are amenable to treatment. The first-line treatment is rapid rewarming therapy using water at 40°C to 42°C, which addresses the formation of ice crystals in the intra and extra cellular compartments. The second mechanism is progressive tissue ischemia after rewarming and is only accessible to a second-line therapy represented by thrombolysis. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of thrombolysis. This is a single-center retrospective cohort study, where it was aimed to evaluate two groups of patients. A total of 18 patients were included in this study. Mean times between injury to thrombolytic therapy and admission to thrombolytic therapy was 26.04 hours (SD 13.6) and 9.65 hours (SD 9.89), respectively. All patients suffered injuries ranging from second-degree deep to third degree. The rate of patients having complete, partial, and no angiographic responses were 55.6%, 11.1%, and 33.3%, respectively. The main outcome of interest showed that 11 (61.1%) patients in total had amputations at different levels. Results showed that in the intervention group, five (55.6%) of the patients had amputations compared with six (66.7%) from the control group (P = .6) at comparable levels of amputation. The literature supports that the use of intra-arterial tissue plasminogen activator might be beneficial for severe cases of frostbites; however, it lacks of studies of major significance and results are often controversial. Our study has not shown statistically significant results on amputation levels and cannot support the hypothesis of efficacy of thrombolytic therapy.

Background Skin coverage remains a significant hurdle in large-sized burns. Recent advances have allowed to grow Bilaminar Cultured Skin Autografts (BCSGs) from patients’ own donor sites. The aim of this study was to report long-term outcomes in patients with large-sized burns having received BCSGs. Methods Nine patients received BCSGs from January 2010 to May 2015. Except one patient who died during hospitalization, all patients were contacted. Four agreed to partake in the study. Patients were tested with the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), QuickDASH questionnaire and Burn Specific Health Scale (BSHS). Incisional biopsies of BCSGs were compared with patients’ autografts. Results From nine patients, mean age was 40 years and mean TBSA was 70.3%. For the four patients included, score averaged was 2.25 on the VSS, 29.5 on QuickDASH, 36/36 for psychosocial items and 63/84 for functional abilities on the BSHS. Compared with autografts, BCSGs demonstrated better pliability VSS and functionality. Biopsies showed no evidence of malignancy or atypical changes, but areas of hyperpigmentation. Conclusion This is the first report investigating the long-term outcome of a newly developed BCSG. BCSGs demonstrated comparable results with patients’ autografts, functional outcomes on self-reported questionnaires and excellent psychological states. Precaution given the extensive unexpected hyperpigmentation must be taken and a randomized controlled study is underway.

Free flap reconstruction in acute burns has high failure rates, relating mainly to a systemic inflammatory state. The “vulnerable phase” can last for 6 weeks after burn and can cause thrombosis of the flap microcirculation with patent arterial and venous anastomoses. Revision surgery alone may be unsuccessful, but thrombolysis can lead to flap salvage. We describe a case of successful flap salvage with thrombolysis after unsuccessful revision surgery by permeable arterial and venous anastomoses in a patient in the acute burn phase suffering from microcirculatory thrombosis. Thrombolysis in these cases has not been described to date, but it could contribute to salvaging flaps by radiological intervention alone. A 23-year-old man was admitted with a 38% TBSA burn, including loss of all eyelid skin. The right eye was reconstructed in a satisfactory manner, but the left eye required urgent corneal coverage on day 32 with a dorsalis pedis fasciocutaneous free flap. The flap was hypo-perfused postoperatively, but anastomoses were found to be permeable on exploration. Angiography performed postoperatively after revision confirmed anastomotic patency, but failed to demonstrate small vessel beds within the flap. Thus, r-tPa was given at the anastomosis site and immediately the flap recovered completely. However, a total of 10 packed red blood cell transfusions were needed over the next 9 days. Thrombolysis in the context of free flap microvascular compromise may improve the overall success rates, especially in acute-phase burn patients where this etiology may be found, due to a vulnerable inflammatory period.

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) represents one of the many solutions for complex wounds of the upper extremity. The goal of this study was to investigate the most common indications for definitive treatment of wound defects in the upper extremity with NPWT and to report revision surgery outcomes after its use. A systematic review of the literature was performed. The following keywords and their combinations were used: "upper extremity," "arm," "forearm," "wrist," "hand," "finger" AND "negative-pressure wound therapy," "VAC therapy," "vacuum assisted closure." A total of 45 articles were included, regrouping 404 cases of NPWT in the upper extremity. The forearm was involved in 53% of cases, followed by hand (36%), fingers (10%), and arm (1%). Seventeen different indications were cited, the most common of which were radial forearm flap reconstruction (23%), burn wounds (18%), and compartment syndromes (17%). Of the cases, 90% did not require any subsequent surgical procedure, as opposed to 6% considered partial failures requiring minor revisions and 4% total failures requiring major revisions. Closure of radial forearm flap donor site required the most revision procedures when treated with NPWT. NPWT can be used for several indications pertaining to the reconstruction of the upper extremity. Positive outcomes as a definitive treatment are demonstrated in this systematic review, which reaffirms NPWT as a potent tool for reconstructive endeavours.

Midfacial distraction for facial stenosis is minimizing the communication between cranial fossa and nasal fossa caused by the Le Fort III osteotomy during frontofacial advancement procedures. There are different types of distractors, such as internal and external devices. The aim of our study is to present a series of 22 consecutive distraction cases operated without any Le Fort osteotomy with external distraction frames. We completely avoid the gap between the skull and nose, thus avoiding related complications. Between 1997 and 2012, we operated on 22 patients presenting syndromes associating midfacial retrusion, maxillomandibular class III malocclusion and upper airway obstruction. We perform a fronto-orbital advancement. We do not perform any maxillary osteotomy. A vertical cut in the lateral orbital wall is done towards the inferior orbital fissure and another cut on the zygomatic arch. We realise the fixation of the frame posteriorly with a folded K-wire and anteriorly with a transmaxillary pin. Aiming overcorrection, we distract on average 1 mm a day for a mean period of 26 days and with a horizontal distraction vector. No deaths or life-threatening complications were reported. All midfacial retrusions were corrected without relapse. The advancement ranged between 6 and 20 mm. Several complications were notified: one sphenopetrous dislocation, one ethmoidonasal dislocation, two device disassemblages and two cases of maxillary sinusitis. Some of these complications caused an incomplete distraction result. Compared to other techniques, this method is safe, simple and efficient. By sparing major osteotomies, it avoids severe complications.

The authors report the case of a 30-year-old male with 52% TBSA high-voltage electrical injury of the upper half of the body. Injuries included a cervical burn with associated alteration of the left brachial plexus as well as extensive soft tissue burn of the right hand. Three months later, he developed osteomyelitis of the right thumb metacarpal bone requiring amputation proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joint. Following initial management, the patient had a permanent distal left upper extremity paralysis with nonfunctional but relatively undamaged ipsilateral hand digits. The right hand remained functional with four intact digits and a thumb stump. Usually, late reconstruction of proximal thumb amputation is performed by pollicization or free toe transfer procedures. In this particular case, right thumb reconstruction was done by free transfer of the left little finger. Four months postoperatively, the patient demonstrated a functional pinch between the reconstructed thumb and the ipsilateral digits along with improving sensation. This uncommon surgical procedure restored a functional thumb with minimal donor site morbidity. The decision-making process and operative technique are presented in detail along with a review of the thumb reconstruction literature.

Introduction During the 1970s, frontofacial advancement revolutionized the treatment of severe facial stenosis. Unfortunately, this method was associated with significant morbidity due to the Le Fort III osteotomy, which creates a major communication between the frontocranial dead space and the nasal fossae. Midfacial distraction improves the complication rate by diminishing the size of this gap. The aim of our study was to present an original technique that uses external distraction frames and eliminates the need for Le Fort osteotomies. This innovative technique eliminates the gap between the skull and nose, thus avoiding related complications. Patients and methods Between 1997 and 2008, we operated on 17 patients presenting midfacial retrusion and maxillomandibular class III malocclusion. We performed classic fronto-orbital advancement. The only facial osteotomies are vertical cuts of both the lateral orbital wall and the zygomatic arch. The distraction device is then anchored posteriorly with a K-wire and anteriorly with a transfacial pin through the maxilla. Finally, the distraction is performed horizontally until a class II overcorrection is obtained. Results No life-threatening complications or mortalities occurred. In all cases, the midfacial retrusion was corrected without relapse. All patients with complications fully recovered. It was observed that most complications were a result of either an overly rapid activation (>1 mm/d). Discussion Midface distraction using the external transfacial pin is a simple and safe procedure that allows an efficient correction of major facial retrusion. The external transfacial pin acts directly onto the maxilla and allows distraction without Le Fort osteotomy. By eliminating major osteotomies, it reduces the number of severe complications encountered in craniofacial surgery.

Lymphocytes from 14 patients treated with a combination of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and dipyridamole (DIPY) showed a decreased ability to produce leucocyte migration inhibitory activity (LMIA) when stimulated with concanavalin-A (ConA). The combined treatment also produced a decrease of leucocyte response to a standard LMIA-containing culture supernatant. Treatment with only one of the two drugs did not cause detectable alteration of the lymphocyte response to Con-A or the leucocyte response to LMIA. In vitro, both DIPY and ASA were independently effective in decreasing the LMIA production of Con-A-stimulated lymphocytes and the leucocyte response to a standard LMIA-containing culture supernatant.