1. Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry
- Author
-
François Vachon, Alexandre Marois, and John E. Marsh
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Dissociation (neuropsychology) ,Audiology ,Pink noise ,behavioral disciplines and activities ,050105 experimental psychology ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,Cognition ,0302 clinical medicine ,Orientation ,Distraction ,medicine ,Pupillary response ,Humans ,Tonic (music) ,Attention ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,skin and connective tissue diseases ,Recall ,Mechanism (biology) ,General Neuroscience ,05 social sciences ,Pupil ,C800 ,Sound ,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology ,Acoustic Stimulation ,Mental Recall ,Auditory Perception ,Female ,sense organs ,Psychology ,Perceptual Masking ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Pupillometry - Abstract
The mere presence of task-irrelevant auditory stimuli is known to interfere with cognitive functioning. Disruption can be caused by changing auditory distractors (the changing-state effect) or by a sound that deviates from the auditory background (the deviation effect). The unitary account of auditory distraction explains both phenomena in terms of attentional capture whereas the duplex-mechanism account posits that they reflect two fundamentally different forms of distraction in which only the deviation effect is caused by attentional capture. To test these predictions, we exploited a physiological index of attention orienting: the pupillary dilation response (PDR). Participants performed visual serial recall while ignoring sequences of spoken letters. These sequences either comprised repeated or changing letters, and one letter could sometimes be replaced by pink noise (the deviant). Recall was poorer in both changing-state and deviant trials. Interestingly, the PDR was elicited by deviant sounds but not changing-state sounds, while a tonic increase in pupil size was found throughout changing-state trials. This physiological dissociation of the changing-state and the deviation effects suggests they are subtended by distinct mechanisms thereby procuring support for the duplex-mechanism account over the unitary account.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF