1. Is the fast-track process efficient and safe for older adults admitted to the emergency department?
- Author
-
Antonio Cherubini, A. Fazi, G. Maracchini, Beatrice Gasperini, Francesca Pierri, and E. Espinosa
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,case-control study ,medicine.medical_treatment ,lcsh:Geriatrics ,03 medical and health sciences ,Appointments and Schedules ,0302 clinical medicine ,Interquartile range ,medicine ,Humans ,Fast-track ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Emergency department, Fast-track, Older adults, Length of stay, case-control study ,Aged ,Quality of Health Care ,Patient discharge ,Aged, 80 and over ,Rehabilitation ,business.industry ,Emergency department ,Case-control study ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Safe strategy ,Length of Stay ,Patient Discharge ,lcsh:RC952-954.6 ,Older adults ,Case-Control Studies ,Emergency medicine ,Observational study ,Female ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,Fast track ,Triage ,business ,Emergency Service, Hospital ,Research Article - Abstract
Background The efficiency of the fast-track (FT) process in the management of patients in Emergency Departments is well demonstrated, but there is a lack of research focused on older adults. The aim of our study was to verify whether the FT process is efficient and safe for older adults admitted to ED. Methods Observational case-control single-centre study. Results Five hundred four cases and 504 controls were analysed. The mean age was 75 years, and there was a predominance of women. In total 96% of subjects were classified with a “less-urgent” tag. The length of stay was significantly lower in the fast-track group than in the control group (median 178 min, interquartile range 184 min, and 115 min, interquartile range 69 min, respectively, p p Conclusions The fast-track appears to be an efficient and safe strategy to improve the management of older adults admitted to the ED with minor complaints.
- Published
- 2020