1. Development of a Physical Environmental Observational Tool for Dining Environments in Long-Term Care Settings
- Author
-
Lillian Hung, Kaylen J. Pfisterer, Heather H. Keller, and Habib Chaudhury
- Subjects
Male ,Canada ,Psychometrics ,Intraclass correlation ,Concordance ,Applied psychology ,Audit ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Nursing ,030502 gerontology ,Rating scale ,Homes for the Aged ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Meals ,Categorical variable ,Aged ,Protocol (science) ,business.industry ,Reproducibility of Results ,General Medicine ,Long-Term Care ,Nursing Homes ,Long-term care ,Environment Design ,Female ,Observational study ,Geriatrics and Gerontology ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Gerontology - Abstract
Purpose This paper presents the first standardized physical environmental assessment tool titled Dining Environment Audit Protocol (DEAP) specifically designed for dining spaces in care homes and reports the results of its psychometric properties. Items rated include: adequacy of lighting, glare, personal control, clutter, staff supervision support, restraint use, and seating arrangement option for social interaction. Two scales summarize the prior items and rate the overall homelikeness and functionality of the space. Methods Ten dining rooms in three long-term care homes were selected for assessment. Data were collected over 11 days across 5 weeks. Two trained assessors completed DEAP independently on the same day. Interrater-reliability was completed for lighting, glare, space, homelike aspects, seating arrangements and the two summary scales, homelikeness and functionality of the space. For categorical measures, measure responses were dichotomized at logical points and Cohen's Kappa and concordance on ratings were determined. Results The two overall rating scales on homelikeness and functionality of space were found to be reliable intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (~0.7). The mean rating for homelikeness for Assessor 1 was 3.5 (SD 1.35) and for functionality of the room was 5.3. (SD 0.82; median 5.5). Implications The findings indicate that the tool's interrater-reliability scores are promising. The high concordance on the overall scores for homelikeness and functionality is indicative of the strength of the individual items in generating a reliable global assessment score on these two important aspects of the dining space.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF