Search

Cardiac arrest and sudden death in dialysis units. Background For patients with end-stage renal disease and their providers, dialysis unit-based cardiac arrest is the most feared complication of hemodialysis. However, relatively little is known regarding its frequency or epidemiology, or whether a fraction of these events could be prevented. Methods To explore clinical correlates of dialysis unit-based cardiac arrest, 400 reported arrests over a nine-month period from October 1998 through June 1999 were reviewed in detail. Clinical characteristics of patients who suffered cardiac arrest were compared with a nationally representative cohort openface> 77,000 hemodialysis patients dialyzed at Fresenius Medical Care North America-affiliated facilities. Results The cardiac arrest rate was 400 out of 5,744,708, corresponding to a rate of 7 per 100,000 hemodialysis sessions. Cardiac arrest was more frequent during Monday dialysis sessions than on other days of the week. Case patients were nearly twice as likely to have been dialyzed against a 0 or 1.0 mEq/L potassium dialysate on the day of cardiac arrest (17.1 vs. 8.8%). Patients who suffered a cardiac arrest were on average older (66.3 ± 12.9 vs. 60.2 ± 15.4 years), more likely to have diabetes (61.8 vs. 46.8%), and more likely to use a catheter for vascular access (34.1 vs. 27.8%) than the general hemodialysis population. Sixteen percent of patients experienced a drop in systolic pressure of 30mm Hg or more prior to the arrest. Thirty-seven percent of patients who suffered cardiac arrest had been hospitalized within the past 30 days. Sixty percent of patients died within 48 hours of the arrest, including 13% while in the dialysis unit. Conclusions Cardiac arrest is a relatively infrequent but devastating complication of hemodialysis. To reduce the risk of adverse cardiac events on hemodialysis, the dialysate prescription should be evaluated and modified on an ongoing basis, especially following hospitalization in high-risk patients.

The urea reduction ratio (URR) and normalized treatment ratio (Kt/V) are related quantities that have become accepted measures of hemodialysis dose. Recent studies, however, have suggested that they combine two elements, both favorably associated with clinical outcome, as a single ratio. These elements, Kt and V, may offset each other, producing a complex quantity that does not reflect a true relationship between dialysis exposure and clinical outcome. This project explored and compared the associations of the URR and the ¿urea clearance x time¿ product (Kt) with mortality in a large sample of hemodialysis patients (37,108 patients) during 1998. Survival analyses using conventional techniques were the primary analytic tools. The relationship between URR and survival was U-shaped or J-shaped, with greater relative mortality at both extremes of the URR distribution than at its middle. Thus, identifying a threshold for adequate dialysis was not possible unless one considers also a threshold for overdialysis. Conversely, the association between Kt and outcome was much simpler, reflecting progressive improvement over the range of Kt evaluated here. These analyses suggest that such measures as URR and Kt/V are compound and complex, and that a simpler, more direct, measure, such as the Kt, should be considered to describe hemodialysis dose.

Vintage, nutritional status, and survival in hemodialysis patients.BackgroundThe link between dialysis “vintage” (length of time on dialysis in months to years) and survival has been difficult to define, largely because of selection effects. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is thought to be a wasting illness, but there are no published reports describing the associations between vintage and body composition in hemodialysis patients.MethodsWe explored the relationships among vintage, nutritional status, and survival in a 3009 patient cohort of prevalent hemodialysis patients. Body weight, total body water, body cell mass, and phase angle by bioelectrical impedance analysis were the body composition parameters of interest. We examined vintage as an explanatory variable in multiple linear regression analyses (adjusted for age, gender, race, and diabetes) using body composition parameters and biochemical indicators of nutritional status as dependent variables. Proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate the association of vintage and survival with and without adjustment for case mix and laboratory variables.ResultsDialysis vintage was 3.8 ± 3.7 (median 2.6) years. Body composition parameters tended to be lower after dialysis year 2. Linear estimates per year of vintage beyond year 2 include -0.66 kg body wt (P < 0.0001), -0.17 kg total body water (P = 0.0003), -0.14 kg body cell mass (P < 0.0001), and -0.07 degrees phase angle (P < 0.0001). In unadjusted analyses, vintage was not associated with survival, either as a linear or higher order term. The adjustment for case mix yielded a vintage term associated with an increased relative risk (RR) of death (RR 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.07 per year). A further adjustment for laboratory data yielded a RR of 1.06 (95% CI, 1.03 to 1.09 per year).ConclusionDialysis vintage is related to nutritional status in hemodialysis patients, with vintage of more than years associated with a significant decline in all measured nutritional parameters. Cross-sectional analyses probably underestimate these effects. A year accrued on dialysis is associated with a 6% increase in the risk of death, all else equal. Longitudinal assessments of nutritional status, including body composition, are required to better understand the natural history of wasting with ESRD and its implications for long-term survival.

Short Form 36 (SF-36) is a well-documented health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instrument consisting of 36 questions compressed into eight scales and two primary dimensions: the physical and mental component scores. This tool was used to evaluate QOL among peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. The results of 16,755 HD and 1,260 PD patients (728 continuous ambulatory PD [CAPD] and 532 continuous cycling PD [CCPD]) completing an SF-36 during 1996 were analyzed. Three analyses of variance were performed, consisting of (1) no adjustment, (2) case mix (age, sex, race, and diabetes), and (3) case mix plus laboratory parameters. PD patients were younger (P < 0.001), a larger fraction were white (P < 0.001), fewer had diabetes (P < 0.001), and had lower serum albumin concentrations (P < 0.001) and higher creatinine, hemoglobin, and white blood cell count values (P < 0.001) than HD patients. Diabetes was present in a larger fraction of CCPD than CAPD patients (P < 0.001). HD and PD patients scored similarly for scales reflecting physical processes. PD patients scored higher for mental processes, but only after statistical adjustment for the laboratory measures. Scores on scales reflecting physical processes were worse, and those reflecting mental processes were better among CCPD than CAPD patients. HD and CAPD scores were similar. CCPD patients perceived themselves as more physically impaired but better adjusted than HD or CAPD patients. These descriptive data show that perception of QOL among PD and HD patients is similar before adjustment, but PD patients score higher for mental processes with adjustment. CCPD patients score worse for physical function and better for mental function than either CAPD or HD patients. We cannot, however, exclude the influence of therapy selection.

Exploring the reverse J-shaped curve between urea reduction ratio and mortality. Background Although accepted worldwide as valid measures of dialysis adequacy, neither the Kt/V (urea clearance determined by kinetic modeling) nor the urea reduction ratio (URR) have unambiguously predicted survival in hemodialysis patients. Because the ratio Kt/V can be high with either high Kt (clearance × time) or low V (urea volume of distribution) and V may be a proxy for skeletal muscle mass and nutritional health, we hypothesized that the increase in the relative risk of death observed among individuals dialyzed in the top 10 to 20% of URR or Kt/V values might reflect a competing risk of malnutrition. Methods A total of 3,009 patients who underwent bioelectrical impedance analysis were stratified into quintiles of URR. Laboratory indicators of nutritional status and two bioimpedance-derived parameters, phase angle and estimated total body water, were compared across quintiles. The relationship between dialysis dose and mortality was explored, with a focus on how V influenced the structure of the dose–mortality relationship. Results There were statistically significant differences in all nutritional parameters across quintiles of URR or Kt/V, indicating that patients in the fifth quintile (mean URR, 74.4 ± 3.1%) were more severely malnourished on average than patients in all or some of the other quintiles. The relationship between URR and mortality was decidedly curvilinear, resembling a reverse J shape that was confirmed by statistical analysis. An adjustment for the influence of V on URR or Kt/V was performed by evaluating the Kt-mortality relationship. There was no evidence of an increase in the relative risk of death among patients treated with high Kt. Higher Kt was associated with a better nutritional status. Conclusion We conclude that the increase in mortality observed among those patients whose URR or Kt/V are among the top 10 to 20% of patients reflects a deleterious effect of malnutrition (manifest by a reduced V) that overcomes whatever benefit might be derived from an associated increase in urea clearance. Identification of patients who achieve extremely high URR (>75%) or single-pooled Kt/V (>1.6) values using standard dialysis prescriptions should prompt a careful assessment of nutritional status. Confounding by protein-calorie malnutrition may limit the utility of URR or Kt/V as a population-based measure of dialysis dose.

The current report describes the distributions of selected demographic and biochemical parameters, clearance, and other transport values among patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) and evaluates the associates of mortality using those values, with and without clearance and peritoneal equilibration test (PET) data. All patients receiving PD on January 1, 1994 were selected (n = 2,686). Patients who switched to another form of dialysis during the study period were removed from the study at the time of therapy change. Working files were constructed from the clinical database to include demographic, laboratory, and outcome data. Laboratory data were available in only 1,603 patients and were used to evaluate the biochemical associates of mortality after merging the biochemical, demographic, and outcome data. Patients with clearance data or PET studies underwent a second analysis to assess the effects of peritoneal and renal clearance on survival. The analysis of demographic and laboratory data confirmed the importance of age and serum albumin concentration as predictors of death. Residual renal function (RRF) was strongly correlated with survival, but peritoneal clearance was not. Several possible explanations for the lack of correlation between peritoneal clearance and survival are discussed. The data suggest that RRF and peritoneal clearance may be separate and not equivalent quantities. Substantial work is required to confirm or refute these findings, because the information is essential to establish the adequate dose of PD in patients with various degrees of RRF.

Information from a large clinical database was used to construct time trends for the leading associates of mortality among dialysis patients. The changing strengths of association of those measures with mortal risk were also evaluated. Strength did not change in meaningful ways for serum albumin, creatinine, or anion gap concentrations. It declined for the urea reduction ratio (URR), however, as prevalent values of the URR increased. Irrational patterns of association between the URR and other measures suggested reevaluation of the urea kinetic method for prescribing and judging dialysis dose. Two premises on which the urea kinetic equations rest are not valid if the context for their use is clinical outcome instead of predicting blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration. Rigorous use of the Kt/V criterion for dialysis dose could lead to clinical judgment errors, particularly underdialysis for small or malnourished persons. Changes for prescribing dose and judging therapy are recommended.

Proportional hazards analyses assume that the magnitude of mortality risk for a predictor variable remains proportional over time. In a time-dependent model, the explanatory variable violates this assumption, and repeat observations are required to accommodate the change in risk that occurs over time. Using a retrospective cohort design, we tested the following laboratory values for a time-by-covariate interaction: hematocrit (HCT), serum albumin (ALB), and serum creatinine (CR). A random sample of 4,083 hemodialysis patients whose specimens were analyzed in a central laboratory over a 3-year period served as the study group. Using the baseline observation, we discovered significant probability values for the interaction terms TIME*CR (P = 0.013) and TIME*ALB (P < 0.01). The beta coefficient for TIME*HCT was not significant, indicating that the proportional hazard assumption was not violated by this covariate. Based on these results, we fitted a multivariate regression model containing two time-dependent covariates (CR and ALB) using a data structure that incorporated repeat observations of these laboratory values. Patients with high ALB levels experienced the lowest mortality risk. Similarly, serum CR levels were higher in long-term survivors. This analysis verifies the clinical importance of monitoring ALB and CR levels over time and the hazard of using a single laboratory observation to make long-term projections. Additionally, the predictive values of the time-dependent covariates ALB and CR affirm the significance of nutritional approaches directed toward maintaining visceral and somatic protein content throughout renal replacement therapy.

The mortality rate for hemodialysis patients in the United States is higher than in other industrialized countries. Some attribute this to insufficient quantities of prescribed and delivered dialysis. A multicenter study in Dallas dialysis centers (Dallas Nephrology Associates) was begun in 1989 to assess the impact of increasing the delivered quantity of dialysis on mortality in subsequent years. Dialysis dose was measured by urea kinetic modeling. Kt/V, reflecting the fractional volume of body water clearance of urea during a dialysis treatment, was purposefully increased from 1.18 starting in 1989 to 1.46 in 1992. Additionally, the dialysis dose measured by the urea reduction ratio, the fractional reduction of blood urea nitrogen concentration caused by a dialysis treatment, increased from 63.0% to 69.6% between 1990 and 1992. Outcome analytical methods included both crude and standardized mortality rates and mortality ratios standardized to large end-stage renal disease databases at the United States Renal Data System and at National Medical Care, Inc. Crude mortality rates at Dallas Nephrology Associates decreased from 22.5% in 1989 to 18.1% in 1992. In comparison, between 1990 and 1992 the urea reduction ration in National Medical Care facilities increased from 57.1% to 62.5%. During that time crude mortality rates decreased from 21.8% to 19.5%. Crude mortality in the United States remained essentially unchanged in the same time period. By 1992, Dallas Nephrology Associates and National Medical Care had standardized mortality ratios of 0.77 and 0.74, respectively, compared with the US dialysis population, indicating almost 30% fewer observed deaths than expected. Monitoring dialysis dose by urea kinetic modeling or urea reduction ratio are equally effective in predicting improvement in patient survival. Improved survival is possible in the US end-stage renal disease program with greater amounts of dialysis. This strategy can save an estimated 8,000 to 16,000 lives per year.

Health care quality is assessed by profiling measures of care and/or health outcomes. However, such tools to measure outcome as standardized mortality ratio (SMR) are often used without thorough validation of their strengths and limitations. Our study compared the dialysis facility-specific SMR and SMR-based rating using different statistical methods and followed them over time. All Fresenius Medical Care, North America dialysis facilities (n = 377) that contributed patient data from 1993 to 1995 (103,500 patient-years) were included. Four distinct statistical methods (US Renal Data System [USRDS], Poisson, logistic, and Cox regression) were used to compute facility-specific SMRs and rank and classify facilities. The analysis compared the SMR and SMR-based rating of dialysis facilities between SMR method and over time. Different methods produced statistically significant differences in SMR distribution (P0.05). The USRDS method produced SMR values that decreased over time (P0.001). Based on 90% confidence intervals to determine outliers, the SMR-dependent ranking of dialysis facilities varied by method (P0.001). SMR-based ranking was stable over time except for the USRDS method (P0.001). Contingency table analysis showed up to a 33% total misclassification rate between SMR methods when ranking facilities. The facility-specific SMR and SMR-based ranking are both sensitive to statistical technique. Because the SMR yields different results in a year and over time and because there is no demonstrable gold standard, conclusions based on any one technique are unstable and unreliable. Regulatory monitoring, actions, and/or performance awards should be avoided based on this measure. However, a facility-specific SMR estimated in any valid way may be useful as an epidemiological research tool.

Peritoneal dialysis adequacy: A model to assess feasibility with various modalities. Background The current standard of adequacy for peritoneal dialysis (PD) is to provide a weekly normalized urea clearance (Kt/V) of 2.0 or more and a creatinine clearance (C Cr ) of 60 liter/1.73m 2 or more. As native renal function is lost, it is important to determine the effectiveness of the available therapeutic modalities in achieving these goals. Methods A model to assess our ability to provide a weekly Kt/V urea of 2.0 or more and a C Cr of 60 liter/1.73m 2 or more to anuric patients undergoing continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) and automated PD (PD Plus) was developed. The body surface area (BSA) distribution was obtained from 38,768 patients undergoing dialysis during January 1997. The distribution of peritoneal transport rates (PTRs) was obtained from 2531 peritoneal equilibration tests performed during 1996. The weekly K p t/V urea was calculated for the various PTR groups and the range of BSA with four PD prescriptions: CAPD 8 liters, CAPD 10 liters, PD Plus 12 liters, and PD Plus 15 liters, using a previously validated kinetic program (PackPD). Results The predicted percentage of patients capable of achieving the adequacy goals for Kt/V and C Cr , respectively, were 24.8 and 11.2 for CAPD 8 liters, 54.2 and 33.0 for CAPD 10 liters, 77.8 and 54.9 for PD Plus 12 liters, and 93.2 and 72.9 for PD Plus 15 liters. Conclusions Most patients can attain the current adequacy standards of therapy with automated PD, but few (less than 25%) can do so with standard CAPD in the absence of residual renal function.

Color flow doppler ultrasound examination of the hemodialysis access was conducted in 2,792 hemodialysis patients to evaluate its value in predicting hemodialysis access failure. After baseline assessment of vascular access function with clinical and laboratory tests including color flow doppler evaluation these patients were followed for a minimal of 6 months or until graft failure occurred (defined as surgery or angioplasty intervention, or graft loss). The patient demographics and vascular accesses were typical of a standard hemodialysis patient population. On the day of the color flow doppler examination systolic and diastolic blood pressure, hematocrit, urea reduction ratio, dialysis blood flow, venous line pressure at a dialysis blood flow of 250 ml/min, and access recirculation rate were measured. At the conclusion of the study 23.5% of the patients had access failure. Case mix predictors for access failure were determined using the Cox Model. Case mix predictors of access failure were race, non-white was higher than white (p < 0.005), younger accesses had a higher risk than older accesses (p < 0.025), accesses with prior thrombosis had a higher risk of failure (p = 0.042), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts had a higher risk than native vein fistulae (p < 0.05), loop PTFE grafts had a higher risk than straight PTFE grafts (p < 0.025), and upper arm accesses had a higher risk than forearm accesses (p = 0.033). Most significant, however, was decreased access blood flow as measured by color flow doppler (p < 0.0001). The relative risk of graft failure increased 40% when the blood flow in the graft decreased to less than 500 ml/min and the relative risk doubled when the blood flow was less than 300 ml/min. This study has shown that color flow doppler evaluation, quantifying blood flow in a prosthetic graft, can identify those grafts at risk for failure. In contrast, color doppler volume flow in native AV fistulae could not predict fistula survival. This technique is noninvasive, painless, portable, and reproducible. We believe that preemptory repair of an anatomical abnormality in vascular access grafts with decreased blood flow may decrease patient inconvenience, associated morbidity, and associated costs.

Development of a population specific regression equation to estimate total body water in hemodialysis patients. We have previously shown that the impedance index (height corrected resistance) is a valid and reliable correlate of total body water (TBW) in hemodialysis patients. We estimated TBW by single frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in 3009 in-center hemodialysis patients, and developed an ESRD-specific TBW equation from routinely available demographic and anthropometric variables. The mean ± SD age was 60.5 ± 15.5 years; 47% were female, 47% African-American, and 36% diabetic. Dialysis duration was 3.8 ± 3.7 years. Mean TBW was 40.8 ± 9.3 kg, 56 ± 9% of body weight. A stepwise linear regression equation was fit on a two-thirds random sample, deriving significant parameter estimates for the variables age, gender, height, weight, diabetic status, weight squared, and the cross-products of age and gender, age and weight, gender and weight, and height and weight. The equation was then validated in the remaining one-third sample, and compared with TBW estimates by the Watson and Hume-Weyer formulae. TBW estimated by our equation (40.6 ±8.6 kg) was not significantly different from the BIA TBW (40.5 ± 9.3 kg). In contrast, TBW estimated by the Watson (37.0 ± 7.6 kg) and Hume-Weyer (37.9 ± 7.7 kg) formulae underestimated TBW by a mean of 3.5 and 2.6 kg, respectively. A population-specific equation provides superior prediction of TBW in hemodialysis patients. The use of formulae developed and validated in non-uremic populations may result in underestimates of TBW in patients with ESRD, and potentially, overestimates of dialysis dose approximated by the clearance-time to TBW ratio (Kt/V).

Variables associated with survival among 1,522 peritoneal dialysis patients and 16,404 hemodialysis patients who received treatment during 1992 were evaluated. Analysis was performed separately for the treatment types and for the combined patient group. In general, the associates of survival appear similar among patients receiving peritoneal or hemodialysis. Important variables appear related to nutrition, acid-base status (which is related to nutrition), and age.

Hemodialysis patients who had received intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) during 1991 were identified. These patients were compared with unexposed controls after adjusting for demographic variables, baseline renal diagnosis, diabetic status, serum albumin (ALB), creatinine (CRE), and urea reduction ratio. At lower levels of ALB (< or = 3.4 g/dL), treatment with IDPN was associated with a reduction in the odds of death at 1 year, an effect that became stronger at lower levels of CRE (< or = 8.0 mg/dL). In contrast, treatment with IDPN in patients with normal ALB was associated with increased mortality. Time trend analyses of ALB and CRE demonstrated progressive increases toward pretreatment levels in IDPN recipients that were not evident in control subjects. These time trend data suggest that in undernourished hemodialysis patients, IDPN can effect the serum levels of valid biochemical surrogates of visceral and somatic protein nutrition. Albeit retrospective, the improvement in survival at year's end among patients with ALB < or = 3.4 g/dL suggests that malnutrition and its attendant ill effects in hemodialysis patients may respond to aggressive therapeutic intervention, such as IDPN. These important findings should be prospectively confirmed in a randomized clinical trial.

Logistic regression analysis was applied to a sample of more than 12,000 hemodialysis patients to evaluate the association of various patient descriptors, treatment time (hours/treatment), and various laboratory tests with the probability of death. Advancing age, white race, and diabetes were all associated with a significantly increased risk of death. Short dialysis times were also associated with high death risk before adjustment for the value of laboratory tests. Of the laboratory variables, low serum albumin less than 40 g/L (less than 4.0 g/dL) was most highly associated with death probability. About two thirds of patients had low albumin. These findings suggest that inadequate nutrition may be an important contributing factor to the mortality suffered by hemodialysis patients. The relative risk profiles for other laboratory tests are presented. Among these, low serum creatinine, not high, was associated with high death risk. Both serum albumin concentration and creatinine were directly correlated with treatment time so that high values for both substances were associated with long treatment times. The data suggest that physicians may select patients with high creatinine for more intense dialysis exposure and patients with low creatinine for less intense treatment. In a separate analysis, observed death rates were compared with rates expected on the basis of case mix for these 237 facilities. The data suggest substantial volatility of observed/expected ratios when facility size is small. Nonetheless, a minority of facilities (less than or equal to 2%) may have higher rates than expected when compared with the pool of all patients in this sample. The effect of various laboratory variables on mortality is substantial, while relatively few facilities have observed death rates that exceed their expected values. Therefore, we suggest that strategies designed to improve the overall mortality statistic for dialysis patients in the United States would be better directed toward improving the quality of care for all patients, particularly high-risk patients, within their usual treatment settings rather than trying to identify facilities with high death rate for possible regulatory intervention.

Changing hemodialysis thresholds for optimal survival. Background The urea reduction ratio (URR), a measure quantitating solute removal during hemodialysis, is the fractional reduction of the blood urea concentration during a single hemodialysis treatment. The URR is the principal measure of hemodialysis dose in the United States. Based on studies of patients dialyzed prior to 1994, a minimum URR value of 65% was recommended to optimize survival. Because of new hemodialysis technologies and evolving demographics of the hemodialysis population, the relationship between the amount of hemodialysis and mortality was examined in contemporary cohorts. Methods This retrospective cohort included> 15,000 patients per year receiving hemodialysis during 1994 through 1997. Each patient's URR was averaged for the three months prior to the beginning of each year. Mortality odds ratios were calculated for patients by URR. To determine the URR value above which no further improvement in mortality was seen ("threshold"), spline functions were tested in logistic regression models, both unadjusted and adjusted for case mix measures. The strength of fit for URR, defined by a range of candidate thresholds from 55 to 75%, was evaluated in increments of 1% for each year using spline functions. Results The median URR was 63.2, 65.4, 67.4, and 68.1% for 1994 through 1997, respectively. The median length of hemodialysis treatments increased only six minutes from the beginning to the end of the period of analysis. Using spline functions, the threshold URR values were 61.1, 65.0, 68.0, and 71.0% for 1994 through 1997 in models adjusted for case mix. The ratio of median URR to URR threshold decreased from 1.03 in 1994 to 0.97 in 1997. Conclusions From 1994 to 1997, the median URR and the URR threshold for mortality benefit increased. Although an increased need in the amount of hemodialysis may be a consequence of changes in patients' demographic characteristics, the likely explanation(s) is a change in the dialysis procedure and/or blood sampling favoring higher URR values without changing the amount of dialysis provided. The recommended minimum URR of 65% appears to be too low to confer an optimal mortality benefit in the context of current practices.