Search

Prognostic biomarkers for prostate cancer are needed to improve prediction of disease course and guide treatment decisions. However, biomarker development is complicated by the common multifocality and heterogeneity of the disease. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of candidate biomarkers transcriptional regulator ERG and related ETS family genes, while considering tumor heterogeneity. In a multisampled, prospective, and treatment-naïve radical prostatectomy cohort from one tertiary center (2010–2012, median follow-up 8.1 years), we analyzed ERG protein (480 patients; 2047 tissue cores), and RNA of several ETS genes in a subcohort (165 patients; 778 fresh-frozen tissue samples). Intra- and interfocal heterogeneity was identified in 29% and 33% (ERG protein) and 39% and 27% (ETS RNA) of patients, respectively. ERG protein and ETS RNA was identified exclusively in a nonindex tumor in 31% and 32% of patients, respectively. ERG protein demonstrated independent prognostic value in predicting biochemical (P = 0.04) and clinical recurrence (P = 0.004) and appeared to have greatest prognostic value for patients with Grade Groups 4–5. In conclusion, when heterogeneity is considered, ERG protein is a robust prognostic biomarker for prostate cancer.

Primary prostate cancer shows a striking intraorgan molecular heterogeneity, with multiple spatially separated malignant foci in the majority of patients. Metastatic prostate cancer, however, typically reveals more homogenous molecular profiles, suggesting a monoclonal origin of the metastatic lesions. Longitudinal mutational spectra, comparing multiple primary lesions with metastases from the same patients remain poorly defined. We have here analyzed somatic mutations in multisampled, spatio-temporal biobanked lesions (38 samples from primary foci and 1 sample from each of 8 metastases from seven prostate cancer patients) applying a custom-designed panel targeting 68 prostate cancer relevant genes. The metastatic samples were taken at time of primary surgery and up to 7 years later, and sampling included circulating tumor DNA in plasma or solid metastatic tissue samples. A total of 282 somatic mutations were detected, with a range of 0 to 25 mutations per sample. Although seven samples had solely private mutations, the remaining 39 samples had both private and shared mutations. Seventy-four percent of mutations in metastases were not found in any primary samples, and vice versa, 96% of mutations in primary cancers were not found in any metastatic samples. However, for three patients, shared mutations were found suggesting the focus of origin, including mutations in AKT1, FOXA1, HOXB13, RB1 and TP53. In conclusion, the spatio-temporal heterogeneous nature of multifocal disease is emphasized in our study, and underlines the importance of testing a recent sample in genomics-based precision medicine for metastatic prostate cancer.

The majority of prostate cancer patients are diagnosed with multiple primary malignant foci. The distinct foci are exceptionally heterogeneous with regard to DNA mutations, but whether this is recapitulated at the transcriptome level remains unknown. In this study, inter- and intrafocal heterogeneity has been assessed by whole-transcriptome sequencing of 87 tissue samples from 23 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. From each patient, multiple samples were taken from one or more malignant foci, in addition to one sample from benign prostate tissue. Transcriptomic profiles of different malignant foci from the same patient showed a similar level of heterogeneity as tumors from different patients. This applies to expression of genes, fusion genes, and somatic mutations. Within-patient pair-wise analyses identified expression patterns linked to ETS status and extraprostatic extension. A set of 62 genes were found with low intrapatient heterogeneity and high interpatient heterogeneity, retaining stable expression profiles across foci within the same patient. Among these, 16 genes are associated with biochemical recurrence in a separately published study and are therefore nominated as biomarkers with prognostic value regardless of which malignant focus is sampled. In conclusion, an extensive heterogeneity in multifocal prostate cancer is confirmed at the gene expression level. Diagnostic biomarkers were identified for ETS positive samples and samples from extraprostatic extensions. Finally, prognostic biomarkers independent of multifocal heterogeneity were found.

BACKGROUNDProstate cancer is multifocal with distinct molecular subtypes. The utility of genomic subtyping has been challenged due to inter- and intrafocal heterogeneity. We sought to characterize the subtype-defining molecular alterations of primary prostate cancer across all tumor foci within radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens and determine the prevalence of collision tumors.METHODSFrom the Early Detection Research Network cohort, we identified 333 prospectively collected RPs from 2010 to 2014 and assessed ETS-related gene (ERG), serine peptidase inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), and speckle type BTB/POZ protein (SPOP) molecular status. We utilized dual ERG/SPINK1 immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization to confirm ERG rearrangements and characterize PTEN deletion, as well as high-resolution melting curve analysis and Sanger sequencing to determine SPOP mutation status.RESULTSBased on index focus alone, ERG, SPINK1, PTEN, and SPOP alterations were identified in 47.5%, 10.8%, 14.3%, and 5.1% of RP specimens, respectively. In 233 multifocal RPs with ERG/SPINK1 status in all foci, 139 (59.7%) had discordant molecular alterations between foci. Collision tumors, as defined by discrepant ERG/SPINK1 status within a single focus, were identified in 29 (9.4%) RP specimens.CONCLUSIONInterfocal molecular heterogeneity was identified in about 60% of multifocal RP specimens, and collision tumors were present in about 10%. We present this phenomenon as a model for the intrafocal heterogeneity observed in previous studies and propose that future genomic studies screen for collision tumors to better characterize molecular heterogeneity.FUNDINGEarly Detection Research Network US National Cancer Institute (NCI) 5U01 CA111275-09, Center for Translational Pathology at Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM) Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, US NCI (WCM SPORE in Prostate Cancer, P50CA211024-01), R37CA215040, Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, US MetLife Foundation Family Clinical Investigator Award, Norwegian Cancer Society (grant 208197), and South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (grant 2019016 and 2020063).

KRAS mutation is a well‐known marker for poor response to targeted treatment and patient prognosis in microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC). However, variation in clinical outcomes among patients wild‐type for KRAS underlines that this is not a homogeneous population. Here, we evaluated the prognostic impact of KRAS alternative splicing in relation to mutation status in a single‐hospital series of primary MSS CRCs (N = 258). Using splicing‐sensitive microarrays and RNA sequencing, the relative expression of KRAS‐4A versus KRAS‐4B transcript variants was confirmed to be down‐regulated in CRC compared to normal colonic mucosa (N = 41; p ≤ 0.001). This was independent of mutation status, however, gene set enrichment analysis revealed that the effect of splicing on KRAS signaling was specific to the KRAS wild‐type subgroup, in which low relative KRAS‐4A expression was associated with a higher level of KRAS signaling (p = 0.005). In concordance, the prognostic value of KRAS splicing was also dependent on mutation status, and for patients with Stage I–III KRAS wild‐type MSS CRC, low relative KRAS‐4A expression was associated with inferior overall survival (HR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.07–5.18, p = 0.033), a result not found in mutant cases (p interaction = 0.026). The prognostic association in the wild‐type subgroup was independent of clinicopathological factors, including cancer stage in multivariable analysis (HR: 2.68, 95% CI: 1.18–6.09, p = 0.018). This suggests that KRAS has prognostic value beyond mutation status in MSS CRC, and highlights the importance of molecular heterogeneity in the clinically relevant KRAS wild‐type subgroup., What's new? Patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) that lacks KRAS mutation benefit from targeted therapy. Nonetheless, variations in clinical outcome suggest that KRAS wild‐type CRC is a heterogeneous disease. Here, two KRAS transcript variants, KRAS‐4A and KRAS‐4B, generated through alternative splicing, were investigated in relation to KRAS mutation status and MSS CRC prognosis. Aberrant splicing resulting in low expression of the KRAS‐4A transcript variant, relative to the KRAS‐4B transcript, was associated with increased KRAS signaling and poor patient prognosis specifically in KRAS wild‐type MSS CRC. The findings suggest that KRAS splicing is of prognostic relevance in KRAS wild‐type CRC.

We have shown recently that about half of the human TGCTs(3) reveal DNA copy number increases affecting two distinct regions on chromosome arm 17q. To identify potential target genes with elevated expressions attributable to the extra copies, we constructed a cDNA microarray containing 636 genes and expressed sequence tags from chromosome 17. The expression patterns of 14 TGCTs, 1 carcinoma in situ, and 3 normal testis samples were examined, all with known chromosome 17 copy numbers. The growth factor receptor-bound protein 7 (GRB7) and junction plakoglobin (JUP) were the two most highly overexpressed genes in the TGCTs. GRB7 is tightly linked to ERBB2 and is coamplified and coexpressed with this gene in several cancer types. Interestingly, the expression levels of ERBB2 were not elevated in the TGCTs, suggesting that GRB7 might be the target for the increased DNA copy number in TGCTs. Because of the limited knowledge of altered gene expression in the development of TGCTs, we also examined the expression levels of 512 additional genes located throughout the genome. Several genes novel to testicular tumorigenesis were consistently up- or down-regulated, including POV1, MYCL1, MYBL2, MXI1, and DNMT2. Additionally, overexpression of the proto-oncogenes CCND2 and MYCN were confirmed from the literature. The overexpressions were for some of the target genes closely associated to either seminoma or nonseminoma TGCTs, and hierarchical cluster analysis of the gene expression data effectively distinguished among the known histological subtypes. In summary, this focused functional genomic characterization of TGCTs has lead to the identification of new gene targets associated with a common genomic rearrangement as well as other genes with potential importance to testicular tumorigenesis.