Search

Background Back pain is a leading reason for patients to seek medical attention. Although musculoskeletal causes are common, patients can also present with rarer etiologies. Case Description A 50-year-old man presented with 2 months of isolated upper back pain initially suspected to be secondary to overuse muscular strain. During the next 3 months, his pain worsened, and he developed lower extremity dysesthesia and subjective weakness, despite normal neurological examination findings. Nonrevealing laboratory workup included normal muscle enzymes, C-reactive protein, urinalysis, and human leukocyte antigen B27. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a normal brain but a hypointense C7–T5 epidural mass, prompting a neurosurgical recommendation for laminectomy with evacuation of the suspected hematoma. His symptoms fully and promptly resolved after a 5-day course of prednisone 40 mg. When his symptoms recurred within 2 months, he underwent T4-T5 laminectomy with biopsy of a mass confluent with the dura mater. Initial pathological examination revealed fibrotic tissue of unclear etiology with polyclonal lymphoid infiltrate but no malignant cells, vasculitis, or granulomas. After months of recurrent, steroid-responsive symptoms, he presented to the rheumatology clinic. Repeat spinal magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated progression of epidural thickening with suspected spinal cord compression. Previous biopsy samples were then immunostained for IgG4, revealing focally dense IgG4-positive plasma cells, up to 29 cells per high power field, consistent with spinal IgG4-related hypertrophic pachymeningitis. He began rituximab therapy with a prednisone taper and demonstrated symptomatic and neurologic improvement with successful withdrawal from corticosteroids. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, the present case represents the 12th reported case of spinal IgG4-related hypertrophic pachymeningitis. An early diagnosis and treatment could prevent progression to permanent neurological impairment and functional disability.

Running shoes are often marketed based on mass. A total of 50 young adult males participated across two separate experiments to determine how well they could perceive the relative masses of five different running shoes using hands versus feet. For the foot portion, subjects were blindly fitted with the shoes and asked to rank their masses individually using visual analogue scales (VAS) and verbal rankings. For the hand portion, two different methods were used, one presenting all shoes simultaneously and the other presenting the shoes individually. Verbal accuracy and VAS scores correlated across subjects for the hand and foot, but accuracy in mass perception by the feet was 30% compared to 92% or 63% by the hand (depending on the method). These results indicate the foot perceives mass poorly compared to the hand, and that consumers' perception of shoe mass may come more from handling shoes versus wearing them.