Search

Summary Background The Thymectomy Trial in Non-Thymomatous Myasthenia Gravis Patients Receiving Prednisone (MGTX) showed that thymectomy combined with prednisone was superior to prednisone alone in improving clinical status as measured by the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis at 3 years. We investigated the long-term effects of thymectomy up to 5 years on clinical status, medication requirements, and adverse events. Methods We did a rater-blinded 2-year extension study at 36 centres in 15 countries for all patients who completed the randomised controlled MGTX and were willing to participate. MGTX patients were aged 18 to 65 years at enrolment, had generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis of less than 5 years' duration, had acetylcholine receptor antibody titres of 1·00 nmol/L or higher (or concentrations of 0·50–0·99 nmol/L if diagnosis was confirmed by positive edrophonium or abnormal repetitive nerve stimulation, or abnormal single fibre electromyography), had Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Clinical Classification Class II–IV disease, and were on optimal anticholinesterase therapy with or without oral corticosteroids. In MGTX, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either thymectomy plus prednisone or prednisone alone. All patients in both groups received oral prednisone at doses titrated up to 100 mg on alternate days until they achieved minimal manifestation status. The primary endpoints of the extension phase were the time-weighted means of the QMG score and alternate-day prednisone dose from month 0 to month 60. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00294658. It is closed to new participants, with follow-up completed. Findings Of the 111 patients who completed the 3-year MGTX, 68 (61%) entered the extension study between Sept 1, 2009, and Aug 26, 2015 (33 in the prednisone alone group and 35 in the prednisone plus thymectomy group). 50 (74%) patients completed the 60-month assessment, 24 in the prednisone alone group and 26 in the prednisone plus thymectomy group. At 5 years, patients in the thymectomy plus prednisone group had significantly lower time-weighted mean QMG scores (5·47 [SD 3·87] vs 9·34 [5·08]; p=0·0007) and mean alternate-day prednisone doses (24 mg [SD 21] vs 48 mg [29]; p=0·0002) than did those in the prednisone alone group. 14 (42%) of 33 patients in the prednisone group, and 12 (34%) of 35 in the thymectomy plus prednisone group, had at least one adverse event by month 60. No treatment-related deaths were reported during the extension phase. Interpretation At 5 years, thymectomy plus prednisone continues to confer benefits in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis compared with prednisone alone. Although caution is appropriate when generalising our findings because of the small sample size of our study, they nevertheless provide further support for the benefits of thymectomy in patients with generalised non-thymomatous myasthenia gravis. Funding National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

Objective To explore patient observations of teamwork-related behaviors such as inter-team communication through a newly designed survey. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 101 patients ( N =86) and caregivers ( N =15) recruited from the emergency department (ED) of an urban, academic medical center (>85,000 visits/year) completed the 16-item Patients' Insights and Views Observing Teams (PIVOT) Survey. We evaluated validity evidence through descriptive statistics and analysis including a Many-facet Rasch model to determine associations between questionnaire items and sociodemographic characteristics. Results Participant responses provided evidence survey items performed well and reflected patients' awareness of team behaviors such as inter-team communication, coordination, and keeping teammates informed. Also, participants responded about the consistency of information from team members and knowing what people's jobs were on the team. Rasch analysis largely supported that the PIVOT items reflected the intended content area and adequacy of ratings scales supporting evidence of response processes. High internal consistency (Cronbach alpha, r =.87) supported evidence of internal structure. As expected, response patterns differed by ED visit acuity level and length of stay. Conclusions The PIVOT survey offered a means to collect patient and caregiver observations of health care teams. Practice implications PIVOT survey responses may contribute to evaluation of teamwork behaviors.

Vincristine is an integral part of the "PCV" regimen that is commonly administered to treat primary brain tumors. The efficacy of vincristine as a single agent in these tumors has been poorly studied. This study was designed to determine whether vincristine enters normal rat brain or an intracranially or subcutaneously implanted glioma and to assess the presence of the efflux pump P-glycoprotein (P-gp) on tumor and vascular endothelial cells. The 9L rat gliosarcoma was implanted intracranially and subcutaneously in three Fischer 344 rats. On day 7, [3H]vincristine (50 microCi, 4.8 microg) was injected into the carotid artery, and the animals were euthanized 10 or 20 min later. Quantitative autoradiography revealed that vincristine levels in the liver were 6- to 11-fold greater than in the i.c. tumor, and 15- to 37-fold greater than in normal brain, the reverse of the expected pattern with intraarterial delivery. Vincristine levels in the s.c. tumor were 2-fold higher than levels in the i.c. tumor. P-gp was detected with JSB1 antibody in vascular endothelium of both normal brain and the i.c. tumor, but not in the tumor cells in either location, or in endothelial cells in the s.c. tumor. These results demonstrate that vincristine has negligible penetration of normal rat brain or i.c. 9L glioma despite intra-arterial delivery and the presence of blood-brain barrier dysfunction as demonstrated by Evan's blue. Furthermore, this study suggests that P-gp-mediated efflux from endothelium may explain these findings. The lack of penetration of vincristine into brain tumor and the paucity of single-agent activity studies suggest that vincristine should not be used in the treatment of primary brain tumors.

Paclitaxel is an important agent in the treatment of many common malignancies. Although the symptomatic peripheral neuropathy caused by this drug is its principal nonhematologic toxicity, little is known about the distribution of paclitaxel within the peripheral or central nervous system following systemic administration. In order to study paclitaxel's distribution in neural and extraneural tissues, adult Sprague-Dawley rats were sacrificed 2 h after a tail vein injection of [3H]-paclitaxel (0.03 mg/kg, 250 microC/rat). Samples of lung, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, skeletal muscle, brain, spinal cord, dorsal root ganglion, and peripheral nerve were then removed and snap-frozen. These tissues were sectioned at 10 microns in a cryostat and exposed to autoradiography film for 2 weeks. The distribution and concentrations of [3H]-paclitaxel in plasma, urine and cerebrospinal fluid were also determined using liquid scintillation spectrometry. [3H]-paclitaxel concentrations (and organ/plasma concentration ratios) in plasma, urine and cerebrospinal fluid were 2.6 nM (1), 38 nM (15) and 0.7 nM (0.3), respectively. A relatively homogeneous distribution of [3H]-paclitaxel was observed in liver [412 nM (151)], spleen [351 nM (133)], heart [319 nM (117)], lung [268 nM (93)] and muscle [69 nM (26)]. Higher concentrations of [3H]-paclitaxel were noted in the portal triads [869 nM (361)], glomeruli [797 nM (304)], and renal medulla [961 nM (363)], which may reflect biliary excretion and glomerular filtration. A high concentration of [3H]-paclitaxel was also noted in the choroid plexus [432 nM (167)], but [3H]-paclitaxel was not detected in the brain parenchyma, spinal cord, dorsal root ganglion, peripheral nerve, or the testicles. The pathogenesis of paclitaxel-induced neurotoxicity remains obscure given its limited distribution in the nervous system. In addition, these results suggest that systemically administered paclitaxel is not likely to be effective for the treatment of malignancies in the testes or the nervous system.