Search

Coronoid process hyperplasia (CPH) is an oral and maxillofacial surgical disease that can result in restricted jaw movement due to an enlarged and elongated mandibular coronoid process. It is characterized by the painless progressive restriction of unilaterally or bilaterally mouth opening. Clinically, unexplained bilateral CPH is less common and therefore often overlooked or misdiagnosed, and coronoidectomy can be very effective on improving mouth opening. Currently, the exact etiology and mechanism of congenital CPH have not yet been fully understood, but it is generally believed to be genetically related. In this paper, the relationship of the congenital mandibular CPH with the related diseases was examined based on cases collected in our clinic and literature review for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of patients with restricted mouth opening associated with CPH., (© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Bimaxillary protrusion is a dentofacial deformity common in the East Asian population. It is often difficult to decide between orthodontic and surgical retraction to treat patients with bimaxillary protrusion, especially if surgery to correct skeletal base discrepancies is also required. The objective of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes of surgical versus orthodontic retraction in patients with bimaxillary protrusion undergoing orthognathic surgery. A retrospective cohort study was conducted, where the medical records and radiographs of 51 patients with bimaxillary protrusion who had an anterior segmental osteotomy concomitant with orthognathic surgery were examined. Patients who had bimaxillary anterior segmental osteotomies were more likely to achieve an inter-incisal angle of 135 ± 5° at the end of treatment, when compared to patients who had orthodontic retraction (P < 0.01). The total treatment duration of patients who had bimaxillary anterior segmental osteotomies was significantly shorter as compared to that of the patients who only had these osteotomies in the maxilla (P < 0.001) or mandible (P = 0.012). Complications and permanent long-term sequelae following anterior segmental osteotomies were uncommon. It is concluded that bimaxillary anterior segmental osteotomies are a viable alternative for patients with concomitant bimaxillary protrusion and skeletal base discrepancies. This allows for a significantly shorter treatment time and greater correction of inter-incisal angles, without a significant increase in complications., (Copyright © 2022 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the stability and complications of mandibular anterior subapical osteotomy (ASO) in the treatment of bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion by way of a retrospective study., Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty patients who received orthognathic surgery at a single center between 2008 and 2017 were included. Relapse was assessed by serial tracings of lateral cephalograms which were obtained pre-operatively (T1), within 6 weeks after surgery (T2) and at 2 years after surgery. The changes between T2 and T3 represented stability and were tested using the paired t test. The relationship between the extents of surgical repositioning (T2-T1) and relapse (T3-T2) was investigated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. The associations between the variables and the occurrence of relapse and complications identified the risk factors and were evaluated using the χ 2 test or Fisher's exact test. When r > 0.80, clinical correlation was considered significant; and statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, while confidence interval was set at 95%., Results: There was a mean uprighting of L1-MP by 12.7°. At 2 years after surgery, 96.7% of the patients experienced a mean relapse of L1-MP by 2.9°. The extent of surgical repositioning was only weakly correlated with that of relapse and no specific factor that increased the risk of relapse could be identified. The most frequent complications were blood loss requiring transfusion, wound dehiscence or infection, gingival recession, and periodontal bone loss, involving 25.8 to 43.3% of the patients. The remaining complications included tooth root damage, fixation hardware exposure or infection, lingual mucosal laceration, and tooth devitalization. There were no cases of avascular necrosis or nonunion., Conclusions: Although relapse occurred in most of the patients after 2 years, the actual extent was small (2.9°) which was not likely to be clinically significant., Trial Registration: HKUCTR-2964 CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although ASO may be valuable in correcting mandibular dentoalveolar protrusion, the procedure brings with it risks and complications and should be reserved for severe deformities., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The review article examines the methodology for the complex treatment of patients with occlusion anomalies without prior orthodontic treatment, the problems of treating patients with combined jaw deformities, the history of the development and appearance of orthognathic surgery, the prerequisites for the emergence of a two-stage treatment method. Differences between two-step and classic treatment protocols. The authors described the problems associated with the use of the two-stage treatment method, the advantages of the two-stage treatment method in comparison with the classic three-stage approach, examined the goals, objectives and differences of orthodontic treatment, identified the problems associated with the implementation of this treatment method.