Search

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate breast reconstruction have demonstrated positive aesthetic outcomes and high patient satisfaction. However, challenges arise when performing NSM on patients with large and ptotic breasts because of the higher risk of nipple-areola complex (NAC) necrosis. This study proposes a new technique: the three pedicle-based nipple-sparing skin-reducing mastectomy (TP-NSSRM), combined with direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction, aimed at reducing complications., Methods: A prospective study was conducted from November of 2021 to April of 2022, enrolling patients with large and drooping breasts requiring mastectomy for breast cancer treatment or risk reduction. Patient selection criteria included a sternal notch-to-nipple distance of greater than or equal to 23 cm, grade 3 ptosis, and eligibility for immediate prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction. Patient satisfaction was assessed using BREAST-Q modules., Results: Seventy-two TP-NSSRM procedures combined with immediate DTI-based breast reconstruction were performed on a total of 45 patients. High patient satisfaction was observed, and statistically significant improvements were noted in postoperative BREAST-Q scores ( P = 0.001). The complication rate was low, and preservation of the nipple-areola complex was achieved in all cases., Conclusions: The TP-NSSRM technique offers a potential solution for patients with large and drooping breasts undergoing NSM. It aims to minimize complications and achieve satisfactory outcomes. This study demonstrates favorable results in terms of patient satisfaction and quality of life. Further research and long-term follow-up are necessary to validate these findings and evaluate the long-term outcomes of this technique., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, IV., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Breastfeeding has been widely encouraged by health care systems for many years. Breast reduction or mastopexy, are very frequent procedures often performed on young women. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of breast surgery on breastfeeding by comparing the success rate of breastfeeding in operated women versus unoperated women. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the breastfeeding success rate according to the surgical technique or the weight resected. A retrospective comparative study was conducted. Women of childbearing age who underwent breast reduction surgery or mastopexy at Henri-Mondor Hospital were contacted to answer a questionnaire about their pregnancies. Two hundred nine patients answered and two groups of patients were constituted, a preoperative group of 104 women who had a pregnancy before surgery and a postoperative group formed by 61 women who had a pregnancy after surgery. Breastfeeding success rate was 82% in the preoperative group versus 41% in the postoperative group. A statistically significant difference was found on the success rate of breastfeeding, as well as the rate of exclusive breastfeeding, with significantly lower rates in the postoperative group. In contrast, there was no significant difference between the different pedicles used, neither according to the weight of the resected gland. The cause of failure in the postoperative group was in most cases insufficient milk. Breast reduction surgery or mastopexy seems to have negative impact on the ability of operated women to breastfeed. This impact is multifactorial so these results should be interpreted with caution and further studies are needed to improve the management of these patients., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Breast hypertrophy, a common pathological condition, often requires surgical intervention to alleviate musculoskeletal pain and improve patients' quality of life. Various techniques have been developed for breast reduction, each with its own advantages and complications. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of the authors technique: the Superomedial-Posterior Pedicle-Based Reduction Mammaplasty., Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 912 patients who underwent breast reduction surgery between November 2012 and July 2020. The surgical technique involved preserving all glandular tissue from the areola to the pectoralis major muscle using the superomedial-posterior pedicle. The patients' demographic data, operative details, complications, breast-related quality of life (measured using the Breast-Q questionnaire), and nipple-areola complex sensitivity were analyzed., Results: The average operative time was 62.12 ± 10.3 minutes. Complications included minor wound dehiscence (4.05%) and hematoma (1.2%), with no cases of nipple-areola complex necrosis. Nipple-areola sensitivity was fully restored in all patients at the 2-year follow-up. Patient satisfaction with the procedure was high with a statistically significant difference observed between pre- and postoperative scores (p < 0.001) of the Breast-Q questionnaire., Conclusion: Authors technique offers reliable vascularization and innervation of the nipple-areola complex and achieves satisfactory aesthetic outcomes. It is associated with shorter operative times compared to other techniques reported in the literature. The Superomedial-Posterior Pedicle-Based Reduction Mammaplasty represents a safe and effective method for breast reduction surgery, providing significant benefits to patients with breast hypertrophy., Level of Evidence I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Patients undergoing breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap are at risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, necessitating flap salvage surgery. However, this carries the risk of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and potential significant partial or complete flap loss. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of corticosteroids in reducing IRI related complications in DIEP flaps that are returned to the operation theater for attempted salvage after venous or arterial failure. A double-blinded prospective randomized study was conducted between January 2012 and January 2023 on patients scheduled for secondary unilateral breast reconstruction using the DIEP flap technique. Patients were included if they developed post-operative venous or arterial flap thrombosis and experienced DIEP flap IRI following operative take-back and anastomosis revision. The treatment group (TG) received a 5-day course of corticosteroids, while the control group (CG) did not receive any specific treatment. Forty-six patients were enrolled in the study. In the CG, two cases of total flap loss and eight cases of partial flap necrosis were observed, while the TG had only 1 case of partial flap necrosis (p < 0.05). The complete resolution of clinical signs of IRI occurred within 13 ± 2.1 days for the TG and 21 ± 3.5 days for the CG (p = 0.00001). The TG had a significantly shorter hospital stay (11.13 ± 0.38 days) compared with the CG (15.47 ± 1.27 days; p < 0.0001). Targeted corticosteroid therapy following a salvage procedure for vascular thrombosis in DIEP flaps has shown promise as an effective treatment for subsequent IRI. This approach may be considered as a viable option for managing IRI in free flaps. However, further studies involving a larger number of patients are required to substantiate our hypothesis., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The morphological result of nipple-areola complex (NAC) reconstruction may be disappointing for patients who undergo skin-sparing mastectomies and immediate breast reconstruction, followed by secondary reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex.The aim of this study was to analyze patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap., Materials and Methods: Our retrospective study involved all patients who underwent an immediate breast reconstruction after unilateral mastectomy with conservation of the NAC. The following three kinds of surgical approach were used: mastectomy with periareolar incision, mastectomy with hemiperiareolar incision and lateral extension, and mastectomy with inverted-T mammoplasty incision. Our study was based on a survey using a standardized questionnaire and a Likert scale to report patient satisfaction on the basis of criteria defined by the investigators., Results: We evaluated 17 patients. All reconstruction patients were satisfied or very satisfied with the overall aesthetic appearance, projection, and volume as well as the appearance of scarring on the reconstructed breast. None of our patients reported dissatisfaction in response to the criteria under evaluation. A periareolar incision was used most often to perform the mastectomy (10 patients). Partial NAC necrosis was observed in five patients, without negatively influencing their perception of the morphological outcome of their reconstruction., Conclusions: Immediate breast reconstruction using a deep inferior epigastric perforator free flap after nipple-sparing mastectomies met with a high rate of general satisfaction among patients and resulted in a low rate of nipple-areola complex necrosis.

As older people increasingly care for their body image and remain active longer, the demand for reduction mammaplasty is increasing in this population. Only a few studies of reduction mammaplasty have specifically focussed on the outcomes in elderly women. We developed a new breast reduction technique: the Liposuction-Assisted Four Pedicle-Based Breast Reduction (LAFPBR) that is especially indicated for elderly patients. The aim of this paper was to describe the LAFPBR technique and to determine whether it could be considered a safer option for elderly patients compared to the superomedial pedicle (SMP) technique. A retrospective study included sixty-two women aged 60 years and over who underwent bilateral breast reduction mammaplasty. Thirty-one patients underwent LAFPBR and 31 patients were operated using the SMP technique. Complications and patient satisfaction in both groups were analysed. Patient satisfaction was measured using a validated questionnaire: the client satisfaction questionnaire 8 (CSQ-8). The LAFPBR technique required less operating time, and avoided significant blood loss. Six minor complications were observed in SMP patients. No LAFPBR women developed a procedure-related complication. Patient satisfaction was high with a mean score of 29.65 in LAFPBR patients and 28.68 in SMP patients. The LAFPBR is an easy procedure that appears safer than SMP and results in a high satisfaction rate in elderly women., (Copyright © 2018 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Hormone (anti-estrogen) therapy (HT) plays a major role in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer management. The latest guidelines propose to extend the duration of adjuvant treatment from 5 to 10 years. The association between HT and thromboembolic or microvascular complications during breast reconstruction has been investigated. However, while estrogens play a crucial role in wound healing, no study has assessed the impact of tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors on other postoperative complications, including wound healing complications. This study aimed to assess the impact of HT on surgical outcomes after breast reconstruction., Methods: All patients who underwent breast reconstruction between January 2012 and December 2013 were reviewed. Rates of wound healing complications, prosthesis complications, microvascular thrombosis, flap failures, and venous thromboembolism were retrospectively compared between patients treated and not treated with HT at the time of surgery., Results: A total of 233 operations were performed: 78 free flaps, 12 autologous latissimus dorsi flaps, 47 implants, 42 lipofilling, and 54 secondary symmetrization. At the time of surgery, 38% of patients were treated with HT. Those who received HT experienced significantly more wound healing complications (61% versus 28%; p < 0.001), including fat necrosis (26% versus 8.3%; p < 0.001), infections (15% versus 2.8%; p < 0.001), delayed wound healing (49% versus 13%; p < 0.001), and grade III/IV capsular contracture (55% versus 9.1%; p = 0.001). No significant difference was observed in the occurrence of microvascular thrombosis and venous thromboembolism., Conclusions: HT seems to be associated with an increased risk of wound healing complications. Currently, there is no guideline on perioperative HT discontinuation. Further investigations are required., (Copyright © 2017 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Venous congestion is a common cause of DIEP flap failure. When identified intraoperatively, an additional venous anastomosis can improve the venous outflow and prevent flap failure. The aim of this study was to assess if the retrograde limb of the internal mammary vein (IMV) could be considered a good recipient vessel to be used when persistent flap congestion is present, and a second venous anastomosis is required., Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 74 patients who had undergone DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Patients were classified into two groups: SVA (single venous anastomosis) and DVA (dual venous anastomosis). In the SVA group (n = 38), the IMV antegrade limb was used for venous drainage. A single DIEV (Deep Inferior Epigastric Vein) was anastomosed to the superior arm of the IMV. In the DVA group (n = 36), both the antegrade (superior) and retrograde (inferior) stumps of the IMV were used, connecting the larger DIEV to the antegrade IMV and the other DIEV or the SIEV (Superficial Inferior Epigastric Vein) to the IMV retrograde limb., Results: No venous congestion or flap loss was observed when two venous anastomoses were performed using both the IMV antegrade and retrograde limbs (P = 0.3271). In the DVA group, no major complication occurred (P = 0.0453). Operative explorations were significantly reduced in the DVA group (P = 0.0242)., Conclusion: These findings suggest that when an additional venous outflow is required, the use of the IMV retrograde limb may help to avoid flap venous congestion. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:447-452, 2016., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)