Search

Aim: This research compares postoperative complication rates with Strattice™, SERAGYN ® BR, and TiLOOP ® Bra interposition devices for subpectoral implant placement after skin or nipple sparing mastectomy., Patients and Methods: 188 breast reconstructions in 157 patients after primary (n=96), secondary (n=71), or prophylactic (n=21) surgery were analyzed regarding major and minor complications., Results: With acellular dermal matrix (ADM) Strattice™, 27.5% major and 27.5% minor complications occurred. Implant loss rates were 27.3% in primary and 30.8% in secondary reconstructions. With SERAGYN ® BR, 11.1% major and 13,0% minor complications occurred. Implant losses (6.1%) occurred exclusively in primary reconstructions. With TiLOOP ® Bra, 14.9% major and 9.6% minor complications occurred. Implant loss rates were 7.7% in primary and 7.1% in secondary reconstructions., Conclusion: ADM was associated with high complication rates in primary and secondary reconstructions. Low complication rates were seen with mesh interposition devices in primary, secondary, and prophylactic reconstructions., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Background/aim: Synthetic meshes (SMs) and acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are used in reconstructive breast surgery. In the absence of prospective comparative studies, the identification of differences relies on retrospective analyses., Patients and Methods: Our analysis focused on the impact of pre- and postoperative radiotherapy (RTX) and material-related differences. The analysis included 281 breast cancer patients (362 breasts) after nipple- and skin-sparing mastectomy with subpectoral implant insertion., Results: Overall, the implant loss rate was 23.1% using porcine ADM, 7% using partially resorbable SM (prSM), and 5.6% using non-resorbable SM (nrSM). After RTX, the implant loss rate was 56.3% with ADM, 13% with prSM and 13.2% with nrSM. The ADM group showed a significant effect of RTX on the postoperative seroma rate, wound infections, and implant loss rate. When prSM was used, RTX showed no significant effect. When using the nrSM, RTX significantly influenced complication rates regarding wound infections and implant loss., Conclusion: In material-assisted breast reconstructions with pre- or post-operative RTX, there is a significantly higher implant loss rate when using porcine ADM compared to SM., (Copyright © 2021 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Implant-based or expander-supported breast reconstruction is an established surgical method after mastectomies due to cancer or to prophylactic reasons. Patient reported outcome (PRO) and cosmetic outcome after breast reconstruction with a synthetic surgical mesh was investigated in a prospective, single-arm, multi-center study., Material and Methods: Primary or secondary implant-based breast reconstruction with support of TiLOOP® Bra was performed in 269 patients during the PRO-BRA study. PRO 12 months after breast reconstruction was evaluated using Breast-Q questionnaire. Cosmetic outcome was evaluated by two independent experts by means of pictures taken preoperatively and at the follow-up visits., Results: Breast-Q and 12 months FU were completed by 210 women. Patients without adverse event had a significantly higher Breast-Q score for "sexual well-being" (p = 0.001); "psychosocial well-being" was negatively influenced by prior therapies (p < 0.01), and older patients had significantly lower scores at 12 months FU compared to pre-OP for "satisfaction with breasts" (p < 0.01) while the opposite was true for younger patients. Unilateral surgery resulted in reduced "satisfaction with breast" at 12 months FU (p < 0.01). Radiotherapy negatively influenced "satisfaction with breast", "sexual well-being" and "physical well-being chest". The cosmetic evaluation showed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in the evaluation by the patients and experts with the patients' assessment being worse compared to experts' assessment., Conclusion: Our study showed that two years after implant-based breast reconstruction with support of TiLOOP® Bra PRO is influenced by different factors. This information can be used to improve the decision-making process for women who chose implant-based breast reconstruction., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Acellular dermal matrix is increasingly used as caudolateral coverage for breast implants in immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or in the correction of implant-associated breast deformities. Matrices of human, bovine, and porcine origin are available. The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study was to report experiences with porcine acellular dermal matrices, as only limited data can be found in the literature., Methods: In the hospital databases of five institutions, 127 patients were identified who underwent breast reconstructions in 156 breasts using an acellular porcine dermal matrix. Medical records were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups: immediate expander-implant or direct to implant reconstructions (n = 98), delayed expander-implant reconstructions (n = 14), and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities (n = 44)., Results: With a mean follow-up of 19.6 months, total major complication rate was 7.1 %: implant loss (3.2 %), skin flap necrosis (2.6 %), delayed skin healing (2.6 %), hematoma (1.9 %), seroma (1.3 %), infection (0.6 %), and capsular contracture (0.6 %). Total minor complication rate was 22.9 %, with seroma being the most frequent complication (19.2 %). In the group of immediate breast reconstructions, 20.4 % of the breasts had received radiotherapy in the past. These patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of seroma than patients without prior radiotherapy (35.0 vs. 14.9 %, p = 0.031)., Conclusions: Complication rates using porcine acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction are comparable to complication rates reported in studies using human acellular dermal matrices. Thus, porcine acellular dermal matrices can safely be applied in breast reconstructive surgery.