Search

Background: The TMG flap is a popular choice for breast reconstruction. However, it remains unclear whether the side of flap harvest, subsequent flap shaping and inset impacts breast appearance and volume dispersion. This study compares the aesthetic outcome of the reconstructed breast following TMG flap harvest from the ipsilateral or contralateral thigh., Patient and Methods: A retrospective matched-pair multi-center study was conducted. Patients were grouped according to the side of flap harvest (ipsilateral vs. contralateral) and matched for age, BMI and mastectomy type. Between 01/2013 and 03/2020, 384 TMG breast reconstructions were performed, of which 86 were included (43 ipsilateral vs. 43 contralateral). Standardized pre- and postoperative photographs were evaluated using a modified assessment scale comprising of a symmetry score (SymS, max. 20 points), a volume discrepancy score (VDS, max. 8 points) and an aesthetic appearance score (AS, max. 10 points). Autologous fat grafting (AFG) procedures for breast refinement were compared., Results: Pleasing breast symmetry (SymS Ipsi: 14.5/20; Contra: 14.9/20), volume (VDS Ipsi: 3.3/8; Contra: 2.4/8) and aesthetic appearance (AS Ipsi: 6.7/10; Contra: 6.7/10) were achieved with both surgical methods. No significant changes were present regarding the VDS (F(1.82) = 2.848, p = 0.095) or the SymS (F(1.82) = 1.031, p = 0.313) pre- to postoperatively. Significantly more autologous fat grafting was done in the contralateral group (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: The side of the TMG flap harvest, different shaping and inset techniques do not impact the aesthetic breast outcome. Both surgical methods result in pleasing breast symmetry and volume. Secondary procedures are common and should be entailed in the reconstructive strategy., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japanese Breast Cancer Society.)

Autologous immediate breast reconstruction in large and ptotic breasts remains challenging. We aimed to identify independent risk factors for impaired wound healing and nipple necrosis after skin reducing wise pattern mastectomy in autologous reconstruction with an auxiliary deepithelialized inferiorly based dermal flap (IBDF). Methods. This retrospective study examined patients with wise pattern mastectomy with autologous immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) between 2017 and 2019. All cases of large and ptotic breasts were included. Demographic, oncologic, reconstructive, and surgical data were compiled, and multifactorial binary logistic regression models identified independent predictors for skin complications and nipple areolar complex (NAC) necrosis. Results. Of 591 autologous breast reconstructions, 62 (11%) met the inclusion criteria. Overall wound complication rate was 32% (n = 20, DIEP 11, thigh 9, p = 0.99), including 26% minor (n = 16, non-surgically treated) and 7% major complications (n = 4, surgically treated). Complete NAC necrosis occurred in one case. Nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) (p = 0.003), high BMI (p = 0.019), longer operation time (p = 0.044) and higher patient age (p = 0.045) were independent risk factors for skin complications. Using internal mammary artery perforators (IMAP) as recipient vessels did not result in increased complication rates (p = 0.59). Conclusion. Higher patient age, BMI, and operation time (OT) significantly increase the risk for skin complications in combined reduction wise pattern mastectomies with autologous IBR. In this context, IBDFs help preserve the inframammary fold, providing vasculature to the T-junction and the mastectomy skin flaps. Acceptable complication rates can be achieved in large and ptotic breasts, regardless of preoperative chemotherapy or radiation. Gentle tissue handling with minimal thermal trauma preserves internal mammary artery perforators (IMAPs) as recipient vessels. In cases of flap failure and alloplastic conversion, the IBDF can serve as an autoderm, protecting the implant from exposure [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]