Search

Background: In breast reduction, traditionally the inferior pedicle (IFP) technique is considered the most performed by plastic surgeons. A growing interest for the superomedial pedicle (SMP) mammoplasty technique has been documented in literature and clinical practice. Sensory recovery of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC), final areolar shape and scarring may also have a significant impact on patient satisfaction., Objective: This study represents a retrospective multimodal analysis comparing NAC sensation and appearance outcomes in IFP and SMP wise pattern breast reductions with 2-year follow-up., Methods: From 2013 to 2017, all performed reduction mammoplasty were included and divided in two groups (IFP or SMP technique). Testing included pressure perception (Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments), NAC measurement (diameters ratio and circumference) and circumareolar scar hypertrophy assessment. Measurements were repeated at 2 weeks, 6 and 24 months postoperatively., Results: amongst the 73 patients, 42 (58%) had SMP technique and 31 (42%) had IFP technique. Values at 6-months showed better sensory return in the SMP (p < 0.01**). NAC enlargement, showed no difference between groups. However, there was a statistically significant increase in both the SMP (p < 0.001***) and the IFP (p < 0.01**) groups when comparing the 2-week and 24-month follow-up visits measured ratios confirming a more oval appearance over time with both techniques. Scar hypertrophy showed statistically significant reduction in both the SMP (p < 0.001***) and the IFP (p < 0.01**) groups over time., Conclusion: This 2-year follow-up study showed little difference in outcomes between the two techniques, but some advantages in NAC sensory recovery with the SMP., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Mastopexy is one of the most performed cosmetic surgery procedures in the U.S. Numerous studies on mastopexy techniques have been published in the past decades, including case reports, retrospective reviews, and prospective studies. However, to date, no study has investigated the overall complications or satisfaction rates associated with the wide spectrum of techniques., Objectives: This review aims to assess the outcomes of the various mastopexy techniques, without the use of implants, thus focusing on associated complications, and to provide a simplified classification system., Methods: This systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed database was queried in search of clinical studies describing nonprosthetic mastopexy techniques, which reported the technique, indication, and outcomes., Results: Thirty-four studies, published from 1980 through 2016, were included and represented 1888 treated patients. Four main surgical technique categories were identified: dermal reshape, glandular reshape, glandular reshape associated with perforator flaps, and glandular reshape with mesh support. Despite varying techniques, mastopexy was generally found to be a reliable esthetic procedure with unsatisfactory breast shape, thus accounting for only 1.3% of the patients. The overall complication rate was 10.4%. The most represented complications were scar-related (3%, including hypertrophic or unesthetic appearance) and nipple-areola-related problems (2.9%; including distortion, asymmetry, and reduction in sensation)., Conclusions: Mastopexy techniques achieve high patient satisfaction and can be tailored according to patient needs and clinical presentation. Complication rates and morbidity are relatively low. However, a significant number of issues related to scars, asymmetry, and potential ptosis recurrence should be highlighted in the information provided to patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Nowadays, the ultimate goal of microsurgical breast reconstruction is not merely the effective transfer of vascularized tissue but the achievement of a natural, symmetric appearance. The aim of this present study was to systematically summarize the published evidence on abdominal-based free flap inset for breast reconstruction in order to provide principles and classification that could guide the surgeon in choosing the most appropriate inset technique based on patient and flap characteristics. A comprehensive review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, looking for articles on the insetting technique for free flap breast reconstruction. After screening 306 publications, 24 papers (published from 1994 to 2020) were included in the study. We identified four main breast anatomical features on which the papers reviewed focused when describing their insetting technique: breast width, breast ptosis, breast projection, and upper pole fullness. Patient body type, type of mastectomy, and reported complications are also discussed. Flap shaping and inset during breast reconstruction are fundamental steps in any reconstructive procedure. Despite the low evidence in the current literature, this systematic review provides a framework to guide the surgeon's decision-making and optimize the aesthetic outcomes of abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]