Search

New Findings: What is the central question of this study? Cachexia causes severe changes in skeletal muscle metabolism and function and is a key predictor of negative outcomes in cancer patients: what are the changes in whole animal energy metabolism and mitochondria in skeletal muscle? What is the main finding and its importance? There is decreased whole animal energy expenditure in mice with cachexia. They displayed highly dysmorphic mitochondria and mitophagy in skeletal muscle., Abstract: Cachexia causes changes in skeletal muscle metabolism. Mice with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer bone metastases and cachexia have decreased whole animal energy metabolism and increased skeletal muscle mitophagy. We examined whole animal energy metabolism by indirect calorimetry in mice with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer bone metastases, and showed decreased energy expenditure. We also examined skeletal muscle mitochondria and found that mitochondria in mice with MDA-MB-231 bone metastases are highly dysmorphic and have altered protein markers of mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics. In addition, LC3B protein was increased in mitochondria of skeletal muscle from cachectic mice, and colocalized with the mitochondrial protein Tom20. Our data demonstrate the importance of mitophagy in cachexia. Understanding these changes will help contribute to defining treatments for cancer cachexia., (© 2020 The Authors. Experimental Physiology © 2020 The Physiological Society.)

We report here a detailed time course study of the individual and combined chemopreventive effects of Tamoxifen (Tam) and a high fish oil (FO) diet on multiple histologic parameters of mammary carcinogenesis. Groups of female Sprague-Dawley rats were injected ip with 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea at 50 days of age and assigned to either a control diet (20% corn oil [CO]) or a FO-rich diet (10% FO + 10% CO) in the presence and absence of Tam in the diet (0.6 ppm). Rats were sacrificed at weeks 4 (before palpable tumors), 8 and 12 (when ∼90% of control rats had palpable tumors). Our results demonstrate a major effect of Tam in inhibiting the development of early preneoplastic lesions. FO, while having a marginal protective effect of it own, enhanced the antitumor action of Tam on all histologic parameters of carcinogenesis, although the effects of the combination were not statistically different from those of Tam alone. The combination of FO and Tam was the only intervention that induced regression of established preneoplastic lesions. We also found that in contrast to plasma, only target tissue n-3 fatty acids (FAs) levels correlated with select tissue biomarkers of carcinogenesis whose expression was altered in a manner predictive of a protective effect. Our results demonstrating the potentially superior chemopreventive efficacy of Tam and n-3FA have important translational implications. Our data also emphasize the importance of local factors in affecting target tissue levels and biologic effects of n-3FA., (© 2013 UICC.)

We have previously shown that a fish oil (FO)-rich diet increased the chemopreventive efficacy of tamoxifen (Tam) against N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced rat mammary carcinogenesis. Herein, we provide evidence that Tam treatment modifies gene expression of mammary tumors depending upon the type of dietary fat fed to the animals. Rats initiated with MNU and treated with Tam were fed a diet rich in corn oil or FO. After 8 wk, cribriform tumors were collected and gene expression analysis was performed. Increased RNA expression of genes such as SerpinB10, Wisp2, and Apod in tumors from FO-treated rats is indicative of highly differentiated tumors. Decreased expression of H19 and Igf2 mRNA in Tam-treated groups, and Gamma Synuclein mRNA in the FO + Tam group may be related to tumor growth impairment and lower metastatic capacity. Change in the expression of genes associated with immunity in animals in the FO + Tam group may suggest a shift in the immune response. These data show that, although Tam modulates the expression of genes leading to tumor growth impairment, further modulations of genes are influenced by FO. FO modulation of Tam changes in gene expression accounts for its enhancing chemopreventive effect against MNU-induced mammary carcinogenesis. Supplemental materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher's online edition of Nutrition and Cancer to view the supplemental file.

Epidemiologic studies on the protective role of omega-3 fatty acids (n:3) on breast cancer prevention remain inconclusive but studies in preclinical models provide more positive outcome. However, the mechanisms accounting for the protective effect of n:3 are not defined. In the present study, conducted in the N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced rat mammary carcinogenesis model, we examined the effects of n:3 individually and in combination with the anti-estrogen Tamoxifen (Tam) on a comprehensive panel of systemic and preneoplastic mammary gland restricted biomarkers which may be critical in the progression to invasive cancer. We observed that fish oil (FO) rich diets significantly reduced Ki67 expression in hyperplastic lesions, while cleaved caspase-3 expression was not affected. Dietary FO and/or Tam did not have major effects on systemic oxidative stress biomarkers, based on oxidative damage to DNA measured as 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) and lipid peroxidation assessed as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). Tissue levels of 8-isoprostane, on the other hand, were markedly reduced (p<0.0001) in FO-fed rats, possibly as a result of FO-induced depletion of arachidonic acid in the mammary gland. These results suggest that the protective effect of n:3 in this experimental system is not mediated by changes in the levels of oxidative stress but may result from suppression of arachidonic acid-specific pathways.

In these experiments, we tested the hypothesis that inhibition of the estrogen receptor (ER) with Tamoxifen and activation of PPARγ with fish oil (FO) rich in omega-3 (n-3; known PPAR agonists) inhibit the development of hormone-independent breast cancer in view of the known crosstalk between the ER and PPARγ pathways. We selected the polyoma middle T transgenic mouse model, since in this system the development of ER- tumors is preceded by ER positive preneoplastic lesions. Tamoxifen admixed with a 20% corn oil (CO) modified AIN-76A diet delayed mammary carcinogenesis and inhibited tumor multiplicity, volume, and weight in a dose-dependent (1, 10, and 100 ppm) fashion. Administration of increasing concentrations of FO in the diet (5%, 10%, and 17%) did not affect any of the tumor parameters. Combined administration of different doses of Tamoxifen and FO delayed carcinogenesis and suppressed tumor multiplicity and volume to the same extent as Tamoxifen alone. Mice fed 10% FO exhibited the expected increase in n-3/n-6 ratio in plasma and tumor based on diet analysis. Further increase in the n-3/n-6 ratio was not observed in mice fed the 17% FO diet. FO reduced tissue levels of arachidonic acid and its metabolite PGF-2α. Our results support the role of ER expression by preneoplastic lesions in the development of hormone-independent tumors and consequently the importance of including ER targeting in combination with mechanistically based novel chemopreventive agents.

The antiestrogen tamoxifen reduces breast cancer incidence in high-risk women but is unable to inhibit the development of hormone-independent tumors. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA), known ligands of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma), generally exert tumor-suppressive effects. Based on the known crosstalk between the estrogen and the PPARgamma receptors, we tested the hypothesis that the combination of tamoxifen with n-3 PUFA results in a superior antitumor action over the individual interventions. In this study, we report for the first time that the combination of a fish oil diet rich in n-3 PUFA and tamoxifen seemed to inhibit N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced mammary carcinogenesis, tumor multiplicity, and volume to a greater extent than the individual interventions. The potential superiority of the combination was particularly evident at a suboptimal dose of tamoxifen, which, by itself, was unable to significantly decrease tumor development. Because activation of PPARgamma is known to inhibit oxidative stress, we examined the effects of our interventions on circulating and tumor levels of glutathione, a major intracellular antioxidant. Our results indicate that reduction in the level of oxidative stress may be a potential mechanism by which the n-3 PUFA-rich diet potentiated the tumor-suppressive effect of tamoxifen. Our interventions were well tolerated without evidence of toxicity. Combined administration of tamoxifen and n-3 PUFA is a promising new approach to breast cancer prevention. Because of its safety, this combination can quickly be translated to the clinic if its superiority can be supported by future studies.