Search

In this paper we propose reduction factors accounting for the decrease of stiffness of monumental masonry foundations due to aging, weathering, or other deteriorating effects. The proposed reduced stiffness values can be readily used in finite element structural analysis software in the framework of performance-based assessment, representing linear elastic springs at the foundation level. These springs account for foundation-soil system flexibility and soil-foundation interaction (SFI) at low-frequency vibrations. Accordingly, we propose a procedure to reduce monumental masonry foundation-wall stiffness from the rigid-footing assumption, with respect to the relative stiffness between the foundation and the soil. The proposed procedure is applied to the historical structure Arsenal De Milly in the Medieval City of Rhodes, where period elongation and ductility increase are highlighted, because of SFI and foundation flexibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper presents the application of the seismic assessment procedure developed in the PERPETUATE project on a single monument, the Neoclassical School in the Medieval City of Rhodes. The PERPETUATE methodology for the estimation of seismic risk of cultural heritage assets is based on the principles of performance-based assessment ( PBA), using nonlinear static procedures. The outcome of the PBA methodology is the maximum seismic intensity measure compatible to different performance levels. The focus of the paper is on the application of the methodology, considering the effects of both soil-foundation-structure interaction ( SFSI) and masonry foundation flexibility on the building response, before and after rehabilitation design measures. It is found that SFSI and foundation flexibility produce larger displacements and reduce the maximum ground acceleration that the building can sustain by over 50 %. However, despite the detrimental effects of SFSI on the acceleration capacity, SFSI and foundation flexibility may have a favorable effect on the structure safety, as they modify the collapse mechanism. The results of seismic analyses showed that the building, in its current state, does not sustain the demands for the Life Safety and Collapse Prevention performance levels. Stiffening the roof of the structure and providing sufficient anchorage to the structure, along with systematic grouting of the masonry walls, are the principal rehabilitation decisions considered herein. Mitigation measures were evaluated, considering SFSI and the analyses revealed the adequacy of the proposed retrofitting measure, which combines vertical (wall) and horizontal (roof) stiffening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]