Search

The development of rapid, sensitive, and accurate mass spectrometric methods for measuring peptides, proteins, and even intact protein assemblies has made mass spectrometry (MS) an extraordinarily enabling tool for structural biology. Here, we provide a personal perspective of the increasingly useful role that mass spectrometric techniques are exerting during the elucidation of higher order protein structures. Areas covered in this brief perspective include MS as an enabling tool for the high resolution structural biologist, for compositional analysis of endogenous protein complexes, for stoichiometry determination, as well as for integrated approaches for the structural elucidation of protein complexes. We conclude with a vision for the future role of MS-based techniques in the development of a multi-scale molecular microscope. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Background: Human Phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein 1 (hPEBP1) also known as Raf kinase inhibitory protein (RKIP), affects various cellular processes, and is implicated in metastasis formation and Alzheimer's disease. Human PEBP1 has also been shown to inhibit the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. Numerous reports concern various mammalian PEBP1 binding ligands. However, since PEBP1 proteins from many different species were investigated, drawing general conclusions regarding human PEBP1 binding properties is rather difficult. Moreover, the binding site of Raf-1 on hPEBP1 is still unknown., Methods/findings: In the present study, we investigated human PEBP1 by NMR to determine the binding site of four different ligands: GTP, FMN, and one Raf-1 peptide in tri-phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated forms. The study was carried out by NMR in near physiological conditions, allowing for the identification of the binding site and the determination of the affinity constants K(D) for different ligands. Native mass spectrometry was used as an alternative method for measuring K(D) values., Conclusions/significance: Our study demonstrates and/or confirms the binding of hPEBP1 to the four studied ligands. All of them bind to the same region centered on the conserved ligand-binding pocket of hPEBP1. Although the affinities for GTP and FMN decrease as pH, salt concentration and temperature increase from pH 6.5/NaCl 0 mM/20°C to pH 7.5/NaCl 100 mM/30°C, both ligands clearly do bind under conditions similar to what is found in cells regarding pH, salt concentration and temperature. In addition, our work confirms that residues in the vicinity of the pocket rather than those within the pocket seem to be required for interaction with Raf-1.

Polymorphonuclear neutrophils contain at least four serine endopeptidases, namely neutrophil elastase (NE), proteinase 3 (PR3), cathepsin G (CatG), and NSP4, which contribute to the regulation of infection and of inflammatory processes. In physiological conditions, endogenous inhibitors including α2‐macroglobulin (α2‐M), serpins [α1‐proteinase inhibitor (α1‐PI)], monocyte neutrophil elastase inhibitor (MNEI), α1‐antichymotrypsin, and locally produced chelonianins (elafin, SLPI) control excessive proteolytic activity of neutrophilic serine proteinases. In contrast to human NE (hNE), hPR3 is weakly inhibited by α1‐PI and MNEI but not by SLPI. α2‐M is a large spectrum inhibitor that traps a variety of proteinases in response to cleavage(s) in its bait region. We report here that α2‐M was more rapidly processed by hNE than hPR3 or hCatG. This was confirmed by the observation that the association between α2‐M and hPR3 is governed by a kass in the ≤ 105 m−1·s−1 range. Since α2‐M‐trapped proteinases retain peptidase activity, we first predicted the putative cleavage sites within the α2‐M bait region (residues 690–728) using kinetic and molecular modeling approaches. We then identified by mass spectrum analysis the cleavage sites of hPR3 in a synthetic peptide spanning the 39‐residue bait region of α2‐M (39pep‐α2‐M). Since the 39pep‐α2‐M peptide and the corresponding bait area in the whole protein do not contain sequences with a high probability of specific cleavage by hPR3 and were indeed only slowly cleaved by hPR3, it can be concluded that α2‐M is a poor inhibitor of hPR3. The resistance of hPR3 to inhibition by endogenous inhibitors explains at least in part its role in tissue injury during chronic inflammatory diseases and its well‐recognized function of major target autoantigen in granulomatosis with polyangiitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Greglin is an 83-residue serine protease inhibitor purified from the ovaries of the locust Schistocerca gregaria. Greglin is a strong inhibitor of subtilisin and human neutrophil elastase, acting at sub-nanomolar and nanomolar concentrations, respectively; it also inhibits neutrophil cathepsin G, α-chymotrypsin and porcine pancreatic elastase, but to a lesser extent. In the present study, we show that greglin resists denaturation at high temperature (95 °C) and after exposure to acetonitrile and acidic or basic p H. Greglin is composed of two domains consisting of residues 1-20 and 21-83. Mass spectrometry indicates that the N-terminal domain (1-20) is post-translationally modified by phosphorylations at three sites and probably contains a glycosylation site. The crystal structure of the region of greglin comprising residues 21-78 in complex with subtilisin was determined at 1.75 Å resolution. Greglin represents a novel member of the non-classical Kazal inhibitors, as it has a unique additional C-terminal region (70-83) connected to the core of the molecule via a supplementary disulfide bond. The stability of greglin was compared with that of an ovomucoid inhibitor. The thermostability and inhibitory specificity of greglin are discussed in light of its structure. In particular, we propose that the C-terminal region is responsible for non-favourable interactions with the autolysis loop (140-loop) of serine proteases of the chymotrypsin family, and thus governs specificity. Database The atomic coordinates and structure factors for the greglin-subtilisin complex have been deposited with the RCSB Protein Data Bank under accession number 4GI3. Structured digital abstract Greglin and Subtilisin Carlsberg bind by X-ray crystallography (View interaction) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The crystallization and structure determination of integral membrane proteins remains a difficult task relying on a good understanding of the behavior of the protein for success. To date, membrane protein structures are still far outnumbered by soluble protein structures. Mass spectrometry is a powerful and versatile tool offering deep insights into the state of the integral membrane protein the structuralist intends to crystallize. With appropriate sample preparation methods, it provides information that can sometimes prove critical at various stages of the structure determination process, from protein expression to model building. Moreover, valuable knowledge is gained when the identified structural features underlie important functional aspects. Electrospray and matrix assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) methods, however, face a particular challenge when dealing with integral membrane proteins. A MALDI method specifically optimized for membrane protein analysis is presented here, with detailed information on the sample preparation and deposition, as well as guidelines for domain determination by limited proteolysis. MALDI-time of flight mass spectrometry can be used to do a proper inventory of initiation sites, to tailor a protein to a stable, well-folded form, and to evaluate selenomethionine replacement. These approaches are illustrated with a few examples drawn from the structural biology of ion channels. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Describes a method for the mass spectrometric analysis of integral membrane proteins. Use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization to analyze the proteins; Importance of the method in facilitating the production of X-ray diffraction grade analysis; Molecular mass determination of proteins.

Design-of-experiment (DOE) approaches, originally conceived by Fischer, are widely applied in industry, particularly in the context of production for which they have been greatly expended. In a research and development context, DOE can be of great use for method development. Specifically, DOE can greatly speed up instrument parameter optimization by first identifying parameters that are critical to a given outcome, showing parameter interdependency where it occurs and accelerating optimization of said parameters using matrices of experimental conditions. While DOE approaches have been applied in mass spectrometry experiments, they have so far failed to gain widespread adoption. This could be attributed to the fact that DOE can get quite complex and daunting to the everyday user. Here we make the case that a subset of DOE tools, hereafter called SimpleDOE (sDOE), can make DOE accessible and useful to the Mass Spectrometry community at large. We illustrate the progressive gains from a purely manual approach to sDOE through a stepwise optimization of parameters affecting the efficiency of top-down ETD fragmentation of proteins on a high-resolution Q-TOF mass spectrometer, where the aim is to maximize sequence coverage of fragmentation events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The Methanosarcina thermophila MC1 protein is a small basic protein that is able to bend DNA sharply. When this protein is submitted to oxidative stress through gamma irradiation, it loses its original DNA interaction properties. The protein can still bind DNA but its ability to bend DNA is decreased dramatically. Here, we used different approaches to determine the oxidations that are responsible for this inactivation. Through a combination of proteolysis and mass spectrometry we have identified the three residues that are oxidized preferentially. We show by site directed mutagenesis that two of these residues, Trp74 and Met75, are involved in the DNA binding. Their substitution by alanine leads to a strong reduction in the protein capacity to bend DNA, and a total loss of its ability to recognize bent DNA. Taken together, these results show that oxidation of both these residues is responsible for the protein inactivation. Furthermore, the results confirm the strong relationship between DNA bending and recognition of DNA sequences by the MC1 protein. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]