Search

We study a modal extension of the Continuous First-Order Logic of Ben Yaacov and Pedersen (J Symb Logic 75(1):168–190, 2010). We provide a set of axioms for such an extension. Deduction rules are just Modus Ponens and Necessitation. We prove that our system is sound with respect to a Kripke semantics and, building on Ben Yaacov and Pedersen (2010), that it satisfies a number of properties similar to those of first-order predicate logic. Then, by means of a canonical model construction, we get that every consistent set of formulas is satisfiable. From the latter result we derive an Approximated Strong Completeness Theorem, in the vein of Continuous Logic, and a Compactness Theorem.

We introduce a two-dimensional metric (interval) temporal logic whose internal and external time flows are dense linear orderings. We provide a suitable semantics and a sequent calculus with axioms for equality and extralogical axioms. Then we prove completeness and a semantic partial cut-elimination theorem down to formulas of a certain type.

We show how to extend the Continuous Propositional Logic by means of an infinitary rule in order to achieve a Strong Completeness Theorem. Eventually we investigate how to recover a weak version of the Deduction Theorem.

We study a real valued propositional logic with unbounded positive and negative truth values that we call R-valued logic. Such logic slightly extends continuous propositional logic which, in turn, builds on Lukasiewicz many-valued logic. After presenting the deduction machinery and the semantics of R-valued logic, we prove a completeness theorem for finite theories. Then we define unital and Archimedean theories, in accordance with the theory of Riesz spaces. In the unital setting, we prove the equivalence of consistency and satisfiability and an approximated completeness theorem similar to the one that holds for continuous propositional logic. Eventually, among unital theories, we characterize Archimedean theories as those for which strong completeness holds. We also point out that R-valued logic provides alternative calculi for Lukasiewicz and for propositional continuous logic.

We introduce a natural deduction system for the until-free subsystem of the branching time logic Although we work with labelled formulas, our system differs conceptually from the usual labelled deduction systems because we have no relational formulas. Moreover, no deduction rule embodies semantic features such as properties of accessibility relation or similar algebraic properties. We provide a suitable semantics for our system and prove that it is sound and weakly complete with respect to such semantics.

We study a predicate extension of an unbounded real valued propositional logic that has been recently introduced. The latter, in turn, can be regarded as an extension of both the abelian logic and of the propositional continuous logic. Among other results, we prove that our predicate extension satisfies the property of weak completeness (the equivalence between satisfiability and consistency) and, under an additional assumption on the set of premisses, the property of strong completeness (the equivalence between logical consequence and provability). Eventually we discuss some topological properties of the space of types in our logic.

Quantum Coherent Spaces were introduced by Girard as a quantum framework where to interpret the exponential-free fragment of Linear Logic. Aim of this paper is to extend Girard's interpretation to a subsystem of linear logic with bounded exponentials. We provide deduction rules for the bounded exponentials and, correspondingly, we introduce the novel notion of bounded exponentials of Quantum Coherent Spaces. We show that the latter provide a categorical model of our system. In order to do that, we first study properties of the category of Quantum Coherent Spaces.

We introduce a complete and cut-free proof system for a sufficiently expressive fragment of Metric Temporal Logic over dense time domains in which a schema of induction is provable. So doing we extend results previously obtained by Montagna et al. to unbounded temporal operators. (© 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

We introduce an extension of natural deduction that is suitable for dealing with modal operators and induction. We provide a proof reduction system and we prove a strong normalization theorem for an intuitionistic calculus. As a consequence we obtain a purely syntactic proof of consistency. We also present a classical calculus and we relate provability in the two calculi by means of an adequate formula translation.

We provide some consequences of a Quantifier Elimination Property and related properties previously introduced (see [4]) in the setting of Banach space structures. We further consider some applications of quantifierfree definability, such as strict convexity via the definability of certain mapping and the continuity of definable functions.

The Eberlein-Smulian theorem on the equivalence of weak compactness and the finite intersection property of bounded closed convex sets is given a short elementary proof by applying Abraham Robinson's nonstandard characterization of compactness.

We study a modal extension of the Continuous First-Order Logic of Ben Yaacov and Pedersen (J Symb Logic 75(1):168–190, 2010). We provide a set of axioms for such an extension. Deduction rules are just Modus Ponens and Necessitation. We prove that our system is sound with respect to a Kripke semantics and, building on Ben Yaacov and Pedersen (2010), that it satisfies a number of properties similar to those of first-order predicate logic. Then, by means of a canonical model construction, we get that every consistent set of formulas is satisfiable. From the latter result we derive an Approximated Strong Completeness Theorem, in the vein of Continuous Logic, and a Compactness Theorem.

We study conditions for structures based on Banach spaces having the property that each set definable by neocompact formula (certain infinitary formula) is equivalent to the countable intersection of sets definable by quantifier-free formulas. We show that this property is invariant with respect to different nonstandard hull constructions and it is the same as Henson's Quantifier Elimination in sufficiently saturated nonstandard hulls of internal Banach spaces.

For arbitrary finite group $G$ and countable Dedekind domain $R$ such that the residue field $R/P$ is finite for every maximal $R$ -ideal $P$ , we show that the localizations at every maximal ideal of two $RG$ -lattices are isomorphic if and only if the two lattices satisfy the same first order sentences. Then we investigate generalizations of the above results to arbitrary $R$ -torsion-free $RG$ -modules and we apply the previous results to show the decidability of the theory of ${\vec Z}C(2)^2$ -lattices. Eventually, we show that ${\vec Z} [i] C(2)^2$ -lattices have undecidable theory.

We describe the constructive content of proofs in a fragment of propositional Infinitary Linear Logic in terms of strategies for a suitable class of games. Such strategies interpret linear proofs as parallel algorithms as long as the asymmetry of the connectives ? and ! allows it.

We introduce the notion of generalized invertibility, a weak notion of invertibility that makes sense in the nonstandard hull of a Banach algebra. We show that a standard algebra is the closure of its invertible elements exactly when all the elements of its nonstandard hull are generalized invertible. For commutative algebras, we relate the problem of liftability of homomorphisms to the property of approximately multiplicative functionals being near to multiplicative functionals (AMNM property) and we prove a nonstandard characterization of the latter property. Finally we show that a standard superreflexive Banach algebra has the the AMNM property exactly when its nonstandard hull does.

In this paper, we prove completeness of SLDNF resolution and NAF rule for the class of allowed and locally stratified programs satisfying the further condition of well-behavedness. Well-behavedness imposes a computational restriction on programs whose aim is to ensure that the 3- and 2-valued consequences of Clark's completion of a program belonging to the above-mentioned class do coincide. Then one can apply Kunen's 3-valued completeness theorem in order to get a 2-valued completeness result

Aim of this paper is to provide an alternative proof of consistency for the completion of a semi-strict program. Furthermore, we prove the continuity of the immediate consequence map associated to a locally call-consistent program with respect to any preinterpretation that is a model of the equality theory of its Clark’s completion.

We investigate the consequences of removing the infinitary axiom and rules from a previously defined proof system for a fragment of propositional metric temporal logic over dense time (see [1]). (© 2006 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

Aim of this work is to investigate from a proof-theoretic viewpoint a propositional and a predicate sequent calculus with an ω–type schema of inference that naturally interpret the propositional and the predicate until–free fragments of Linear Time Logic LTL respectively. The two calculi are based on a natural extension of ordinary sequents and of standard modal rules. We examine the pure propositional case (no extralogical axioms), the propositional and the first order predicate cases (both with a possibly infinite set of extralogical axioms). For each system we provide a syntactic proof of cut elimination and a proof of completeness.

We propose a set theory, called NRFST, in which the Cantorian axiom of infinity is negated, and a new notion of infinity is introduced via non standard methods, i. e. via adequate notions of standard and internal, two unary predicates added to the language of ZF. After some initial results on NRFST, we investigate its relative consistency with respect to ZF and Kawai's WNST.

In this paper we introduce a theory of finite sets FST with a strong negation of the axiom of infinity asserting that every set is provably bijective with a natural number. We study in detail the role of the axioms of Power Set, Choice, Regularity in FST, pointing out the relative dependences or independences among them. FST is shown to be provably equivalent to a fragment of Alternative Set Theory. Furthermore, the introduction of FST is motivated in view of a non-standard development. MSC: 03E30, 03E35.