Search

This study examines the effectiveness of the corporate governance structure when coping with any potentially unexpected events. For the purpose of this research, an event study has been conducted in order to investigate the market responses of various firms through the Cumulative Average Abnormal Return (CAAR) of the stocks listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange (PSX). The stocks data under consideration is that which was presented after the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in 2007. The overall results indicate that firms that are governed conventionally do not perform well in the markets during a crisis situation. In our comparison of conventionally, and non-conventionally governed firms, the overall pooled results show that the former record a lower CAAR. This, in short, indicates that conventional corporate governance structures may not be equipped to take timely and dynamic actions that are deemed necessary in the face of a crisis. Moreover, our results suggest that firms which have less diversified ownership, and governance mechanisms are less vulnerable to such unanticipated events. There are two reasons that support our hypotheses: first, strict governance mechanisms, and a resultant cautious/conservative approach may not allow firms to take timely and proactive decisions during these situations and second, there is a lower chance of existing agency problems, as family owners would be working for the protection of their own wealth during these events. Therefore, our findings ultimately reveal that the conventional corporate governance structures that work during normal time period, may become ineffective during a crisis. This study, aims to fill a gap in the literature in order to provide fresh insights into the stock market dynamic, and corporate governance risk management. Furthermore, it also highlights the benefits of family owned structures, and unconventional corporate governance systems, that may outperform conventional governance structure in some situations. This, however, raises the question whether one governance framework could be the correct fit in all the situations.

Purpose The Corruption Perception Index (CPI) for 2016 shows Pakistan as among the more corrupt nations in the world with a ranking of 117 among 176 countries surveyed. This situation raises concerns about members of the society and especially about the business communities. This paper aims to examine whether the tendency to corruption is also prevalent amongst business students, the future leaders and executives of business organizations. Design/methodology/approach The study uses survey questionnaires in the manner of Parsa and Lankford (1999) to examine the ethical levels of business students. It uses Levene’s (1960) tests for equality of variances and the t-test for equality of means to examine whether there are difference in the ethical perceptions between: bachelors (BBA) and graduate (MBA) students; business students who have taken the ethics course and those who have not; and female and male students. The authors also examine the overall ethical perceptions of business students. Findings The results show that students seem to make a clear distinction in respect of what they consider as acceptable and unacceptable ethical behavior. They would not indulge in behavior that directly falls within the category of stealing, misusing of company’s resources and undertaking actions that are wrong or dishonest, which may stem from their religious indoctrination. However, they would consider as acceptable behavior the overlooking of safety violations, not telling on peers; and fudging of the truth to get the job done. The latter attitude appears to be in line with business objectives of achieving targets irrespective of the means employed and that inform business education. We do not find any differences between the behavior of women and men which may be the outcome of the same religious indoctrination and educational perceptions. While there is a difference in the ethical perceptions between students who have taken the ethics course and those who have not, the course is not able to counter the lack of ethics among business students. There is a need for some stronger measures to inculcate a set of ethical values within students. However, we did find that some of the unethical behavior is diluted at the MBA level in comparison to BBA students. Originality/value This study provides new insights into the ethical perceptions of students in an Islamic emerging country. There is a conflict between ethics conveyed through Islamic precepts, and the ethics of business education with a focus on profits/revenues, costs, performance and competition that endorses a Machiavellian attitude of achieving goals at any cost and the love of money (Tang and Chen, 2008). It is the first study to suggest a differentiation in the ethical behavior of business students that exhibit both ethical and unethical behavior. There appears to be a clear segregation between what students deem as acceptable and unacceptable ethical behavior that may result from their personal/religious beliefs, and their business attitudes that strongly informs their ethical behavior. It provides a basis for developing more customized and effective ethics courses in Pakistan and suggests more importantly that ethics needs to be integrated into business concepts imparted in business programs at universities.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the financing behavior of firms in Pakistan. Previous studies have investigated corporate leverage determinants within any particular industry, such as manufacturing industry, textiles industry, etc., with varying results. This is one of the few studies that examine the determinants of leveraging attitude of firms across industrial sectors for textiles, large industries, and small industries. Thus, the study provides an insight into the general debt financing behavior in Pakistan and allows a basis for comparison of the leveraging decisions across industries. Design/methodology/approach The study employs the structural equations methodology which captures the endogenous relationship between profitability and leverage. Thereby, eliminating bias and providing more accurate results. Findings The findings suggest that the leveraging decisions differ across sectors and that each industry has its own distinctive debt requirements/characteristics. The authors conclude that a singular approach taken by investors and analysts would provide inaccurate assessment of firms’ debt financing policies and strategies. Research limitations/implications There is a limitation on data availability in emerging countries, and a larger sample would have provided more robust results. Therefore, the study has only taken three sector sub-divisions, and more industry categories would have provided in-depth insights into the industry-wise leveraging behavior. Practical implications This is the first study to suggest that the borrowing attitude of firms differ across industries and vary due to their specific needs. This has implications for government regulators, investors, and creditors in providing a more customized approach to analyzing and meeting the external financing needs of firms. Originality/value This study is the first to use simultaneous equations model to eliminate bias that is prevalent in similar studies in Pakistan. The SEM captures the endogenous relationship between profitability and leverage. The research provides important information about the underlying financing behavior across industries, which has largely been ignored.

Purpose –The extant literature is divided regarding the impacts of firm size on financial derivatives and the empirical studies provide conflicting results and offer opposing viewpoints. There is strong evidence to suggest that firm characteristics differ between larger and smaller sized firms and that derivative users are generally larger firms. Firm size may also influence the risk management behavior of corporate governance and reveal some biases and personal agendas. However, this area is largely unexplored and warrants investigation. This is the first study that examines whether corporate governance risk management over financial derivatives is sensitive to firm size considerations. Design/methodology/approach – The authors employ Maddala’s simultaneous equations methodology to examine the firm’s derivatives usage simultaneously with debt borrowings, as both form basis of the capital structure decisions of the firm. Further we split the data into large and small size firms to examine the size effects of corporate governance risk behavior, departing from the method employed in the derivatives literature. Findings – The authors provide empirical evidence to suggest that corporate governance is consistent in their risk management of financial derivatives use and that they are not influenced by any firm size considerations. Research limitations/implications – Additional examination of the risk and value effects on firm performance based on firm-size differences would provide additional insights into the hedging effectiveness of corporate governance in respect to financial derivatives. Practical implications – The findings provide assurance that corporate governance is not influenced by firm size with respect to financial derivatives. Therefore, governance regulations and accounting standards requirements do not need to provide any restrictions/modifications on the size of firms employing financial derivatives instruments. Originality/Value – This is the first study to examine the effects of firm size on corporate governance risk management over financial derivatives. The area is unexplored and has far reaching consequences. If firm size has an impact on corporate governance, then regulators would need to develop varying controls based on the firm size to cater to differences in risk management by corporate governance. As it is corporate governance mechanisms do not make any distinctions based on firm size, and the study supports the need for one set of corporate governance controls across all size firms.