Search

Background: The proportion of women entering medicine has increased in recent years, and understanding the different practice patterns of female and male family physicians (FPs) will provide important information for health workforce planning. We sought to evaluate differences by sex in the supply, payments and clinical activity among FPs in Ontario. Methods: We conducted a cohort study using claims data from the Ontario Health Insurance Plan. We included all Ontario FPs who submitted claims from 1992 to 2018. We analyzed data using regression analyses for our outcomes of yearly number of FPs, payments, patient visits and distinct patients. Results: The number of practising FPs increased from 10 370 in 1992 to 14 329 in 2018, with an annual increase of 155 female FPs and 13 male FPs. In 2018, male FPs outnumbered female FPs by 1159. Among male FPs, 32.7% worked less than 1 full-time equivalent (FTE) position, 18.1% worked 1 FTE and 49.2% worked more than 1 FTE, with little change over the 27-year study period. Among female FPs, the percentage of those who worked less than 1 FTE position decreased over time (58.6% in 1998 to 48.3% in 2015), those who worked 1 FTE was stable (22.2%–24.3%) and those who worked more than 1 FTE increased (18.7% in 1998 to 28.0% in 2017). Yearly payments were higher for male FPs than female FPs by 40%–60% overall and by 10%–20% in FPs who worked more than 1 FTE. For FPs who worked 1 FTE or less than 1 FTE, both sexes had similar payment amounts (from 2005–2018). For FPs who worked 1 FTE, female FPs were less likely to receive payments from fee-for-service after 2004, and had 550 fewer visits and 121 fewer patients annually than male FPs. Interpretation: In Ontario, there are differences by sex in FP supply, payments, percentages of FTE groups, number of patient visits and number of distinct patients. Health administrators should be mindful of these differences when considering FP workforce plans to ensure a stronger primary health care system, with adequate health care delivery for the population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Timely access to effective treatments for arthritis is a priority at national, provincial and regional levels in Canada due to population aging coupled with limited health human resources. Models of care for arthritis are being implemented across the country but mainly in local contexts, not from an evidence-informed policy or framework. The purpose of this study is to examine existing models of care for arthritis in Canada at the local level in order to identify commonalities and differences in their implementation that could point to important considerations for health policy and service delivery.Methods: Semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with 70 program managers and/or care providers in three Canadian provinces identified through purposive and snowball sampling followed by more detailed examination of 6 models of care (two per province). Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using a qualitative descriptive approach.Results: Two broad models of care were identified for Total Joint Replacement and Inflammatory Arthritis. Commonalities included lack of complete and appropriate referrals from primary care physicians and lack of health human resources to meet local demands. Strategies included standardized referrals and centralized intake and triage using non-specialist health care professionals. Differences included the nature of the care and follow-up, the role of the specialist, and location of service delivery.Conclusions: Current models of care are mainly focused on Total Joint Replacement and Inflammatory Arthritis. Given the increasing prevalence of arthritis and that published data report only a small proportion of current service delivery is specialist care; provision of timely, appropriate care requires development, implementation and evaluation of models of care across the continuum of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are among the most prevalent chronic conditions, minimal attention has been paid to the paediatric population. The aim of this study is to describe the annual prevalence of healthcare contacts for MSD by children and youth age 0-19 years, including type of MSD, care delivery setting and the specialty of the physician consulted. Methods: Analysis of data on all children with healthcare contacts for MSD in Ontario, Canada using data from universal health insurance databases on ambulatory physician and emergency department (ED) visits, same-day outpatient surgery, and in-patient admissions for the fiscal year 2006/07. The proportion of children and youth seeing different physician specialties was calculated for each physician and condition grouping. Census data for the 2006 Ontario population was used to calculate person visit rates. Results: 122.1 per 1,000 children and youth made visits for MSD. The majority visited for injury and related conditions (63.2 per 1,000), followed by unspecified MSD complaints (33.0 per 1,000), arthritis and related conditions (27.7 per 1,000), bone and spinal conditions (14.2 per 1,000), and congenital anomalies (3 per 1,000). Injury was the most common reason for ED visits and in-patient admissions, and arthritis and related conditions for day-surgery. The majority of children presented to primary care physicians (74.4%), surgeons (22.3%), and paediatricians (10.1%). Paediatricians were more likely to see younger children and those with congenital anomalies or arthritis and related conditions. Conclusion: One in eight children and youth make physician visits for MSD in a year, suggesting that the prevalence of MSD in children may have been previously underestimated. Although most children may have self-limiting conditions, it is unknown to what extent these may deter involvement in physical activity, or be indicators of serious and potentially life-threatening conditions. Given deficiencies in medical education, particularly of primary care physicians and paediatricians, it is important that training programs devote an appropriate amount of time to paediatric MSD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aging population and increasing obesity rates will increase the prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions. Reports of orthopaedic surgeon shortages raise concerns about the ability of the health-care system to meet current and future demand in orthopaedics. A survey of all orthopaedic surgeons in Ontario, Canada, was carried out in 2006 to (1) update provision estimates of orthopaedic surgeons; (2) examine practice characteristics and perceived barriers to service; and (3) relate geographic availability of surgeons to population utilization of office-based and surgical orthopaedic services. Methods: A two-part questionnaire was sent to all orthopaedic surgeons in Ontario in 2006. Provision data in hours per week and full-time equivalents and practice patterns were analyzed by health region. Population-based data on the use of orthopaedic services were obtained from health service administrative databases. Results: There were 396 practicing orthopaedic surgeons in Ontario in 2006, equivalent to 2.43 full-time equivalents per 100,000 population, a finding similar to surveys in 1997 and 2000. Most surgeons were male, with a mean age of forty- nine years, with mainly adult practices; 48% reported having a subspecialty. Provision varied across Ontario, with an average of 112 hours per week of direct clinical time per 100,000 population (50% in the office, 30% in the operating room, 20% working on call). Many surgeons also reported time for administration, teaching, and research. Most respondents reported barriers to timely surgery, notably a lack of resources (operating room time, anesthesia, nursing, and! or bed capacity). Low orthopaedic provision was associated with lower utilization of office-based and surgical services, after controlling for neighborhood income and type of residence (urban or rural). Conclusions: Shortages and geographic variation in the supply of surgeons mean that access to care continues to be a challenge in Ontario. In regions with fewer surgeons, residents are more likely to be deprived of office-based services, potentially affecting access to surgery and to orthopaedic expertise. In light of a potential shortage of surgeons, alter- native methods of service provision may be needed to respond to the aging of the baby boomer population and an anticipated growth in the demand for surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]