Search

Aim: One definition of research co-production is a collaboration between researchers and healthcare professionals throughout a research process to facilitate knowledge translation and improve the clinical impact of research findings. In this paper, we present a case study of clinical research co-production and reflect on how the process was facilitated between researchers and healthcare professionals. Type of program or service: Development of a novel transdisciplinary assessment for implementation in an acute stroke unit (ASU). Methods: Researchers and healthcare professionals integrated perspectives and co-produced a novel transdisciplinary assessment. Team-based activities were guided by a logic model, including task analysis and simulation testing. A logframe matrix was used to plan implementation strategies to mitigate potential risks. Results: Research co-production was fundamental to integrating multiple perspectives to develop an effective, novel transdisciplinary assessment for patients with stroke. Preliminary data demonstrated that the transdisciplinary approach could save up to 103 minutes per patient in assessment time. Lessons Learnt: As the project evolved, the three most important factors for research co-production were 1) the right people to integrate critical disciplinary and pragmatic perspectives; 2) a project leader who was inclusive of perspectives held by researchers and healthcare professionals, and 3) structured and non-biased team discussions using a theoretical tool. We recommend these three factors be considered in future research co-production in healthcare settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One strategy to meet increasing consumer demand for healthcare services in the pandemic era has been to reorganize the healthcare workforce. This can be achieved by reorganizing healthcare teams, which are associated with improved workforce productivity and better patient outcomes. However, healthcare teams are described using numerous terminologies and labels, which has led to conceptual confusion for researchers and research users. In this paper, we explore the disparate nature of healthcare team terminology, ramifications of conceptual confusion, and we propose standardized terminology with synthesized definitions focused on characteristics of clinically based healthcare teams including unidisciplinary, multidisciplinary, interprofessional, and transdisciplinary teams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient centred care (PCC) positively influences individual and organisational outcomes. It is important that dietitians working in rehabilitation units are supported to deliver PCC because effective rehabilitation is a collaborative and patient centred process. The objective of this scoping review was to explore the literature available regarding the delivery of dietetic PCC, with patients undergoing rehabilitation in subacute inpatient units. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Scopus were searched for relevant published literature. Searches for grey and unpublished literature were also completed. Studies were eligible for inclusion and data extraction if they demonstrated the delivery of PCC by qualified dietitians, through individual consultations with adult patients undertaking subacute rehabilitation. Results: Overall, 675 studies were identified and six were included in the review. From the literature available, documentation was lacking regarding conceptualisation and delivery of patient centred nutrition care, with only one study providing quality indicators for patient centred dietetic services. Elements of PCC cited were mostly limited to phrases such as, 'individualised care', 'tailored advice', 'follow‐up' and 'team collaboration'. Conclusions: This scoping review identified a considerable gap in the literature regarding the delivery of dietetic PCC in subacute rehabilitation units. Contemporary descriptions of PCC show that the delivery of care which is truly patient centred is far more comprehensive than individualising interventions or organising ongoing services. This raises the question: is the delivery of nutrition care in subacute rehabilitation unit's patient centred? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Most patients with minor stroke are discharged directly home from acute care, under the assumption that little will be required in the way of adaptation and adjustment because informal caregivers will manage the stroke recovery process. We explored male patients with minor stroke and their wife-caregivers’ perceptions of factors affecting quality of life and caregiver strain encountered during the first year post-discharge. Methods: Data were obtained from responses to two open-ended questions, part of quality of life and caregiver strain scales administered to participants in a larger descriptive study. Conventional content analysis was used to assess narrative accounts of living with minor stroke provided by 26 male patients and their wife-caregivers over a period of 1-year post-discharge. Results: Two major themes that emerged from these data were ‘being vulnerable’ and ‘realization’. Subthemes that arose within the vulnerability theme included changes to patients’ masculine image and wife-caregivers’ assumption of a hyper-vigilance role. In terms of ‘realization’ patients and their wife-caregivers shared ‘loss’ as well as ‘changing self and relationships’. Patients in this study focused primarily on their physical recovery and their perceptions of necessary changes. Wife-caregivers were actively involved in managing the day-to-day demands that stroke placed on individual, family and social roles. Conclusions: We conclude that patients and wife-caregivers expend considerable time and energy reestablishing control of their lives following minor stroke in an attempt to incorporate changes to self and their relationship into the fabric of their lives. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]