Search

This article discusses the findings of three studies related to neonatal neuroprotection. The first study explores the potential use of haptoglobin as a treatment for cerebral intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants. The second study examines the impact of anakinra on immune function in infants with neonatal encephalopathy. The third study explores the therapeutic potential of human mesenchymal stem cells in encephalopathy of prematurity. These studies provide insights into potential treatments for neurodevelopmental impairments in preterm infants. Another study evaluates the impact of telemedicine consults on the time it takes to assess neonatal encephalopathy in a rural state, finding that the program significantly reduced assessment time and improved collaboration and communication. A study on infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy investigates the levels of immune regulatory cells and suggests their potential use as an adjuvant strategy to reduce inflammation. Lastly, a study compares the use of morphine in neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy using two different cooling devices, finding no significant difference in morphine use between the groups. These studies highlight the need for further research and interventions to improve outcomes for infants with neonatal encephalopathy and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. [Extracted from the article]

Abstract: Background: The present review aimed to identify what is known about the use of blended diets in gastrostomy fed children and young people (i.e. children and young people refers to those who are aged up to 25 years with special educational needs or a disability in accordance with Part 3 of the Children and Family Act 2014; within the review, the word children is used for simplicity but encompasses young people too) and to identify gaps in the literature on this topic to inform future research and policy. Methods: A scoping review methodology was used searching the online databases PUBMED, PsychINFO, CINAHL, SCOPUS and AMED, EMBASE for articles that addressed issues pertaining to blended diets. The review identified a broad range of literature, regardless of study design, and described and evaluated the quality, range and nature of research activity related to the use of blenderised diets. Results: Forty‐three studies were included in the review. The studies focused on nutrition, equipment, the views of carers and patients, and the views of professionals. Several studies described the lack of evidence regarding pros and cons of blended diets and highlighted the need for further research into the field. Conclusions: There were gaps in the evidence base regarding the impact of blended diets on the health and well‐being of the children who receive them and upon the carers who feed the children. The nutritional impact of blended diets is not fully understood and the knowledge and views of professionals involved in the care of those receiving blended diets varies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]