Search

Background: Data on COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (VE) among healthcare workers (HCWs) during periods of delta variant predominance are limited. Methods: We followed a population of urban Massachusetts HCWs (45% non-White) subject to epidemiologic surveillance. We accounted for covariates such as demographics and community background infection incidence, as well as information bias regarding COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccination status. Results: During the study period (December 16, 2020 to September 30, 2021), 4615 HCWs contributed to a total of 1,152,486 person-days at risk (excluding 309 HCWs with prior infection) and had a COVID-19 incidence rate of 5.2/10,000 (114 infections out of 219,842 person-days) for unvaccinated person-days and 0.6/10,000 (49 infections out of 830,084 person-days) for fully vaccinated person-days, resulting in an adjusted VE of 82.3% (95% CI 75.1–87.4%). For the secondary analysis limited to the period of delta variant predominance in Massachusetts (i.e., July 1 to September 30, 2021), we observed an adjusted VE of 76.5% (95% CI 40.9–90.6%). Independently, we found no re-infection among those with prior COVID-19, contributing to 74,557 re-infection-free person-days, adding to the evidence base for the robustness of naturally acquired immunity. Conclusions: We found a VE of 76.5% against the delta variant. Our work also provides further evidence of naturally acquired immunity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a research study on the temporal distribution of COVID-19 complications among healthcare workers (HCWs) to determine if complication rates are decreasing. Topics include the examination of HCWs from a Massachusetts healthcare system using a uniform COVID-19 protocol with the use of SARS-CoV-2 viral assay, and nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay.

Background Hand hygiene (HH) is the cornerstone of infection prevention and improved compliance has been associated with reduced healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). However, traditional methods for HH data collection have limitations and may not accurately reflect true compliance. We sought to evaluate whether an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system (HHMS) can improve data collection, compliance, and reduce HAIs. Methods A HHMS was implemented as part of a pilot at a single facility in June 2018 for all healthcare workers (HCWs) who entered patient rooms. The system prompted HCWs to perform HH with an audible and visual reminder emitted from a badge if a HH event had not been registered within specific timeframes of entering or exiting a patient room. The system captured compliance with preferential handwashing (soap and water) for at least 15 seconds upon exit of Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) designated rooms. All HH data were collected by the HHMS. Hand hygiene compliance and HAI data were compared for the pre-intervention (June 2017-May 2018) and intervention periods (July 2018-March 2019). No changes were made to environmental cleaning protocols or compliance monitoring, nor in antibiotic stewardship practices. Results HH compliance by direct observation in the pre-intervention period was 91% (1,612 observations). HH compliance with the HHMS during the intervention period was 97% (2,778,402 observations). The mean monthly HH opportunities recorded during the pre-intervention period was 134, while the HHMS captured 308,711, a greater than 2,300-fold increase. The incidence of healthcare facility-onset C. difficile infections (HO-CDI) pre-intervention was 9.60 per 10,000 patient-days (41 GDH+/Toxin+ laboratory-identified [labID] events/42,726 patient-days). With the HHMS, HO-CDI decreased 70% (P = 0.0003) to 2.89 per 10,000 patient-days (9 labID events/31,169 patient-days). No policy changes in environmental cleaning of high-touch surfaces were made or observed during the pilot. Conclusion The use of an HHMS facilitated more comprehensive HH data and improved compliance. The preliminary findings also support an association between more robust HH compliance data and a significant decrease in toxin-producing CDI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]