Search

Background: The aim of this retrospective observational study was to examine the relationship between SCORE2 and the occurrence of colonic diverticula in a screening population without cardiovascular or gastrointestinal symptoms. SCORE2, recognized and supported by the European Society of Cardiology for cardiovascular risk assessment, served as the primary metric for the analysis in this investigation. Methods: We studied 3935 asymptomatic individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy. SCORE2 was calculated for each participant and categorized into three groups based on the following projected 10-year cardiovascular disease risk: SCORE2 0–4.9%, SCORE2 5–9.9%, and SCORE2 ≥ 10%. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between SCORE2 and diverticulosis. Results: SCORE2 was associated with the presence of diverticulosis (OR 1.09, 95%CI 1.07–1.10; p < 0.001) in univariable logistic regression, translating into an RR of 1.07 per unit increase. The association persisted after multivariable adjusting for metabolic syndrome (aOR 1.08; 95%CI 1.06–1.10; p < 0.001). Patients with high cardiovascular risk had higher rates of diverticulosis compared to those with lower risk: high risk (OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.71–2.33; p < 0.001); very high risk (OR 2.53, 95%CI 2.10–3.05; p < 0.001). This association remained after adjusting for metabolic syndrome: high risk (aOR 1.86, 95%CI 1.59–2.18; p < 0.001); very high risk (aOR 2.27, 95%CI 1.88–2.75; p < 0.001). Conclusions: A higher SCORE2 was found to be a suitable screening parameter for diverticular disease. This suggests a potential link between cardiovascular risk factors and colon diverticula development, warranting further research on whether optimizing cardiovascular risk factors could positively influence diverticular disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The European Society of Cardiology endorsed SCORE2 to assess cardiovascular risk. The aim of this observational, retrospective study was to assess whether SCORE2 is associated with colorectal neoplasia in an asymptomatic screening population. Further, we evaluated if SCORE2 predicts tumor-related mortality. Methods: We included 3408 asymptomatic patients who underwent a screening colonoscopy. We calculated SCORE2 for each participant and stratified patients according to their predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: SCORE2 0–4.9%, SCORE2 5–9.9%, and SCORE2 ≥ 10%. We assessed the association between SCORE2 as a continuous variable, the presence of colorectal neoplasia using multilevel logistic regression, and SCORE2 and mortality using Cox regression. Results: In total, 1537 patients had a SCORE2 of 0–4.9%, 1235 a SCORE2 of 5–9.9%, and 636 a SCORE2 ≥ 10%. The respective rates of colorectal neoplasia were 20%, 37%, and 44%. SCORE2 was associated with the presence of any (OR 1.11 95%CI 1.09–1.12; p < 0.001) and advanced colorectal neoplasia (OR 1.06 95%CI 1.08–1.13; p < 0.001) in univariate analysis. After multivariable adjustment (age, sex, family history, and metabolic syndrome) a higher SCORE2 remained associated with higher odds for any (aOR 1.04 95%CI 1.02–1.06; p = 0.001) and advanced (aOR 1.06 95%CI 1.03–1.10; p < 0.001) colorectal neoplasia. SCORE2 was associated with both all-cause (HR 1.11 95%CI 1.09–1.14; p < 0.001) and tumor-related mortality (HR 1.10 95%CI 1.05–1.14; p < 0.001). Conclusions: We found that SCORE2 is associated with the presence of colorectal neoplasia. Clinicians could kill two birds with one stone calculating SCORE2. In patients with a high SCORE2, screening colonoscopy aside from cardiovascular risk mitigation could improve outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]