Search

Background: The Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program has led to fewer readmissions following hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of heart failure (HF). Patients with HF are frequently hospitalized for other causes., Objectives: This study sought to compare trends in Medicare risk-adjusted, 30-day readmissions following principal HF hospitalizations and other hospitalizations with HF., Methods: This was a retrospective study of 12,973,853 Medicare hospitalizations with a principal or secondary diagnosis of HF between January 2008 and June 2015. Hospitalizations were categorized as follows: principal HF hospitalizations; principal acute myocardial infarction or pneumonia hospitalizations with secondary HF; and other hospitalizations with secondary HF. The study examined trends in risk-adjusted, 30-day, all-cause readmission rates for each cohort and trends in differences in readmission rates among cohorts by using linear spline regression models., Results: Before passage of the Affordable Care Act in March 2010, risk-adjusted, 30-day readmission rates were stable for all 3 cohorts, with mean monthly rates of 26.1%, 24.9%, and 24.4%, respectively. Risk-adjusted readmission rates started declining after passage of the Affordable Care Act by 1.09% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51% to 1.68%), 1.24% (95% CI: 0.92% to 1.57%), and 1.05% (95% CI: 0.52% to 1.58%) per year, respectively, until implementation of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program in October 2012 and then stabilized for all 3 cohorts., Conclusions: Patients with HF are often hospitalized for other causes, and these hospitalizations have high readmission rates. Policy changes led to decreases in readmission rates for both principal and secondary HF hospitalizations. Readmission rates in both groups remain high, suggesting that initiatives targeting all hospitalized patients with HF continue to be warranted., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hospitalization and readmission rates have decreased in recent years, with the possible consequence that hospitals are increasingly filled with high-risk patients., Objective: We studied whether readmission reduction has affected the risk profile of hospitalized patients and whether readmission reduction was similarly realized among hospitalizations with low, medium, and high risk of readmissions., Design: Retrospective study of hospitalizations between January 2009 and June 2015., Patients: Hospitalized fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries, categorized into 1 of 5 specialty cohorts used for the publicly reported hospital-wide readmission measure., Measurements: Each hospitalization was assigned a predicted risk of 30-day, unplanned readmission using a risk-adjusted model similar to publicly reported measures. Trends in monthly mean predicted risk for each cohort and trends in monthly observed to expected readmission for hospitalizations in the lowest 20%, middle 60%, and highest 20% of risk of readmission were assessed using time series models., Results: Of 47,288,961 hospitalizations, 16.2% (n = 7,642,161) were followed by an unplanned readmission within 30 days. We found that predicted risk of readmission increased by 0.24% (P = .03) and 0.13% (P = .004) per year for hospitalizations in the surgery/ gynecology and neurology cohorts, respectively. We found no significant increase in predicted risk for hospitalizations in the medicine (0.12%, P = .12), cardiovascular (0.32%, P = .07), or cardiorespiratory (0.03%, P = .55) cohorts. In each cohort, observed to expected readmission rates steadily declined, and at similar rates for patients at low, medium, and high risk of readmission., Conclusions: Hospitals have been effective at reducing readmissions across a range of patient risk strata and clinical conditions. The risk of readmission for hospitalized patients has increased for 2 of 5 clinical cohorts., (© 2018 Society of Hospital Medicine)

Introduction: Orthopaedic care is shifting to alternative payment models. We examined whether New York University Langone Medical Center achieved savings under the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative., Methods: This study was a difference-in-differences study of Medicare fee-for-service patients hospitalized from April 2011 to June 2012 and October 2013 to December 2014 for lower extremity joint arthroplasty, cardiac valve procedures, or spine surgery (intervention groups), or for congestive heart failure, major bowel procedures, medical peripheral vascular disorders, medical noninfectious orthopaedic care, or stroke (control group). We examined total episode costs and costs by service category., Results: We included 2,940 intervention episodes and 1,474 control episodes. Relative to the trend in the control group, lower extremity joint arthroplasty episodes achieved the greatest savings: adjusted average episode cost during the intervention period decreased by $3,017 (95% confidence interval [CI], -$6,066 to $31). For cardiac procedures, the adjusted average episode cost decreased by $2,999 (95% CI, -$8,103 to $2,105), and for spinal fusion, it increased by $8,291 (95% CI, $2,879 to $13,703). Savings were driven predominantly by shifting postdischarge care from inpatient rehabilitation facilities to home. Spinal fusion index admission costs increased because of changes in surgical technique., Discussion: Under bundled payment, New York University Langone Medical Center decreased total episode costs in patients undergoing lower extremity joint arthroplasty. For patients undergoing cardiac valve procedures, evidence of savings was not as strong, and for patients undergoing spinal fusion, total episode costs increased. For all three conditions, the proportion of patients referred to inpatient rehabilitation facilities upon discharge decreased. These changes were not associated with an increase in index hospital length of stay or readmission rate., Conclusion: Opportunities for savings under bundled payment may be greater for lower extremity joint arthroplasty than for other conditions.

Competing Interests: Dr. Horwitz receives funding from CMS to develop and maintain quality measures.

Background: Diabetes is associated with increased risk of mortality in heart failure. We examined the association of diabetes with expenditures, hospitalizations, and procedures among Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure during the last 6 months of life., Methods and Results: In a 5% national Medicare sample, the prevalence of diabetes was 41.7% among 16,613 beneficiaries who died in 2007 with a diagnosis of heart failure. Diabetes was associated with higher expenditures during the last 6 months of life (mean $39,042 vs $29,003; P < .001), even after adjusting for covariates, including age, sex, race, geographic location, comorbidities, and preceding hospitalizations (cost ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.12). For both diabetic and nondiabetic adults, more than one-half of Medicare expenditures were related to hospitalization costs (mean $22,516 vs $15,721; P < .001). Compared with their counterparts without diabetes, beneficiaries with diabetes had higher rates of hospitalization (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.12) and days spent in the intensive care unit., Conclusions: Comorbid diabetes was common in heart failure and associated with higher expenditures, much of which was driven by increased rates of hospitalizations. Programs that focus on prevention of hospitalizations may reduce the substantial costs associated with heart failure near the end of life., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although hospice use may be increasing among heart failure patients, its association with both cost and intensity of care in this population has not been well examined., Objective: To assess the association of hospice care with resource utilization among a national sample of Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure during the last 6 months of life., Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 5% sample of Medicare claims data. Negative binomial regression models were used to compare expenditures, hospitalization rates, and intensive care unit (ICU) days between hospice and nonhospice beneficiaries. We used Poisson regression models to compare utilization of certain procedures between hospice and nonhospice beneficiaries., Results: Among 16613 Medicare beneficiaries who died with heart failure in 2007, 6436 (38.7%) received hospice care during the last 6 months of life. The mean total medical expenditures were $31,793 (SD 25,691) among decedents with hospice care, in comparison to $34,067 (SD 40,561) among decedents without hospice care. However, after adjustments for covariates, hospice care was associated with 4% higher expenditures (cost ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.01-1.07). Hospice use was associated with reduced hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.87, 95% CI: 0.84-0.89), ICU days (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.73), and procedures, including cardiac catheterization, noninvasive ventilation, and mechanical ventilation., Conclusions: Despite lower rates of hospitalization, ICU days, and invasive procedures, hospice care was not associated with reduced expenditures in heart failure. Financial savings related to reduced intensive medical care seems to be offset by the expenditures related to hospice care itself.