Search

Qualitative studies suggest that social relationships play an important role in HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use, but there have been few quantitative assessments of the role of social relationships in PrEP uptake or adherence. We examined the association between disclosure of study participation or LGBT identity and PrEP use in the 1603 HIV-negative participants enrolled in the iPrEx OLE study. We also evaluated the association between LGBT social group involvement and PrEP use. Study participation disclosure to parents and LGBT identity disclosure to anyone in a participant's social network were associated with greater PrEP uptake. Study participation disclosure to partners was associated with higher probability of having protective PrEP drug concentrations compared [risk difference 0.15 95% CI (0.01, 0.30)]. For each additional type of LGBT organization a participant was involved in, the probability of PrEP uptake and having protective drug concentrations increased by 0.04 [95% CI (0.03, 0.06)] and 0.04 (95% CI (0.02, 0.07)] respectively. Overall, social context was associated with PrEP use in iPrEx OLE, and should be taken into consideration when designing future PrEP implementation programs.

We assessed the role of depressive symptoms on adherence to daily oral FTC/TDF for HIV PrEP in cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women who have sex with men (TGW) using data from the iPrEx OLE study. A marginal structural logistic regression model was used to estimate the effect of time-varying CES-D scores on having protective levels of drug concentration, adjusting for confounding by sexual practices over time, prior adherence, and baseline demographic characteristics. We found a non-monotonic relationship between CES-D score and odds of protective FTC/TDF levels in MSM. We found evidence that the effect of depression on adherence varied between MSM and TGW, and that depressive symptoms did not contribute greatly to decreased adherence on a population scale. We recommend that depressive symptoms not preclude the prescription of PrEP, and that MSM and TGW be studied separately.

Monitoring adherence to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is part of the recommended package for PrEP prescribing, yet ongoing concerns about how to do so confidently are exacerbated by gross discrepancies in reported and actual use in clinical trials. We evaluated concordance between reports of recent PrEP dosing collected via neutral interviewing and drug quantitation in the iPrEx open-label extension, where participants (n = 1172) had the choice to receive or not receive PrEP. Self-report of recent dosing (at least one PrEP dose in the past 3-day) was the most common report (84 % of participants), and among these 83 % did have quantifiable levels of drug. The vast majority of those reporting no doses in the past 3-day (16 % of the sample) did not have quantifiable levels of drug (82 %). Predictors of over-report of dosing included younger age and lower educational attainment. Monitoring recent PrEP use through neutral interviewing may be a productive approach for clinicians to consider in implementation of real-world PrEP. Strategies to capture longer term or prevention-effective PrEP use, particularly for younger cohorts, are needed.

Background: Blinded clinical trials have reported a modest and transient "start-up syndrome" with initiation of tenofovir-based pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). We evaluate this phenomenon and its effect on adherence in an open-label PrEP study., Methods: In the iPrEx open-label extension (OLE) study, an 18-month open-label, multi-site PrEP cohort taking daily oral co-formulated tenofovir/emtricitabine, we examined the prevalence and duration of PrEP-associated symptoms and their effect on adherence, assessed by drug levels in dried blood spots tested monthly for the first 3 months., Results: Symptom reports peaked within the first month, with 39% reporting potentially PrEP-related symptoms compared to 22% at baseline. Symptoms largely resolved to pre-PrEP levels by 3 months.Symptoms varied substantially in frequency by study site (range in 1-month symptoms: 11% to 70%). Nongastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were not associated with adherence (odds ratio [OR] = 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI], .4-3.7); however, GI-associated symptoms in the first 4 weeks were inversely associated with adherence at 4 weeks (OR = 0.47, 95% CI, .23-.96). Reports of GI symptoms were associated with 7% (95% CI, 4%-11%) of suboptimal adherence in this cohort., Conclusions: PrEP-associated symptoms in the open-label setting occur in a minority of users and largely resolve within 3 months. GI symptoms are associated with a modest reduction in PrEP adherence, but good adherence is possible even in the presence of frequent symptom reports., Clinical Trials Registration: Clinicaltrials.govNCT00458393., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with oral emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is used to prevent the sexual acquisition of HIV in groups at high risk such as transgender women. We used data from the iPrEx study to assess PrEP efficacy, effectiveness, and adherence in transgender women., Methods: The iPrEx trial was a randomised controlled trial of PrEP with oral emtricitabine plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate compared with placebo in men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women, followed by an open-label extension. Drug concentrations were measured in blood by liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectroscopy. We did unplanned exploratory analyses to investigate differences in PrEP outcomes among transgender women and between transgender women and MSM., Findings: Of the 2499 participants enrolled in the randomised controlled trial, 29 (1%) identified as women, 296 (12%) identified as trans, 14 (1%) identified as men but reported use of feminising hormones, such that 339 (14%) reported one or more characteristics and are classified as transgender women for the purpose of this study. Compared with MSM, transgender women more frequently reported transactional sex, receptive anal intercourse without a condom, or more than five partners in the past 3 months. Among transgender women, there were 11 HIV infections in the PrEP group and ten in the placebo group (hazard ratio 1·1, 95% CI 0·5-2·7). In the PrEP group, drug was detected in none of the transgender women at the seroconversion visit, six (18%) of 33 seronegative transgender women (p=0·31), and 58 (52%) of 111 seronegative MSM (p<0·0001). PrEP use was not linked to behavioural indicators of HIV risk among transgender women, whereas MSM at highest risk were more adherent., Interpretation: PrEP seems to be effective in preventing HIV acquisition in transgender women when taken, but there seem to be barriers to adherence, particularly among those at the most risk. Studies of PrEP use in transgender women populations should be designed and tailored specifically for this population, rather than adapted from or subsumed into studies of MSM., Funding: US National Institutes of Health and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In the world of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) research, there is emerging interest in providing study participants with pharmacokinetic results from drug level testing to guide adherence counseling. The iPrEx randomized control trial was the first study to produce meaningful results of PrEP in humans. In the iPrEx open-label extension (OLE) study, blood plasma samples collected in the first 12 weeks of study participation were tested for the presence of tenofovir/emtricitabine--the drugs which compromise PrEP. Study clinicians shared results (detectable/undetectable) with participants at their 24-week visit. We evaluated the acceptability of receiving these results among a subset of iPrEx OLE participants. We conducted in-depth interviews (n = 59) with participants (those with and those without drug detected) enrolled in Boston, Chicago, and San Francisco to assess their experiences with receiving drug detection feedback. Incorporating drug detection results into the clinical study visit was well received and no negative reactions were expressed. For about half of participants, receiving their drug detection lab result was useful while for others it was not important. In a few cases, no drug detected results led to increased efforts to take PrEP consistently and in most cases enhanced open discussion of missed doses. Participants reported a desire for greater specificity, particularly quantitative drug levels needed for protection. We recommend exploring strategies to increase the salience of drug level results, including using feedback to target adherence counseling, and reducing the time between specimen collection, testing, and receipt of results. Future studies should evaluate the feasibility and impact of providing more specific quantitative drug levels using biomarkers of longer term PrEP exposure, i.e., hair/dried blood spots.

Objective: To evaluate the concordance between adherence estimated by self-report (in-person interview or computer-assisted self-interview), in-clinic pill counts, and pharmacy dispensation records and drug detection among participants in a placebo-controlled pre-exposure prophylaxis HIV prevention trial (iPrEx)., Design: Cross-sectional evaluation of 510 participants who had drug concentration data and matched adherence assessments from their week-24 study visit., Methods: Self-reported adherence collected through (1) interview and (2) computer-assisted self-interview surveys, (3) adherence estimated by pill count, and (4) medication possession ratio was contrasted to having a detectable level of drug concentrations [either tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) or emtricitabine triphosphate (FTC-TP)], as well as to having evidence of consistent dosing (tenofovir diphosphate ≥ 16 fmol/10⁶ cells), focusing on positive predictive values, overall and by research site., Results: Overall, self-report and pharmacy records suggested high rates of product use (over 90% adherence); however, large discrepancies between these measures and drug detection were noted, which varied considerably between sites (positive predictive values from 34% to 62%). Measures of adherence performed generally well in the US sites but had poor accuracy in other research locations. Medication possession ratio outperformed other measures but still had relatively low discrimination., Conclusions: The sizable discrepancy between adherence measures and drug detection in certain regions highlights the potential contribution of factors that may have incentivized efforts to seem adherent. Understanding the processes driving adherence reporting in some settings, but not others, is essential for finding effective ways to increase accuracy in measurement of product use and may generalize to promotion efforts for open-label pre-exposure prophylaxis.