Search

Objective The primary objective of this study was to delineate differences in management, overall and distant disease-free survival in males diagnosed with breast cancer and treated at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center as compared to comprehensively matched female subjects. Secondary objectives included assessment of clinical and histopathologic features and recurrence score, as measured by Oncotype DX and the modified Magee equation #2. Materials and methods This single institution retrospective study compared male and comprehensively matched female patients (1:2) with stage I-III breast cancer between 1994 and 2014. Recurrence risk was estimated using a modified Magee equation. Overall survival and distant disease-free survival were estimated and compared using Kaplan-Meier and Log-rank methods. Results Forty-five male breast cancer patients were included (stage I: 26.7%; stage II: 53.3%; stage III: 20.0%; hormone receptor positive: 97.8%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative: 84.4%) with a median age of 63.8 (43.0-79.4) years at diagnosis. Intermediate and low recurrence scores were most common in male and female patients respectively; mean score was similar between groups (20.3 vs. 19.8). The proportion of male breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and post-mastectomy radiation was lower compared to female patients (42.2% vs. 65.3%, p=0.013; 22.7% vs. 44.4%, p=0.030, respectively). Overall survival and distant disease-free survival between male and female patients were similar. Conclusion Male breast cancer patient outcomes were similar compared to well-matched female patients suggesting that breast cancer specific factors are more prognostic than gender.

Alemtuzumab is an anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody used to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis following failure of second-line medications. It is administered intravenously in 2 treatment sequences 1 year apart. This drug is frequently associated with mild infusion reactions within days of administration, increased infection risk, and long term adverse events from secondary autoimmunity. Alemtuzumab-induced serious immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (ITP) is well-reported and occurred in 1.0-2.2% of participants in initial phase 2 and 3 trials for multiple sclerosis. Significant neutropenia, however, is rare and was only observed in 0.1% of study participants. Delayed neutropenia and/or ITP is thought to occur from secondary autoimmunity. Few case reports have described severe neutropenia occurring beyond 2 months of last alemtuzumab dose. We present an unusual case of delayed combined neutropenia and thrombocytopenia that occurred 15 months after the second infusion of alemtuzumab. The patient was asymptomatic and presented following discovery of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia during routine laboratory studies. The patient responded to steroids initially and was discharged, although outpatient cell counts subsequently revealed recurrent neutropenia and ITP. The adverse drug reaction probability (Naranjo) scale was completed and showed probable likelihood that the adverse event was alemtuzumab-related. Long term screening for delayed hematologic abnormalities, at least 4 years after initial dose, is necessary when using alemtuzumab. Greater research is needed to understand the mechanism of drug-associated neutropenia.

Introduction: The protective effects of breastfeeding against developing breast cancer are well known; however, it is unknown whether women are aware of this breastfeeding benefit. Researc...

Background Metaplastic breast cancer remains poorly characterized given its rarity and heterogeneity. The majority of metaplastic breast cancers demonstrate a phenotype of triple-negative breast cancer; however, differences in clinical outcomes between metaplastic breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer in the era of third-generation chemotherapy remain unclear. Methods We compared the clinical outcomes between women with metaplastic breast cancer and women with triple-negative breast cancer diagnosed between 1994 and 2014. Metaplastic breast cancer patients were matched 1:3 to triple-negative breast cancer patients by stage and age at diagnosis. Distant disease-free survival (DDFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard regression models. Immune checkpoint markers were characterized by immunohistochemistry in a subset of samples. Results Forty-four metaplastic breast cancer patients (stage I 14%; stage II 73%; stage III 11%; stage IV 2%) with an average age of 55.4 (± 13.9) years at diagnosis. Median follow-up for the included metaplastic breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer patients (n = 174) was 2.8 (0.1–19.0) years. The DDFS and OS between matched metaplastic breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer patients were similar, even when adjusting for clinical covariates (DDFS: HR = 1.64, p = 0.22; OS: HR = 1.64, p = 0.26). Metaplastic breast cancer samples (n = 27) demonstrated greater amount of CD163 in the stroma (p = 0.05) and PD-L1 in the tumor (p = 0.01) than triple-negative breast cancer samples (n = 119), although more triple-negative breast cancer samples were positive for CD8 in the tumor than metaplastic breast cancer samples (p = 0.02). Conclusions Patients with metaplastic breast cancer had similar outcomes to those with triple-negative breast cancer based on DDFS and OS. The immune checkpoint marker profile of metaplastic breast cancers in this study may prove useful in future studies attempting to demonstrate an association between immune profile and survival.

Purpose: mAbs including cetuximab can induce antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and cytokine production mediated via innate immune cells with the ability to recognize mAb-coated tumors. Preclinical modeling has shown that costimulation of natural killer (NK) cells via the Fc receptor and the IL12 receptor promotes NK-cell–mediated ADCC and production of cytokines. Patients and Methods: This phase I/II trial evaluated the combination of cetuximab with IL12 for the treatment of EGFR-expressing head and neck cancer. Treatment consisted of cetuximab 500 mg/m2 i.v. every 2 weeks with either 0.2 mcg/kg or 0.3 mcg/kg IL12 s.c. on days 2 and 5 of the 2-week cycle, beginning with cycle 2. Correlative studies from blood draws obtained prior to treatment and during therapy included measurement of ADCC, serum cytokine, and chemokine analysis, determination of NK cell FcγRIIIa polymorphisms, and an analysis of myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) frequency in peripheral blood. Results: The combination of cetuximab and IL12 was well tolerated. No clinical responses were observed, however, 48% of patients exhibited prolonged progression-free survival (PFS; average of 6.5 months). Compared with patients that did not exhibit clinical benefit, patients with PFS >100 days exhibited increased ADCC as therapy continued compared with baseline, greater production of IFNγ, IP-10, and TNFα at the beginning of cycle 8 compared with baseline values and had a predominance of monocytic MDSCs versus granulocytic MDSCs prior to therapy. Conclusions: Further investigation of IL12 as an immunomodulatory agent in combination with cetuximab in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is warranted.

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer. Current challenges facing the management of melanoma include accurate prediction of individuals who will respond to adjuvant therapies as well as early detection of recurrences. These and other challenges have prompted investigation into biomarkers that could be used as diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic aids. MicroRNAs (miRs) are small 19-22 nucleotide RNA inhibitors of protein translation. Over 800 different miRs are present within cells and importantly miR expression profiles may vary across different cells types and stages of malignancy. Unique expression profiles have been described for malignant melanoma; however, this work has yet to be translated into routine clinical practice. We highlight pertinent studies involving common miRs implicated in the oncogenesis of melanoma including miR-21, miR-125b, miR-150, miR-155, miR-205, and miR-211. In particular, emphasis is placed upon differential expression across different stages of melanoma progression, prognostic implications and potential mechanistic involvement. Focused efforts on inhibition of these miRs could be the most efficient method of translating preclinical endeavors into clinically meaningful applications.

e13554 Background: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC) is a complication of advanced malignancies wherein primary tumors metastasize to the leptomeninges surrounding brain and spinal cord. LMC complicates 4-15% of malignant solid tumors with incidence increasing as survival of patients with advanced cancer improves. Diagnostic methods include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology. MRI findings may be nonspecific, and the gold standard of diagnosis is malignant cytology on CSF analysis. We assessed detection methods, incidence, and outcomes of LMC at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2005-2015. Methods: This was an IRB-approved single-institution retrospective study of 160 patients with confirmed diagnosis of LMC who were treated at the OSUCCC-James between Jan 1, 2005 and Dec 31, 2015. Patients with hematologic and central nervous system malignancies were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from LMC diagnosis to death or last known follow-up, and was generated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: Median age of LMC diagnosis was 55.8 years (range: 48, 62.5). 69 (43%) patients had primary breast cancer, 41 (26%) had lung cancer, and 17 (11%) had melanoma. 73 patients (46%) presented with stage IV disease at initial diagnosis of the primary cancer, 41 (26%) with stage III disease, and 26 (16%) with stage II disease. Median time from diagnosis of primary cancer to diagnosis of LMC was 2 years (range: 0, 31.2). 158 (99%) patients had metastases at the time of LMC diagnosis, predominantly in bone (36%) or brain (36%). Median OS was 1.9 months (CI: 1.3, 2.5). 160 (100%) patients had an MRI of the brain or spine and 155 (97%) had MRI findings consistent with LMC. 75 (47%) patients underwent lumbar puncture, and 39 (52%) had CSF cytology positive for malignancy. Conclusions: Patients with LMC commonly presented with stage IV breast cancer, lung cancer, or melanoma with metastases to the brain or bone. Despite treatment, prognosis remains poor and confirmation of diagnosis can be challenging. Clinicians should have a low threshold for investigating LMC in high risk patients presenting with neurologic signs or symptoms.

Psoriasin (S100A7) is a calcium-binding protein that has shown to be highly expressed in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and a subset of invasive breast cancers. However, its role in invasion and metastasis is not very well known. In this study, we have shown that S100A7 differentially regulates epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced cell migration and invasion in ERα(-) MDA-MB-231 cells and ERα(+) MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells. Further signaling studies revealed that S100A7 enhances EGF-induced EGFR phosphorylation and actin remodeling that seems to favor lamellipodia formation in ERα(-) cells. In addition, S100A7 overexpression enhanced NF-κB-mediated matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) secretion in MDA-MB-231 cells indicating its role in enhanced invasiveness. However, S100A7 overexpression inhibited migration and invasion of MCF-7 cells by inactivating Rac-1 pathway and MMP-9 secretion. Moreover, S100A7 overexpressing MDA-MB-231 cells showed enhanced metastasis compared to vector control in in vivo nude mice as detected by bioluminescence imaging. Our tissue microarray data also revealed predominant expression of S100A7 in ERα(-) metastatic carcinoma, especially in lymph node regions. Overall these studies suggest that S100A7 may enhance metastasis in ERα(-) breast cancer cells by a novel mechanism through regulation of actin cytoskeleton and MMP-9 secretion.

Background: The approved dosing schedule of capecitabine monotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is 1250 mg/m2/dose administered days 1 through 14 of a 21-day cycle, but many patients (pts) have difficulty with this schedule due to side effects. Use of a lower starting dose such as 1000 mg/m2/dose or use of an alternative 28-day administration schedule (7 day on, 7 day off, repeat) allows for greater tolerability. Given limited data regarding efficacy of the alternative 28-day schedule, the primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of different schedules of capecitabine in patients with MBC. Methods: A retrospective chart review of pts with metastatic breast cancer who received capecitabine as monotherapy between 2002 and 2014 at the Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital was performed. We excluded any HER2-positive patients who had received concurrent HER2-targeted therapy. Pts who initiated therapy at a dose of 1000 mg/m2/dose were classified by these dosing schedules: Arm A (21 day), B (28 day), and C (changeover from 21 day to 28 day). Time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were compared between dosing schedules using Kaplan Meier curves and log-rank tests. Results: A total of 181 MBC patients (Arm A: n = 113, Arm B: n = 25, Arm C: n = 43) with the following patient characteristics met eligibility criteria; 86.2% Caucasians, 13.8% non-Caucasians, 64.64% estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, 3.31% ER positive/HER2-positive, 2.22% ER negative/HER2-positive, and 29.83% triple-negative. The HER2-positive patients were excluded as they received concurrent therapy. A significant difference was seen in TTF (Arm A: 2.7 mo, Arm B: 2.8 mo, Arm C: 7.1 mo, p = 0.001) when comparing all dosing schedules as well as in OS (Arm A: 5.7 yrs, Arm B: 9.6 yrs, Arm C: 7.8 yrs, p = 0.006). After an initial dose reduction, patients on Arm B tolerated capecitabine for a longer period of time than patients on Arm A before needing a second dose reduction (Table 1). The median time on capecitabine for Arm A was 11.9 weeks and 12.6 weeks for Arm B, and the mean time of both Arm A and Arm B on capecitabine was 22.2 weeks. Patients with ER-positive breast cancer had improved TTF (4.45 months vs 2.32 months, p < 0.001) and OS (7.26 years vs 3.99 years, p < 0.001) compared to ER-negative breast cancer. Caucasians had improved TTF compared to African Americans (AA) and other races (3.90 mo vs 2.87 mo, p = 0.004); however, there was no significant difference in OS. Median starting dose (mg/m2): Arm A - 1000; Arm B - 1043; Arm C - 1000 Time to 1st dose reduction (weeks): Arm A - 6; Arm B - 6; Arm C - 6.5 Dose after 1st reduction (mg/m2): Arm A - 808; Arm B - 848.5; Arm C - 802 Time to 2nd dose reduction (weeks): Arm A - 6; Arm B - 20; Arm C - 8 Dose after 2nd reduction (mg/m2): Arm A - 599.5; Arm B - 690; Arm C - 697 Time to 3rd dose reduction (weeks): Arm A - 6; Arm B - 0; Arm C - 24 Dose after 3rd reduction (mg/m2): Arm A - 575; Arm B - 0; Arm C - 557 Table 1: Median dose (mg/m2) and median time to reductions (in weeks) Conclusions: Our study shows that patients who received the 28-day cycle initially or who were switched to the 28-day cycle appeared to have improved TTF and OS compared to patients on the 21-day cycle. It also shows that AA women had worse TTF on capecitabine when compared to Caucasians. One hypothesis for the improved TTF and OS is that this could be due to a higher total dose of capecitabine received in Arm B and C as shown in Table 1. We acknowledge that the limitations of our study include the sample size and the retrospective nature, and that further work needs to be done. However, the 28-day dosing schedule for capecitabine could be an alternative for elderly patients or patients with poor performance status who are at higher risk for drug toxicities. Citation Format: Nicole Olivia Williams, Anupama Suresh, Julie Stephens, Marilly Palettas, Michael J. Berger, Akaansha Ganju, Raquel Reinbolt, Robert Wesolowski, Anne M. Noonan, Jeffrey Bryan VanDeusen, Sagar Sardesai, Maryam Lustberg, Maryam B. Lustberg, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy. Efficacy of alternative 28-day capecitabine dosing schedule in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Breast Cancer Research; 2017 Oct 7-10; Hollywood, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2018;16(8_Suppl):Abstract nr A69.

Background: Increasing evidence suggests that higher parity and lack of breastfeeding associates strongly with the risk of developing the aggressive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). There is a 25-50% reduction in risk of developing TNBC in women who have breastfed >4-6 months when compared to parous women who have never breastfed. Higher rates of breastfeeding and lower incidence of BC observed in native African women support this postulate. Observational studies and recent national statistics indicate that the prevalence of breastfeeding is markedly low among African-American women (AAW) (58.9%) compared to Caucasian women (CW) (75.2%). Due to the remarkable health and economic benefit of breastfeeding, we investigated whether patients received information about breast cancer risk reduction as part of breastfeeding counseling and whether this knowledge affected participants' decision to initiate and sustain breastfeeding. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted from September 2016 to June 2017 at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (OSUCCC) on women aged 18-50 who had at least one live-born child. Participants completed an electronic survey that included demographic information and details of breastfeeding history. Recruitment occurred via primary care secure patient portal electronic messaging (MyChart) and an online national clinical research registry (Research Match). Summary statistics were used to describe responses. Wilcoxon Rank Sum test was used to compare length of breastfeeding. Results: A total of 724 women (496 CW and 152 AAW and 76 unknown) completed the online survey; 503 responses through Research Match, 197 through MyChart, and 24 unknown. 92% of those who responded had breastfed. 56% (60.7% Caucasians and 46.1% AA) of women said they were aware breastfeeding reduced the risk of cancer. Of those who were aware of the risk, 36.4% said that this knowledge affected their decision to breastfeed. Of the 39 who did not breastfeed, 23 (59.0%) said being aware of this risk would have influenced their decision. Only 16.6% of women reported they received this information from health care providers; others were informed through magazines and Internet. The mean length of breastfeeding among women who were aware of this benefit was significantly longer than the women who were not aware (13.2 months vs 9.3 months, respectively, p Conclusions: Our study showed that there are disparities between AAW and CW in the knowledge that breastfeeding reduces the risk of breast cancer and in the duration of breast feeding. In addition, we showed that increased knowledge impacts decision-making regarding breastfeeding. Hence, development of culturally relevant communication strategies, especially in AAW, can impact initiation and maintenance of breastfeeding, and ultimately result in aggressive breast cancer reduction. Citation Format: Akaansha Ganju, Anupama Suresh, Julie Stephens, Marilly Palettas, Diana Burke, Laura Miles, Maryam Lustberg, Seuli Brill, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy. Knowledge of breastfeeding to reduce breast cancer risk [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Tenth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2017 Sep 25-28; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2018;27(7 Suppl):Abstract nr C57.

Metastatic melanoma is the most aggressive form of this cancer. It is important to understand factors that increase or decrease metastatic activity in order to more effectively research and implement treatments for melanoma. Increased cell invasion through the extracellular matrix is required for metastasis and is enhanced by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 3 (TIMP3) inhibits MMP activity. It was previously shown by our group that miR-21, a potential regulator of TIMP3, is over-expressed in cutaneous melanoma. It was therefore hypothesized that increased levels of miR-21 expression would lead to decreased expression of TIMP3 and thereby enhance the invasiveness of melanoma cells. miR-21 over-expression in the melanoma cell lines WM1552c, WM793b, A375 and MEL 39 was accomplished via transfection with pre-miR-21. Immunoblot analysis of miR-21-overexpressing cell lines revealed reduced expression of TIMP3 as compared to controls. This in turn led to a significant increase in the invasiveness of the radial growth phase cell line WM1552c and the vertical growth phase cell line WM793b (p < 0.05), but not in the metastatic cell lines A375 or MEL 39. The proliferation and migration of miR-21 over-expressing cell lines was not affected. Reduced expression of TIMP3 was achieved by siRNA knockdown and significantly enhanced invasion of melanoma cell lines, mimicking the effects of miR-21 over-expression. Treatment of tumor cells with a linked nucleic acid antagomir to miR-21 inhibited tumor growth and increased tumor expression of TIMP3 in vivo in 01B74 Athymic NCr-nu/nu mice. Intra-tumoral injections of anti-miR-21 produced similar effects. This data shows that increased expression of miR-21 enhanced the invasive potential of melanoma cell lines through TIMP3 inhibition. Therefore, inhibition of miR-21 in melanoma may reduce melanoma invasiveness.

Introduction S100A7 (Psoriasin) is an inflammatory protein known to be upregulated in breast cancer. However, the role of S100A7 in breast cancer has been elusive, since both pro- and anti-proliferative roles have been reported in different types of breast cancer cells and animal models. To date, the mechanism by which S100A7 differentially regulates breast cancer cell proliferation is still not clear. Methods We used Gene Functional Enrichment Analysis to search for the determining factor of S100A7 differential regulation. We confirmed the factor and elaborated its regulating mechanism using in vitro cell culture. We further verified the findings using xenografts of human breast cancer cells in nude mice. Results In the present study, we show that S100A7 significantly downregulates the expression of miR-29b in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells (represented by MCF7), and significantly upregulates miR-29b in ER-negative cells (represented by MDA-MB-231). The differential regulation of miR-29b by S100A7 in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer is supported by the gene expression analysis of TCGA invasive breast cancer dataset. miR-29b transcription is inhibited by NF-κB, and NF-κB activation is differentially regulated by S100A7 in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cells. This further leads to differential regulation of PI3K p85α and CDC42 expression, p53 activation and p53-associated anti-proliferative pathways. Reversing the S100A7-caused changes of miR-29b expression by transfecting exogenous miR-29b or miR-29b-Decoy can inhibit the effects of S100A7 on in vitro cell proliferation and tumor growth in nude mice. Conclusions The distinct modulations of the NF-κB – miR-29b – p53 pathway make S100A7 an oncogene in ER-negative and a cancer-suppressing gene in ER-positive breast cancer cells, with miR-29b being the determining regulatory factor. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12943-014-0275-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

S100A7 (Psoriasin) is an inflammatory protein known to be upregulated in breast cancer. However, the role of S100A7 in breast cancer has been elusive, since both pro- and anti-proliferative roles have been reported in different types of breast cancer cells and animal models. To date, the mechanism by which S100A7 differentially regulates breast cancer cell proliferation is still not clear.We used Gene Functional Enrichment Analysis to search for the determining factor of S100A7 differential regulation. We confirmed the factor and elaborated its regulating mechanism using in vitro cell culture. We further verified the findings using xenografts of human breast cancer cells in nude mice.In the present study, we show that S100A7 significantly upregulates the expression of miR-29b in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cells (represented by MCF7), and significantly downregulates miR-29b in ER-negative cells (represented by MDA-MB-231) [Corrected]. The differential regulation of miR-29b by S100A7 in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer is supported by the gene expression analysis of TCGA invasive breast cancer dataset. miR-29b transcription is inhibited by NF-κB, and NF-κB activation is differentially regulated by S100A7 in ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cells. This further leads to differential regulation of PI3K p85α and CDC42 expression, p53 activation and p53-associated anti-proliferative pathways. Reversing the S100A7-caused changes of miR-29b expression by transfecting exogenous miR-29b or miR-29b-Decoy can inhibit the effects of S100A7 on in vitro cell proliferation and tumor growth in nude mice.The distinct modulations of the NF-κB - miR-29b - p53 pathway make S100A7 an oncogene in ER-negative and a cancer-suppressing gene in ER-positive breast cancer cells, with miR-29b being the determining regulatory factor.