Search

Introduction To evaluate the correlation between macular integrity assessment (MAIA) and standard automated perimetry (SAP) in detecting macular function damage in glaucoma and to explore the relationship between macular structure and functional damage by using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods This was a cross-sectional study. Seventy patients with glaucoma, with hemifield defects verified by Humphrey 24-2 examination, and 60 normal subjects underwent Humphrey 10-2 and MAIA expert 10-2 examinations. Patients with glaucoma with normal hemifields, as detected by SAP, were divided into a normal hemifield group and a visual field (VF) defect group. The difference in the retina and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thicknesses was analyzed between the abnormal and normal hemifields. Results Among the 70 glaucoma eyes, the results of MAIA and SAP were consistent for 66 (66/70, 94.3%). The others showed SAP hemifield defects, while MAIA was normal (4/70, 5.7%). There was a good correlation of the mean sensitivity between MAIA and SAP (P

Aim: To compare the results of short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in diabetic patients without retinopathy and healthy subjects and show if it is possible to detect an abnormal function of the retina in diabetic patients before vascular changes on the retina develop. Further, the effect of diabetes duration and long-term glycaemic control on the visual field was examined. Methods: The study group included 22 patients with diabetes type 1 or 2, without any signs of retinopathy. The control group consisted of 21 healthy subjects. Short-wavelength automated perimetry was performed on the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA 860, Carl Zeiss Meditec), SITA SWAP, 24-2 test. In diabetic patients, the duration of diabetes and the level of glycohemoglobin (HbA1c) was registered. The visual field indices MD (mean deviation) and PSD (pattern standard deviation) were compared between both groups by the Mann-Whitney test. The correlation between the visual field indices, HbA1c and duration of diabetes was assessed by the Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: The mean value of MD in the study and control group was -3.64±3.66 dB and -1.48±2.12 dB respectively, the values in the study group were significantly lower (p < 0.05). Mean PSD in the study group was 2.92±1.04 dB and 2.23±0.33 dB in the control group, again the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Patients in the study group suffered from diabetes for 17±9.4 years in average. The mean value of HbA1c in the study group was 60.64±16.63 mmol/mol. A significant correlation was found only for PSD and HbA1c (p > 0.05). The duration of diabetes had no effect on either of the visual field indices. Conclusion: Short-wavelength sensitivity of retina seems to be affected in diabetic patients without clinically significant retinopathy suggesting a neuroretinal impairment at early stages of the retinopathy. We found no association between the visual field and the control or duration of diabetes.

Background: Visual field defects (VFD) usually do not show improvement beyond 12 weeks from their onset. It has been shown that repetitive presentation of a stimulus to areas of residual vision in cases of visual field defect can improve vision. The counterpart of these areas in the brain are the partially damaged brain regions at the perilesional areas where plasticity can be enhanced. Objective: We aimed to study the effect of navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to perilesional areas on the recovery of patients with cortical VFD. Methods: Thirty-two patients with cortical VFD secondary to stroke of more than 3 months duration received 16 sessions of either active or sham high frequency navigated perilesional rTMS. Automated perimetry and visual functioning questionnaire (VFQ-25) were performed at baseline and after completion of the sessions. Results: The active group showed significant improvement after intervention, compared to the sham group, in both mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI) and in the VFQ-25 scores. Conclusions: Navigated rTMS is a new treatment option for post-stroke VFD as it can selectively stimulate areas of residual vision around the infarcted tissue, improving the threshold of visual stimulus detection which could be used alone or in combination with existing therapies.

Modern computer perimetry is divided into traditional white stimulus-on-white background, the gold standard of which is perimetry performed by using expert class perimeters Humphrey and Octopus and therefore called standard automatic or automated perimetry (SAP), and non-traditional or non-standard perimetry, which differs, first of all, in a different nature of a stimulus. The article is a review devoted to the assessment of the diagnostic capabilities of non-standard computer perimetry in the form of different variants of perimetry with doubling the spatial frequency (Frequency Doubling Technology Perimetry or FDT perimetry), which is performed by using perimeters of the 1st (Carl Zeiss Humphrey 710 Visual Field / FDT, 1997) and the 2nd (Carl Zeiss Humphrey Matrix / HM 715, 800 Visual Field Analyzer, 2005, 2010) generation. Most authors consider that FDT perimetry is effective in a glaucoma screening and, possibly, in monitoring a glaucomatous process, but only a few authors consider that non-standard perimetry method can be useful in diagnosing optic neuropathies of a different nature.

PURPOSE: To assess whether longitudinal changes in a deep learning algorithm’s predictions of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness based on fundus photographs can predict future development of glaucomatous visual field defects. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study METHODS: This study included 1072 eyes of 827 glaucoma-suspect patients with an average follow-up of 5.9 ± 3.8 years. All eyes had normal standard automated perimetry (SAP) at baseline. Additional SAP and fundus photographs were acquired throughout follow-up. Conversion to glaucoma was defined as repeatable glaucomatous defects on SAP. An OCT-trained deep learning algorithm (Machine to Machine, M2M) was used to predict RNFL thicknesses from fundus photographs. Joint longitudinal survival models were used to assess whether baseline and longitudinal change in M2M’s RNFL thickness estimates could predict development of visual field defects. RESULTS: 196 eyes (18%) converted to glaucoma during follow-up. The mean rate of change in M2M’s predicted RNFL thickness was −1.02 μm/y for conversors and −0.67 μm/y for non-conversors (P < 0.001). Baseline and rate of change of predicted RNFL thickness were significantly predictive of conversion to glaucoma, with hazard ratios in the multivariable model of 1.56 per 10 μm lower at baseline (95% CI, 1.33 – 1.82; P < 0.001) and 1.99 per 1 μm/y faster loss in thickness during follow-up (95% CI, 1.36 – 2.93; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal changes in a deep learning algorithm’s predictions of RNFL thickness measurements based on fundus photographs can be used to predict risk of glaucoma conversion in eyes suspected of having the disease.

BACKGROUND We wanted to measure and compare retinal sensitivity in central 30 degree in diabetic patients, with and without diabetic retinopathy in different stages, evaluate changes in retinal sensitivity in relation to change in HbA1c values, measure and compare GCL thickness in various stages of DR with the help of optical coherence tomography (OCT). METHODS This observational, cross-sectional study involving 100 eyes of 100 middle aged (45 - 64 years) type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (50 eyes without DR - group 1 & 50 eyes with DR - group 2) without any other ocular abnormalities was conducted in the outpatient and in-patient departments of department of ophthalmology in a tertiary care centre in West Bengal. Non-randomised sequential sampling was performed with corrected visual acuity better than or equal to 6 / 12. Fasting and postprandial blood glucose and HbA1c were estimated. Detailed ocular examination was performed using direct and indirect ophthalmoscope with + 20 D lens and slit lamp bio-microscope using + 90D lens. Retinal sensitivity was assessed by Humphrey visual field analyser by Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) standard strategy (30 - 2 programme). Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) was performed in all patients. SPSS version 20 has been used for the analysis. RESULTS Among DR patients, 33 had mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (male = 15, female = 18) and 17 had moderate NPDR (male = 7, female = 10). Mean age in DR (Gr. 2) and no DR (Gr. 1) group were 52.62 and 50.74 years respectively. Mean foveal sensitivity and mean retinal sensitivity decreased significantly (P-value 0.001 and 0.002 respectively) in group 2 patients. It further decreased with increased severity of DR. Mean ganglion cell + inner plexiform layer (GC + IPL) thickness in temporal quadrant decreased in DR group compared to no DR group with significant difference between the two (P-value < 0.001). Mean retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness was significantly reduced in DR group (P-value < 0.001). HbA1c mean in no DR (6.7 %) and DR group (8.07 %) and in mild (7.5 %) and moderate NPDR (9.17 %) shows significant association of poor control of blood sugar with severity of DR. CONCLUSIONS Retinal sensitivity decreased significantly in diabetes even without retinopathy as detected by automated perimetry. Significant decrease in retinal thickness as detected by OCT suggested that neurodegeneration occurs in diabetes even without retinopathy. So automated perimetry and OCT could be helpful in identifying persons at an early stage who are at risk of future vision loss due to diabetes. KEYWORDS Diabetic Retinopathy, Retinal Neurodegeneration, Retinal Sensitivity, Automated Perimetry, GCL + IPL Thickness, RNFL Thickness

Purpose To investigate the use of a retinal thickness deviation map generated from swept-source (SS) OCT images for hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening. Design Retrospective cohort study. Participants This study included 1192 Korean patients with a history of hydroxychloroquine treatment: 881 patients (1723 eyes) in the discovery set and 311 patients (591 eyes) in the validation set. Patients were screened for retinal toxicity using SS OCT, fundus autofluorescence, and standard automated perimetry. Methods According to the 2016 American Academy of Ophthalmology guidelines, hydroxychloroquine retinopathy was diagnosed by the presence of abnormalities on ≥1 objective structural tests alongside corresponding visual field defects. The 12 × 9-mm2 macular volume SS OCT scan was performed, and the retinal thickness deviation map was generated automatically using the built-in software. On this map, yellow (retinal thickness, Main Outcome Measures The rate and patterns of abnormalities on the retinal thickness deviation map and sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic criteria. Results The retinal thickness deviation map showed the following abnormal patterns in eyes with hydroxychloroquine retinopathy: pericentral (36.0%) or parafoveal (6.1%) ring, mixed-ring (34.2%), central island (13.2%), and whole macular thinning (10.5%). The criterion of ≥5 contiguous red pixels showing 1 of the 5 characteristic patterns in both eyes yielded the greatest diagnostic performance (sensitivity and specificity of 98.2% and 89.1% and of 100% and 87.5% in the discovery and validation set data, respectively). Moreover, the area of abnormal pixels on the map was correlated significantly with the mean deviation (P Conclusions The retinal thickness deviation map may facilitate the objective evaluation of hydroxychloroquine retinopathy because it does not require subjective, morphologic evaluation of the outer retinal layers. The map has the potential to enhance hydroxychloroquine retinopathy screening when used in conjunction with conventional screening methods.

Purpose of review The field of artificial intelligence has grown exponentially in recent years with new technology, methods, and applications emerging at a rapid rate. Many of these advancements have been used to improve the diagnosis and management of glaucoma. We aim to provide an overview of recent publications regarding the use of artificial intelligence to enhance the detection and treatment of glaucoma. Recent findings Machine learning classifiers and deep learning algorithms have been developed to autonomously detect early structural and functional changes of glaucoma using different imaging and testing modalities such as fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, and standard automated perimetry. Artificial intelligence has also been used to further delineate structure-function correlation in glaucoma. Additional 'structure-structure' predictions have been successfully estimated. Other machine learning techniques utilizing complex statistical modeling have been used to detect glaucoma progression, as well as to predict future progression. Although not yet approved for clinical use, these artificial intelligence techniques have the potential to significantly improve glaucoma diagnosis and management. Summary Rapidly emerging artificial intelligence algorithms have been used for the detection and management of glaucoma. These algorithms may aid the clinician in caring for patients with this complex disease. Further validation is required prior to employing these techniques widely in clinical practice.

Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness and disability worldwide. Nevertheless, the majority of patients do not know they have the disease and detection of glaucoma progression using standard technology remains a challenge in clinical practice. Artificial intelligence (AI) is an expanding field that offers the potential to improve diagnosis and screening for glaucoma with minimal reliance on human input. Deep learning (DL) algorithms have risen to the forefront of AI by providing nearly human-level performance, at times exceeding the performance of humans for detection of glaucoma on structural and functional tests. A succinct summary of present studies and challenges to be addressed in this field is needed. Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of studies that applied DL methods for detection of glaucoma using color fundus photographs, optical coherence tomography (OCT), or standard automated perimetry (SAP). In this review article we describe recent advances in DL as applied to the diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucoma progression for application in screening and clinical settings, as well as the challenges that remain when applying this novel technique in glaucoma.

Objective: Evaluation of efficacy of the application of artificial intelligence technology and neural networks in the analysis of the condition of the optic disc and the peripapillary retina in healthy individuals.Methods: Prospective analysis of the condition of visual organs in 54 patients aged from 49 to 71 years (100 eyes) was conducted. The examination included autorefractometry, visometry, tonometry, automated perimetry, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, Heidelberg retina tomography. A pre-trained neural network evaluated only a photograph of the optic nerve disc and the peripapillary retina.Results: Neural network identified twelve images with suspected glaucoma, five of which were selected by medical experts. The comparison of all study groups has demonstrated the presence of statistically significant differences between them according to a range of visiometric indicators.Conclusions: The study results showed high efficiency of artificial intelligence and the prospects of its use for the diagnosis of glaucoma.

PRECIS The VisuALL head-mounted perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients had a moderate to strong correlation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). PURPOSE Visual field testing has a vital role in diagnosing and managing glaucoma. The current clinical practice relies on large, table-based testing units. This study investigated the performance of a novel virtual reality head-mounted visual perimetry device (VisuALL), in normal and glaucoma patients. METHODS This prospective observational study was conducted on 50 eyes of 25 healthy subjects (normal group) and 52 eyes of 26 patients with a controlled mild or moderate stage of glaucoma (glaucoma group). All participants had visual field testing with VisuALL and the HFA (24-2, Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm). The mean sensitivity of the whole visual field and each quadrant were compared between both machines and the receiver operating characteristic was used to compare the diagnostic abilities and the Bland-Altman plot to evaluate the agreement of the 2 perimeters. RESULTS The global mean sensitivity of the VisuALL and the HFA correlated significantly in both normal (r=0.5, P=0.001) and glaucoma (r=0.8, P

PURPOSE: To investigate long-term structural and functional progression of untreated and treated glaucoma suspects (UGS, TGS) METHODS: Retrospective analysis of serial steady-state pattern electroretinogram (PERG), Mean Retinal Nerve Fiber Thickness (RNFLT), and Standard Automated Perimetry Mean Deviation (SAP-MD) in UGS (N=20) and TGS (N=18). Outcome measures were the rates of change (linear regression slopes) of PERG amplitude, PERG phase, mean RNFLT, and SAP-MD over 9.8 ± 1.3 years (15.6 ± 4.2 visits). RESULTS: The number of patients with significant (P

PReCIS:: This eye movement perimetry (EMP) study describes the development of saccadic reaction time (SRT)-based visual field plots, which could effectively display the presence, location, and extent of glaucomatous defects and support clinical decision-making. Purpose EMP is capable of discriminating normal from glaucomatous visual field defects on the basis of average delays in SRTs. To classify the presence and extent of age-corrected visual field defects, it is required to create SRT-based probability maps. Aim The aim of this study was to create visual field probability plots based on SRTs and to evaluate their clinical applicability by 2 glaucoma specialists. Materials and methods The development phase included 95 controls segregated into 5 age-bins to estimate normative limits of SRT. Next, for the testing phase, a set of 28 healthy subjects and 24 glaucoma patients were recruited who underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP) and EMP visual field testing. Fifty-two SAP and EMP plots were presented to 2 glaucoma specialists to classify them as normal or abnormal and to identify the defect location and pattern as 1 or more of 7 predefined categories. Results The glaucoma specialists showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93% and 96% for identifying normal versus abnormal visual field. For specialists 1 and 2, 85% and 92%, respectively, of EMP reports were assigned to the same category as SAP. The reports that did not agree with SAP were graded to a higher defect pattern. The intermethod agreement for specialists 1 and 2 was κ 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. Conclusion SRT-based visual field probability plots provided a comprehensive summary of an individual's visual field status and showed comparable clinical applicability to that of SAP plots.

SIGNIFICANCE Assessing and managing glaucoma are a complicated process in which experience plays a key role in decision making. Although advanced glaucoma is more easily diagnosed, patients with early glaucoma or who present with suspicious findings are more complicated. A need to aid clinicians in the decision-making process exists. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of en face ocular coherence tomography images to clinical decision making when added to standard presentations of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and automated perimetry. METHODS Thirty participants from two centers presenting either as a glaucoma suspect or for an initial glaucoma evaluation were enrolled. Six masked investigators were given standard presentations of circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and perimetry. They were asked if glaucomatous damage was present as well as a recommended plan of management on 5-point Likert scales. They were then given en face images of the retinal nerve fiber layer in three different presentations coupled with the standard presentation, and the questions were repeated. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was generated. RESULTS The masked investigators had moderate agreement from the standard presentation for assessment (ICC = 0.67 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.54 to 0.80] and ICC = 0.69 [95% CI, 0.52 to 0.80], respectively), as well as with the addition of the en face images (ICC = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81). The en face images tended to change decisions in both assessment and plan toward likely to have glaucoma and likely to start treatment. CONCLUSIONS The addition of en face images to a standard presentation has an impact on clinical decision making. Although en face images seem to influence the decision toward likely to have glaucoma and likely to treat, it is unclear if this leads to a more accurate decision. Further investigations seem warranted to assess sensitivity and specificity of this approach.

Purpose To assess the efficacy of novel Digital spectacles (DSpecs) to improve mobility of patients with peripheral visual field (VF) loss. Design Prospective case series. Methods Binocular VF defects were quantified with the DSpecs testing strategy. An algorithm was implemented that generated personalized visual augmentation profiles based on the measured VF. These profiles were achieved by relocating and resizing video signals to fit within the remaining VF in real time. Twenty patients with known binocular VF defects were tested using static test images, followed by dynamic walking simulations to determine if they could identify objects and avoid obstacles in an environment mimicking a real-life situation. The effect of the DSpecs were assessed for visual/hand coordination with object-grasping tests. Patients performed these tests with and without the DSpecs correction profile. Results The diagnostic binocular VF testing with the DSpecs was comparable to the integrated monocular standard automated perimetry based on point-by-point assessment with a mismatch error of 7.0%. Eighteen of 20 patients (90%) could identify peripheral objects in test images with the DSpecs that they could not previously. Visual/hand coordination was successful for 17 patients (85%) from the first trial. The object-grasping performance improved to 100% by the third trial. Patient performance, judged by finding and identifying objects in the periphery in a simulated walking environment, was significantly better with the DSpecs (P = 0.02, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Conclusions DSpecs may improve mobility by facilitating the ability of patients to better identify moving peripheral hazardous objects.

A 58-year-old man presented with a complaint of subjective visual field loss on the right side and hypertensive emergency. Examination revealed a right homonymous hemianopia. Computed tomography imaging revealed an acute stroke of the left lateral geniculate body. A few months later, automated perimetry revealed characteristic visual field changes associated with this lesion. In this report, the anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical findings, and previously reported etiologies of lateral geniculate body lesions are reviewed.

Introduction: To determine which patients with visual snow (VS) and VS syndrome (VSS) require standard ophthalmologic testing including automated visual field and which patients require further testing such as macular spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), electrophysiology, and neuroimaging.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 52 consecutive patients at three institutions with VS and VSS including the University of Alabama, Callahan Eye Hospital, the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, and the Little Rock Eye Clinic from the years 2015 to 2021. We collected historical information, examination findings, ophthalmic testing, electrophysiology, and neuroimaging.Results: Of the 52 patients with VS and VSS, eight of the 52 cases met the clinical criteria for VSS. The ages ranged from 7 to 79 years, with a mean age of 25 years (SD = 14.0). There were 22 males and 30 females. Color vision was tested in 51 cases and was normal in 47 cases (92%). A funduscopic exam was performed in all 52 cases and was normal in 46 cases (88%). The macular SD-OCT was normal in all of the 19 cases that it was performed (100%). A Humphrey visual field was performed in 50 cases and was normal in 43 (86%). A visually evoked potential (VEP) was normal in 18 of the 19 cases where it was obtained (95%). The full-field electroretinography (ffERG) was obtained in 28 cases and was normal in 25 (89%). The multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) was normal in 11 of 12 cases (92%). Only four patients accounted for all of the abnormal electrophysiological tests. In the 37 cases that had an MRI, 29 were normal (78%). Only one patient revealed a lesion in the visual pathway (right optic nerve enhancement in an optic neuritis patient).Conclusions: Patients with VS and VSS, if typical in presentation and with normal testing, do not require a workup beyond a thorough history, neuro-ophthalmologic examination, and automated perimetry. If this testing is abnormal, then ancillary testing is required.

Background Existing evidence suggests that visual field defect in eyes with glaucoma significantly varies between individuals. The following study compared the central visual field defects with the peripheral visual field defects in patients with suspect glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and investigated whether using the central visual field test alone could result in loss of clinically valuable information. Methods In this prospective observational study, 167 eyes from 89 patients with suspect glaucoma or POAG were first examined with static automated perimetry (SAP), followed by a peripheral visual field test on Octopus 900 perimeter (Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland). The peripheral visual field test was performed by “Auto Kinetic Perimetry” program, in which Goldmann III4e stimuli randomly moved along 16 vectors at a constant angular velocity of 5 deg/s. Results Glaucomatous peripheral visual field defects were seen in 18% of the eyes with a normal central visual field. In addition, 86% of glaucoma patients with moderate-to-severe central visual field defects had corresponding peripheral visual field defects in the form of localized or diffuse depression of the isopters. Furthermore, a moderate correlation was found between the central and peripheral visual fields. The median test duration was 71 s for the peripheral test and 803 s for the central test (p Conclusions Our study demonstrated the diversity of glaucomatous visual field defects, as well as the possibility of losing the clinically valuable information due to focusing on the central visual field test alone. The peripheral kinetic perimetry is clinically feasible to complement the central static perimetry for a comprehensive assessment of visual function in glaucoma patients.

Purpose The first reported case of bilateral transient visual field defect, experienced by an ophthalmologist, which developed shortly after COVID-19 vaccination (CoronaVac, Sinovac Biotech Ltd., Beijing, China) and confirmed by computerized automated perimetry. Observation The patient is a 42-year-old Thai ophthalmologist. He developed blurred vision within an hour after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination. We described his self-observed of sequential symptoms, chronologic events, and management steps. The visual field of left congruous hemianopia with respect to vertical midline was detected with computerized automated perimetry. The possible mechanism could be related to an acute vasospasm of the artery in the postchiasmatic visual pathway, triggered by COVID-19 vaccine, Corona Vac. Conclusion and importance With increasing use of the COVID-19 vaccine in the near future, it would be prudent for medical staff and ophthalmologists to be considered and aware of this associated condition.

Supharat Jariyakosol,1,2,&ast; Patcharaporn Jaru-ampornpan,1,2,&ast; Anita Manassakorn,1,2 Rath Itthipanichpong,1,2 Parima Hirunwiwatkul,1,2 Visanee Tantisevi,1,2 Thanapong Somkijrungroj,1,2 Prin Rojanapongpun1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; 2Ophthalmology Department, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Supharat Jariyakosol Email jsupharat@gmail.comPurpose: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of visual field results generated by the newly developed software (CU-VF) and the standard automated perimetry (SAP) for detecting hemianopia.Patients and Methods: Forty-three subjects with hemianopia and 33 controls were tested with the CU-VF software on a personal computer and SAP. Hemianopia was defined as the presence of a hemianopic field respecting the vertical meridian on SAP with the corresponding neuroimaging pathology as evaluated by 2 neuro-ophthalmologists. Results of CU-VF were independently evaluated by 2 neuro-ophthalmologists, 1 general ophthalmologist, and 1 general practitioner in terms of the presence of hemianopia. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa coefficient for inter-observer reliability were calculated. Satisfaction and ease of use were evaluated with a visual analog-scale questionnaire and analyzed using paired t-test.Results: The sensitivity (95% CI) and specificity (95% CI) of the CU-VF to detect hemianopia was 74.42% (58.53– 85.96) and 93.94% (78.38– 99.94). Kappa coefficient between neuro-ophthalmologists versus general ophthalmologist and general practitioner were 0.71 and 0.84, respectively. The mean (SD) test duration was 2.25 (0.002) minutes for the CU-VF and 5.38 (1.34) minutes for SAP (p < 0.001). Subjects reported significantly higher satisfaction and comfort using the CU-VF software compared to SAP.Conclusion: The CU-VF screening software showed good validity and reliability to detect hemianopia, with shorter test duration and higher subject satisfaction compared to SAP.Keywords: hemianopia, visual field, screening software

Purpose This study evaluates the effect of intravitreal injection of a Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) inhibitor, fasudil, on diabetic macular edema (DME) with an unfavorable response. Methods This study included 14 eyes of 13 patients (mean age: 65.7 ± 5.2 years) with DME, and eligible eyes underwent single intravitreal injection of 0.025 mg fasudil. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), and central macular thickness (CMT) were evaluated before and 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. The standard automated perimetry (SAP) results and maximal response of the electroretinogram (ERG) were recorded before and 3 months after treatment. Results The BCVA, IOP, and CMT remained unchanged during the study period. Similarly, the mean deviation obtained by SAP and each ERG parameter did not show significant changes after the treatment. Conclusions Although single intravitreal fasudil injection failed to show therapeutic benefits in DME, it seemed to have no negative effect on the retina.

Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy with characteristic changes to the optic nerve head and the visual field (VF). Detecting progression of VF damage with Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) is of paramount importance for clinical care. One common approach to detecting progression is to compare each new VF test to a baseline SAP test (event analysis). This comparison is made difficult by the test–retest variability of SAP, which increases with the level of VF damage, and the limited range of measurement, meaning that damage cannot be assessed below a certain level. We performed a prospective international multi-centre data collection of SAP data on 90 eyes from 90 people with glaucoma and different levels of VF damage over a short period of time (6 tests in 60 days). Data were collected using a fundus tracked perimeter (Compass, CenterVue). We used these data (minus the first test) to develop an improved event analysis that accounts for both the change in variability with damage and the lower bound on the measurement imposed by SAP. Using simulations, we show that our approach is more sensitive compared to previously developed methods, especially in the case of advanced glaucoma, while retaining similar specificity.

Loss of vision is a feared consequence of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF) may be an effective surgical approach to protect visual function in medically refractory IIH. In this study, we evaluate the impact of unilateral superomedial transconjunctival ONSF on bilateral visual outcome using a comprehensive follow-up program. A retrospective chart review of IIH patients who underwent unilateral ONSF between January 2016 and March 2021 was conducted. Patients fulfilling the revised Friedman criteria for IIH and who had exclusively received ONSF as a surgical treatment were included. Main outcomes were visual acuity (VA), perimetric mean deviation (PMD), papilledema grade, and optic nerve head elevation (maxONHE) 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. VA (p &lt, 0.05), PMD (p &lt, 0.05), papilledema grade (p &lt, 0.01), and maxOHNE (p &lt, 0.001) were improved after 6 months on both the operated and non-operated eye. Prolonged surgical delay impedes PMD improvement (r = −0.78, p &lt, 0.01), and an increasing opening pressure initiates a greater ganglion cell loss (r = −0.79, p &lt, 0.01). In this small case series, we demonstrate that unilateral superonasal transconjunctival ONSF is a safe procedure with an effect on both eyes. Optic nerve head elevation and PMD are feasible biomarkers for assessing early treatment efficacy after ONSF.

To assess the performance of machine learning classifiers for prediction of progression of normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) in young myopic patients. Cross-sectional study. One hundred and fifty-five eyes of 155 myopic NTG patients (axial length [AL] ≥ 24.00 mm and refractive error ≤ − 3.0 D) between the ages of 20 and 40 were enrolled and divided into training (110) and test (45) sets. Sixty-five eyes showed glaucoma progression as defined by standard automated perimetry, while 91 eyes (nonprogressors) had been stable over the course of a follow-up period of at least 3 years. Two machine learning classifiers were built using the random forest and extremely randomized trees (extra-trees) models. Baseline clinical measurements obtained only at the initial visit were used as input features. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the accuracy of prediction. Mean age and AL did not significantly differ between the 2 groups on either the training or the test set. The extra-trees model achieved an AUC of 0.881 [95% CI 0.814–0.945], higher than that of the random forest model (0.811 [0.731–0.888]; P = 0.010). The extra-trees model also outperformed all the clinical measurements for prediction of NTG progression, including average macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness (0.735 [0.639–0.831]) and average circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (0.691 [0.590–0.792]; both P

Purpose To evaluate whether loss of 5 μm or more in global retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness on spectral-domain (SD) between 2 consecutive visits is specific for glaucoma progression. Design Prospective cohort. Participants Ninety-two eyes of 49 control participants and 300 eyes of 210 glaucoma patients. Methods Patients completed at least 5 standard automated perimetry and SD OCT examinations at 6-month intervals over at least 2 years. Eyes were categorized as progressing from glaucoma if the average RNFL declined by 5 μm or more between 2 consecutive visits. The false-positive proportion was estimated by 2 methods: (1) 5-μm or more loss in control participants and (2) 5-μm or more gain in glaucoma. The false-positive proportion was subtracted from the cumulative proportion of eyes categorized with glaucoma progression to estimate the true progression prevalence. Main Outcome Measures False-positive and true progression prevalence of patients with glaucoma detected as progressing on SD OCT. Results After 5 years of semiannual testing, the cumulative proportion of false-positive results based on 5-μm or more RNFL losses between visits was 24.8% in the control participants. Although 40.6% of glaucoma eyes were diagnosed with progression at 5 years, only 15.8% would have been considered to show true progression based on the expected false-positive ratio from the control participants (i.e., 40.6%–24.8%). The cumulative proportion of an intervisit gain of 5 μm or more at 5 years was 27.4% in glaucoma eyes, suggesting that only 13.2% of eyes with glaucoma truly had progressed (i.e., 40.6%–27.4%). Conclusions Loss of 5 μm or more in average RNFL thickness between consecutive SD OCT tests is not specific for glaucoma progression. Application of this intervisit rule of 5 can result in a high cumulative proportion of false-positive results over time, which could lead to unnecessary interventions in patients whose disease is stable. More specific diagnostic criteria are needed to help clinicians determine whether patients with glaucoma are progressing so that therapy escalation is both timely and appropriate.

BACKGROUND Glaucoma is a chronic progressive optic neuropathy characterised by optic nerve head changes and field defects due to apoptosis of ganglion cells, with raised intraocular pressure being the most important risk factor. Traditionally Armaly’s cup/disc (C/D) ratio was considered as a standard method of evaluation of optic nerve head. The Disc Damage Likelihood Scale DDLS relies on the optic nerve as a direct indicator of disease. Because the scale divides glaucomatous progression into 10 stages, it can also aid to monitor the disease progression. DDLS helps in quantification of the amount of damage that the optic nerve has sustained. This study correlates the DDLS score with the visual field indices establishing a structural and functional correlation. We wanted to analyse Disc Damage Likelihood Ratio in patients with established open angle glaucoma and to correlate it with field defects and to thereby obtain an anatomical versus functional correlation. This study also evaluates the diagnostic ability of disc damage likelihood scale in glaucoma. METHODS 50 cases of established open angle glaucoma were included in this study. For all cases visual fields were recorded by Octopus 301 using G1 program and TOP strategy. After field testing, DDLS scores were calculated after dilatation. The DDLS score and field parameters of the patients were analysed. RESULTS Of the 50 patients included in this study, 70% were on topical antiglaucoma medications and 30% had undergone trabeculectomy. DDLS score and average loss variance showed a strong positive correlation as the r value was 0.95. CONCLUSIONS Disc diameter evaluation is an important part of optic nerve head evaluation. In cases with asymmetry of the cup disc ratio between two eyes, asymmetry of the disc size should also be considered if the neuroretinal rim is healthy. Disc Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) is a better indicator of optic nerve head status and has strong positive correlation with visual field indices.

Background Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a disorder of unidentified etiology characterized by raised intracranial pressure (ICP) without clinical, laboratory, or radiological evidence of intracranial pathology. The aim of this work was to determine the visual outcome in newly diagnosed IIH patients. Methods The study included 68 IIH patients; 59 responded to medical treatment and nine needed lumboperitoneal shunting (LPS). Patients were submitted to papilledema grading using Frisén Scale, water CSF manometry, brain MRI/MRV, mean deviation of visual field examination (MD-VFE), optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD), average optic disc optical coherence tomography–retinal nerve fiber layer (OCT–RNFL) thickness, and pattern–reversal visual evoked potential (VEP). Results Patients needed LPS showed statistically significant increase in baseline papilledema grade, MD-VFE, ONSD, average OCT–RNFL thickness, and P100 VEP latency. On the other hand, both studied groups showed statistically non-significant differences regarding the patients’ ages and opening CSF pressure. Conclusion Newly diagnosed IIH patients’ evaluation must be based on multimodality neuro-ophthalmological assessment where papilledema grade, MD-VFE, and OCT–RNFL are valuable biomarkers of PVD while P100 VEP latency delay is a predictor of poor visual outcome and ONSD is an early indicator of elevated ICP regression after LPS surgery.

Introduction White-on-white standard automated perimetry (AP) uses a white round stimulus with 0.43° diameter and 4.0 mm2 area (Goldmann size III). Patients with low vision have difficulty seeing such a small stimulus and are often tested with perimetry using the size V stimulus with 1.72° diameter and 64 mm2 area. We undertook an observational case-control study to compare the performance of patients on AP using two differently sized stimuli. Methods Patients with glaucoma and visual acuity worse than 20/100 underwent AP using the standard size III stimulus Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) standard test and size V stimulus full threshold test. All patients were familiar with the procedure, having done the test at least twice previously. Another group of glaucoma patients with visual acuity better than 20/40 served as controls. The main outcome measures included test time, mean retinal sensitivity (MRS), foveal sensitivity (FS), fixation loss (FL), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), and the patient's subjective preference. Results Fifty patients were included in the study. Most preferred the size V stimulus target size test. For glaucoma patients, test time was shorter with size III; MRS and FS were higher with size V; FL, FP, and FN did not differ between the tests. Conclusion AP with stimulus size V may be a good alternative to standard size III in selected visually debilitated patients who report difficulty undergoing a standard SITA 24-2 test. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40123-019-0175-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: To study the correlation between peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measured with Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) and pattern electroretin-ogram (pERG) parameters in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients.Aim of Study: To study the correlation between peripap-illary RNFL thickness measured with OCT and pERG param-eters in POAG patients.Patients and Methods: Fifty eyes of 50 patients diagnosed with POAG and 15 eyes of 15 normal subjects as control group, were enrolled in a prospective comparative study. The eyes in the POAG group were further subdivided into mild, moderate, and severe subgroups. All eyes had visual field testing using 24-2 Humphery standard automated perimetry, peripapillary RNFL average thickness using the 3.4mm circular scan of the Heidelberg OCT spectralis and pERG using CSO RetiMax device in accordance with the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision (ISCEV) guidelines.Results: There were significant differences in the visual field mean deviation (VF MD), peripapillary RNFL average thickness & some pERG measured parameters (N95 latency & P50-N95 latency) between normal and POAG eyes as were as among the three subgroups of POAG. Significant correlation was found between peripapillary RNFL average thickness and N95 amplitude (p

Purpose: To evaluate diagnostic ability of macular ganglion cell layer–inner plexiform layer (GCL-IPL) for detection of preperimetric glaucoma (PPG) and perimetric glaucoma and comparison with peripapillary RNFL. Methods: Three hundred and thirty seven eyes of 190 patients were enrolled (127 normals, 70 PPG, 140 perimetric glaucoma). Each patient underwent detailed ocular evaluation, standard automated perimetry, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Diagnostic abilities of GCL-IPL and RNFL parameters were determined. Data were compared using one-way analysis of variance, Pearson's Chi-square test, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: After adjusting for age, gender, and signal strength, all GCL-IPL and RNFL parameters except mean thickness and disc area differed significantly. Among GCL-IPL thicknesses, inferotemporal had the highest AUC (0.865) for classifying perimetric glaucoma from normals, inferior (0.746) for PPG from normals, and inferotemporal (0.750) for perimetric glaucoma from PPG. When using RNFL, inferior thickness had the highest AUC (0.922) in discriminating POAG from normal, while the same parameter had lower AUC (0.813) in discriminating PPG from normal. The average thickness had maximum AUC (0.775) for discriminating POAG from PPG. For discriminating perimetric glaucoma and normals, inferotemporal GCL-IPL had the highest strength (sensitivity 81.43% and specificity 77.96%), slightly lower than inferior RNFL thickness (sensitivity 87.85% and specificity 84.26%). The same parameters were sensitive in discriminating perimetric glaucoma from PPG (87.14% and 92.85%, respectively). However, their specificities were poor (56.43% both). Conclusion: RNFL had better diagnostic ability, when compared with GCL-IPL for detecting PPG and perimetric glaucoma. However, difference was small and may not be clinically relevant.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic ability of macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) analysis using spectral domain optical coherence tomography against retinal nerve fiber layer analysis (RNFL), short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP), and standard automated perimetry (SAP) in early detection of glaucoma. Methods: Participants fulfilling the inclusion criteria were consecutively enrolled from the glaucoma clinic of tertiary care eye hospital in Western India from November 2015 to October 2016. The subjects underwent a detailed evaluation by trained glaucoma specialists. On suspicion of glaucoma, the patients underwent SAP, SWAP, and SD-OCT for GCL and RNFL analysis. Results: There were 91 patients in total of which experts classified 54 eyes into GON and 37 eyes into nonglaucomatous group. Sensitivity of SAP (42.59%) was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that of average GCL thickness (79.63%) and average RNFL thickness (72.22%). Specificity and positive LR of SWAP (97.3% and 19.19, respectively) and SAP (94.6% and 7.88, respectively) were greater than those of GCL (81.08% and 4.21) and RNFL (67.57% and 2.23) parameters. Negative LR of average GCL thickness (0.25) was superior to that of average RNFL thickness (0.411), SWAP (0.495), and SAP (0.607). Conclusion: Macular GCL parameters perform better than RNFL parameters in patients with early glaucomatous damage. There is superior ability of SWAP over SAP in detecting glaucomatous changes in glaucoma suspect group. GCL thickness analysis has higher sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio, whereas SWAP had higher specificity and positive likelihood ratio. Thus, combining both tests can lead to better diagnostic ability for early glaucomatous damage.

Purpose: To analyze the relationship between rates of false positive (FP) responses and standard automated perimetry results. Design: Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. Methods: One hundred twenty-six patients with manifest or suspect glaucoma were tested with Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA) Standard, SITA Fast, and SITA Faster at each of 2 visits. We calculated intervisit differences in mean deviation (MD), visual field index (VFI), and number of statistically significant test points as a function of FP rates and also as a function of general height (GH). Results: Increasing FP values were associated with higher MD values for all 3 algorithms, but the effects were small, 0.3 dB to 0.6 dB, for an increase of 10 percentage points of FP rate, and for VFI even smaller (0.6%-1.4%). Only small parts of intervisit differences were explained by FP (r2 values 0.00-0.11). The effects of FP were larger in severe glaucoma, with MD increases of 1.1 dB to 2.0 dB per 10 percentage points of FP, and r2 values ranging from 0.04 to 0.33. The numbers of significantly depressed total deviation points were affected only slightly, and pattern deviation probability maps were generally unaffected. GH was much more strongly related to perimetric outcomes than FP. Conclusions: Across 3 different standard automated perimetry thresholding algorithms, FP rates showed only weak associations with visual field test results, except in severe glaucoma. Current recommendations regarding acceptable FP ranges may require revision. GH or other analyses may be better suited than FP rates for identifying unreliable results in patients who frequently press the response button without having perceived stimuli. publishedVersion

Purpose To evaluate the central visual field by microperimetry (MP), in early glaucoma. Methods Consecutive perimetrically experienced patients with a single nasal step or arcuate scotoma and 14 control eyes underwent MP. Retinal sensitivity on MP was mapped for frequency and depth of loss in the central 10° around fixation. Results Twenty-one eyes had a single nasal step and 19 eyes with single arcuate scotoma on standard automated perimetry (SAP), with central 10° being normal on 30-2 and 10-2 perimetry. The average mean sensitivity on MP, in glaucomatous and control eyes was 11.8 ± 3.9 dB and 16.6 ± 1.2 dB, respectively, P = 0.0004. The average mean defect on MP-1, in glaucomatous and control eyes was -6.5 ± 2.0 dB and -3.0 ± 1.2 Db, respectively, P = 0.05. The corresponding retinal hemisphere showed significant defects in MP. In eyes with single nasal steps, an absolute scotoma was seen in 14-28% of eyes 8-10° off fixation, moderate to mild defects were seen in 10-52% eyes, and 10% eyes showed involvement up to 4° from the fixation. Eyes with arcuate scotoma had an absolute scotoma on MP in 95% of eyes, 6-10° from fixation, with extension up to 2° from fixation in 21%. In glaucomatous eyes, the normal hemisphere on SAP showed a mild defect on MP in 43%. Control eyes did not show any defect in SAP or MP. Conclusion A significant loss of central retinal sensitivity is recorded on MP in early glaucomatous neuropathy as compared to SAP. Paramacular absolute defects were seen at 6-10° from fixation.

A high rate of unreliability is an issue in visual field (VF) testing, especially in elderly patients, and warrants patient education. We assessed whether subjective perception of the visual field test (VFT) is a good predictor of its reliability in different age groups and examined age differences in patients' awareness of VF damage.This cross-sectional study investigated 107 VFT results of 54 patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Subjective perceptions were compared to reliability indices for cooperation analysis and to mean deviation results for VF damage analysis, and an age-segregated sub-analysis was performed.Kappa coefficients showed poor agreement between subjective and objective parameters. Nevertheless, there were age differences. Younger patients had a higher positive predictive value and sensitivity in cooperation analysis and a higher negative predictive value in VF damage analysis.Patients' perception of cooperation in VFT is a poor predictor of its reliability. Although young cooperative patients may be aware of their good cooperation, even the youngest are unaware of their poor performance. This emphasizes the importance of giving proper directions to all patients during VFT to obtain better reliability indices. Younger, healthy patients are more aware of their health status, than those with a damaged VF, regardless of age. Therefore, illness education is crucial in all glaucoma patients.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether the retinal peripapillary capillary plexus vessel density (RPCP VD) or the retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFLT) is better in showing the structure–function relationship in glaucoma. METHODS: Sixty-seven patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in one eye and no visual field loss in fellow eye were included in this study. The scans of RPCP VD and RNFLT, and the standard automated perimetry data [including mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), sector-based pattern deviation (PD) values] were analysed and compared. RESULTS: The global RNFLT was associated with MD (P = 0.035). RNFLTs of the superotemporal, superonasal, inferotemporal and inferonasal quadrants were associated with the corresponding PD (P = 0.004

The current lack of consensus for diagnosing glaucoma makes it difficult to develop diagnostic tests derived from deep learning (DL) algorithms. In the present study, we propose an objective definition of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) using clearly defined parameters from optical coherence tomography and standard automated perimetry. We then use the proposed objective definition as reference standard to develop a DL algorithm to detect GON on fundus photos. A DL algorithm was trained to detect GON on fundus photos, using the proposed objective definition as reference standard. The performance was evaluated on an independent test sample with sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and likelihood ratios (LR). The test sample had 2118 fundus photos from 585 eyes of 405 individuals. The AUC to discriminate between GON and normal was 0.92 with sensitivity of 77% at 95% specificity. LRs indicated that the DL algorithm provided large changes in the post-test probability of disease for the majority of eyes. A DL algorithm to evaluate fundus photos had high performance to discriminate GON from normal. The newly proposed objective definition of GON used as reference standard may increase the comparability of diagnostic studies of glaucoma across devices and populations.

Purpose The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spread rapidly worldwide, causing a severe outbreak. Because the disease is easily transmitted, face masks are a vital tool to slow the spread. The aim of this study is to investigate the impacts of face mask use on standard automated perimetry (SAP) results in glaucoma patients. Materials and methods All follow-up glaucoma patients who underwent SAP between May and October 2020 were enrolled in this study. In patients with low test reliability and/or visual field changes, SAP was repeated after repositioning and taping patients' face masks. Results A total of 127 patients (59 female and 68 male) with a mean age of 59.8±10.3 years were included in the study. While 101 patients (79.5%) wore surgical face masks, 26 patients (20.5%) wore cloth face masks. Low SAP reliability appeared in 23 patients (18.1%), and inferior visual field defects were present in 3 patients (2.4%). The main effects of poorly fitting face masks on SAP reliability were increased fixation losses and false-positive errors (for both, P=0.001). Low SAP reliability was significantly higher in patients wearing cloth face masks than in those wearing surgical face masks (47.8% vs. 9.9%; P=0.0001). The face mask-related fogging of eyeglasses before SAP is a strong predictor of fogging of the trial lenses-related low SAP reliability (odds ratio: 27, 95% confidence interval: 5.48-132.92, P=0.0001). In all repeated SAPs, the patients' reliability parameters improved, and inferior visual field artifacts disappeared. Conclusions Unsuitable face masks can cause either visual field artifacts, which may be interpreted as glaucoma progression or low test reliability. Taping the face masks' upper edges is an effective technique to prevent visual field artifacts and obtain good test reliability.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the rate of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss during initial follow-up and the magnitude of associated visual field loss during an extended follow-up period. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A total of 1,150 eyes of 839 glaucoma patients extracted from the Duke Glaucoma Registry. Rates of RNFL loss were obtained from global RNFL thickness values of the first 5 optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. Rates of visual field loss were assessed using standard automated perimetry mean deviation (SAP MD) during the entire follow-up period. Joint longitudinal mixed effects models were used to estimate rates of change. Eyes were categorized as fast, moderate or slow progressors based on rates of RNFL loss, with cutoffs of ≤−2 μm/year, −2 to −1 μm/year and ≥−1 μm/year, respectively. Univariable and multivariable regressions were completed to identify significant predictors of SAP MD loss. RESULTS: The rate of RNFL change was −0.76±0.85 μm/y during initial follow-up, which occurred over 3.7±1.5 years. 765 (66%) eyes were slow, 328 (29%) moderate, and 57 (5%) fast progressors, with rates of RNFL thinning of −0.36±0.54 μm/year, −1.34±0.25 μm/year, and −2.87±1.39 μm/year respectively. The rates of SAP MD loss among slow, moderate, and fast OCT progressors were −0.16±0.35 dB/y, −0.32±0.43 dB/y, and −0.71±0.65 dB/y respectively over the extended follow-up period of 6.1±1.9 years (P

Purpose: We compared the performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry (FAP) and Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in patients with glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and healthy subjects. Materials and methods: A total of 60 participants, divided in three groups of 20, glaucoma (POAG), ocular hypertension (OHT), and controls group, underwent a HFA test 24-2 SITA standard and a FAP test 24-2 ZEST sequence, in randomized order. The mean differences between perimeters of mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD) were correlated using the t-test and the Bland–Altman plot while execution time, Glaucoma Staging System 2 (GSS2), Hodapp–Parrish–Anderson staging system, localization of the defect, false positives (FP), and false negatives (FN) were compared with t-test analysis. Usability was measured through answers of a dedicated questionnaire. Results: MD’s difference was higher for FAP than HFA: OHT −2.20 ± 1.33 dB ( p Conclusion: Considering MD and GSS2 classification, FAP finds more severe defects. Moreover, although FAP duration is longer, this method is preferred by most of the patients.

Purpose: The aim of the study was to determine the perimetric rate of glaucoma progression in the ongoing Glaucoma Intensive Treatment Study (GITS) after 3 years of follow-up. Design: This is a randomized, two-centre, prospective open-labelled treatment trial for open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Participants The participants of this study were treatment-naive patients with newly diagnosed OAG, aged 46-78 years, with early to moderate glaucomatous visual field loss scheduled to be followed for 5 years within the study. Methods: Patients were randomized to initial treatment with either topical monotherapy or with an intensive approach using drugs from three different classes, plus 360 degrees laser trabeculoplasty. Changes in treatment were allowed. Standard automated perimetry and tonometry were performed and side-effects documented. All results are presented using intention-to-treat analysis. Results: A total of 242 patients were randomized. After 3 years of follow-up, eight patients were lost to follow-up, six of whom were deceased. The median untreated baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) was 24 mmHg in both arms. The median IOP was almost constant over the 3 years of follow-up: approximate to 17 mmHg in the mono-arm and approximate to 14 mmHg in the multi-treatment arm. Treatment was intensified in 42% of the mono-treated patients and in 7% of the multi-treated patients. Treatment was reduced in 13% of the multi-treated patients. The median perimetric rate of progression was -0.5%/year in the mono-treated group and -0.1%/year in the multi-treated group (p = 0.03). Conclusion: The rate of disease progression was significantly slower in the multi-treated patients than in the mono-treated patients. Further follow-up will show whether this difference is sustained over time.

In eye movement perimetry (EMP), the saccadic reaction time (SRT) to ‘seen’ visual stimuli are delayed in glaucoma. Evaluating SRT behaviour in hemi-field sectors could refine its clinical implication. The development phase included 60 controls retrospectively and for the test cohort in evaluation phase, another 30 healthy subjects and 30 glaucoma patients were recruited prospectively. The SRTs were used to calculate the normative limits within 5 predefined hemi-field sectors. Scores were assigned to probabilities for SRT at the level of 5%, 2.5% 1% and 0.5%. Per sector pair, a probability score limit (PSL) was calculated at each of the four levels and were compared with the scores obtained from the test cohort. The classification accuracy ‘normal versus abnormal’ was assessed for PSL in EMP and compared with glaucoma hemi-field test in standard automated perimetry. We found no statistically significant differences in SRTs between the mirror sectors in healthy subjects. The PSL at 2.5% had moderate classification accuracy with a specificity of 77% and sensitivity 70%. This could be suggestive of an SRT delay in the overall visual field in glaucoma.

This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) on standard automated perimetry. Ninety eyes of 90 patients who had undergone cataract surgery from February 2018 to December 2018 were included. No patients had any diseases that might affect the visual field. ZMB00 (+ 4.00 D add), ZXR00V (+ 1.75 D add), and ZCB00V (Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Santa Ana, CA, USA) were used as multifocal, EDOF, and monofocal IOLs, respectively. Humphrey Visual Field 10–2 testing was performed 2–3 months after cataract surgery, acceptable reliability indices were measured, and mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), foveal sensitivity and mean sensitivity (MS) were compared. Seventy-one eyes (ZXR00V: 24 eyes, ZMB00: 25 eyes, ZCB00V: 22 eyes) were used for the analyses. The MD and MS of the EDOF and monofocal groups were significantly higher than those of the multifocal group (P P > 0.23). The PSD and foveal sensitivity were not different among the groups. In non-glaucomatous patients, the MD and MS of the EDOF IOL were comparable to those of the monofocal IOL and better than those of the multifocal IOL.

Purpose The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has changed how outpatient care is delivered in ophthalmology clinics, particularly with glaucoma care. This case series highlights the need for awareness of fogging and improper face mask fit as causes of standard automated perimetry artifacts in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clinical presentations Six patients with the diagnosis of ocular hypertension, glaucoma suspect, or glaucoma underwent standard automated perimetry (24-2 or 10-2 SITA, Humphrey Field Analyzer) while wearing ear-loop surgical face masks. Due to patient complaints of fogging during the testing, low test reliability, and unexpected results, the tests were repeated after taping securely the mask to the bridge of the nose. Clinical findings Fogging may reduce visual field (VF) test reliability and induce artifacts that mimic glaucomatous defects. VF test reliability can be improved and artifacts minimized following mask taping. In 1 case there was worsening of VF defects after mask taping. This suggests that fogging may also disguise true VF defects. Conclusions Fogging can result in unreliable VF testing with glaucoma-like artifacts. Secure taping of the face mask to the nose bridge may minimize this problem and reduce unnecessary additional testing and follow-up visits.

Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) is known for detecting the early reduction of retinal sensitivity (RS) in glaucoma. It’s application in retinal diseases have also been discussed previously. We investigated the difference in RS measured between standard white-on-white automated perimetry (WW) and blue-on-yellow SWAP in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). The overall RS (W-RS, S-RS) as well as the RS inside and outside of the serous retinal detachment (SRD) region were investigated in 26 eyes of 26 CSC patients using WW and SWAP. The central retinal thickness, central choroidal thickness, SRD area (SRDa), and SRD height at the fovea were measured using optic coherence tomography. RS inside the SRD region was lower than that of outside for both perimetries (both p

Objective To determine the diagnostic ability of isolated-check visual evoked potential (icVEP), pattern visual evoked potential (pVEP), and standard automated perimetry (SAP) between dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) without DON (non-DON). Methods This is a case-control study, 49 bilateral patients (26 DON and 23 non-DON) were included. icVEP, pVEP, and SAP were conducted in all the subjects, icVEP parameters compared were signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) under 8, 16, and 32% depth of modulation (DOM). pVEP parameters compared were amplitude and latency. SAP parameters were mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination index (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were applied for analysis. Results In icVEP, values of SNR in DON were significantly smaller than non-DON (p p = 0.0026). In SAP, value of PSD in DON was larger than non-DON (p = 0.0006), and value of MD in DON was smaller (p = 0.0007). AUC, NRI, and IDI among the three tests were not significantly different. DCA showed that SNR of icVEP under 8% DOM was the farthest from the two extreme curves. Conclusions icVEP, pVEP, and SAP have equal diagnostic capabilities to discern between DON and non-DON. In addition, icVEP may represent a significant ancillary diagnostic approach to DON detection, with more clinical benefit.

Glaucomatous damage results in characteristics structural and functional changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and standard automated perimetry (SAP) testing. The clinical utility of these measures differs based on disease severity, as they are evaluated along different measurement scales. This study therefore sought to examine if a simplified combined structure–function index (sCSFI) could improve the detection and staging of glaucomatous damage, compared to the use of average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFL) measurements from OCT and mean deviation (MD) values from SAP alone, and also an estimated retinal ganglion cell counts (eRGC) measure derived using empirical formulas described previously. Examining 577 eyes from 354 participants with perimetric glaucoma and 241 normal eyes from 138 healthy participants, we found that the sCSFI performed significantly better than average RNFL, MD and eRGC count for discriminating between glaucoma and healthy eyes (P ≤ 0.008 for all). The sCSFI also performed significantly better than RNFL and eRGC count at discriminating between different levels of visual field damage in glaucoma eyes (P

Pablo Galarza,1,* Elhanan Parnasa,2,* Noah Guttmann,3 Joshua M Kruger1 1Neuro-Ophthalmology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; 2Hebrew University-Hadassah School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel; 3Independent Researcher, Toronto, Ontario, Canada*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Joshua M KrugerNeuro-Ophthalmology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, IsraelTel +972508946493Email kruger@hadassah.org.ilPurpose: To assess the reliability of automated visual field studies with neurological abnormalities and normal reliability indices that were inconsistent with the remainder of the neuro-ophthalmic assessment.Methods: Retrospective observational study from the clinical practice of a neuro-ophthalmologist at a tertiary referral center.Results: From 2230 patient charts, ten cases were identified that met the inclusion criteria. In eight of the cases repeat visual field testing had no reproducible abnormality. Four of these cases were concerning for a bitemporal or homonymous hemianopia. None of the patients, including the two cases with a reproducible defect, developed any convincing manifestations of an organic disease related to the visual field defect.Conclusion: Our findings suggest that even marked neurological abnormalities on reliable automated visual field tests can be false. When the remainder of the neuro-ophthalmic evaluation is inconsistent with the test result, we recommend that clinicians attempt to immediately repeat the visual field study.Keywords: automated perimetry, visual field, Humphrey, reliability

Current clinical evaluation, which focuses on central vision, could be improved through characterization of residual vision with peripheral testing of visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color vision, crowding, and reading speed. Assessing visual functions in addition to light sensitivity, a comprehensive visual field map (VFM) would be valuable for detecting and managing eye diseases. In a previous study, we developed a Bayesian adaptive qVFM method that combines a global module for preliminary assessment of the VFM's shape and a local module for assessment at individual retinal locations. The method was validated in measuring the light sensitivity VFM. In this study, we extended the qVFM method to measure contrast sensitivity across the visual field. In both simulations and psychophysics, we sampled 64 visual field locations (48 x 48 deg) and compared the qVFM method with a procedure that tested each retinal location independently (qFC; Lesmes et al., 2015). In each trial, subjects were required to identify a single optotype (size: 2.5 x 2.5 deg), one of 10 filtered Sloan letters. To compare the accuracy and precision of the two methods, three simulated eyes were tested in 1,280 trials with each method. In addition, data were collected from 10 eyes (5 OS, 5 OD) of five normal observers. For simulations, the average RMSE of the estimated contrast sensitivity with the qVFM and qFC methods were 0.057 and 0.100 after 320 trials, and 0.037 and 0.041 after 1,280 trials [all in log10 units, represent as log(sensitivity)], respectively. The average SD of the qVFM and qFC estimates were 0.054 and 0.096 after 320 trials, and 0.032 and 0.041 after 1,280 trials, respectively. The within-run variability (68.2% HWCIs) were comparable to the cross-run variability (SD). In the psychophysics experiment, the average HWCI of the estimated contrast sensitivity from the qVFM and qFC methods across the visual field decreased from 0.33 on the first trial to 0.072 and 0.16 after 160, and to 0.060 and 0.10 after 320 trials. The RMSE between the qVFM and qFC estimates started at 0.26, decreased to 0.12 after 160 and to 0.11 after 320 qVFM trials. The qVFM provides an accurate, precise, and efficient mapping of contrast sensitivity across the entire visual field. The method might find potential clinical applications in monitoring vision loss, evaluating therapeutic interventions, and developing effective rehabilitation for visual diseases.

Precis No significant difference in knowledge of glaucoma was found among patients attending virtual and face-to-face glaucoma clinics. Gaps in knowledge were identified in both groups highlighting the importance of incorporating patient education into glaucoma services. Purpose To examine knowledge of glaucoma among patients attending virtual compared with face-to-face glaucoma clinics. Materials and methods A survey was conducted of 105 patients with glaucoma, including 50 attending virtual and 55 attending face-to-face clinics. Participants were asked to complete a glaucoma knowledge assessment using the National Eye Health Education Program Eye-Q test. All participants had a comprehensive eye examination and completed standard automated perimetry. Knowledge of glaucoma was compared between groups and the effect of potential confounders, including age, sex, education level, and standard automated perimetry mean deviation, was explored using regression analyses. The relationship between test scores and self-perception of knowledge of glaucoma was also examined. Results There was no significant difference between knowledge scores between patients attending virtual and face-to-face clinics with mean scores of 5.6±1.0 and 6.0±1.6 (P=0.762) respectively. More patients attending the virtual clinic could correctly identify the type of glaucoma they had (74% vs. 52.7%, P=0.005). Regression analyses found education level and patients' correct knowledge of their type of glaucoma were significantly associated with Eye-Q scores. Patients with university qualifications scored significantly higher than those with no or basic school qualifications (P=0.003) and higher-level school qualifications (P=0.038). Most patients desired to know more about their condition. Conclusions Patients attending virtual glaucoma clinics demonstrated similar knowledge of glaucoma compared with those attending face-to-face clinics but gaps in knowledge were identified in both groups. Patient education should be incorporated into the design of all glaucoma services.