1. LOw-dose CT Or Lung UltraSonography versus standard of care based-strategies for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the elderly: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (OCTOPLUS)
- Author
-
Beat Lehmann, Christine Baumgartner, Laurent Kaiser, Tanja Birrenbach, Christophe Combescure, Jerôme Stirnemann, Olivier Grosgurin, Jean-Luc Reny, Enos Bernasconi, Dina Zekry, Christophe Marti, François Herrmann, Xavier Roux, Pierre-Alexandre Poletti, Antonio Leidi, Virginie Prendki, Nicolas Garin, Alexandra Platon, Thomas Sauter, Wolf Hautz, Gianluca Argentieri, Cristina Boehm-Bosmani, Clémence Cuvelier, Christophe Fehlmann, Pauline Gosselin, Alessandro Jessula, Aileen Kharat, Véronique Lachat, Cornelia Lambrigger, Elisa Marchi, Mihaela Martinvalet, Lara Morosoli, Daniel Ott, Thibault Parent, Frédéric Rouyer, Thomas Ruder, Max Scheffler, Guillaume Soret, Jérôme Tessieras, Catherine Vindret, and Enrico Zucconi
- Subjects
Medicine - Abstract
Introduction Pneumonia is a leading cause of mortality and a common indication for antibiotic in elderly patients. However, its diagnosis is often inaccurate. We aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy, the clinical and cost outcomes and the use of antibiotics associated with three imaging strategies in patients >65 years old with suspected pneumonia in the emergency room (ER): chest X-ray (CXR, standard of care), low-dose CT scan (LDCT) or lung ultrasonography (LUS).Methods and analysis This is a multicentre randomised superiority clinical trial with three parallel arms. Patients will be allocated in the ER to a diagnostic strategy based on either CXR, LDCT or LUS. All three imaging modalities will be performed but the results of two of them will be masked during 5 days to the patients, the physicians in charge of the patients and the investigators according to random allocation. The primary objective is to compare the accuracy of LDCT versus CXR-based strategies. As secondary objectives, antibiotics prescription, clinical and cost outcomes will be compared, and the same analyses repeated to compare the LUS and CXR strategies. The reference diagnosis will be established a posteriori by a panel of experts. Based on a previous study, we expect an improvement of 16% of the accuracy of pneumonia diagnosis using LDCT instead of CXR. Under this assumption, and accounting for 10% of drop-out, the enrolment of 495 patients is needed to prove the superiority of LDCT over CRX (alpha error=0.05, beta error=0.10).Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval: CER Geneva 2019-01288.Trial registration number NCT04978116.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF