Search

Abstract Background Student-led clinics (SLC) have been described, but not in gynecology. Gynecology is a subject typically covered in the last terms of medical training, however it includes few opportunities for students to tackle all phases of a consultation and a shortage of opportunities to perform gynecological examinations. Therefore, we started a student-led clinic for cervical cancer screening (SLC-CCS) in Linköping, Sweden and aimed to evaluate students’ views on the progression of learning, the quality of the Papanicolaou (Pap) smear, and women´s experiences of the visit, using mixed methodology. Methods The implementation of the SLC-CCS is described in detail. Students (n = 61) taking part in the SLC-CCS between January and May 2021 were invited to participate in a follow-up discussion (n = 24) focused around four themes: attitudes and expectations prior to participation, experiences of the patient encounter, organization of the placement, and reflections on and suggestions for further development of the placements. The group meetings were conducted in Swedish, recorded, transcribed verbatim and subjected to a qualitative, descriptive thematic analysis. Thematic analysis is considered an appropriate method of analysis for seeking to understand experiences, thoughts, or behaviors across a data set. The proportion of Pap smears lacking cells from the squamous epithelium during the study period was compared with data from the same clinic before the SLC-CCS started. A validated questionnaire on women’s experience of the Pap smear visit was provided. Answers were compared between women who had the Pap smear taken by a student or a healthcare provider. Results Three different themes were generated: growing confidence in the clinical situation, embodied awareness of variation in anatomy, doubting accuracy of one’s own performance. The percentage of Pap smears lacking cells from the squamous epithelium were equal (2%) during the study period compared to the period before the SLC-CCS started (p = 0.28). No difference was found in the satisfaction index between the women examined by a student, those examined by a healthcare provider, or women who did not know who the examiner was (p = 0.112). Conclusions The students expressed a growing confidence in the clinical situation and there was high satisfaction from the women. The quality of the Pap smears taken by the students was equal to the quality of those taken by the health care staff. All these findings indicate that high patient safety was maintained during this activity support the recommendation to include SLC-CCS as part of the medical training.

BACKGROUND:Cervical cancer is a highly preventable disease. To not attend an organized cervical cancer screening program increases the risk for cervical dysplasia and cervical cancer. The aim was to investigate the participation rate in three different intervention groups for non- attendees in the Swedish national program for cervical screening. The participation in the recommended follow up, and the histology found were also examined. METHOD:Population-based randomized control trial. It included10,614 women that had not participated in the cervical cancer screening programme during the last six years (ages 30-49) and the last eight years (ages 50-64) were randomised 1:1:1(telephone call from a midwife (offering the choice between a visit for a pap smear or an HPV self-sampling test); an HPV self-sampling test only; or the routine procedure with a yearly invitation). RESULTS:In the intention to treat analysis the participation rates were 25.5% (N = 803/3146) vs 34.1% (N = 1047/3068) and 7.0% (N = 250/3538) (p

OBJECTIVE:Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the most common obstetric emergency. A well-established postpartum haemorrhage protocol in the labour ward is crucial for effective treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate if practical obstetric team training improves the patient outcome and clinical management of PPH. SETTING:The practical obstetric team training (PROBE) at Linköping University Hospital, Sweden, with approximate 3000 deliveries annually, was studied between the years of 2004-2011. Each team consisted of one or two midwives, one obstetrician or one junior doctor and one nurse assistant. Emergency obstetrics cases were trained in a simulation setting. PROBE was scheduled during work hours at an interval of 1.5 years. POPULATION:Pre-PROBE women (N = 419 were defined as all women with vaginal birth between the years of 2004-2007 with an estimated blood loss of ≥1000 ml within the first 24 hours of delivery. Post-PROBE women (N = 483) were defined as all women with vaginal birth between the years of 2008-2011 with an estimated blood loss of ≥1000 ml within the first 24 hours of delivery. The two groups were compared regarding blood loss parameters and management variables using retrospective data from medical records. RESULTS:No difference was observed in estimated blood loss, haemoglobin level, blood transfusions or the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage between the two groups. Post-PROBE women had more often secured venous access (p