1. Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: a matter of safety in head and neck cancer
- Author
-
Marta Maddalo, Giulia Marvaso, Davide Tomasini, Luigi Spiazzi, Andrea Emanuele Guerini, Irene Turturici, Marianna Alessandra Gerardi, D. Alterio, Michela Buglione, Maria Cossu Rocca, Matteo Augugliaro, L. Costa, Mohssen Ansarin, Diana Greco, L. Pegurri, Stefano Maria Magrini, and Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Subjects
inorganic chemicals ,Cisplatin ,Oncology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Internal medicine ,Head and neck cancer ,medicine ,medicine.disease ,business ,neoplasms ,female genital diseases and pregnancy complications ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background Radio-chemotherapy with CDDP is the standard for H&N squamous cell cancer. CDDP 100mg/m2/q3 is the standard; alternative schedules are used to reduce toxicity, mostly 40mg/m2/q1. Methods Patients were treated from 1/2010 to 1/2017 in two Radiation Oncology Centres. Propensity score analysis (PS) was retrospectively used to compare these two schedules. Results Patients analyzed were 166. Most (114/166) had 1w-CDDP while 52 had 3w-CDDP. In the 3w-CDDP group, patients were younger and with better performance status; disease extent was smaller and nodal involvement was more common than in the 1w-CDDP. Acute toxicity was similar in the groups. Treatment compliance was lower in the w-CCDP. OS before PS was better for female, for oropharyngeal disease and for 3w-CDDP group. After PS, survival was not related to the CDDP schedule. Conclusions 3w-CDDP remains the standard for fit patients, weekly schedule could be safely used in selected patients.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF